In an ancap utopia what is to prevent me from building private roads?

Lmao ancap would never work

A corporation that has a monopoly on all private property.

This

I would just issue my own private money backed by the road standard to pay for the road
That would be violating the NAP and isn't allowed

Not like you have a better solution. I would much rather live in ancapistan's freedom shithole than shot by a firing squad and be tossed into a death pit.

Everyone else would alienate you to the point that keeping your roads private wouldn't be worth it.

>commie
>ancap will never work

Kek

Ancap are cucks

>commie
>"Ancap are cucks"
Coming from a commie might just be the most ironic thing i have read on this site

>isn't allowed
boo hoo the nasty man was mean to me... if only there was a system of government to enforce the NAP... then i might get somewhere...

I remembered the exact name of it but if forgot. It was something like coordination problem or something.

Case in point is some privately managed city in India, where instead of proper sewage, each block has septic tank. It's obvious that at population close to 500k or something, sewage would be more efficient and less troublesome, the thing is that every developer would rather wait for some other sucker to build the core of it as RoI is too small to bother.

Now the thing is that sewage is complicated while roads are less so, unless we're talking about something like long distance highway which requires extensive planning and coordination with other projects like that to really get the best of it, so on short distances I wouldn't be surprised if people just grabbed shovels and built the roads themselves, unless they're bugmen NPC's.

You sure? You want the rich to be able butt fuck you mercilessly

>Anarcho-Capitalist
>not Libertarian
get out

lmao

>buying private property violates the NAP

Restricting access to my private property violates the NAP

Because, of course, that doesn't happen at all in commieland...
I mean, it's not like the nation would be under authoritarian regime by a handful of party members, right?

which they aren't doing by making you stay on your private property.

AnCap is literally the most unpractical retarded """ideology""". Why do so many Burgers fall for it?

So you are saying that acces roads towards private property are.... public property?

Because National Socialism is shit.

>what is to prevent me from building private roads?
other people's properties but you can easily negotiate with them

NAP is a literal pinky promise basis for society, explain to me how the fuck that would ever work

>pinky promise
>implying law wouldnt exist
>implying law enforcement would exist
>being this ignorant

Attached: 1525401776545.jpg (601x508, 63K)

Don't ask me, ask the Ancap.

Because ancap is a set of literal memes smugly masquerading as a practicable political system. So in many ways it's like our current system

It's not "pinky promise". You trust markets to provide you with food, transportation, healthcare, etc. Why wouldn't you trust them to also provide you with law and its enforcement?

>what is an easement
get learned dummy

In perfect markets people make 0 economic profit (Look it up). A way to increase your share of the pie is to abuse market power. If you rely on PMCs to keep the peace, whats to stop them to extort the population because they feel they deserve more or maybe just because they can?

Where are the checks and balances? Who is going to police the police?

Another point: Lets assume scale is the most important driver of efficiency in law enforcement. Then you are going to end up with 1 or a couple very large law enforcement agencies who hold our the power and can kiss your NAP goodbye the moment they feel like it.

anarcho-capitalism is a meme ideology, grow up Juan

I don't trust them to provide me with anything if I don't have money.

I don't trust them to provide me with a good service if I do have money.

I don't trust them to provide me with a fairly priced service even if i am very rich.

I trust them to let me starve, not let me ride the bus and die of a cheaply curable disease if it wont make them a profit..

I trust them to make profits, and give them to shareholders and salespeople and advertising and insurance board directors as bonuses, not put them into actual health care for people, or imrove their services or ensure the food is safe or the trains run on time.

. I trust them to compete for customers and not co-operate, in a wasteful duplication of resources, and to drive local businesses out of business with unfair practices, then become monopolies in the area and drive up prices.

I trust them to screw me and everyone else over whenever not regulated to not do so.

anyone who trusts markets is a fucking idiot.

>I would just issue my own private money backed by the road standard to pay for the road
Oh I'm sure people will be lining up for miles to work for you and trade away their hard-earned materials for your "money"

Time to go on strike Pierre

Being a lazy cunt.

I trust the FDA to ensure the food I eat isn't filled with fillers and toxins. If there was no regulation, with the current market as monopolized as it as, and consumers not being sufficiently informed, the AUTHORITY OF THE STATE is the main thing that prevents corporations from putting sawdust and opioids into food.

Good post

Your ancap neighbor who is bulding a canal for his boat. Now fight on a duel to decide who survives and which is built.

>AnCap
>Means of Production, Supply Chain
Pick one you massive fagget.

What do you need a road for when you literally can't build anything without compliance?

Kek

You mean toll roads?

Nothing stops you. Ancap deer build roads in the woods.

Okay. Say he decides to buy the land surrounding your property anyway, and the (((current landlord))) doesn't care. He has violated the NAP, now have to fight back. Say he's a lot more wealthy than you, what's your plan? What if he hires PMC's to defend his settlement? What if he starts storing nuclear waste in your shared water supply and animal carcasses next to your property? How will you fight off all these NAP violations with all his armed guards? Who will you run to? You would probably try to make a deal to pass through his property for a fee.

Wealth = Power
Power>NAP

it's not that A can't buy all of the land surrounding B's property, but it would violate the NAP if A didn't allow B to cross over A's land to get out of B's own property it's known as an easement.
in other words, A couldn't build a wall around B's property.
an easement can be something as simple as a path or alleyway, and have been a part of common law for centuries.

>In an ancap utopia what is to prevent me from building private roads?

NIGGERS. LITERALLY.

It's okay, I used to be there. I have a new meme ideology now, one far whiter and more powerful.

Attached: AspbCapsIRL.png (3250x1700, 1.49M)

If our eyes aren't real how can roads be real?
Checkmate ancaps

Attached: Haha.jpg (1600x1150, 198K)

Sounds awesome.

Attached: 1537715096172.png (818x854, 1008K)

>I would just issue my own private money backed by the road standard to pay for the road

Attached: 1501293993969.jpg (550x550, 35K)

I would just print lots of money then I would be rich.

Who would stop me

I get that, but when someone in ancapistan has their rights violated (which will happen constantly) and nobody around to mediate it, the two people would have a small war on their hands. I guarantee that within a day, the NAP would be replaced with a person or company that has the monopoly on violence. These groups would expand their borders until they begin to encroach on each other, now you've got hundreds of tiny wars that will last for decades until Nestle is crowned Emperor. Bleak example, but that's exactly what would happen if you tried to institute Anarcho-Capitalism in the current year.

I think it could work in theory, but every individual in ancapistan would have to be a Philosopher King unto themselves. This would probably only be attainable after a few hundred years of specialized education and eugenics.

>I would just issue my own private money backed by the road standard to pay for the road
That is fucking awesome allegory

nothing at all. Actually, that shit is very used here in Chile is a solid 9/10

The logical conclusion is Entirely Apartheid Fully Automated Space Fascism

Is second hand smoke a violation of the NAP?

>Trust markets
Have you ever bought drugs before? The market forces of quality control are pretty weak.

Can I hire a PMC to shoot vaping wankers who let out billows of fruity faggot smoke constantly? Maybe Ancap is the way after all.

Drug abusers often aren't the most discerning customers.

Flying cars would make your private road unusefull

youtube.com/watch?v=Mr1V-r2YxME&t=223s

if you aren't ancap you will be deported into ocean via helicopter

If you have autism which you likely do:
You will be euthanised for the good of the country

Nice numbers

This image is perfect.

Isn't that just a government though?

Yeah and they’d have miles of road to line up on (for a nominal fee)

Attached: A945672C-10DC-4477-8CCB-61AA498069B8.jpg (624x531, 122K)

Ancaps are retarded

this also applies to big pharma - they lie like rugs to get drugs on teh market (lookat the deception over prozak, adn have you heard of Thalidomide?)

even better example - Homeopathic 2medicine" - totally unregulated, adn a total scam - billions a year on sugar pills and water. the free market has allowed them to make huge profits for nothing, conning people. Regulation is needed to close the scammers down.

You'd own guns and could kill them for violating the NAP.

>but niggers could have guns too
They already have guns while you get cucked with gun control.

Easy. You break the pinky swear - you violate the NAP. You know the drill when the NAP gets violated.

Attached: ancap mcnuke.png (793x794, 602K)

>commie saying shit wont work
It's like irony staring into an infinity mirror.

NAP everybody will follow it

>You sure? You want the rich to be able butt fuck you mercilessly
Central planning is exactly that you silly brainwashed fool.

I'm stuck at minarchism and pretty happy about it to be honest

> use nuke against NAP breaker
> radioactive fallout gets on several other's private property
> this violates NAP
> they retaliate with nukes
> endless cycle of retaliatory nukes
> Earth is destroyed
> finally free

>I trust the FDA to ensure the food I eat isn't filled with fillers and toxins.
Is this sarcasm or shilling ?! Our food is FULL OF SHIT you fucking moron!
>sawdust into food
They literally put sawdust in shredded cheese..

This is the problem with commies. They believe if it wasn't for government, corporations would have so much power they'd make Stalin look like an anarchist. Then they get Stalin.

and this is a good arguemnt to get rid of regulations?

really?

Sometimes I can't tell if ANCAPs are retarded or just pretending.

What good is a regulatory body if it's a pointless waste of money? You make it sound like the regulations imposed on businesses aren't the result of collusion between huge food monopolies and the government to strong-arm any new company that wants to compete.

If the people want to buy bread with sawdust, let them. Supply and demand, froggy.

AnCap is inherently Libertarian, just taken to the extreme or its logical conclusion so to speak

Ancap are fucking retarded
If i want i can raised a lot of childs and sell them as sex salves.
> Souply and deman lol

>Ancap are fucking retarded
kek, your body is your property, end of story, slavery is unacceptable we don't want niggers
lurk moar fag

but people do not want to buy bread with sawdust. sadly if large compaines are allowed to get away with it, they have no choice.

supply and demand only works if demand is monetary, and co-ordinated.

it also needs transperancy int eh market and easy entry for competition, and fluid assets. none of these are common.

big companies stifle competition, lie about their practices and ignore complaints.

and there is often no means for demands to be heard. Millions may want something, but who do they tell?

the public wants what the public gets, not the other way round.

you mean "illogical" not logical

And who will stop me nigger faggot ?
Your private police ?
Even tho i can buy a police to myself ?
> How to be more utopic than the commies

Hey dumb nigger, the first turnpike in the USA was private. The MAJORITY of ROADS in the USA are PRIVATE. Fuck. You.

>sadly if large compaines are allowed to get away with it, they have no choice

They do. If they're unsatisfied, they can just switch their bread supplier.

>big companies stifle competition, lie about their practices and ignore complaints.

You mean like right now?

>it also needs transperancy int eh market and easy entry for competition

No easier entry level than with absolutely zero regulations.

>and there is often no means for demands to be heard

When sawdust bread sales plummet and people start criticizing it, it's a clear indication that they want real bread and companies will rush to provide the people with real bread ASAP.

>the public wants what the public gets, not the other way round.

Again, that's exactly how it is right now.

Attached: 798FD86B-3017-4140-8429-EF3BF5B430B9.jpg (960x601, 156K)

now you're gettin it, polution violates the NAP so we would be forced to make green energy and weapons, this could possibly be achieved more efficiently through a Hoppean Covenant
in short you would have to produce small and clean mcnukes
enjoy your nuke then faggot
>french humor

Attached: e06.jpg (640x427, 30K)