After the spectacle today, there has to be at least one democrat hanging their head in shame. At least one so repulsed that they defect and leave the party.
Will Any Democrat Have Any Morals and Ethics and Defect
Ayden Martin
Other urls found in this thread:
sciencedirect.com
pjmedia.com
academic.oup.com
reason.com
mediaite.com
washingtontimes.com
theatlantic.com
scientificamerican.com
twitter.com
Brandon Thomas
Yeah, that one guy who beat Roy Moore.
Ryan Carter
Reply to this post if you are doing your part by calling senators and leaving messages on their hotlines
Jeremiah Allen
We were already cheated out of one SCotUS seat (Garland). After that the Republicans used personal connections with Justice Kennedy & his family to get him to retire in favor of Kav, his protoge who is to continue on with his legacy.
As such the SCotUS has displayed to be grossly biased against the Democrat party, by letting its selection process be so blatantly tampered from both outside and inside, effectively robbing Democrats of potentially two seats.
In response our party should treat it with no holds barred, and attempt to discredit and weaken it in any way possible. I don't agree with Feinstein often but she did the best she could do with the cards dealt
Oliver Jones
Those type of people are weeded out in the primaries for Dems.
Jacob Cruz
No one who is fair minded would want the accused serial rapist Kavanaugh on the SCOTUS without a proper FBI investigation. Republicans are power hungry money grubbers.
Jonathan Williams
Yeah, I've had some normie friend express disgust to me today.
Samuel Garcia
>Will Any Democrat Have Any Morals and Ethics and Defect?
From what we know from research findings, the answer is "No," this cannot happen. Consider the following:
Having a liberal political ideology is “significantly associated” with criminal behavior
sciencedirect.com
Study Finds Democrats Least Tolerant of Opposing Views
pjmedia.com
Liberals complain more and dispute complaint resolutions more than conservatives
academic.oup.com
Liberals, Not Conservatives, Express More Psychoticism (uncooperative, hostile, troublesome, socially withdrawn, manipulative, and lack of feelings of inferiority)
reason.com
Pew study: Liberals more likely to unfriend or block someone over politics
mediaite.com
Conservatives have a broader moral sense than liberals
washingtontimes.com
Conservatives have moral concerns that liberals do not recognize as moral concerns
theatlantic.com
Conservatives are less likely than liberals to compromise their morals
scientificamerican.com
Samuel Watson
See my list of research articles posted above, Leaf faggot.
Hunter Howard
Doug Jones maybe. He's voted for Trump endorsed bills ~50% of the time.
Adam Martin
How the fuck can anyone watch MSNBC?
Luke Ross
I'm thinking Joe Manchin will defect like last time. Maybe Doug Jones. I'm thinking some Dems in swing states will consider it. When is the vote?
Charles Gonzalez
>the SCotUS has displayed to be grossly biased against the Democrat party, by letting its selection process be so blatantly tampered from both outside and inside
The SCOTUS did what to the selection process? The SCOTUS has no control over the selection process. What the fuck are you even talking about?
Garland didn't get in because there was evidence that Scalia was murdered.
And about Kennedy, a SCOTUS member has every right to resign under a pres of his choosing. Your complaint should be with the Dem Party for being such a crazy, unamerican party that promotes judicial activism. No sane Justice would resign under a dem president.
Wyatt Ramirez
In the late 90s Icelands fragmented left wing united in a single party which controlled a large part of the votes and formed a government after the 2008 crash.
In 2016 they went all in on attacks versus the establishment through promoting identity politics, open borders and feminism. They got completely wiped out and are no longer a viable party.
Like them you are completely out of touch with the common people and will be wiped out. There is no popular support for this shit, just insane cat ladies on twitter.
Aiden James
What do you mean he clearly raped her?
Nicholas Moore
>As such the SCotUS has displayed to be grossly biased against the Democrat party, by letting its selection process be so blatantly tampered from both outside and inside, e
Demoshits victim blaming.
This is priceless.
Ayden Cox
>The SCOTUS did what to the selection process?
they didn't object to Garland's hearing being delayed for over a year or in any way protest that their own selection process was tampered with by delaying the selection till a more favorable president gets elected. perhaps it isn't their place to comment but if they let themselves be manipulated then, nobody should be surprised Dems are attempting to manipulate them now.
>Garland didn't get in because there was evidence that Scalia was murdered.
there literally is not a shread of evidence apart from Jow Forums tier conjectures and conspiracy nuts. an 80 year old, Scalia was just above average life expectancy.
>And about Kennedy, a SCOTUS member has every right to resign under a pres of his choosing.
while that is obviously correct, his retirement was conditioned on nominating Kavanaugh, his protoge and legal clerk, essentially selecting his own replacement and ensuring his own legacy extends well beyond his retirement.
In that sense SCotUS displayed bias when it came to selection process as it tacitly approved denying Garland's confirmation hearing and influenced the selection by trading in retirement for specific Justice.
Sorry but suburban level politics of Iceland aren't really comparable here. The popular support was made evident by winning the popular vote in the past 7 out of 8 election. It's the Westminister electoral formula and electoral college (the same one Trump bashed as completely unfair and undemocratic till it gave him the presidency) as well as copious amounts of gerrymandering and voter suppression that's our main problem.
Chase Mitchell
>implying liberal have morals
If they can turn a blind eye to nigger on white crime whilst making out niggers are oppressed I don’t think they’ll suddenly start being decent people
Joshua Reyes
The left party had control of the government until it was wiped out. It was popular when it was perceived as representing the working class, the exact same thing is happening in the US. Democrats no longer represent the working class and the voters will become more and more awake to that fact as more of these circus games are exposed which is exactly what happened here.
Trump played to win, if the popular vote was what he needed he would have gotten it.
Andrew Powell
>perhaps it isn't their place to comment but if they let themselves be manipulated then, nobody should be surprised Dems are attempting to manipulate them now.
THEY HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THE SELECTION PROCESS, MORON. It's not their place to object to the lawful decisions of the president and legislature. It would be improper for them to do so.
>>Garland didn't get in because there was evidence that Scalia was murdered.
>there literally is not a shread of evidence apart from Jow Forums tier conjectures and conspiracy nuts.
They found him with a pillow over his face/head.
Also, it was done near the end of Obama's presidency. Guess Obama/Dems got tired of waiting for a conservative justice to die.
>his retirement was conditioned on nominating Kavanaugh
Even if that was true (any evidence?), it's not illegal or improper. It's also non-binding. Trump was under no obligation to select any particular person.
Jack Johnson
I left the party last year. Everyone I went to school w/ went into campaigning and I went into the private sector. No one talks to me anymore.
Isaac Perez
You're a special kind of dickbag