The difference between how boys are trusted about rape more than women are believed about it shows that society is...

Well, difference is this little thing called evidence and several priests admitting it, and sadly thinking it was no big deal as they were abused as boys by their own priests.

Whattaboutism

Because they don't conveniently appear during elections, nominations, and other opportune moments

Attached: THIS.gif (400x286, 1.18M)

You're making it sound like it happened to Ford. It didn't.

literally half of those accusations were complete bullshit

People trust boys more when they make sex abuse accusations because it's extremely embarrassing and emasculating for them so to admit it is difficult. Nobody really thinks "oh it's so pathetic that girl/women couldn't defend herself" but that is often what people think when boys are raped.

this

Attached: checktrump.jpg (700x512, 84K)

Every woman on earth has had a man touch her shoulder or something in an attempt to woo her. The problem here is anyone giving a shit that it happens, because it's very common practice. Unless a man's body part enters a woman's hole, it's not sexual assault or rape.

there is literally no advantage for a man to admit being raped by clergy

kids getting the shit fucked out of them by clergymen and tortured = HE ALMOST GRABBED A BOOB MAYBE SOMEWHERE SOMETIME

The boys weren't trying to stall a nomination for time so that democrats could potentially get more seats in congress so that they can block all republican nominations until there is a democrat president.

Police records of reports after the fact. I'm sure you're just a faggot who gets his info and opinions from movies mostly so how does Spotlight start again?

I'd be suspicious if it came out right as a priest was being appointed as pope or cardinal.

Also kids not telling about an authority godly person is different than a woman not telling anyone about a drunk touchy guy at a party.

Because the boys
-DO remember where is happened
-DO remember how they got there
-DO remember who brought them there

-have at least 1 witness or document confirming they where present at the a time and place they say they where present.

-They are 51 year men who sound like 51 year old men - not trying to sound like 15 year old cute boys.

They didn't have a political motive and didn't have to gain anything.

...

One group of accusers claim that the Catholic Church has a homosexual priest problem.
The other group of accusers claim that straight, white men have a rape problem.
One of these groups has legitimate concerns about the being believed in the current year. Hint: it's not the white 1%'ers with lawyers referred to them by Senators.

illegal thought detected

They were asked why they waited so long though.

Thats a good point, why did they wait so long?

Pretty sure that's the very first thing he gets asked, actually.

Attached: 1509359562854.png (499x322, 28K)

What is the difference between these two cases?
If you are talking about the recent case in Pennsylvania it wasn't just boys first of all. Girls and boys were victims. One of the girl victims was raped and forced to get an abortion. Wake up from your false reality in which girls don't get believed for rape and boys do.
Second of all, the church not only knew it was going on they documented every bit of it. They literally collected the evidence that these people were doing what they were doing. Some of the priests even admitted it themselves to the Church. Ford and Kavanaugh's situation is completely lacking in evidence. The tiniest form of corroboration that mainstream news outlets could scrape together is maybe one or two people who didn't have anything to do with the alleged event but would say Kavanaugh liked to get drunk. Everyone else reached for corroboration says he couldn't, didn't, and wouldn't have done this. This is almost completely a case of "he said she said".

Are you saying that Ford was diddled by a priest when she was a little boy?

>In the Greensburg diocese, a priest impregnated a 17-year-old, forged a pastor's signature on a marriage certificate and divorced the girl months later. According to the grand jury, the priest was allowed to stay in ministry by finding a "benevolent bishop."

>In Harrisburg, a priest abused five sisters from the same family and collected samples of their urine, pubic hair and menstrual blood.

>Also in Harrisburg, a priest raped a 7-year-old girl who was in the hospital after her tonsils were removed, according to the report.

>In Pittsburgh, church officials said that a 15-year-old boy "pursued" and "literally seduced" a priest. A church report later acknowledged that the priest had admitted to "sado-masochistic" activities with several boys.

>In the Allentown diocese, a priest admitted sexually molesting a boy and pleaded for help, according to documents, but was left in ministry for several more years.

>In Scranton, a priest who later served prison time for abusing children was found to have been HIV-positive for years.

Fuck you for trying to turn that case into "muh gender wars fuck da patriarchy".

>be liberal
>hate Catholics
>want to bash sex scandal but know you'll have to mention that it's because of fags
>...ummmm t-t-t-they were pedos! Gays are good people in my book!