The second American civil war

Could it happen? Will it?

Attached: imgonline-com-ua-twotoone-qF6tGy97uAo2z~2.jpg (2901x2282, 353K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth-generation_warfare
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Nope. Not gonna happen. Economy is too good and Trump has too much support. The silent majority isn't gonna put up with this mainstream shit.

It will, but not anytime soon. There's not a single successful multinational state in the world. Eventually, the nations fight each other and split off. That's our future.

I sure hope so

Attached: 1491867144804.png (894x977, 509K)

Civil war or balkanization will happen, it's just a matter of how soon. Despite what the idiots posting above me say, it could happen any time or twenty years from now.

Spanish civil war had a precursor of intense civil violence that lasted decades before the actual game kicked-off. It would be like the 1970's continued until today but the 1970s were significantly more violent and there had been a number of mini civil-wars already.

this

It'll happen next time there's a SERIOUS and SUSTAINED economic crash. (ie. once the pharmaceuticals stop flowing and theres a problem getting food on the table). Until then the normies will slumber.

>Not gonna happen. Economy is too good

Attached: bb3b8bdd101a19d72c8a67e16a73c3881df81bdfr1-380-349v2_00.jpg (380x349, 25K)

No and No

This

A better correlation would be the collapse of Yugoslavia.

Attached: 1523155162234.jpg (400x400, 57K)

he's right though

we are nearing 0% employment and the stock market is the best in history

Naa. Just like out for tell-tail signs like the left sending ricin to republicans or fedX losing 300firearms or deep state trying to start with with Russia.
We fine

unemployment*

No, anyone who thinks otherwise is retarded. The military would instantly crush any rebellion and the rebels (whether they are left or right wing) would be universally denounced as terrorists. A civil war would require a complete economic collapse, and would have multiple factions based on many different groups, not your brainlet "liberal/conservative" spectrum

Yep. People don't go to war when they have food and jobs. Another economic collapse could put us in a pretty dangerous place though, considering the levels of rhetoric going on these days.

Someone post the old screencap of the guy that did red wargaming for a potential civil war so this user can read it

You can have a booming economy and everyone well fed and still have a civil war. There are very few civil wars throughout history based on the lack of food. When people run out of food that means the END of the civil war. The main causes are greed, a group feels oppressed, or a group tries to take power. All three of these things are present now. Don't fall for the *there won't be a civil war until we're out of food* meme.

Nevermind I found it. Worth reading, user. The military aren't robots. If ordered to fire on US citizens, many would desert.

Attached: 1441738978085.png (1802x905, 203K)

No, you're wrong. Green, oppression, and power seeking have been going on for decades. People don't fight if it isn't less dangerous than the alternative. Bread and circuses isn't a meme. As long as the TVs are on and wonderbread is cheap, no one in middle america is going to do much other that vote for trump. Which I guess is a kind of civil war in its own right, really.

>That primary
are you sure you're not a raging homosexual user

I really fucking doubt it. I think the sensible option would be to make the left realize that they should stop with the anti-white propaganda, enact stricter immigration laws and fucking chill the fuck out instead of screaming over every little perceived injustice. A civil war would have devastating consequences for our future as a nation to be honest. The damage and weakness of the state would be exploited by the chinks. If we lose our grip on the world, it'll be hard to recover it.

Beyond that, the whole ethnostate shit is retarded. Dumbasses need to get outside more. There are in fact good hispanics and good blacks out there. I honestly suspect that the whole theory about turning the races against one another is true. For example, the kike that runs blacked.com must've known that such a racist anti-white website would only incense hatred against blacks amongst whites, unless he's just a retard. There's no way they don't expect any backlash when they hate on "white males" in Hollywood. There's only so much shit a group can take before they chimp out.

>implying

Attached: 0C85CDDB-6497-4469-9C18-04806D470152.gif (326x281, 171K)

>The damage and weakness of the state would be exploited by the chinks.
The Chinese economy depends on the US consumer market to an extreme degree, any collapse in the US economy, such as one that would occur during a civil conflict, would likely do more damage to them in the long term than us. They were hit harder than the 2008 crash than we were. We got back on our feet after 6 months or so. They still haven't recovered, and you can see that in the fact that their government is becoming more and more authoritarian & paranoid.

>There are in fact good hispanics and good blacks out there.
Absolutely. Problem is averages. I'm gonna ask you a question, you don't have to answer it, but I want you to think about it honestly: Is there a majority non-white country that you would be happy to live in? Not visit, mind you. Not go for a weekend to check out their pretty beaches. Live in, work in, pay taxes in, raise children in.

A defense of good governance necessitates a defense of the conditions that make good governance possible. That means a high-iq, high trust, and relatively homogeneous population. Japan certainly makes the cut, so this isn't exclusively a white phenomenon. But no country in south america, Africa, or the middle east does. Additionally, there is not a single successful multinational country in the world. America won't be an exception.

read a book nigger

Attached: 1200px-Roman_Empire_Trajan_117AD[1].png (1200x729, 431K)

Seems like you should, seeing as I said in the world, not in history. Regardless, the roman empire collapsed because of multinationalism, so I wouldn't exactly use them as a shining example of it.

it's already happening just one side isn't shooting back
look at all the democrat terrorism over the last few years from street riots to assassination attempts

The roman empire is probably the worst example you could have chosen seeing that it did in fact collapse into tribal warfare.

Its like some sort of information war

Attached: 6C416452-D0B7-497D-9348-6B6A713DA9BB.jpg (860x484, 69K)

Exactly. Maybe it's the 4th generation equivalent of civil war.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth-generation_warfare

>hating on FN

Attached: loadout.png (1300x2253, 2.81M)

But today that part of the story has been totally erased by the establishment liberals and the Left, because it would recognize that the military take over lead by Franco was justified (even if to a certain degree), the average Joe here has no idea about what lead to the nationalist take over. They intentionally portray the Spanish Republic as an outsanding democratic society lead by a socialist government against whomst one day the fascists decided to coup because "they are evil fashzitsgzs who hate good people who always are univocally socialist or Leftist". Let's forget about the Revolution of Asturias that lead to almost 2000 people killed and 30,000 injured, the constant political assasinations (99% of the victims right-wing), the intense political clashes that happened in the streets and ended in bloodsheds, the rebellion of Catalonia by Companys, etc.

Attached: 1536430994876.jpg (1024x588, 51K)

based

>Not repping that waffen ss look
It's like you want to look gay

>Muh shekels
We still have a complete moral and ethnic collapse going on.

Attached: DY0oBrRXcAAuMSu.jpg (639x459, 31K)

Frogman mini-14? Not bad

Already did. The Revolution was a civil war against England

Already in it.

But its more of a revolution than a "war"