Should harems be legalized to boost the white birthrate?
>One vote per head of household
>Women relegated to housework
>Alpha males produce swaths of children with superior genetics
Should harems be legalized to boost the white birthrate?
>One vote per head of household
>Women relegated to housework
>Alpha males produce swaths of children with superior genetics
Doable only if you remove taxation.
Because if childless betas can't reproduce sure as hell they will not want to finance other peoples children
This
>when you see it
nice thought experiment/larp but there arent though woman for that, or you get a middle eastern style shithole were the rich get all the pussy and the poor turn to a gang of rape monkeys.
eather way, harems only work right after great wars or other types of high male mortality.
sexbots are a more realistic solution.
Unless these harems are based specifically on inteligence; the polygamy will lead to whites breading for strength rather than intelligence. It's why the Scandinavians were such brutes 1000 years ago; and the blacks still act brutish (as many have only been civilized for between 5 - 2 centuries; depending on how far into the interior they are/ their ancestors).
The great thing about monogomy is it encourages women to chose their men based on their success and ability to assist in child rearing in the future. Also, as a side note, it would be dangerous as many males would suffer from these lack of females. Granted, we don't know how the betas of today would react but historically this leads to a lot of violence and in some cases the killing of the alpha and all of his "stolen children".
The star of david?
Sorry, didn't finish up my thought on the 2nd paragraph. This breeding for success and availability in the future causes women to seek men who are rich, well-established, and (historically speaking) not in the military or any other dangerous job (of course more physical jobs tend to coincide well with early deaths; so i'm sure you can see the genetic tradeoff here between intelligence and strength). As an example, take a look at the barely 18 whores who ride the dick of some 50-Y/O millionaire divorcee. 1000 years ago, that guy would be some brazen and honored soldier in some european army.
Civilization was literally founded on the idea that every man who contributed to society would get some pussy and kids to raise (their own biological ones). You undermine this, and you're asking for collapse.
Even with automation, none of what we have today can last for long without the hard work of men. You remove their incentive to work hard, and they will check out of society in far greater numbers than what we're seeing now. And that's the best case scenario. Worst case: they riot.
History is full of angry disparaged men chimping out. You don't want to go through a chimp out when it's done by white men (even if they're incel betas).
Muslim nation's have legalized polygamy and they're basically shitholes. It will only produce envy in men who lack mates of their own, inspiring them to do any number of horrid things just to get laid. Anyone who shills for anything than a strictly enforced monogamy can promptly hang themselves from a tree, because nothing else will promote an even slightly stable society where men aren't going at each other's throats like savages