Define cultural marxism.
Use your own words.
Define cultural marxism.
Use your own words.
>Define cultural marxism
Jewish subversion.
Culture has to be molded to conform to ideas about equity.
I should add, provide detail
It's a form of Marxian-inspired Idealism, which uses the cultural elements of Marxism and Trotskyism like atheism, feminism, socialism, deconstructionism, promoted homosexuality etc and more often than not is advocated by Schlomo, just without the economic aspect of Marxism as much. The ideas are unnatural and always lead to a Dionysian system of enforcement and rule of terror to be applied unto the public
Kikes
The idea that to achieve communis you first have to socially engineer the people rather than imposing it as an economic system first and expecting people to adjust.
People categorized in a heirs by race and other ethnic, physical, cultural, and social factors. Oppressors of higher status in hierarchy are oppressing other groups and their power must be deconstructed and redistributed to others of lower status so we can all be balanced and equal.
Fake and gay
cuckold supremacism
I think Cultural Marxism is the lowering of previously-established standards of quality for the inherent value of art.
People think old Scores of Orchestral Music are high art, but why isn't Death Grips high art too?
And then all of your culture dies.
take normal Marxism and replace bourgeoise with straight white christian men or whites in general (I.e. the Privileged unopprossed oppressors) and the proletariat with non-whites, homos, trannies and all manner of deviants. That's what it means today, now if you mean the goal of this Marxism, it would be a "utopia", where instead of classes ceasing to exist, it's gender, sexuality, language, age, religion, everything pretty much, which ceases to exist, good enough?
The most jarring thing about it, is the fact that Muslims count as the oppressed rather than oppressors, since throughout the history they have been the latter
retard boogeyman
Marx is God
Why? Goebbels already did a good job:
1. The complete abrogation of those paragraphs of the law dealing with the crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of charge in State Hospitals.
2. Non-interference with prostitution.
3. The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard to marriage and divorce.
4. Official registration to be optional and the children to be educated by the community.
5. Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to be granted to all persons condemned as “sexual criminals.”
Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the wilful destruction of the nations and their civilization and the substitution of barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
A secular faith that asserts the falsehood that innate equality is both real and an inherently benevolent, and justifiable end; it is a manichean academic ideology which opposes normal, natural, and human thriving of european traditions. It is a tool by which the unfit impose their ressentiment for those who are smarter, healthier and better looking, by aggressively asserting white heterosexuals are evil, using dubious historical narratives, just by existing.
fpbp
Authoritarians winning the only way they can.
Classical Marxism recognizes history as class struggle between the ruling class that controls economic and ideological power vs the classes that are exploited for the benefit of the ruling class.
Cultural Marxism is a revision that shifts the focus of its analysis from economic class struggle to culture and identity groups. From this analysis concepts such as white privilege, patriarchy, etc are constructed. It holds that no matter what changes occur in economic conditions, the privileged white male will still maintain cultural hegemony and ruling power thus preventing the utopian dream of communist equality.
Cultural Marxists’ goal then is to reduce by any means available the cultural power of the white male, by removing him from media, by removing him from positions of institutional power and authority, and basically assaulting the entire Ethos of the white male by representing him as evil.
It is revisionist shit created by bourgeois intellectuals, it undermines the concept of class struggle and creates blurry divides between the so called "priveleged" and "oppressed" further atomizing the workers and preventing them from unifying just like porky wants. Jow Forums inteprets it in a very bizzare way but what can you expect from a brainlet incel forum.
There is no such thing as a cultural marxist. It is a straw man created by right wingers in an attempt to demonize their political opponents. I have never met or heard a single left winger or liberal who identified as a "cultural marxist" or even knew what it was. It's only ever used by braindead reactionaries like Jordan Peterson.
The desire of the weak to gain power by tricking the strong into giving away resources and protection
See
>feminism
>civil rights
>communism
>brainlet
You're another member of a bullshit faith, and an idealist ideologue whose cognitive dissonance is too strong to accept that your so called "revolutionaries" were nothing more than psychopaths angling for power and your experiment in altruism is anything but altruistic. You have the audacity to think that you alone have the answer to alleviating misery of the poor, yet you probably come from an upper middle class background and probably don't have a real job and if you do, you probably are too stupid to get a raise. kys please
Faggots
Jewish subversion of Western values
Communists for whom economy and shit is too hard to grasp.
Harry Potter radicals.
Women.
>Jordan Peterson
Fuck Jordan Peterson, read Jim Goad. takimag.com
>My ideology doesn't exist!
>an attempt to demonize political opponents
And the 'patriarchy' is real right?
SJWs always project.
My ideology is actual marxist, where people like you are left with their entrails sliding down the street.
"Liberal Psych 101 subverted the dominant paradigm until nothing made sense. It taught that cockroaches are equivalent to butterflies. It preached that success was a sign of evil and that failure was an emblem of virtue. It saw something noble in losing rather than winning. It didn’t seem so keen about “leveling the playing field” as it was on perverting natural law until they forced the game to end in a sudden-death two-overtimes tie. It published endless treatises on deconstruction without making a peep about how to reconstruct everything after destroying it.
"Then as now, the left preached a Gospel of innate cognitive and physical equality among all social groups. What it did not preach was an equality of character. White people generally, and rich white males in particular, were depicted as morally defective, probably by birth.
"Even though a white male, I dutifully absorbed and assented to the liberal blueprint. Journalism degree in tow, I set about to right historical wrongs. I appointed myself an advocacy journalist who would defend the poor against the rich and the weak against the strong.
"In many cases, I didn’t realize I’d be defending the stupid against the smart.
"Ironically, it was precisely this hands-on advocacy journalism that led me to abandon leftist thought entirely. It was a long and painful process, like an old car where the parts start to go and then one day the engine finally throws a rod. One experience after the other led to more chinks in my ideological armor than there were Chinks in Mao’s Red Army. Against my better wishes, I found I do not have the inexhaustible capacity for cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias that most leftists seem to possess."
-Jim Goad
Entropy
Nazi/Neocon gibberish smear term.
Basic devide and conquer strategy by agitating the lower class (poc) to attack the upper class majority (white people)
Jews were poor so used economic Marxism against the Tsar. Rich Western Jews use psychological battery against the White man since economic disparity whining no longer benefits them.
Basically Children of the Corn; only with more vegetables.
>Neocon nazi smear
Pick one.
Faggot detected.
Retardation
Go away subhuman.
The oppression of heterosexual Christian whites under the veneer of egalitarianism.
en.rightpedia.info
>Cultural Marxism (also known as Freudo-Marxism, or Neo-Marxism) is what the Communists created in 1919 when they found that regular Marxism wasn't convincing people. Marxism made the people under it poor and many of the top people who promoted Communism were rich so Communists needed a new scapegoat. They made this scapegoat Europeans and European culture. They proclaimed that a complete white genocide and cultural genocide of all European influence would make the world a utopia. The people who came up with these all were Communists of Jewish ancestry, making Cultural Marxism a Jewish ideology.
>Cultural Marxists came from the Soviet Union, went to Germany, then fled because of Hitler and went to the USA where they incubated and grew. Regular Marxists still existed. Communists still attacked the rich in the 1950s such as in Mao's Cultural Revolution where the wealth and descendants of wealthy had everything from sewing machines robbed from them and many were tortured and killed[1], but over time as Communists basically became rich Globalists of which Mark Zuckerberg and George Soros are perfect examples. Both are basically the richest men in the world and push the Cultural Marxism in an Orwellian fashion (along with their ties to the US government) of attacking Europeans based on their culture rather than wealth. One quote that shows the Communist shift in scapegoating is when Bernie Sanders said in 2016, "If you're white, you don't know what it's like to be poor."
>no arguments left
literally only right wing buffons use made up terms like "cultural marxist"
imagine if left wingers started calling you nazipitalists or something like that. this is how retarded you sound.
In order to be a commie faggot, you must know nothing about economy, human evolution and social studies and basically about anything at all.
>muh retarded
Please kill yourself.
deteriorate the moral principles of the society to your best abilities
>The most jarring thing about it, is the fact that Muslims count as the oppressed rather than oppressors,
This is a ploy by the subversives to gain more land for israel, more control over the US push for more wars in the middle east to destabilize non-jewish communities by making muzzies "the true enemies of america"
Imagine accusing everyone to the left of Mao of being a member of a nonexistant political party. Imagine believing in bullshit conspiracy theories like 'white privilege'. Imagine resenting people for having more money and having healthier habits than you. It's not capitalism that's the problem, it's that youre a fat retard.
>you can't distribute wealth equally
>it has to be distributed in a way where 50% of it goes to 8 people and the other 50% goes to 300 million
>that's the only way the system can ever work
capitalists are the dumbest people alive
Fuck all these Putinbot threads
It also protects the banks interest by destroying countries that would have switched to the gold standard instead of giving the jews control of their money.
>It taught that cockroaches are equivalent to butterflies.
Hilarious, but false.
And btw arguing with commies is pointles, Either you know very vell that your idolised system can't and won't work and you are an evil sick fuck, or you are just really really fucking stupid. You can't understand even basic terms and facts. Pointless.
It's an application of marx's class warfare as applied to the analogy of social classes (including skin color, ethnicity, fatness, skinnyness).
Having good social traits is akin to being wealthy... and cultural marxism promotes the destruction of the social heirarchy.
I'd like to see one of you manlets try it.
>success was a sign of evil
Wrong again. The libs are targeting ~crony captialism~ and on this I agree with them. We have to stop the globalists like Trump who corrupt our politics with good-old-boy favoritism over meritocracy.
shut the fuck up and stop making excuses you pussy
explain why capitalism is not a ridiculous system but communism is
ridiculous is a subjective quality.
Communism always fails really fast.... and transitions to something better (literally anything)
they won
Jow Forums watched a video of some Russian saying strange things and thinks it explains US politics
It's not my job to educate you you absolute fucking loser.
We get it. You’re a lazy fuck.
The Protocols of the elders of Zion.
because you don't know anything, like most dipshits on this dogshit board
Show me an example of a successful communist country.
Get a job. Find a different emotion besides resentment.
>believes in innate equality
>calls us ignorant
Whew lad.
Show me an example of a succesful capitalist country. How you define success is entirely up to you. Capitalist countries succeed in having enormous wealth because it's concentrated in the hands of a few people. But as far as actually providing for their citizens they are a failure. That's why the countries with the highest standards of living socialize everything except luxury goods, i.e. the nordic model.
Introduced by the Nazis... Picked up by the Neocons.
I don't think Groucho would be in favor of Marxism since it's pro-censorship.
Read the full quote dude.
Why do you sound like a buttmad Christian? You don't know anything maaaaan!!! Yea really?
The idea that every differences in outcomes between groups in a society are caused exclusively by social factors and injustices rather than ethnical, cultural or biological factors.
The focus of the marxist critique shifts from the economy to culture. From the economic substratum to the superstructure.
The opressor-opressed conflict is rediscovered in all forms of culture.
Lol hahahahahahaha
Nigga you know you are writing on a capitalist website watching ads for products on a capitalist inspired infrastructure and network using a capitalist spawned equipment words memes and technology right?
>But as far as actually providing for their citizens they are a failure. That's why the countries with the highest standards of living socialize everything except luxury goods, i.e. the nordic model.
The US is capitalist... Even if there are some socialized institutions. You're trying to shift the goalposts away from communism. We're not talking about some socialized institutions, we're talking about communism. We're not talking about the nordic model. We're talking about the jewish model.
Communism is shit. Show me an example of a successful communist country.
A cringey buzzterm used exclusively by pseudointellectuals
Jow Forums is based on a modified version of the Futaba script. It only exists because of open sourcing of code.
Open source only exists in capitalist countries
Communism is literally just socialism taken to its logical conclusion you fucking dipshit. Karl Marx himself said many times that abolishing capitalism is a slow process. So yes communism is a society that has achieved total equality by slowly abolishing capitalism and socializing things. It's not an overnight process. You're not owning anyone by pointing out that [insert country] isn't full on communist, all you have to do is look at the fact they are more socialist than you and their citizens are doing better.
Just assert that your beliefs are not based on a false version of reality. We believe you, it's working.
Fucking kek at this bullshit “wealth concentrated in the hands of the few cuz capitalism” meme. You’re telling me Stalin and his cronies (inb4 NOT REAL COMMUNISM REEEEEE) weren’t living high on the hog while everybody else suffered? Or Kim Jong Un? How about when they opened that McDonald’s (a fucking McDonald’s) that only high-level apparatchiks were allowed to eat at?
Every society has a wealthy few and a vast poor. Only through capitalism can wealth stratify such that, yes, there are fat cats at the top, but ordinary people can do things like own houses and shit. Fuck off you fat wannabe revolutionary fuck
>total equality
Impossible goal used to justify your own malicious resentment.
Ok, I accept your concession that there is no such thing as a successful communist country.
This is a great reason to avoid risking the future of your society on communism. Case closed.
As far as your brainlet speculation goes:...
>all you have to do is look at the fact they are more socialist than you and their citizens are doing better.
Have you noticed that the rich donate more money to charity than the destitute?
Wow, so to achieve communism, we just have to kill the poor.
imaginary threat conservatives use to trigger each other and make them vote against their own economic interests
This image is more powerful than Uncle Sam to most nu-Americans
Dosen't exist.Marxism was always pro open borders,feminism,gay rights etc..
>Cultural marxism is the belief that equality of outcome is the desired and ideal state of humankind.
>All inequality ( = all differences) are explained as result of opression and evil. >Any and all individuals, groups, cultures currently at the top of any hierarchy are explained as having got there through opression and plunder. These are seen as enemies of the goal of equality of outcome as they naturally tend to form and climb hierarcies.
>The following must be removed from existence: achivement, pride, group cohesion. However, they may be temporarily employed as tools in the pursuit of the ultimate goal.
>Cultural Marxsims postulates that inner strength in individuals and inner pride in families and nations are it's two greatest enemies and must be destroyed first.
This.
Lol no trump supporter identifies as fascist and I’ve never read any fascist theory so fascism doesn’t exist
Communism is ridiculous because people actually pay other to take on responsibility and risk because the vast majority of people prefer a life where they don’t have to bother with tough decisions and their consequences
People would rather just clock in clock out watch sportsball and sips instead of worrying about collective ownership
If you personally want power and responsibility then get a business or law degree and join a bank. Don’t lobby for idiots who just want peaceful lives to join some collective ownership nonsense
You mean Trotskyists?
Well no most people with basic understanding of communism, socialism, etc, don't consider the soviet union to be communist. I dunno where you got Kim Jong Un from. North Korea claims to be a democratic people's republic so their claim is they are closer to the US. As far as inequality goes I guarantee you the soviet union had less of it than modern day US and the people at the top controlled less of the total wealth.
Can you name a single succesful capitalist country?
USA
the fact that postmodernism, cultural marxism (same thing) puts weight on the issue of most european high culture being made by and for white men, that its a problem, alone makes it a subversive and downright anti-European and white ideology and philosophy
What do you define as success? What makes the USA succesful?
marxism is not the same as egalitarianism, cultural marxism is a word ecelebs made up because they wanted an excuse to sperg out at feminists talking about video games
>Explain why capitalism is ridiculous.
I have food in my stomach.
>most people with basic understanding
Aaaaaaaaaand I stopped reading here
General indicators are wealth, power, freedom, opportunity, quality of life. These kinds of things.
>it wasn't real communism
You could at least try to avoid it.
Correlation is not causation my commie friend. You're not fooling anyone.
For all we know living standards in the US could be high DESPITE increased socialization and redistribution.
For all we know whatever socialization is happening could be in fact stopping living standards from rising even higher.
The fact that two things are happening at the same time doesn't mean one is the cause of the other. If you want us to believe that you will have to illustrate how that happens.