Why is sex the center of so many sitcom plots?

It was bad enough in Friends, but New Girl and other modern shows seem to make sex a disproportionately important focus. Is the a conscious effort by network executives to push pre-marital sex?

Attached: cum.jpg (650x861, 36K)

Other urls found in this thread:

100777.com/nwo/barbarians
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because muh dick.

I think it's just because attractive girls talking about sex and getting into sexual situations is an easy way to get ratings.

sitcoms are porn for women

People focused on sex aren't thinking about bigger questions.

satan

99 percent of people are hedonistic losers

So you feed on basic animal instincts
Sex sells
etc etc

>WOULD

Attached: 1538131680548.jpg (390x285, 24K)

Most of the world has pre marital sex, you want them to pander to some sexually frustrated demographic that won’t even watch their show?

These shite shows are for teenagers and plebs and sexualising the show is an easy way to get attention

Do you know anything about marketing?

"REDIRECTING THE PURPOSE OF SEX - SEX WITHOUT
REPRODUCTION AND REPRODUCTION WITHOUT SEX
Well, from population control, the natural next step then was sex. He said sex must be separated from reproduction. Sex is too pleasurable, and the urges are too strong, to expect people to give it up. Chemicals in food and in the water supply to reduce the sex drive are not practical. The strategy then would be not to diminish sex activity, but to increase sex activity, but in such a way that people won't be having babies."

"SEX AND VIOLENCE INCULCATED THROUGH ENTERTAINMENT
Entertainment. Movies would gradually be made more explicit as regards sex and language. After all, sex and rough language are real and why pretend that they are not? There would be pornographic movies in the theaters and on television. VCR's were not around at that time, but he had indicated that these cassettes would be available, and video cassette players would be available for use in the home and pornographic movies would be available for use on these as well as in the neighborhood theater and on your television. He said something like: "you'll see people in the movies doing everything you can think of." He went on to say that all of this is intended to bring sex out in the open. That was another comment that was made several times- the term "sex out in the open." Violence would be made more graphic. This was intended to desensitize people to violence. There might need to be a time when people would witness real violence and be a part of it. Later on it will become clear where this is headed. So there would be more realistic violence in entertainment which would make it easier for people to adjust.

People's attitudes toward death would change. People would not be so fearful of it but more accepting of it, and they would not be so aghast at the sight of dead people or injured people. We don't need to have a genteel population paralyzed by what they might see. People would just learn to say, well I don't want that to happen to me. This was the first statement suggesting that the plan includes numerous human casualties which the survivors would see. This particular aspect of the presentation came back in my memory very sharply a few years later when a movie about the Lone Ranger came out and I took my very young son to see it and early in the movie were some very violent scenes. One of the victims was shot in the forehead and there was sort of a splat where the bullet entered his forehead and blood and I remember regretting that I took my son and feeling anger toward the doctor who spoke. Not that he made the movie, but he agreed to be part of this movement, and I was repelled by the movie and it brought back this aspect of his presentation very sharply in my memory. As regards music, he made a rather straightforward statement like: Music will get worse. In 1969 Rock music was getting more and more unpleasant. It was interesting just his words-the way he expressed it " it would get worse" acknowledging that it was already bad. Lyrics would become more openly sexual.

No new sugary romantic music would be publicized like that which had been written before that time. All of the old music would be brought back on certain radio stations and records for older people to hear, and older folks would have sort of their own radio stations to hear and for younger people, their music as it got worse and worse would be on their stations. He seemed to indicate that one group would not hear the other group's music. Older folks would just refuse to hear the junk that was offered to young people, and the young people would accept the junk because it identified them as their generation and helped them feel distinct from the older generation. I remember at the time thinking that would not last very long because even young kids wouldn't like the junk when they got a chance to hear the older music that was prettier they would gravitate toward it. Unfortunately I was wrong about that, when the kids get through their teens and into their 20's some of them improve their taste in music, but unfortunately he was right. They get used to this junk and that's all they want. A lot of them can't stand really pretty music. He went on to say that the music would carry a message to the young and nobody would even know the message was there they would just think it was loud music. At the time I didn't understand quite what he meant by that, but in retrospect I think we know now what the messages are in the music for the young.

Yeah, social media and this.

Yeah, the shows are for indoctrinating teenagers, but you already knew that, you insufferable kike.

It's relatable. Sex in some form is a part of most people's lives, meaning it reaches the most people. Making a sitcom where the focus is fixing programming bugs wouldn't be successful on the level a sex centric sitcom would be.

And again he was right. This aspect was sort of summarized with the notion that entertainment would be a tool to influence young people. It won't change the older people, they are already set in their ways, but the changes would all be aimed at the young who are in their formative years and the older generation would be passing. Not only could you not change them but they are relatively unimportant anyhow. Once they live out their lives and are gone the younger generation being formed are the ones that would be important for the future in the 21st century. He also indicated all the old movies would be brought back again and I remember on hearing that through my mind ran quickly the memory of a number of old movies. I wondered if they would be included, the ones that I thought I would like to see again. Along with bringing back old music and movies for older people there were other privileges that would also be accorded older folks: free transportation, breaks on purchases, discounts, tax discounts, - a number of privileges just because they were older. This was stated to be sort of a reward for the generation which had grown up through the depression and had survived the rigors of World War II. They had deserved it and they were going to be rewarded with all these goodies, and the bringing back of the good old music and the good old movies was going to help ease them through their final years in comfort. Then the presentation began to get rather grim, because once that generation passed, and that would be in the late 80's and early 90's where we are now, most of that group would be gone and then gradually things would tighten up and the tightening up would be accelerated. The old movies and old songs would be withdrawn, the gentler entertainment would be withdrawn."

new order of barbarians text had the answer as it always do for almost anything. people here will try to guess stuff and find some answer that fits, but its not the right one
100777.com/nwo/barbarians

No one has time to read all that shit..

Are you autistic? Who do you think you are to command so much attention?

It desensitizes and destroys the psyxhology of sex just making it about stimulants and not a divine holy ritual and procedure.

Porn is like dulling your senses or overloading on sugar, your brain is desensitized and overindulged.

Attached: 1538282801102.png (657x527, 45K)

No, people think it's a major, if not the most important activity in life because of this propaganda.

Television is atheist indoctrination.

Do you think you aren’t being indoctrinated by pol, To unreservedly hate jews? Or am I a shill?

People that watch those shows have been raised by pleb parents and aren’t clever to begin with

>No one has time to read all that shit..

5 posts is "all that shit"?

Trying to imagine you trying to read the books the school told you to read

It's the same with sex and food in a way. Get people to eat not for health but for pleasure. Then they will not only eat more yet also eat junk food without proper nutrition.

Pol is open about its biases. You pretend to be an Anglo when you're a kike.

Porn destroys your neurons.

>Why is sex the center of so many (any entartainment or art form since the Sumerians)?
Even Shakespeare writes about people getting cucked. Think about that. Humans are animals. Sex is overrated. We need to abandon it as a way of breeding and reach for the stars.

Attached: la_creatura_urbana.png (1017x689, 806K)

Because sex is how you control the population

You think even 1 person has read all that shite? You are a nobody, be realistic and keep it brief

Such shit people skills, you must be boring

Sitcoms joking about getting fucked. Then actresses complain when they get fucked. #MooToo.

Psychologicao manipulation is how you control people, rewards, punishment, control

>It's the same with sex and food in a way. Get people to eat not for health but for pleasure. Then they will not only eat more yet also eat junk food without proper nutrition.


Actually new order of barbarians text has something about it like it always do

He then went on to talk about nutrition and exercise sort of in the same framework. People would not have to .. people would have to eat right and exercise right to live as long as before. Most won't. This in the connection of nutrition, there was no specific statement that I can recall as to particular nutrients that would be either inadequate or in excess. In retrospect, I tend to think he meant high salt diets and high fat diets would predispose toward high blood pressure and premature arteriosclerotic heart disease. And that if people who were too dumb or too lazy to exercise as they should then their dietary .. their circulating fats go up and predispose to disease. And he said something about diet information - about proper diet - would be widely available, but most people, particularly stupid people, who had no right to continue living anyway, they would ignore the advice and just go on and eat what was convenient and tasted good. There were some other unpleasant things said about food. I just can't recall what they were. But I do remember of .. having reflections about wanting to plant a garden in the backyard to get around whatever these contaminated foods would be. I regret I don't remember the details .. the rest of this .. about nutrition and hazardous nutrition. With regard to Exercise

. He went on to say that more people would be exercising more, especially running, because everybody can run. You don't need any special equipment or place. You can run wherever you are. As he put it. "people will be running all over the place." And in this vein, he pointed out how supply produces demand. And this was in reference to athletic clothing and equipment. As this would be made more widely available and glamorized, particularly as regards running shoes, this would stimulate people to develop an interest in running and .. as part of a whole sort of public propaganda campaign. People would be encouraged then to buy the attractive sports equipment and to get into exercise. Again .. well in connection with nutrition he also mentioned that public eating places would rapidly increase. That .. this had a connection with the family too. As more and more people eat out, eating at home would become less important. People would be less dependent on their kitchens at home. And then this also connected to convenience foods being made widely available - things like you could pop into the microwave. Whole meals would be available pre-fixed. And of course. we've now seen this ... and some pretty good ones. But this whole different approach to eating out and to .. previously prepared meals being eaten in the home was predicted at that time to be brought about - convenience foods. The convenience foods would be part of the hazards. Anybody who was lazy enough to want the convenience foods rather than fixing his own also had better be energetic enough to exercise. Because if he was too lazy to exercise and too lazy to fix his own food, then he didn't deserve to live very long. This was all presented as sort of a moral judgement about people and what they should do with their energies. People who are smart, who would learn about nutrition, and who are disciplined enough to eat right and exercise right are better people - and the kind you want to live longer.

Very good point
sex and violence has been in our theatres and shows for a very long time

>Why is sex the center of so many sitcom plots?
Who nose?

Attached: electric jew 2.jpg (388x400, 28K)

Also people who cant notice hiw sugar affects their brain or porn are retarded.

My friend, I have an uncircumcised penis

You wouldn’t make the gentile test

Because women really wish they could have sex as carelessly and freely as these cunts they see on TV --- but they would basically have to BTFO themselves in doing so.

Circumcision is the same as molestation, all circumcized people are like raped kids.

it's peak Kali Yuga
yes, easy to commercialize.

I think it is a conscious effort. They make it so that promiscuous characters are the "coolest ones" and as examples on "how to live the best life".

You’re gay if you don’t like that

You know, I have given it a lot of thought. Too much thought.

I have realized its best not to care, worry, or think about why women do certain things or watch certain things, or talk about certain things. It is best not do think about it because it literally makes no sense, and/or the answers you uncover will disgust you.

Most people do things without thinking about doing them at all. Hmm, why am I watching new girl? The answer is because chicks like it. If you are a man watching it, chances are you are watching it to impress some hog.

Why do they like it? Probably because they are lazy over-fucked slobs and the show deals with relatable themes such as worthlessness, nervous behaviors, depression, angst, loss, and thinking all of these problems will be cured by a steady stream of sub-par cock (they wont). They like it because it saying what they want to hear: "See, there are people who suck, JUST LIKE YOU, it is ok to be miserable, it isn't your fault and never will be... change is hard, so don't do that! just keep spreading your legs... don't lose weight, don't stop drinking, don't improve yourself... the secret to a happy life is glib and hedonism." That sounds good, because it is easy. And if it sounds good people like to hear it.

See? problem solved. Does the answer help? No, because seeing a problem doesn't necessarily help you to solve it. And, some problems are better left unseen.

She was hot when she sucked.

>would boof/10

because sex sell you fucking moron, are we really having this conversation right now? jesus fucking christ

Shows like the girlfriend experience are experimenting with featuring extended sequences of unsimulated explicit felatio. There's another series about sex workers that I forget the name of but it had explicit unsimulated female masturbation.

Shits gonna ramp up like you wouldn't believe

It’s a barbaric thing you’d expect in an African country

If I pull my foreskin back to piss, there is way too much pressure to stop me pissing on the underside of the lifted up lid, I genuinely don’t know how Americans piss

Its Absolutely cultish and stoneage ritualistic practice, mutililation rephrased and cleaner.

>he's unconfortable with sex

Attached: women-laughing11.jpg (2533x1908, 3M)

>people have to be smart and put in effort to be healthy
>but we're gonna make them stupid and too depressed to care
>still it's THEIR CHOICE
based elites as always

Atheist kikes are far worse than orthodox

>divine holy ritual and procedure

Fucking KEK, this is honestly the most pathetic thing I’ve ever heard. You feeling euphoric today?

Attached: 375486CE-D014-431B-A0E7-CC49D23327AB.jpg (640x535, 96K)

this is what happens when slaves are allowed
genitals by God that they did not earn.

the next world is going to be hell for these types.

Attached: images.jpg (194x259, 8K)

You're right Apu user.

lol im married and occasionally let my wife pick the movie we watch
she inevitably picks out a romcom every time
and every single time we only get to the middle of the movie at latest before she starts apologizing profusely for picking such a bad movie
I wonder if this is the same as me feeling really guilty after jerking off
This has eventually led to me having supreme domain over movie night

Hear, hear

Because sitcoms are made by Jews and Jews are perverts.

Attached: blob merchant.gif (540x540, 330K)

(((television)))

Don't listen to that little faggot
I read all of it, it's what we're here to do (some of us.) That brainlet is here for the pictures.

Anyway, just another sign of the times. It proves your point.

>why so much sex on media?
To normalize weird sexual behavior.

Lets talk about sex was about heterosexual partners in bed, as of now talking about sex is more of made up genders, transexualims, slut culture, female empowerment (pushing agendas).

It's the carrot on a stick but to what hidden purposes ask (((them)))

Because its all women think about

because for normie NPCs sex the most important thing there is

It is LITERALLY a Liberal's greatest goal in life. Why do you think all of their causes focus sex? Transexuality, homosexuality, abortion, pornography, "free love" - they just want unrestrained sex again and again and again and again.