Abortion should be legal!

>abortion should be legal!
>charge those who kill the unborn!

So which is it? Is it a life or is it not?

Attached: unborn.png (505x900, 365K)

it's only murder if someone else does it

it's a life but it's not a person, if you kill my pet you still have to pay damages

>saying the mother isn't someone else to the baby
Pro-choicers are literally the most retarded people I argue with

Pro-life is the only choice

pol btfo

>it's a life not a person
When does it become a "person" then retard

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 76K)

upon birth imbecile

if a dog died as a result of a car accident they would be no additional criminal charges
nice try though

I'm pretty sure that in countries like yours I'd be able to sue for psychological damage done by death of dog.

If women and niggers count as people then unborn babies should count.

it's a human life if the mom wants it and a soulless clump of cells if not

How can this nigga even see the road lmao

Attached: E7936A52-BFCB-497C-9540-BD5342B45A02.jpg (303x303, 86K)

let's say baby is expected to be born in one week
The doctors cut the mother open, remove the baby and slice it in half with a knife
is this murder?

>The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology by Keith L Moore et al:

Human development begins at fertilization when a male gamete or sperm unites with a female gamete or oocyte to produce a single cell, a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.

>premature baby born at 6 months is a person
>almost fertile baby in the womb at 9 months is not a person
brainlet

pretty sure that's still not a criminal charge

it's a person because it's human
it has human dna and it is alive
from the time of conception
>science

dunno, but the death of his wife should be a real eye opener

no, it's a civil suit
a criminal charge might land you a couple months community service
a civil suit will cost you solicitor fees aplus your house, car, savings account.

>your house, car, savings account
my what?

caesarean section is still considered birth
unique individual != person, animals are also individually unique yet not people
I see, pic related

Attached: serveimage.jpg (483x450, 58K)

I always thought about how weird it is that we will give more severe punishments for murders/manslaughters of pregnant women, yet allow abortion to be legal at the same point. I think the line should be drawn at viability. When the sperm and ovum meet you get a zygote, the first cell. It then multiplies to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 and so on until you start getting specialized cells designated to be muscle, bone, and brains cells. The mass of cells is indeed another individual organism. I can't show any remorse for a literal mass of cells. You can terminate pregnancy at that point via a pill which I think is fine. Our gametes are human yet we show no remorse for the death of sperm. People go on about "muh beating heart" I mean even worms and ants have hearts yet we don't think twice about squishing those to death. What really matters here is if the Constitution grants rights to the unborn, or even newborns and todlers. If not then you could legally murder the baby right before birth. If that's the case then Congress really ought to pass an amendment clarifying that rights apply to the unborn at the point of viability: potential to be born. They should do this for the same reason criminals are punished more harshly for murdering pregnant women. A fetus is a life whether anyone wants to accept that or not. What annoys me most about the abortion argument is the "my body my choice", because a fetus is unequivocally a different body than the mother. Genetically it's 50% mother and 50% father because of how meiosis works. It doesn't stop being you because it left your vagina.

its whatever they want whenever they want.
Everything else is 'oppression'.

No surprise he crashed desu, to all intents and purposes he's legally blind behind the wheel

Attached: 1517203017191.gif (300x300, 192K)

>egg
the fucking thing needs to be fertilised you stupid porn addicted faggot. You must be baiting

you are retarded
an egg is a stage in chicken development
a nut is stage in tree development
while harvesting silk is a stage in making a dress it is not a dress - red herring
but a worm is a stage in moth development
and a zygote, is a stage in human development
just like
a fetus
a baby
a child
an adolescent
an adult
all just stages of human development
all humans

and it's still not chicken until it gets out of shell, your point?

So a baby that is half a month due isn't a person yet?

So this is what Czech education looks like...

When it graduates.

and? sperm is also stage of human development, are you going to sue for murder of millions every time i fap?

but hey I don't really care, illegalize abortion all you want, for every single white person you save you get 10 minorities, your choice

So say I slug a pregnant lady in her belly and cause her to miscarriage. Will I get charged for murder, or just assault?

Abortion of whites should be murder. Abortion of non-whites should be a duty.

>caesarean section is still considered birth
ok, they cut the baby in half before removing it. is that better?
or maybe they reach their arm all the way up her pussy and snap its neck

depending on country, left to me you'd pay for mental and physical damage which, with enough dose of pretending, will fuck you over more than a murder would

not murder but rape

I can understand wanting rights for zygotes, but in order to use a stage model for human development, you need reproduction in there. You can't have a zygote without ovum and sperm, which you can't have without sexually functional people. It's a cycle. Those are all stages in human development, you can't cut any of those out. I hope you understand how we can't punish the death of sperm. Which is the same reason I hope you understand why we can't have rights at the opisthokont stage. I suggest the line at viability because it could survive if you were to separate it from the mother.

exactly
if you co-owned a car or a house with a woman, and she decided to burn it down because she didn't want it, she'd go to jail.
she didn't make that baby on her own, she certainly doesn't have the right to terminate without the father's permission
>for this argument only, i'll say except for cases of rape

>heavily pregnant
what is it?

I'm conflicted. On one hand, I hate the flawed logic behind "my body my choice". What about the child's body. Do they not get a choice? On the other hand, if Roe v Wade is overturned, more niggers.

sperm is not a stage of human development
it contains 1/2 the necessary components for creating life
you must be 18 to post on this board

Like far along in your pregnancy, I guess.

>ovcourse

Attached: 6502908.gif (460x270, 764K)

see same applies to an ovum

If the "darkening" of America is your main concern, part of the problem is white people don't have nearly as much children as Latinos and blacks. Even if abortion remained legal whites will still become a smaller percentage of the overall population, it's just inevitable unless you call for genocide

He took 3 chinks out at once, cunt should be given a medal.

Gamete is a stage in human development because zygotes don't just appear out of thin air. You're talking about the cycle of life with different stages. You can't cut out gamete it's still a stage because you can't have a zygote without gametes.

>brat ass

sperms do appear out of thin air? noice

No, they come from sexually mature males.

i would probably say the law should grant rights to a human baby at the scientific moment its capable of surviving outside of the womb naturally.

i think thats probably fairest to everyone and i would also mean that we could consider hyper premature , deformed or medically incapable of survival babies non human and put them down if they cannot develop the ability to survive outside of a hospital.

being mature male is part of human development, without them you can't have sperm, without sperm you can't have your precious zygotes, you can't say that female gamete(egg) is a part of human development while cutting male gamete (sperm) out

Eugenics. Think about all of the would-be mulattos and quadroons that are and will be aborted in the coming years by white girls. Statistically, aren't blacks still getting the more anortions than whites currently?

a gamete is a part of human reproduction
it is NOT a stage in human development
>read a booh
hell, GOOGLE it

*book

Sperm have a lifespan of 1 week within the testes. This means they'll die whether you fap or not. Same goes for women, the egg has a lifespan of 1 month with which they get disposed of during menstruation. Which means, in a normal sense, the death of a sperm or an ovum is a natural thing regardless of what we do.

The question then is, when does the creation of a person's life begins? Many argue at the conception where the sperm and the ovum meets, where they develop into a zygote, then into a fetus. This is the process where the mother nor the father have no hands on. In a sense, it's where nature starts to take the wheel.

Is it moral to kill the life after the conception begins? At that point it's no longer an ordinary cell. Many regard this as a sacred process whichbis controversial to put a stop to

So if I hit a 9 months pregnant lady in the stomach just as she goes into labour, killing the baby as a result, it's not murder?

>whichbis

*Which is

Are gametes not human? One could argue ovum don't simply become fertilized, but zygotes don't just become a fetus. There are external processes like responding to the external stimuli such as the hormones from the mother. It's all a process that extends from something other than just the organism. You could say these responses to stimuli are inherent in the development process, however the stimuli that begins puberty at the start of adolescents and thereafter are completely internal, whereas in utero they are external. So evidently, human development is more than just the individual.

as I said before, read the thread, it depends on country and best way would be to count damages in millions instead of murder, you just destroyed an expensive pet/part of someone's body

I never cut out any male or female sex cells, said gametes if you read the thread. Before a zygote you have gametes, and before you have sexually capable people.
See here

Women have no consistency in their logic.
Primarily because they have the minds of children, and their character and mental development stops somewhere around the age of 16.
>Abortion isn't murder because it inconveniences me
>Punishment for killing a pregnant woman should include punishment for the murder of the unborn children

To see a woman's hamster spin is an amazing thing.

People die on average in 76 years, so in a normal sense there is nothing we can do.

checked
it's not fertilized until it's fertilized. easy enough for you? herbs in the field

Poor fag detected

Whenever they choose it most beneficial to them. Women have the magical ability to create children or a bloody mess on a whim.