There are people on this board who defend this privileged rapist

>there are people on this board who defend this privileged rapist
Jow Forums died in 2016

Attached: kava.jpg (950x534, 258K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1Rmv1PmL6q0
hooktube.com/watch?v=1Rmv1PmL6q0
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>EU memeflag

Attached: 1514429912798.jpg (480x472, 181K)

If some lying liberal cunt lied about you and said you raped her, what would you do?

Can't wait for the salt mine to get blasted open when get gets confirmed.

>Rape is wrong
No it's not you degenerate faggot

Do you know the difference between credible and not credible?

Twitter dies in 2019. It is a propaganda weapon funded by the DNC. This is why money seems unnecessary to it and it believes it should answer to no one. Kiss it goodbye.

Jokes on you, Dems will win the midterms.

he's not just any rapist

most rapists do it once and get caught, never do it again

this sick fuck gets black out drunk on alcohol literally every single day and organized gang rapes for decades

There are people on this board who defend a system of injustice that forces a rape victim to be raped in soul again, to relive her trauma, to confront her rapist, to beg and grovel before a jury for the justice that is due to her by right. We should believe women: the burden of proof should be upon the men, who should be presumed guilty. There is no need for a trial, that mockery of justice that forces victims to relive their rape: men need to shut up, step aside, and believe women in order to restore justice. Anything else is pure injustice towards the oppressed.

kill yourself shill rat

Own it. Nothing wrong with rape.

like Juanita Broaddrick credible?

Attached: mike_nope.gif (500x248, 1006K)

Because he isn't a rapist

eat broken glass

slandering a judge who will be a supreme court judge soon.
I wonder how that will pan out

>privliged
>be labeled a rapist by the establishment and therefore the NPC public, even though the one "credible" accusation has no supporting evidence whatsoever

pick one or the other

But you are also a rapist.

As if there's anything wrong with that

he wouldn’t be the swing vote, he could go 1000x right and no decions would change

>what is nuance
Nobody said all women should be believed without question, you goddamn shrimp brain. If you saw the hearing, and know all the facts about the case, there is no way to find her not credible except being autistic retard. But then again, that's what you probably are so

>nuance
>Jow Forums
lel

Attached: lyingpaidshill.jpg (1200x800, 140K)

>credible
Has proof it happened
>not credible
Does not have proof it happened

Careful now, those concepts are too complex for some people.

youtube.com/watch?v=1Rmv1PmL6q0
hooktube.com/watch?v=1Rmv1PmL6q0

Attached: we_drank_beer.png (571x599, 433K)

Only your penis and your privilege keep you from realizing that women don't lie about the trauma they suffer. If you trusted women, you would know that: instead, your mistrust leads you to misogyny and oppression and rape. You are already raping by refusing to believe women.

>credible

You mean you found credible the woman who is laughing and smiling until the moment when somebody ask something about the incident and she immediately starts crying with no tears?
And repeat this several times?

it's her fault she didn't record the incident in HD, am I right?

Different things add weight to credibility. Like the fact that she spoke about it in 2012 to her therapist. Then her conduct during the hearing. Then the fact that she was brave enough(not meming, if you think it's a piece of cake to go out with a story like this, in front of the whole world, and answer the questions of most influential people and FBI) to put herself in the spotlight, you're a goddamn fool who probably never left his mom's basement. Then people who know her describe her as trustworthy.

Are you really this retarded?

I sometimes smile when I'm nervous, it's a defense mechanism. Her testimony was as credible as it gets.

Ford
>no evidence
Ramirez
>no evidence
Swetnick
>no evidence
New anonymous accuser
>no evidence

I do not have problem with smiling I have problem with the fake crying.

hey, you, yeah you. Your're a violent rapist. That's all the proof I need to destroy your reputation.

why you so mad brah?

There are people on this board who dont want to crush their enemies. See them driven before them and to hear the lamentations of their women

Attached: image.jpg (300x338, 95K)

>Belive her because you should
Eveyone she named says it didnt happed and there are hole in her story you can run a rape train through.

He only proof is a 2012 therapy session that doesn't match her story she told to Congress. Thats not proof.

OP raped me, I don't remember when, or where, or have any witnesses that could corroborate it, but i swear it happened. Why is this rapist allowed to post here?

#Believespics

Well, that's just like your opinion man.
You say it's fake crying, I most certainly don't think it's fake. The way she spoke and behaved is very much consistent with person being authentic.

okay, next time there's a politician elected that you don't like, just ask your mum to falsely accuse him. It's that simple, right? :)

kek

Yes, you are absolutely right.
That is my opinion, because I do not have any evidence that she faked that cry. It just seemed so.

Like you do not have any evidence that she is authentic.

>The way she spoke and behaved is very much consistent with person being authentic.
Movies must blow you away eveytime you see them.

lol fuck of braintard.

the left in europe are next. fuck you deceivers and liars. scum of the earth.

Attached: bloomer.png (1024x1024, 1M)

I told my therapist in 2002 that N2nPZjLC repeatedly gang raped me, also

You smiled when you gang raped me. Were you nervous?

>Jow Forums isn't pro-rape
>Jow Forums hasn't always been pro-rape
nigger you have no idea
fuck off

There are indicators of authenticity. If we could speak in person, it's would be much easier to come to the conclusion. Well, if you were a reasonable person, which I doubt you are.

Someone accused him of rape. She could not say where it happened. She could not say when it happened. The few witnesses she named refuted her story. Arguments being publicly made by people that the burden of proof rests on the accused.....

Frunny havnt seen one shred of evidence about him being a rapist, plenty of faggots screaming it but not surprisingly one shred of evidence or even a date or location...

Are you willing to go out in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee and talk about that?

Jow Forums and the other communities are taken over by russian trolls using american IP addresses. its gross.

Just like the democrats right ?

Nice try OP Gaychad. Memeflag dead-give-away.

Attached: 1538281881796.jpg (1000x998, 217K)

No. But you and your Jew goddess Merkel will soon before 2030.

Attached: 18923287_jpg-r_640_600-b_1_D6D6D6-f_jpg-q_x-xxyxx.jpg (600x400, 26K)

The thing that you stated that I am not a reasonable person based on five sentences clearly shows that you can't decide who is credible and who is not.

You raped me

Attached: pp,550x550.jpg (550x469, 42K)

This angers the Milano.

If you watched the hearing and think that her testimony was not credible, I think it's fair to conclude that you are not a reasonable person.

You are devoid of any critical thinking abilities.

I watched the hearing, the whole thing.
For me that woman was not credible.

Please list the indicators which proves that your view is accurate and mine is not.

look you dumb niggers it was 35-6 years ago, my SO was raped 5 years ago and I can't remember the month, day, etc... who the fuck would remember those details? Now it was 2013 and she had a rape kit done at 2am in the morning and we talked with the cops until 7am so there are some records I can dig up. absolutely NOTHING happened to the rapist. I know its hard for Jow Forums to believe, but even with a woman going to the hospital and having doctors probe at her for 4 hours, the guy gets to roam free raping as many women as he wants.

Next time SO was sexually assaulted, she didnt want to report it because of the above, NOTHING happened to the accused, so why the fuck would she go through the stress of reporting again? as the SO, it makes me hate men my age 22-28, they haven't been through jack shit, they are all just fantasizing some false rape accusation is going to stem from a misunderstanding because they are awkward as fuck virgin fags. Guess what virgins? no one is going to falsely accuse you of sexual assault unless you are sexually assaulting them. This guy forcibly made my girl suck his cock. she only got away by convincing him to have a threesome with me...he ran when he saw me, these guys have no fucking empathy they know what they are doing is wrong. if you have a heart, and you don't think women are objects, you will never be falsely accused. Stop spreading lies you god damn coons.

I hope your entire family is brutally raped and murdered in front of you.

Attached: 51D1C0E7CDF940F29D3CEF348EE29C4F.gif (200x150, 1.53M)

why the fuck are people bumping this shitty thread

One of them is answering at last.

People here will defend rape if it's a republican that did it. You can't even hate democrats and the shit republicans without being called a (((centrist)))

Guve me 2 jew lawyers and a million dollars and I'd send you to jail.

>same shit different memeflag

My question is do we report this as off topic, trolling, or spamming?

You fucking cuck, why did you not kill him?

You're right, there's retards that actually respond to your shit bait.
Saged

wow, a crazy person said something crazy to her therapist? that must mean it's true!

Except he didn't tho.

Also, epic nigger-worshipping "centrist" President you got.

Nah your girl was a hoe and got turned on by a REAL man, face it you got KEKED.

You expect me to write 50 clues, both from her and Brett, which point to the fact that she is credible and that he isn't, just to maybe change the opinion of a random user from Hungary?

Instead, I have a request for you. If it's so simple, ask your mum to accuse a very powerful politican of something similiar. Let's see how that goes.

wat

So jew lawyers are better than non-jew ones?

nah man, nothing happened to him because you got cucked by your whore gf, not because she got raped, rape is the scapegoat of whores

Juanita Broderick was credible. There were people there tending to her injuries within an hour. Hotel records, phone records, etc. But why am I even replying to a shill. Something something goes in all fields.

So true. The irony of /pol defending a Chad degenerate rapist is hilarious.

>Like the fact that she spoke about it in 2012 to her therapist
Except she described an entirely different incident and mentioned no names in order to get a doctors note for anxiety after her husband tried to get her to stop acting as an illegal landlady. Nobody who actually knew them corroborates her story and numerous people have conflicting accounts. She's already made a million dollars for a day of lying through her teeth in court and potentially tanked the career of a political opponent.

Meanwhile there are character witnesses lining up around the block to defend Kavanaugh, most of them women.

another Jow Forums virgin fantasy that is hard to grasp. some people have jobs and houses and dogs and lives that they do not want to destroy by the persuit of revenge.

not really, guess what will make your argument invalid? I have been in an open relationship with her from the start, shes allowed to fuck whoever she wants, and so am I. I wouldn't be able to stay with her throughout the sexual assault if not, the hate I have for guys my age has made me go on a cheater hunting spree. can't really get cheated on if I get turned on by it, can I faggot?

Usually

Why is your woman hanging out with so many """rapists""" while you're not around.

it's actually impossible for such a degenerate whore to be raped

I'm not farmiliar with her case, maybe she indeed is credible. What does that have to do with anything?
If one rapist got away, the other shoud too? Is that it?

The entire premise of why she went to a therapist in the first place is based on an early provable lie, so is her "fear of flying." The only part of her testimony I find true is that she probably has been raped by some jungle monkey on one her many vacations to a tropical beach.

Attached: 1538400561657.jpg (600x3240, 284K)

They're more intelligent? Are you a Jew supremacist?

"rape culture isn't real"

>I have been in an open relationship with her from the start, shes allowed to fuck whoever she wants, and so am I.

So you both are whores, wow congrats.

people like you should be put into gas chambers

No your balls aren't real. Or maybe they are and she keeps them in a jar to remind her self she doesn't have a boyfriend, she has a bitch.

Degenerate whore? And why is that?

so funny that must be a troll
>dude doesn understand he was cucked and that's why his wife never wanted to push the accusation

You will die in 2019

rape literally isn't real sorry m8

you retards love getting baited by these nose posts huh.

Attached: 545354635698.jpg (762x1024, 62K)

In your land I hear it's called "Culture Acceptance"

Attached: image-1147610-860_poster_16x9-uird-1147610.jpg (860x484, 54K)

Reported for threat.

Attached: 1505796028724.png (1221x717, 133K)

>Only your penis
>Penis

Something Democrats lack.

I unironically cannot wait for the european caliphate. It can't come soon enough.

Does this website completely lack critical thinking skills? Or are you just an incel/russian troll?

>USA = supposedly a "free" country

>if you try to act like you have freedom = labeled "whore", deserve to be raped/assaulted

how are these two things true to Jow Forums members? lol you guys aren't republican, right-wing, or anything like that, you're straight up russian trolls, or completely black-pilled incels.