Imagine a Democrat President in 2020 requesting a special intervention from the United Nations to confiscate ALL privately owned firearms, and ordering the police and army to STAND DOWN. Is this the only way to end gun violence?
Should the UN just disarm the American public?
Other urls found in this thread:
strongcitiesnetwork.org
twitter.com
The UN couldn't disarm a mousetrap let alone a country.
Sure will be nice amassing a collection of bloody blue helmets.
Need I remind you that the UN peacekeeping forces have spread rape, trafficking, murder, extortion, and misery everywhere they've gone?
They have only ever exacerbated misery. Putting third world soldiers to work gets third world savage results.
I doubt the UN has enough soldiers to sustain the casualties that would happen in such an event.
Kosovo isby far the main source of illegal firearms in the world per capita, so theres that.
just read the Torah
they already have this power, not just here but all over the world, just waiting to be abused, strongcitiesnetwork.org
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I would love to see them try it
I would love to brain some poor blue helmet with my glock and take his rifle
Hilarious.
UN is too busy with human trafficking and drug distribution.
>it's another "I have no idea how UN Peacekeeping actually works" thread
First-worlder soldiers rape and kill people too.
The UN has the entire world to replenish its ranks, not that casualties would be high. Most of the American public would obey their President and voluntarily surrender their guns. The few armed civilians that resist will be no match for professional peacekeeper soldiers.
This is one of my power fantasies...
I would need to take a sabbatical from work to start stacking blue helmets.
They could do it if they bring out the energy weapons like microwave gun
This would only the result in shooting a whole bunch of liberal politicians
I say go for it
Then why hasn't this "invasion" happened under past democrat rule, like as recently ago as Obama?...Maybe is has ALWAYS had something to do with American citizens owning over 300 million firearms.
>disarm the American public
I doubt it
>Most of the American public would obey their President and voluntarily surrender their guns.
HOLY FUCK
> The few armed civilians that resist will be no match for professional peacekeeper soldiers.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THEY CAN'T EVEN BEAT AFRICANS
>Voluntarily surrender our guns
If king nigger couldn’t nobody fucking can.
Come and take them motherfucker
>The UN has the entire world to replenish its ranks
>mfw record kill count...
fpbp
Sounds like a wetdream.
Try it faggot. I could use some of those helmets for a makeshift sandbag barrier for the jewish brigade.
Can't wait to see fudds in realtree turn blue helmets into target practice with .30-06 hunting rifles. Sage you fucking tard.
>professional peacekeeper soldiers.
These fucks have to file a 10 page essay to even unholster their fucking guns and you expect them to do literally anything against a force that's out for their asses?
>more guns in US than in rest of world combined
>they'll just give then up
Fucking holy kek this cant be real
>"Hurr durr it says right here that we can bear arms, nothing will ever change that"
>Points to the 21st Amendment which repealed the 18th.
Bald flattern unser fahnen uber barrikaden!
Fun fact: most soldiers and generals would desert and fight for the people like they are supposed to and their firepower is coming with them
Funniest war ever. Everyone and their mom would have a garage full of blue helmets as war trophies.
I mean, they could try, but it would just end with every UN peacekeeper dead and the UN headquarters burned to the ground.
>The UN has the entire world to replenish its ranks
we'll kill them too, then.
>The UN has the entire world to replenish its ranks
Nigger, the UN has trouble just finding the 90,000 men it has for current peacekeeping missions.
>not that casualties would be high
A measly 118 UN troops were killed in Somalia and that's regarded as one of the most disastrous peacekeeping missions of all time.
Every one of their "soldiers" would wind up being killed within minutes of arrival. They might send a few thousand - if they could even get them here - and we would immediately shoot them down, and the UN would back off.
>UN forces
Asides from the fact that the military of the UN is woefully underfunded, it's largely made up of third worlders that can't even beat other third worlders
>ever being able to amend the first 10
Kek its like you want the right to win.
The entire UN "army" are literally all from 3rd world hellholes, that's why there are so many rape/forced prostitution scandals wherever they are
I'll take out a whole platoon of those retards myself
Imagine if the UN did this to all the third world nations in Africa that are absolutely rancid with warlords and gun violence. Oh wait, they can't even do this there against niggers, what makes you even think they could manage against the US with dozens of times the population and hundreds of times the guns?
How will the UN be able to fight anyone without the money they get from US taxpayers?
Blue helmet are kos
Save the special blue flower pots for me I want to collect them all.
Fear of weapons is a sign of sexual immaturity.
WE WUZ PEACEKEEPAS N SHIET
AYYO NOW WHERE DA FOREN GIRLS AT?
The U.N. doesn't have legal authority to do that you slobbering Down's Syndrome failed abortion.
Hey retard, what's with the two monkeys wearing hats in your pic?
your neanderthal skull would make a nice flowerpot, shlomo.
>100,000 U.N. troops vs 60,000,000 armed citizens
Bubba's be like...
I will make a shelf specifically for the blue helmets I collect.
Isn't the UN takeover thing a meme like black helicopters from the 90s?
The theory is that black helicopters would ship in the men in blue hats from Europe like Red Dawn in a massive wave. Except a helicopter travels what, like 200 nautical miles and the atlantic is a bit bigger. Those peacekeepers aren't a threat to shit even if they wanted to be.
No such thing as legal authority in international relations anyways. They couldn't do it because they'd be dead the second they tried it.
>Orders Emergency services & Armed Forces to stand down.
>Requests foreign nations to take the weapons of about 77 million pissed of Americans.
Yeah, great plan!
You'll excuse us Anglos if we just stand by and watch.. Kek!
That's like 1 month in Chicago. I would actually feel bad for the peace keepers they would have no idea what they were walking into.
Most of these countries lend their troops to peacekeeping missions for free gear and training the US Military provides them on their behalf.
Lel, you wish bucko
>the police would actually stand down
>the military would actually stand down
This is what leftist does to your brain. They literally imagine the people most likely to own guns and be friends with gun owners and participate in gun culture would turn on their families and friends and the constitution and enforce the will of the UN. The left is literally retarded
Lol do it. Give me cover to kill Jews.
What the hell is he armed with?
Because the American Public owns more guns than every other country, government, army, and police force in the world, including the US government, combined, but not including undocumented guns that Americans have milled for themselves in private.
Every. Blade. Of. Grass.
Grenade launcher 37mm
UN permanently BTFO
You wanna know somethin funny?
There's a jew
Behind
Every
killing UN soldiers would be exquisitely satisfying
Curtain
That has to be the single most retarded, brain dead, arrogant bullshit I have heard today.
Let them first try with Chicago and see how long they stay.
There’s no time like UN intervention yo start a body count and fascist league of the south styled movement in the South. Us Southrons will make African genocide look like nothing.
You're not going to disarm a gun-owner with wooden spears and cowhide shields.
Just throwing that out there.
>Most of the American public would obey their President
I see you don't know many Americans.
>being an American and not knowing that it's entirely possible to amend any of the 10 core amendments (Bill of Rights) via several methods, foremost of which is a Constitutional Convention.
Yes, it would be incredibly difficult, but not impossible. You've got an education system that is creating more and more soft skinned liberal pussies every day, so the amount of people calling for gun control grows exponentially. I'd wager it's only a matter of time.
>ordering the police and army to stand down
>police and army: No.
Aw ffs. Of course
It would be a rather novel way for a dem president to commit suicide.
37mm Grenade Launcher. Not sure of the model.
Come and fucking try nigger
>We could win against the whole world and you know it
8 out of 10 for making me respond to an obvious troll thread
>alcohol = guns/militia
noob tube
You couldn't be any more wrong, ching-chong.
The Parkland shenanigans created more 2nd amendment supporters. NRA membership and gun sales always go up whenever the kikes try to galvanize americans against guns.
I wouldn't expect you to understand though. You retards voluntarily handed your guns over to your government so now you want america to make the same mistake you did so that you can redistribute the embarrassment and shame.
>Should
More like Could
Hey its this gay thread again, same photo and everything. Fuck off shill.
That's a lot of dead UN "peacekeepers"
Come to florida plz
The moment a constitutional amendment to any of the first 10 happens, you will see the bloodiest civil war erupt like never before seen in history, a modern apocalypse that none can challenge until revelations.
>disarm americans
UN cucks would be seen as invaders/trespassers for trying to take our constitutional right and would be killed if they so much try any force.
>just disarm the American public
Are you fucking insane?
Nobody is going to disarm the American public, and certainly not the UN
Why would you just stand by? We have more guns than people, I'm sure some young enterprising American would be more than willing to lend you a rifle. Hell think of it like a blue helmet safari, price of a plane ticket and ammo younto could get yourself a genuine UN trophy. I'm going to make a killing.
Yes. Absolutely. I've been wishing a nigga would for 10 years.
>Imagine a Democrat President in 2020
Again, never going to happen ever again in the history of the US.
>The few armed civilians that resist will be no match for professional peacekeeper soldiers
YOU ARE NUTS.
considering that there's harder weapons on the streets of the USA than those of the UN, good luck!
It's a precedent which proves that, under the right circumstances, a repeal CAN happen though.
>handed your guns over to your government
That's a common misconception that you mutts constantly regurgitate. Always makes me laugh. Firearms are regulated here, not banned. We can and still do own firearms, including semi-automatics provided you have a valid reason for owning them. What we don't do is hand out firearms like candy to everyone who wants one, including the mentally ill and niggers. Fucking hell, try doing some research before you make shit up, faggot.
>The UN has the entire world to replenish its ranks
There would be roughly 10,000 leafs willing to give their lives to confiscate US firearms. Other than that, who the fuck would sign up?
>not that casualties would be high.
Sure they wouldn't
>Most of the American public would obey their President and voluntarily surrender their guns.
If that was true then it wouldn't be necessary to use force
The few armed civilians that resist will be no match for professional peacekeeper soldiers.
Ever heard of a veteran? Ever heard of a militia?
Yes, the right circumstances for a repeal was giving people more freedom, not less.