Should harems be legalized to boost the white birthrate?

Should harems be legalized to boost the white birthrate?

>One vote per head of household
>Women relegated to housework
>Alpha males produce swaths of children with superior genetics

Attached: 551ed3090c25e.jpg (750x541, 74K)

Doable only if you remove taxation.

Because if childless betas can't reproduce sure as hell they will not want to finance other peoples children

This

>when you see it

Attached: 1525772741347.png (320x320, 90K)

nice thought experiment/larp but there arent though woman for that, or you get a middle eastern style shithole were the rich get all the pussy and the poor turn to a gang of rape monkeys.
eather way, harems only work right after great wars or other types of high male mortality.
sexbots are a more realistic solution.

Unless these harems are based specifically on inteligence; the polygamy will lead to whites breading for strength rather than intelligence. It's why the Scandinavians were such brutes 1000 years ago; and the blacks still act brutish (as many have only been civilized for between 5 - 2 centuries; depending on how far into the interior they are/ their ancestors).

The great thing about monogomy is it encourages women to chose their men based on their success and ability to assist in child rearing in the future. Also, as a side note, it would be dangerous as many males would suffer from these lack of females. Granted, we don't know how the betas of today would react but historically this leads to a lot of violence and in some cases the killing of the alpha and all of his "stolen children".

Attached: PolygamyExample.jpg (700x393, 39K)

The star of david?

Sorry, didn't finish up my thought on the 2nd paragraph. This breeding for success and availability in the future causes women to seek men who are rich, well-established, and (historically speaking) not in the military or any other dangerous job (of course more physical jobs tend to coincide well with early deaths; so i'm sure you can see the genetic tradeoff here between intelligence and strength). As an example, take a look at the barely 18 whores who ride the dick of some 50-Y/O millionaire divorcee. 1000 years ago, that guy would be some brazen and honored soldier in some european army.

Civilization was literally founded on the idea that every man who contributed to society would get some pussy and kids to raise (their own biological ones). You undermine this, and you're asking for collapse.

Even with automation, none of what we have today can last for long without the hard work of men. You remove their incentive to work hard, and they will check out of society in far greater numbers than what we're seeing now. And that's the best case scenario. Worst case: they riot.

History is full of angry disparaged men chimping out. You don't want to go through a chimp out when it's done by white men (even if they're incel betas).

Muslim nation's have legalized polygamy and they're basically shitholes. It will only produce envy in men who lack mates of their own, inspiring them to do any number of horrid things just to get laid. Anyone who shills for anything than a strictly enforced monogamy can promptly hang themselves from a tree, because nothing else will promote an even slightly stable society where men aren't going at each other's throats like savages

Can confirm.

*nations. Posting from a phone fucking sucks.

Waifu bots will solve everything

My man right here!

Attached: 1531390491120m.jpg (804x1024, 156K)

Polygamy also exist in western nations, it's called having a mistress or divorce. Also there's lot of beta who gave up on getting laid. Polygamy and whorehouse would cause no problem.

Pretty much this, women are men's inspiration to participate in society and increase their status, children are their inspiration to build for the future. Eroding this institution is why things are terrible at the moment.

I will promote monogamy politically, but at an individual level I'm going to fuck as many whores as possible, because that is the society we live in right now.

Have you even heard of STDs? That on its own BTFOs sexual promiscuity, even with safety nets.

The main reason harems aren't allowed in The West is because then all the male goyim without women would refuse to work. When robots take over this won't be a problem and harems will become a thing again.

probably

rich guys already basically have harems, they just started not to have kids. pleasure is more important and kids would be an annoying side product

This is why men start wars

But polygamy can allow for the existence of far more women in the society. If a man has 5 wives, he can easily produce 20 children within a generation (15-25 years), and with a 50% probability of having daughters, that means 1 man would likely produce 10 daughters - twice the number of females that he takes as wives. In this scenario, not every man could take 5 wives since (assuming 50% male/female probability) each man would produce 10 other men who would require 5 women each equalling 50 - 5x the available amount, meaning only the top 20% of men could have this many wives.

This could be mitigated by allowing less than 20% of males the privilege of having this many wives. You could scale it depending on some kind of rank: bottom 50% get 1 wife, higher 20% get 2, next 20% get 3, next 9% get 4, top 1% get up to 10. Or, to make it far less complicated, allow only an elite 1% the opportunity for up to 10 wives and everyone else gets 1.

Then you may have to worry about overpopulation after 4 or 5 generations, but it would probably (depending on population size) take only 5 or 6 generations for the 1% to replace the other 99% genetically. But then there may be less than optimal genetic diversity and it cpuld foster a culture in which men dont really look after their kids much because they have too many, causing the children to suffer from lack of masculine influence. That could be mitigated by having a military state.

No. They should exist, but not be legal, that way only real alpha males can have them.

The whole point of harems is to make women so scarce that beta + omega shlubs can't get them.

Or you could make it a lot more tame; allow the top 10% to have 2 wives, the top 5% to have 3, and the top 1% to have 4.

If we could boost the birthrate, though, and normalize age gaps in relationships, you even remove the woman shortage. If men are expected to marry women 5 years younger, then with a population growing 1% per year, you'll have 5% more women in the younger cohort than in the age-equal cohort. This is actually how a lot of societies work even today.

I was just thinking the same its ridiculous to conceptualize every lammee raising 20 children from twenty wives but a more modernized ratio could allow the men to provide fatherly upbringings to their children wont being misguided by conventional Jewish tactics

Do you mean to say a 5 year age gap is considered abnormal by today's standards?

I was suggesting 20 children from 5 wives over a 15-25 year period. Unless you werent referencing my post.