So, let me get this straight.
This man tried to group a girl by the breasts 36 years ago. And now they have a hearing in the Senate about this incident, which may or may not actually happened?
Is this really such an important issue?
So, let me get this straight.
This man tried to group a girl by the breasts 36 years ago. And now they have a hearing in the Senate about this incident, which may or may not actually happened?
Is this really such an important issue?
Other urls found in this thread:
townhall.com
google.com
twitter.com
Democrats will do and say anything to maintain power.
It's because of the position he's going to take and the fact that he's not in the Clinton's little black book of blackmail
No, you got it all wrong
Democrats are grasping for straws to deny the nomination of a supreme court justice because they don't want trump to accomplish anything.
Actual legitimate reasons are tangential to the primary goal of FUCK DRUMPF. IF they have to lie to do it, then they'll fucking lie.
They don't have any power other than the power of tears and anger.
Check em.
Kek wills it.
That wasn't a girl 36 years ago. She was soo ugly back then. He should press rape charges against her.
he didn't even grope her breasts, he pulled on her clothing. she has ptsd now.
you're alright, leaf.
If hes going to be on the supreme court then yes its important. One of the most important jobs on the planet and you need impeccable character. In the age of #metoo you cant have someone who has potentially sexually assaulted women and then lied under oath about it
That would be grope, not group, you retard. But you are right.
Those digits.
I wonder why, in the age of #metoo, nobody goes and tries to dig up any of the bill clinton rape stories?
Ohhh #metoo is just a tool to attack conservatives? I get it
also it seems literally no proof
its just a randoma accusation anyone could have made
but bill clinton, hes a good boy, he didnt do nuthin
fuck maybe he didnt
but he did
Damn
Clarence Thomas has been on the Court for decades...
Yeah so Bill is guilty because of accusations but Kavanaugh isn’t? Right....
>Is this really such an important issue?
No, and never was.
Can't read, what is that ?
Somebody, possibly him, may have tried to group a girl by the breasts 36 years ago. And now they have a hearing in the Senate, and FBI investigations about this incident, and how many beers he drank, which may or may not actually happened?
>make a comment about a hair on a soda can looking like a pubic hair
>make a joke about a male porn star having a big dick
>be accused of sexual assault
It gets better.
>When I was 15 years old, I passed out at a party after being fed all sorts of alcoholic concoctions by older boys I knew and idolized, but who in hindsight were eager to get me drunk.
>The only people I would have trusted with this information were my parents, but to tell them would involve explaining why I was at a party drinking rather than at a sleepover I had been given permission to attend. I would have been grounded for eternity.
>I told no one.
>I don’t know what month it was. I don’t know whose house it was. I remember one of my two best friends being there but she doesn’t remember it, and why would she? It was just some random party as far as she knew at the time.
>The answer is simple: While I knew something terrible had happened, I didn’t think I had been sexually assaulted. In the early 1980s, we didn’t possess the vocabulary to make such declarations. I thought I had done something stupid and paid a price for it.
She repeats the same story dozen times over, but you get how "credible" it all is.
1 hes a constitutional orientalist there worst nightmare
2 has rules ar15 in common use so therefore protected (can you imagine dem states having too reverse there gun laws)
3roe v wade might be overturned no more baby sacrifices too molech for them
4 and most important if you saw the hearings
traitors are enemy combatants who get no rights under the constitution
there scared as fuck and rightfully so
letter from Monica McLean
I was hoping they'd bring out the "gonna put blacks back in chains" message.
It worked on Roy Moore so I guess Americans are more concerned about rape (by today's standards) even if it happened almost 4 decades ago. Also don't forget he's a raging alcoholic. The political cartoons of him after he's confirmed are going to be great.
Except try to prosecute him in the hearings.
The republicans brought in Rachel Mitchell while the Dems just coddled her interrupting the whole thing.
If the Democrats really wanted him off the bench, they would have brought in their own investigator or cooperated with the Republicans to actually find a charge to bring against him.
>may have
This incident clearly didn’t happen
fuck forgot to turn my meme flag off
Did you read the last line or did you have a stroke? There is actually evidence in the case of bill Clinton. Not a lot, but it’s more than literally nothing as in Fords case.
and what does it say?
Bill aint going to be on the supreme court
Welcome to american politics. Where random-ass smear campaigns gain traction out of nowhere because it plays right into one of the 2 parties' interests.
He was the president, you realize
welcome to feminized america
we now live in the fantasy of a 13 year old girl
I've been warning about the collective sense of a 13 year old girl's fantasy since the very start of the me too movement
sorry, actually, it was written by her boyfriend. the important bit is about Monica McLean though. townhall.com
You're right he was just president of the United States and his wife who attacked his accusers almost won our last election. No need to investigate though.
Incorrect. He was a frat boy type in high school that went to a bunch of parties, eventually saw the bigger picture, turned his life around and became a fair and respectable judge for 30 years, preferring a centrist approach with adamant regard for court precedent.
Now, only after he was nominated by Trump for the Supreme Court, did some fucking nutjob CLAIM that he MAY have groped her in high school during one of the parties, despite Brett having no idea who she was, and providing absolutely no proof, no dates, no exact details, and a completely contradictory testimony.
This is all because the Democrats have abused the Supreme Court to pass their bullshit for 8 years, and having a rigid constitutionalist would absolutely fuck over their future plans.
This isn't about believing women, rape, or even Roe V. Wade, it's a power struggle in the senate, and the Dems are openly committing sedition.
>This man tried to group a girl by the breasts 36 years ago.
Allegedly
The real issue is if he perjured himself in the process.
...
no, don't even pretend like he did anything like that to begin with. Brett is a good guy getting his name dragged through the mud. Democrats literally pick Ned Flanders to go after. Even Matt Damon the Harvey Weinstein rapist apologist tried to go after Brett. The writing is on the wall.
Yeah, dems may be going for perjury
It's here
HE TRIED BOOFING HER YOU CIS SHITLORD
Just look in to his history against the Clintons and you'll find why Soros is spending so much money to discredit him
This
>If the Democrats really wanted him off the bench, they would have brought in their own investigator or cooperated with the Republicans to actually find a charge to bring against him.
The retards thought they had it in the bag, they never expected him to hold out this long against their smear campaign.
Democrats aren't known for their sound policies or logic, they run their politics on hate and emotion. Hence, why they had to make a circus out of the nomination.
Too bad it blow up in their face and it will cost them in the midterms. Hopefully, even the house.
>Is this really such an important issue?
Excuse me? Are you like a misogynist or something?
>t
He is a whiny blubbering fag. If some woman accused me of rape I certainly would not blubber all over a senate hearing like a big fag. If that has what happened to the right wing then they are queers. What innocent man cries like a baby at accusations? I would punch him in the kisser just for being such a wuss.
People repeat the Nicaean Creed over and over because it’s also an article of faith with no tangible evidence.
you'd figure the Presidency was more important and should have even higher standards
>flag mind your own business Putin and fuck off
Wait a minute. I thought she alleged she was raped. What exactly does she allege happened?
>comparing a 30 year old rape case to the Nicaean Creed
Now why would you go and do something like that?
>no tangible evidence.
That's where the Nicaean Creed and Ford accusations differ. Ford had her chance to prove herself. See
drumpf done
All leafs should fuck off and die they are worse than cancer
Dry humping and groping.
she alleged:
>that he locked her in a room with himself and Judge
>that he got on top of her in bed
>that he grinded his genitals against her
>that he covered her mouth with his hand
>that he laughed
Did you know that 3 out of the 9 justices are Jewish?
Did you know you are a fag
3x combo
Noice
that she was pushed and groped. No penetration. It's all bullshit and the statute of limitation expires after 1 year.
Yes Ivan, in this clown world we are grilling an innocent man for the accusations made by a woman who slept with 50+ men, when instead we should put known influential pedophiles and Bill Clinton on trial.
>woman who slept with 50+ men
Link?
nah but the GOP has to pretend to care otherwise they look like real men, er I mean, bad goys
no they aren't.
They lead no committees.
They have no blocking authority.
They can vote. And most will already vote no because party. And some are red state dems on Nov. ballots.
He will be confirmed. It would be hilarious if they managed to set a punishment precedent for congressional testimony perjury. I'd love to see folks like Holder, Clapper, Hill, Comey, oh yeah and Hillary be brought up on charges for demonstrable lying to Senate committees. You know, in actual investigations and not confirmation hearings...
Look at her roast face man, she has the thousand cock stare and all. She has been used up through and through.
everyone is a potential sexual assaulter
and you're potentially a pedo
>impeccable character
Hahahah like the 3 jews on supreme court
Ford is a liar. Rape escape door my ass
Allegedly, with 0 corroborative evidence..... Bu..but guys her feelings are hurt...
best part is the dems coddling her probably made her more relaxed and able to more easily fall for perjury traps, the dems may have inadvertently killed her with kindness
She also committed perjury when she claimed that she'd had no knowledge of and never coached anyone on how to take a polygraph
>In the age of a random hashtag started by the pic related (which no one would rape for a billion dollars), you should automatically believe a rape accusation without proof
Could you imagine being much of a faggot?
What is this, ants being accused of perjury?
Thank you.
case is closed already.
>Dr. Ford was unfaithful while living in Hawaii
how did he find out? it was before mobile phones? perhaps there is a video-tape?
Bump
Dunno user. A bunch of possibilities - confession, mutual friends etc.
It is an important issue when half of the government and 100% of the media thinks it's important.
Democrats will do anything in their power to stop this guy because he will simply follow the constitution and rule everything in favor of what is written in the constitution.
If Kavanaugh gets to be a supreme judge, the first and the second amendment are going to apply for the next 40 years.
The democrats really are mad because they will not be able to silence republicans or take away their guns if this guy gets in.
Let's be real guys, a little booby grabbing at 16 is not even that bad, 16 year old boys fighting each other is by far worse, yet nobody's losing their jobs or getting their lives ruined because they had a fight in school.
and let's be real, if every person who ever grabbed someone else sexually without the other person's consent (not talking about rape or harassment, just a little grabby time) were exposed and their lives were ruined and never allowed to have a job again, lots of women would become unemployed. women are even more ruthless and entitled when taking what they want
>Is this really such an important issue?
no even if the caricaturized account is even true he literally did nothing wrong
Witnessed praise kek