What did he mean by this?

he was always going after them and the anti-semitism accusations largely stem from that. They see him talk about people who cause the financial crisis and automatically assume that its them and all him an anti-semite...think about why that might be

>mfw a literal Communist is the most popular right wing anti-semitic politician in EU

Attached: 1537461268144.png (494x472, 189K)

He means bankers and globalists i.e. capitalists but is too bluepilled to see that most are jews. Isn't Corbyn a jew as well?

I'm unironically voting corbyn next time
>For the many, not the Jew
Finally I'll have my NatSoc Britannia.

My enemy is both Jew capitalists and communists and all the useful idiots that follow both ideologies. Corbyn might have my attention if he could promise something more than meaningless lefty platitudes

How about voting reform? Oh no that’s too radical for the lefty that wants to steal other people’s money and give it to brown people

Huh, I don't recall any members on the board of the Federal Reserve saying that ...

>Isn't Corbyn a jew as well?
Why not

NatSoc doesn’t replace you with foreigners. Left wingers are only against Israel. The Labour Party is littered with Jews. All of Blair’s top cronys (Straw, Mandellson) were jewish. These are the guys that started the mass immigration

At this point you either vote jew or corbyn in tge uk. Its no longer labour vs tories or right vs left.

Yeh but corbyn isnt establishment. Whoever was with blair doesnt matter.

And yet he’s doing exactly what they want practically. What’s the difference

Is he? He hasnt been elected, so...

I guess he’s going to suddenly stop trying to disarm us and he’ll not do any of his campaign pledges when he gets in!

Retard, are you unaware he was a political activist for the majority of his career?

Corbyn=Europe=Mass Immigration=Death of Britain.

Hang on, Corbyn is pro-brexit, as far as I remember

>he’s going to suddenly stop trying to disarm us
Why should he stop trying to take weapons and manpower away from the jews?

Corbyn=Europe=Mass Immigration=Muslim power=implement oppressive Sharia law=Muslims kill the weak socialists=no more racial guilt=Raise Up Christians=New Crusades
Shit's going to be so cash, man

>every city becomes a no-go zone
>crime rate skyrockets

B-but at least the jews lost!!!

Fuck corbyn, every one of his speeches is just him shilling for multiculturalism and appealing to poorfag subhumans.

Corbyn has wanted to leave since before we entered and done everything in his power to cause a no deal so called "hard Brexit". The lies and propaganda against him are a joke. I understand people not wanting to vote Labour but Jezza is clearly the better option than Maybot.

Neither are a good option. Reject the two party ogliarchy. Reject FPTP. Reject the whole damn thing. It’s broken

What's this madlads engame, pol?

Could it be that we indeed my seen another Icepick and firesquad shoa in good old uncle Stalin fashion in our lifetime?!

Attached: Screenshot_20180824-095142.png (1080x1920, 462K)

He stated recently that he will back a second referendum if "Labour supports it".

He's crashing this economy. With no survivors.

Here's something from 'The Independent'......

The Labour leader’s new comments on a People’s Vote Brexit referendum come as a new YouGov poll showed his party’s members overwhelmingly back one, while more than 100 motions relating to a new vote have been proposed for the conference in Liverpool.

And?

He hasnt said he backs a return from brexit, just a second vote. With May dragging her feet and tories trying to brexit without brexit, isnt a second vote kinda necessary also for pro-brexit?

You’re about 300 years to late to reject the jew my friend.

Based Jeremy "Holocaust the big nosed bourgeoisie" Corbyn.

Come on Dude. Catch up.
If it goes to a second vote the remain camp will win.

Voting something until you get the result you wanted is a farce and a mockery of democracy.
Mind, I don't exactly think a (free for all) democracy is a good idea, but if you have it, you are supposed to listen to it.

Also Corbyn was pro-Brexit even before, since in the EU Britain can't protect its laborers from foreign workers and importers.

Ireland was asked to vote twice on the Lisbon Treaty. They didn't like the first result.

They also did it Twice on the Nice Treaty.......

Denmark was asked to vote twice on the Maastrictt Treaty.

Like I said, if you consider democracy a good thing and your ideal, you shouldn't do that. It looks bad, you look weak. Talking about how good democracy is, while taking a diarrhea shit on democracy, will lead to bitter people who feel their government is oppressive.

Is that farce and mockery?

>you look weak
Who looks weak?

Making 4 posts to write 4 sentences is farce and mockery.

You can't be serious , Cameron and May cucked even harder than Blair on immigration, Blair started the shit train and the conservatives being the massive fucktards they are didn't just extend it but made the numbers larger per year.

I honestly couldn't give two fucks who wins anymore , i hope jeremy takes everyones money and pours it into niggers mouths , that might actually spark war in this country finally.

Theresa May is too busy dancing is South Africa with the niggers killing the white farmers , she's happy as fuck.

I wouldn't care if every single UK politician died tomorrow.

Argue the points or shut up

What points you potato nigger, you just listed events that have nothing to do with what I wrote. I can't even tell what side of the argument you are on.

He calls himself a threat?
His peers call him a threat? wew lad

Youre an idiot, bye bye.

Doesn't matter what he means. Corbyn will never be prime minister because he pissed off the Jewish elite that control everything.

He blows with the fucking wind, anything for a vote
Will get harshly BTFO, most of the north voted for Brexit even though they are (formerly) die hard Labour

People are anti semitic without realising it.

We shall use the commie to expose the Jew and dismantle the survivor

Hmmm remind me again, what did people say about the brexit vote before it began? Even literally up to the counting of the votes?
It isnt, if you get blocked institutionally and politically to enact the will of the people, forcing new votes is precisely what you should do - consider it ignoring the elite in exchange for a direct referendum.

>Blair started the shit train
Bull fucking shit
The shit train in the UK began with the empire, planes and internet just sped the process up heavily.

He blows with the wind?

Isnt labour 95% anti-brexit and he was pro-brexit? Doesnt the whole labour establishment hate him, but he doesnt change his positions? Isnt he under massive kike attack due to his comments, but keeps making such comments?

I mean jesus christ, Corbyn may be a filthy jew commie puppet, sure, but an idiot can see he is REALLY consistent.

Attached: 1537382992258.png (2856x1850, 1.44M)

Sure. I know. I know what they said about trump too.
Its just my opinion. Im open to being wrong. I think the remain camp would movilize big time in the face of a new vote and most probably win. They were a little apathetic the last time because they were too complacent. They thought they had it in the bag.
Like I say, I could be wrong.

>if you get blocked institutionally and politically to enact the will of the people

This is also a mockery of democracy. If you take pride of democracy, and your ideology is democracy, and your speeches include democracy, and your schools teach democracy, etc, etc, and then you vote for something and it fails to happen, your system is shit. Like a puppet king commanded by his generals, or a republic where one family essentially is dictating events, your system has failed and you are no longer a democracy.

As I said before, I am not ideologically chained to democracy, I don't think the opinion of plebs is too relevant on most questions, and it swings wildly with mass media and rhetoric influencing it, but if you insist you are a democracy, you can't vote on things again and again until the vote turns to what you want. Its disgusting to look at, and weak as fuck.

You’re really far less clever than you think you are. I highly suggest some self-criticism and listening to different opinions.

>ur dumb xD

Wow great argument fagtron you sure convinced me with those hot opinions.

>You’re really far less clever than you think you are
I think you are being very generous with that guy.
He is Brainless and doesn't know how to argue a point to save his life.

>fagtron
Holy cringe batman

What you posted isnt worth getting into an argument with. The way you posted it clearly indicates an argument will do no good. I simply suggest something that is advisable no matter whether you are right or wrong. Its up to you to accept self-criticism or not.

He is a compatriot, I have to be nicer. And unfortunately a registered voter in my country, which means I cannot just ignore his shit like I would if another national posted it.

What I posted is that in a democracy you vote on something and do that thing. If you vote to do X, and don't do X, you aren't a democracy. If you insist you are a democracy, but aren't one, you are weak and won't be supported.
This is all by definition, its fundamental stuff. You and your buttboi can circlejerk all you want, any neutral reader browsing the thread can see better.

If an army of 5 people kills an army of 6, then combat is pointless and wars dont work?

What the actual fuck are you attempting to communicate? Voting and doing what you voted for is the definition of democracy. It is the one fucking thing you have to fucking do, fuck.

He's a Marxoid prick.

Alright my man, hopefully you’ll be voting for the first time next year and local elections matter a lot here, so let me start at the beginning -

The point of democracy is rule of the people. The word comes from “demos” and “kratos” meaning people and power respectively. The idea of democracy is that every decision taken by the collective, initially a city but now a nation, should be taken by a majority of people within the system. However, the decisions of the collective grow with its size and technology. Due to this, people have to vote on packages of things so they spend less time within decision-making to pursue other work. As the collective grows even more, even that becomes too much and the people executing the decisions become too many and too prone to control - if you vote for and against every corrupt person, it just wont work. Therefore, to simplify things even further, the idea was born that the people vote on a person who says what he will do over a certain period of time and who will control those who execute those things and a new vote will happen periodically for HIM alone, to control what he does, with people voting him out if he didnt do it.

Are you with me so far?

I could probably be your father, stop patronizing me.
Consider this made up arbitrary fantasy scenario:
>Your country joins the Union
>The population wants to leave the Union
>There is a democratic referendum, and they vote to leave the Union
>You don't leave the Union as they wanted, and ask them to vote again, hoping this time they vote to stay

This isn't democracy. People voting to do X, and you doing the opposite, and asking them to vote until they select the other option, is not democracy.
Super basic fundamental by definition stuff. Can't get simpler. Are you with me so far?

Communism is overwhelmingly Jewish though

Even on plebbit "people" are saying hes anti-semitic lmfaoo

Mate, the fact you may be my father is significantly worse. At your age you should know the wisdom of self-criticism and listening to other opinions.

Anyway, you’re completely ignoring my posts and continuing with your narrative, so we really dont need to do this any further.

You aren't saying anything for me to ignore. Your posts read like they were written by Google's autocomplete algorithm.
Democracy is voting on something and then doing it. When you vote on something and then do the opposite, you aren't practicing democracy.

I did clearly indicate why repeated voting is the core of democracy. You chose to ignore it. I also posted your answer as to why not enacting the will of the voters is an issue with democracy and what its solution is.

You chose to ignore that too.

Therefore we have nothing to discuss. You can stop responding to me now.

You are a very simple man with very simple ideas of what democracy is.
A referendum does not fit in well with your simple ideas. There is a big difference between referendums and representative democracy.
They are doing the will of the people in GB, by the way. They are proceding with Brexit.
BUT
There is such as thing as a BINDING or NON-BINDING referendum. There are many variables for a NON-BINDING. In the case of the UK, a NON-BINDING variable would be that of the 'valid majority' where there is the question of what percentage of majority can be considered as unquestionably indicative of the preference of the electorate.
Are we learning something now?