What if bisexuality is the default setting on people?

Just think about it, in ancient Greece and Rome swinging both ways was considered completely normal and nothing out of the ordinary.

In fact, their societies seemed to work with that implicit understanding in mind. For example, pederasty, which was the practice of a 20-30 years old man taking a 13-18 years old as his pupil and usually lover, teaching him everything he knew, couldn't have worked in a society where the majority is straight.
Just imagine coming into age and realizing that you're only into women, but the only way you can become a warrior is to pair up with another man.

Attached: 1534795987103.jpg (657x527, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20170110070142/https://genetiker.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/the-cause-of-homosexuality/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No

Fpbp

No, it is a mental defunct that is developed from overindulgence in a sexual fetish, often first developed from childhood trauma, such as rape or homelessness or like of parenting

Maybe, but homosexuality in Ancient Greece didn't mean that you can live with a man and adopt babies. You would get stoned if you even considered that.

this thing about ancient Greeks is mostly false and based on very little

PISTHETAERUS. I want a town where the father of a handsome lad will stop in the street and say to me reproachfully as if I had failed him, "Ah! Is this well done, Stilbonides! You met my son coming from the bath after the gymnasium and you neither spoke to him, nor embraced him, nor took him with you, nor ever once twitched his testicles. Would anyone call you an old friend of mine?"

what's this ment to be?

You're a fag

Egyem a kis pucukád te kis cukorfalat.

Would it increase fitness in the majority of cases? If yes then it would make sense that it was the default setting, if it is a waste of energy and resources then no.

This only happened in some city states amoung some of the elite and was never widespread. If you look at codified laws of the Greek states over history, the average punishment for homosexual relationships was death.

My thinking on it is that anybody is physically capable of sexually satisfying anybody else, but while the vast majority of people are only sexually attracted to the other gender. So if you live in a culture that has homosexuality as a part of growing up (such as your pederasty example) it will be normalized to you and you will accept the sexual satisfaction even if you are not attracted to the same gender.

>I post theories of things I have no experience with so I sound smart so people can praise me so I can feel good about myself

I never claimed to be right, I was just giving my thoughts. OP asked a question and I gave a response. (and as for having no experience you don't know my life or the dicks I've sucked)

>so smart but still a Hispanic bluecoller boomer from Amerimuttistan
The punishment for being a beggar was death too so Diogenes didn't exist just like his fable of telling royalty to fuck off which was also an anathema. He was used up by philosophers as a meme, "I didn't say this Diogenes invented it".
Alexander the Great of Macedonia conquered the peninsula and him being a homo abolished this. Then his empire crumbled became a Roman vassal state. The Etruscan scum not having a culture of their own copypasted greek arts, science, religion and they were the ones who were into the homofaggotry to the level that same sex unions were legally acknowledged.

So it's a catfight now faggot. Post me your feet. If it's more masc than mine I'll bottom for you.

Men are for fun women are for serious. T. Occasional Bi cock sucker.

1)Don't go for men with a foot fetish
2)I'm the bottom

What’s wrong with feet?

Seriusly .... If you dont know your own fucking sexual orientation without having to go intellectual about it...

Attached: 050fdc232c46288791441a26703ea0bedc984b-wm.jpg (640x920, 35K)

Stop trying to justify your degenerancy

my feet are very ticklish, so if someone were to fuck my feet I'd probably accidentally kick them in the nuts.

based

It was never considered "normal" anywhere. Read books from those eras, not degenerate revisionist history. The liberals pick and choose facts to back up their bullshit narratives.

>homo
>picky
>post on Chan too
I believe you completely.

You’re looking at this all wrong. You’re seeing this through the prism of sexual pleasure. It wasn’t about sexual pleasure as much as dominance. Getting fucked in the ass was acceptable when you were young but as a man it was deemed as shameful, however fucking young ass as a man was deemed as dominance. Everything was about dominance in that society and it also wasn’t nearly as common as you believe it was

Aristotle spoke about faggots and male bonding as something that couldn’t be understood by women. You should look it up, interesting read.

Only one pairing continues our species. Man + Man and Woman + Woman = death.

Homosexuals are literally parasites. In order for them to exist they have to rely on Man + Woman reproducing.

Attached: 1533782902392.jpg (759x1024, 232K)

think of it in the context of prison and you will understand. to wit, the most masculine act for a roman man was to break another man's jaw and then face-fuck him.

Bisexuality is better degeneracy, and must be promoted. Homos hate bisexuals because they conform to standard.

"Bisexuality" spreads disease that would have otherwise been kept between homosexuals. All of you deserve the fire.

It is. That's why so many religions had to forbid it explicitly, because they wanted to control human nature.

It is the state of transformation from Hunter-Gatherer to Farmer
Homosexuality does not exist in nature
However eating restricted diet (wheat), leisure and wealth will make people more gay
Hunter-Gatherers are not gay are more sensory oriented. And Farmers will act less gay each generation because the gays will not pass on their genes
That's why Arabs and South-Europeans are less gay than north-Europeans who are less gay than Niggers
However, in their natural state (excluding some nigger traditions) no human is gay
web.archive.org/web/20170110070142/https://genetiker.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/the-cause-of-homosexuality/

No, you dont have two reproductive organs retardo

It is. It's romantic desire that more clearly defines our sexuality.

except that heterosexuality is the most common orientation and is also what people start as in life. So we would assume it is the default. You haven't provided any reasoning for why bisexuality would be the default.

That's only in Rome and Aristotle was Hellenistic, as in reformed Greek with influence of the rising Roman Empire. Teen gay hookers were a Roman thing.

Your mom is fat.

African tribes are a clusterfuck with homosex. Some says it's not sex. Others say it's an abomination kill it. Others say it's a rite of passage for guys.

>we wuz Romans and Greeks

>However, in their natural state (excluding some nigger traditions) no human is gay
I think you missed the point. He is saying humans are bisexual default so they can always pass on the genes.

Most bisexuals only suck. Ass fucking is gay

Not even 1% who are homo all day every day. Get another hobby and leave us alone.

Attached: Screenshot_20180927_205957.png (1018x653, 87K)

I believe you 100%

Homosexuality exists in all mammals. Some more than others. Zebras settle fights by rape and chimps settle with violence or penis fencing depending on the species. The idea that homosex is unique to humans is very wrong. This isn't meant to justify it, I'm simply telling you that you're somewhat of a faggot. Literally

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A BISEXUAL
YOU ARE EITHER HETEROSEXUAL AND NORMAL

OR A FUCKING FAGGOT

>sucking the dick of a guy that stuck his dick in some other guy's ass is totally not gay and totally not spreading disease

Most bi’s are straight acting and don’t associate with fags. Much safer that way.

The 'default' setting for human beings is Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve

I don’t understand how anyone could be attracted to men at all. Men’s bodies are boring as fuck and men in general are either bland or ugly. I don’t even understand how straight women can like that. What further increases my confusion is how women often seem to like guys who are rather lanky

those stats just prove my point. thanks

I'm bi and only attracted to males of the feminine kind.
AMA

ancient rome? you mean one of the few civilizations that completely died out? thats the one you want to mimic?

Attached: retard.jpg (638x550, 65K)