Top Republican Analyst Confirms That It's Over For Kavanaugh

testimony without CORROBORATING EVIDENCE is just plain bullshit

I'll testify that Mike raped me

>Top Republican Analyst

KEKEKEKEKE

Attached: 1537558720254.gif (625x388, 2.98M)

I testified that shes talling lies, now what?

Another backstabbing jew? I love it! Keep it up heebs you never stop proving us right
>Cernovith
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I though he was a rape coach

> internet troll
> republican analyst

TESTIMONY IS EVIDENCE :clap:
TESTIMONY IS EVIDENCE :clap:
TESTIMONY IS EVIDENCE :clap:
TESTIMONY IS EVIDENCE :clap:
TESTIMONY IS EVIDENCE :clap:

#metoo

Sarcasm doesn't translate well over the internet, even worse over twitter since people will actually believe that shit.

Oh look the Fake MAGAs are activated today.

I'm shocked! SHOCKED! I say.

He's not 'intimating' anything. He's clearly trying to explain to people that there is more than physical, scientific evidence. There is testimonial and documentary evidence. It's literally just him explaining that these are actually considered evidence. The vast majority of people don't realize this and will argue against it in complete ignorance. It's not an argument that what she says is true.

How the fuck a testimony is evidence again? I can fabricate anything and testify

Nooo noot big Mike!!!!! Noooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!

How do you coach rape?

It's not evidence it's a testimony

If Kavanaugh's testimony contradicts hers, then they cancel out. That's what. Then you proceed to make a decision based on reason which should be that you can't condemn someone under those circumstances and you confirm him.

Not sure what the illiterates in this topic are thinking.

I love how Jow Forums has broken you morons to this level of desperation.

Usually why multiple witnesses is a good thing. Shame more people came out calling it BS than could corroborate hers.

businessdictionary.com/definition/testimonial-evidence.html

You people are literally wrong. The problem is you're presupposing the word testimoney infers that it is valid.

I read it and assumed he was shitposting lol... like you know, its a joke?

I love and despise Cernovich at the same time

Attached: 1458177578086.jpg (583x409, 35K)

So when Kav gives his testimony saying he didn't do it then that's evidence too

Attached: 1533742704316.jpg (409x600, 88K)

Im willing to testify under oath that Cernovich is a kike puppet.

I love how you faggots come here and try to act like anyone gives a shit about what the fuck you have to say

Yes.

This is why teaching philosophy is hard as fuck. People can't slow their stupid asses down and think in steps. They keep reading ahead too far.

>putting faith in man
>putting faith in a fucking woman

Of course. Testimony is evidence. It doesn't have to be true or false but its on the record legally.

Evidence = stuff that's on the record legally

>This much smoke blowing up your ass, goyim, there must be fire

Attached: 1531520325338m.jpg (1024x958, 222K)

>Testimony is evidence
What? No its not.

Attached: 1506880613363.jpg (213x237, 7K)

OK guys I have a testimony, "I am the emperor of china". You must believe this evidence of my testimony.

>Waaaaaahhhh nobody is taking my shitty bait

The other side will impeach you if you fabricate, at least in a court. Im not sure how they are carrying out these hearings. Is there cross examination?

Why is it that you're attacking Cernovich for saying the exact same thing as you are?

Doesn't this then work both ways and therefore negate each other out? Whay the fuck am I reading?

Read my post niggerfaggot

>Of course. Testimony is evidence.

I hope he himself gets #methottoo'd and gets his life ruined. Infact this hearing sets a precedence that any thot can do it now. I bet if she wanted Lauren Southern can get this man in prison within 6 months

This is why the US is a Republic.

Attached: 56A05E22-8323-458C-B15A-C100F8E4723A.jpg (720x439, 56K)

>waaahhhh i have no reading comprehension its her turn listen and believe waaahh

This. What Cernovich says is obvious. A fucking shoe at a crime scene is "evidence". It's not clear or convincing though. Is Blasey's testimony clear and convincing evidence? Of course not, not in the absence of literally any other evidence.

No one ever said to listen and believe.

he-said/she-said situation leads to nothing.

>What Cernovich says is obvious.

Not to half the people in this topic nor the people who he said were 'lecturing him otherwise'. So I'm gonna have to say it's not obvious to most people.

Best meds to use for date rape, most efficient way to haul a female jogger behind a bush, best intimidation tactics, pants versus skirts, dna ect

>TFW there are hundreds of applicable lawyers and judges who will be just as pro 2nd amendment and right wing if not more than Kavanaugh.
No matter what, the left will be fucked forever because if Kavanaugh goes through he will be more hardened against Jewish bullshit than ever before. There will always be someone else who are just as anti establishment who will fill his seat if he doesn't get in.

what's wrong with kikeovich?

How did the sleuth who uncovered pizzagate and brought down James Gunn let a fucking serial rapist operate under his nose for so long anyway?

Attached: 1501764519347.png (420x420, 47K)

He's bothered by people telling him testimony isn't considered evidence when it is in fact considered evidence.

>Implying they wouldn't just do the same thing to literally any nominee.

that's the point he'll still be confirmed, democrats know this, republicans know they have to or they look extremely retarded but he will be confirmed to the deranged howling autistic screeching of the democrat base which is what the democrats needed before the election

Came here to say that.

He's said some gay shit today making it sound like he believes this bitch possibly because of bad wording and now he's being a pendantic faggot over the definition of the word "evidence" while using equally bad wording.

He's usually our guy but today he's tweeting like a leftist on reddit and getting lit up for it

>Hearsay is evidence
>doesn't matter if Ford took it to Washington Post first
This isn't a court case, Mike is dumb.

This guy is a fucking twitter personality, he doesn't know shit.

he's not wrong. testimony is evidence until different testimony refutes it, which in this case its really easy to get

He's never /ourguy/, he's a civ nat goofball with flights of fancy. He's a tangential slightly positive influence like Scott Adams.

Kavanaugh finger blasted my butthole at a Dave and Busters while I was playing whack-a-mole.

Then we let them play their tactics for the next 2 years until the 2020 elections. It will show the whole public and let them decide whether "All Republicans are Rapists" or "The Left is Lying and only has one card up their sleeve." Nothing would work better for getting Trump another term than the Democrats to keep this shit up until the elections.

>let's dismiss the 3 testimonies against her, she's telling the truth

Trump is going to win a second election by a landslide.
A bunch of hardcore leftists are going to vote for Trump just to spite the faggotry of the modern Left. Not even counting the fact I bet that this election is going to be so hyped it will get a huge voter turnout and at least 80% of white votes will go straight to him.
And a lot of minorities too because they are getting tired of illegal beaners too.

Mike Cernovich has Down Syndrome

CORY, NO!!

Attached: 8F01ED2A-2159-46A8-A694-A67897CF6529.jpg (1010x1196, 176K)

I believe he got 10% of the black vote in 2016, Unless the dems run a very strong nig candidate, Trump will surely increase that.

Testimony is only evidence when it comes from someone other than the complainant who is making the original claim.

Otherwise you're saying that a claim is evidence for itself being true you fucking stupid bitch.

A claim can't be evidence for itself. Ford's testimony is nothing but her own unsupported claims.

How dare this cunt mislead people by conflating independent witness testimony with testimony from the complainant making the original claims.

Fuck you and fuck your rulebreaking spam.

Attached: Report Rulebreakers.jpg (125x117, 2K)

He did, but he's going to get a whole lot more. It could rise 6%-10% which would be huge.
He got 30% of hispanics in 2016.

I know its ironic me talking about based minoritays with a fascist flag. Still though, those beaners and niggers could make Trump win by a landslide.