> conservashits
conservashits
David King
Dylan Wood
word spoken
Kayden Morales
>No evidence
You're a dumb nigger.
Oliver Morris
three credible allegations?
which 3 are credible.
and yes, this is America. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Not france. America.
Ayden Anderson
>credible = fact
Neck yourself
Matthew Martinez
>Credible
I didn't know that an allegation is evidence
Aiden Murphy
Landon Hernandez
>credible allegations
kek
Ayden Barnes
Go suck off your deep state daddy. Act like the shits not rigged.theres literally a fucking trail of corpses behind hillary. This kavanaugh shits too convenient.
Camden Flores
Say's it all...
Brody Johnson
This argument works both ways
Parker Wood
>no evidence
Try harder
Landon Watson
It's credible because I choose to believe it.
Isaac Davis
3 cool wine aunts are NOT CREDIBLE
Noah Morales
FBI was in her side the documents have been release so time for a real investigation also Judge K hasnt done any crime you stupid fuck.
Grayson Johnson
What do they mean when they say "K has been credibly accused"? They mean that the women who accused K are all professionals with good educations and jobs. The implicit assumption is that K would be incredibly accused if his accusers were poor and uneducated. Therefore poor and uneducated women cannot be raped.
Elijah Fisher
This is fake, right? We made this one, r-right? Poe’s law kicking in.
Alexander Anderson
>credible
Andrew Campbell
>MUH EVUL MASTORMIND HILARRY!
get a load of this faggot
David Sullivan
>three credible allegations
Well, first, none of the allegations are credible at all. None of the supposed "victims" remember anything about any of it, and they've all told contradicting stories, including contradictory statements on what exact wrongdoing he's done (I say wrongdoing and not crime because, in some versions of the events, they're not even really accusing him of a crime). Second, there's no evidence against him. Third, all these allegations came up conveniently when he was nominated by Trump. Fourth, they were "discovered" by people who said, when the nomination was first announced, that they would do "whatever it took" to oppose the nomination (which I guess includes fake allegations of rape/sexual assault/being a perv/whatever). Fifth, leaks already revealed the FBI was biased in favor of Hillary, that they wanted her to win (and expected her to win, and actually cried when she didn't), so you can't trust what the FBI says about Hillary, that's all suspect now. Sixth, even if they are the same, that just makes both sides hypocrites, because both sides want their guy/girl to be "innocent until proven guilty" but want the other side's girl/guy "guilty without evidence." Seventh, you don't even care, you're just shitposting to get replies, so hey, have one.
Jack Jenkins
I'll take "What is the definition of an SAP and how severe is exposing that information to the public," for 500, Alex.