Why do liberals hate due process?

Why do liberals hate due process?

Attached: 1D98E9B4-D246-4A0F-82AB-C8301050AB86.jpg (1536x1203, 795K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=r-Y0dTNH7Ns
theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/09/22/three-witnesses-described-by-kavanaugh-accuser-do-not-support-her-claims/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

they are traitors

believe women you fucking piece of shit

evidence gets in the way of feelings. feelings are the only thing you need

youtube.com/watch?v=r-Y0dTNH7Ns

its part of (((their))) 11 point plan

Attached: FA00E06E-F5C4-445A-A0B1-F30C7F9ED4C5.png (789x913, 696K)

Social justice. It's in the name.
The point isn't to get Justice in the legal sense but rather to give Justice to "historically opposed groups". Basically an ideology that attempts to put their finger on the scale to correct what they see as historical injustices.
It would have worked were the internet not a thing. Their greatest undoing is how brazen they are with all of this and the average person doesn't approve.

Ask a normie if they think women and minorites should be helped to right historical wrongs and they'll say yes.
Ask that same normie if removing free speech and due process is an acceptable way to do this and they'll laugh in your face.

Attached: 1536315538683.jpg (341x347, 33K)

Sounds like Manchin is going to vote for him.

>half of my country is traitors
lol seems perfectly reasonable

Why would I believe a woman any more than a man? What I believe are facts and evidence. In the Kavanaugh accusations, the evidence cited by the accusers pretty much confirms that Kavanaugh is entirely innocent, and they're politically biased left wing activists.

Have they even provided any facts other than by accident?
>Can't remember the year
>Can remember she was 15

Attached: 1529326706133-pol.png (680x680, 401K)

Both women named witnesses. Every single witness denies that such an event or party took place. One woman, a lifelong friend of hers, denies that she's ever even met Kavanaugh.

>Every single witness denies that such an event or party took place.
Source?

What the fuck is wrong with you retards asking this question? Have you not followed it whatsoever? >theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/09/22/three-witnesses-described-by-kavanaugh-accuser-do-not-support-her-claims/
On top of that, read the fucking New Yorker article that "broke open" the second accuser. It's literally contained in that article that they received no corroboration.

Ah right. Turns out friendship doesn't mean shit when your friends is asking you to risk perjury to #resistDrumpf.

Attached: 1528273075297m.jpg (591x1024, 132K)

Every single witness = three witnesses? There's nobody else that could possible corroborate this? And theconservativetreehouse.com? lol

They only hate it when it gets in the way of what they want. Like everything else.

Don't believe women you fucking piece of shit

Yes, every single witness that she claimed was at the party. Note that she said "four people aside from herself" were present. Let's tick them off, retard:
1) Dr. Nutjob
2) Kavanaugh
3) Leland Ingham Keyser
4) Mark Judge
5) PJ
This is based on her account, by the way. That's every person at the fucking party, according to her. Every single one denies it. That's pretty damning that every single person that was supposedly there, including her lifelong friend, claims that it never happened. Her lifelong friend never even met Kavanaugh, for fuck's sake.
Aside from that, if you'll click the fucking article, you'll see that this is based on written statements and also reported by CNN. You're a fucking ostrich burying his head in the sand. lol

It was a small party according to her. Everyone that was there says it never happened.

You're not welcome here. Leave.