Christine Ford BTFO her own lawyers

youtu.be/-gKa8ZIwE7g?t=2036
33:55
Where were you when Christine Blasey Ford not only learned they her lawyers had fucked her, but simultaneously fucked her lawyers at the same time.

Was it on purpose? Did she in that split moment realize how bad they fucked her, how they've paraded her, and took the initiative to clarify that she was not told that they would come out to meet her in California?

Attached: kava4.png (525x693, 221K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reuters.com/article/us-usa-campaign-court-romney/analysis-a-romney-pick-for-top-u-s-court-frontrunners-emerge-idUSBRE83I18U20120419
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>told a therapist in 2012 a few months before the 2012 general election
>kavanaugh was seen as the leading nominee for SCOTUS under a romney administration
but lets ignore that

What was going on in 2012, literally dumber than dog shit OP?

Didn't she research self hypnosis shortly before talking to the therapist

>occupy democrats
>taking the image seriously
lurk more

Attached: kava5.png (502x657, 148K)

>You can be accused of murder with no evidence
They really are a special kind of retarded.

Correct

Attached: kava3.png (528x459, 47K)

Kavanaugh's name wasn't mentioned to therapist in 2012. He could have been added in later.

Kavanaugh was supposedly mentioned to the husband, but it was at the same time he was announced on Romney's short list for SCJ.

How did Kav commit perjury? He just said that he didn't get blackout drunk as a teen. That's a very specific question. He even said that they occasionally had too much to drink. Where is the lie here? The guy that just came out with his story on kava drinking habits never said that Kav blacked out

>No one is seeking to convict Kavanaugh of a crime
So why not? They're absolutely fine with a 'rapist' walking free and 'getting away with it' as long as he doesn't hold this one specific job? What makes that allegation disqualify him for this job that doesn't disqualify him for his existing one?
Don't even get me started on polygraphs, also
>Doesn't name her attacker
>Vaguely says he could be on the supreme court
>Kav was top republican speculative pick for SC in 2012
>HMMMMMMMMMMMMM

And the factual word we have on that is... that both Ford and her husband agree that she definitely must have said it in 2012 sometime, yup.

Attached: fantasy.png (1218x1304, 169K)

those little black and yellow memes the dems make crack me up every time

theyre like fucking boomers trying to speak the language of 14 year olds

Hey quick question. Um didnt we make this hole thing up?

Lol no. Carry your own weight. I'm a free man.

>Just take this weight jeez, I know I described it as unbearable, meaning that you can't actually take the weight, but just do it anyway, it'll make a woman happy for 5 seconds until she finds something else to bitch about.
And this is why women should stay in the fucking kitchen.

Attached: Boof.png (627x558, 410K)

No would rape that thing.

Is this bitch going to be btfo of not?!
Rolling

no, he was mentioned 1 month before she went to see her therapist
04/19/12 reuters.com/article/us-usa-campaign-court-romney/analysis-a-romney-pick-for-top-u-s-court-frontrunners-emerge-idUSBRE83I18U20120419
05/01/12 Ford sees therapist about quibbles over second front door & claims to mention Kavanaugh

>that both Ford and her husband agree that she definitely must have said it in 2012 sometime, yup.
Ford's husband never made a sworn statement. You are trusting her word on her husband's word.

Both have been proven liars because they were lying about the purpose of the second front door. Plus she denied helping out her FBI friend on passing a polygraph.

Why is that therapist line repeated so much?
First of all there is no proof of this occurring, secondly even in her version she claim to have told the therapist that she got raped. Not by a specific person.

In fact, the only evidence for this is her husband's recollection, It likely isn't included in the therapist notes, which is why those are being withheld.

>how he absolutely lost his shit as soon as the question was asked
Pretty telling.

>Previous accusations are evidence
What is easier to fake? "He raped me! Fire him" (or even just "he made a comment 15 years ago... fire him") or "He killed someone!"
1. Polygraph tests are bullshit
2. Witnesses can be in the favor of the accused or the accuser
3. The FBI doesn't have a time machine, 36 years ago at an undisclosed location, time and date won't uncover anything
4. We don't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but if you are going to accuse someone you need evidence.
5. If it is not criminal then lets not get the FBI involved :)
This, she named him and about 4 other people that could have raped her. I am not even saying she didn't get raped, but she has no evidence.

Attached: rape clinton accusers.jpg (960x960, 248K)

>I think you're guilty, therefore if you say you are innocent you must be lying and are therefore guilty of perjury
What the fuck kind of backwards circular logic is this?

...

It's more likely that she was talking to her therapist about a "sexual assault" that happened around 2012, rather than something that happened 28 years ago.