Only ethnostates work!

>only ethnostates work!
>different ethnicities don't work in one state!

Then explain switzerland, ethnotards. Multiple different languages, some not even spoken outside of the country (e.g. Romansch), switzerland is a perfect example of a multi-ethnic state which works. By all means though keep pointing to brazil, discounting its long history of fascism and colonization devastating its people, culture, and economy.

Attached: shutterstock_611229743-bde2e023e33c.jpg (1600x988, 1.65M)

Other urls found in this thread:

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095660
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

They're all white tard.

Is Switzerland 50% nigger?

there it is! the nebulous ill-defined term that seems to discount mediterraneans of which switzerland is populated by and has a heavily influenced culture from (Does the word italy ring a bell?)

White diversity is the only good diversity.

Switzerland is literally a bunch of europeans. Yes different europeans but the country is essentially all white...... a white nation..... that's successful.
>multi ethnic
Hahahaha multi european

>mountain jews
>white

Europe is even more nebulous than white. Stop trying to use blanket terms to discount examples which clearly disprove the basis of your political """"philosophy""""

because they are a confederation of cantons

Eat Shit Nigger.

Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence

We consider the conditions of peace and violence among ethnic groups, testing a theory designed to predict the locations of violence and interventions that can promote peace. Characterizing the model's success in predicting peace requires examples where peace prevails despite diversity. Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence. Here we analyze how peaceful stability is maintained. Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups, allowing for partial autonomy within a single country. In Switzerland, mountains and lakes are an important part of the boundaries between sharply defined linguistic areas. Political canton and circle (sub-canton) boundaries often separate religious groups.

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095660

Attached: 367899-19.jpg (1280x720, 178K)

IQ is the determining factor, not race. Race is just correlated with IQ.

they are really white
heres the (you) mutt

You are clueless. The difference in Italian, French and German Switzerland is obvious. You have never been there, stfu.

North Italians are indistinguishable from other Europeans, even so Italians are still white you fucking retard, stop eating pol memes raw.

So basicaly, an etnostate of ETHNIC whites from different cultural backgrounds.

Diverse, but white.
Perfectly fine.

Switzerland is heavily segregated

Attached: B67C2ABE-07B8-4395-AB8C-CE113E152C71.jpg (655x900, 98K)

And how does your glorious multicutural wonderland respond to the newest arrivals again?
see alsoShit b8 sage

Attached: 223345-2.jpg (428x600, 38K)

Switzerland is actually a bunch of little countries that have almost nothing to do with each other. It's like states rights but turned up to 11.

Niggers are very rare unless you go to the French speaking area but it's definitely full of Turks and Albanians

Even then, there is a difference in dynamic between Italian Switzerland and the rest. They are not as productive and the others look down on them. Even in his stupid example, he is wrong that this union works as harmoniously as he imagined. In fact, ethnic groups are so important, that even regional differences play a role in unified countries like France, Germany or Italy.

>look at this successful white european multi-ethnic society, clearly the same success can be repeated if we import all of Africa into it

>White european multi-ethnic society.
>That segregates everyone into different ethnic territories.
>Then further divides those.

>Then explain switzerland
Mandatory Guns

>only black bulls have big cocks!
>Different bulls dont work together
Then explain my interracial gangbang fantasy?

Switzerland really is the exception that proves the rule:

All these different ethnicities live in different parts of the country. Nobody is forcing the Italians of Tessin into Bern or Zürich or Basel. They all speak their different languages, have their own TV stations and school their children in their own language.

Secondly, Switzerland is very, very strongly commited to its federal model. They sophisticated their politics that revolves around different Kantons making deals with each other under the restriction that they cannot form a pact to the sole detriment of a third Kanton.

And even in that constellation there are grave political differences that make it hard for the country to function. If you look at a map for one of their polling on some initiative you will see that the French and the Germans vote very differently in Switzerland. The thing that holds the country together is that - despite the difficulties - nobody wants to belong to Germany or France so they rather stay Swiss.

They're all white, the sifferent ethnic groups are extremely close genetically, not to mention historically, geographically, and culturally. Ethnicities from within the same racial group easily assimilate or form a new ethnicity.

I know, I don't subscribe to the notion that it's completely without problems either.

But it works, and it has massive potential.
On top of that, it doesn't come with the same ethnic consequences that come with a half european-half nigger spawn as an example.

Ethnic legacies are much easier to maintain even with different europeans.

If Europe was broadly nationalist in collective, I think a case like Switzerland would work better than it does now as it's able to unite people better.

You're always gonna run into some kind of problems, even regionally no matter what.

Is Africa a “nebulous” term? What about Asia? North and South America?

I like how, according to your philosophy, the distinction between Europeans is apparently crystal clear. Germans are SO different from Frenchmen, who are SO different from Italians. Yet the distinction between white Europeans and black Africans is just so illusory and unscientific!

Fuck off, you anti white cretin.

Firstly they're all white.
Second they speak different languages in different parts of the country, and they're all pretty much trilingual at least.
In terms of ethnicity and culture, they are pretty much homogenous.