Jesus was a proto-socialist
"blessed are the meek [proletariat] for they shall inherit the earth [means of production]"
then he smashed up the dirty capitalists in the church (pic related).
prove me wrong you nietzchean heathens!!
Jesus was a proto-socialist
"blessed are the meek [proletariat] for they shall inherit the earth [means of production]"
then he smashed up the dirty capitalists in the church (pic related).
prove me wrong you nietzchean heathens!!
Other urls found in this thread:
webstersdictionary1828.com
citychurchdevotions.wordpress.com
twitter.com
>capitalists
*jews
Yep.
OP if you want to convince me that Jesus was against property ownership you’re gonna need citation. Nigger
capitalism is a wide church of degeneracy that welcomes people of all faiths with flexible ethics
yeah....the post ww2 massacres of jews in the USSR was part of their master plan.
does relinquishing private property sound very jewish to you??
Luke 12:13–15, Jesus is confronted with a redistribution request. A man with a grievance approaches him and demands, "Teacher, tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me." Jesus replies thusly: "Man, who appointed me a judge or an arbiter between you? Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; life does not consist in an abundance of possessions." Wow! He could have equalized the wealth between two men with a wave of his hand, but he chose to denounce envy instead.
>prove me wrong
explain to me how a monarch is a socialist.
he redistributed the fish [property of the fisherman] to all those people.
they loved him for it
Luke 10:29–37: A traveler comes upon a man at the side of a road. The man had been beaten and robbed and left half-dead. What did the traveler do? He helped the man himself, on the spot, with his own resources. He did not say, "Write a letter to the emperor" or "Go see your social worker" and walk on. If he had done that, he would more likely be known today as the "Good-for-nothing Samaritan" — if he were remembered at all.
webstersdictionary1828.com
self-sufficient are the meek you fucking moron.
>envy
i think you meant greed
Christianity has had some big disadvantages for Europeans as well as some advantages but smashing up the moneylenders tables in the Temple seemed to be more of a protection of a sacred space from people directly violating Gods law against usury than any statement against wealth creation.
>“Listen to another parable: There was a landowner who planted a vineyard. He put a wall around it, dug a winepress in it and built a watchtower. Then he rented the vineyard to some farmers and moved to another place. When the harvest time approached, he sent his servants to the tenants to collect his fruit.
>“The tenants seized his servants; they beat one, killed another, and stoned a third. Then he sent other servants to them, more than the first time, and the tenants treated them the same way. Last of all, he sent his son to them. ‘They will respect my son,’ he said.
>“But when the tenants saw the son, they said to each other, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him and take his inheritance.’ So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.
>“Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?”
>“He will bring those wretches to a wretched end,” they replied, “and he will rent the vineyard to other tenants, who will give him his share of the crop at harvest time.” (Matthew 21:33-41)
Amen
It may disappoint progressives to learn that Jesus's words and deeds repeatedly upheld such critically important, capitalist virtues as contract, profit, and private property. For example, consider his parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14–30; see one of the recommended readings below). Of several men in the story, the one who takes his money and buries it is reprimanded while the one who invests and generates the largest return is applauded and rewarded.
Though not central to the story, good lessons in supply and demand, as well as the sanctity of contract, are apparent in Jesus's parable of the workers in the vineyard (Matthew 20:1–16). A landowner offers a wage to attract workers for a day of urgent work picking grapes. Near the end of the day, he realizes he has to quickly hire more and to get them, he offers for an hour of work what he previously had offered to pay the first workers for the whole day. When one of those who worked all day complained, the landowner answered, "I am not being unfair to you, friend. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius? Take your pay and go. I want to give the one who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?"
>memeflag
>the absolute state of that post
Also, jesus wasn't white
nice ad hominem
enjoy that line... we don’t care about Europe any more Muhammad
Meek was a mistranslation.
>”19th century theologian James Strong argued in his Strong's Concordance #4239 that the Greek word praus (πραεῖς) means mild or gentle, but it is not suggesting weakness but instead the way power is handled. It is "strength under control". It is demonstrating power without undue harshness. The English language does not have a word that translates conveying both gentleness and power together.”
i know that this is a shitposting thread but let this post serve to help you shut up some disingenuous fags irl
jesus preached charity as a personal act, because willingly giving your earned wealth to another in need is virtuous ONLY because you are making the choice to do good
"socialism" as it exists in the mind of college liberals means that there is no choice on the part of the "charitable" because your wealth is taken from you by the state under threat of violence
the choice to do good is not truly present because it is made under implied duress; refusal to give charity will result in physical harm to you
do you really think jesus would preach for people to have their decision to make righteous choices taken away from them, effectively erasing their opportunity to become Good people?
>Complex politics in biblical times
>can't tell the difference between jewish tricks and actual capitalism
LOICENSE NOW!
To keep a sharp sword sheathed. To have incredible power and barely/never use it.
>James Strong
"held various local offices, and organized, built, and was the president of the Flushing railroad." i.e. was a capitalist pig with vested interests.
What sort of cognitive discordance leads chantards to think they're christians??
>Jesus was a proto-socialist
Jesus was a voluntarynist
I like how this image acknowledges that people are commanded to worship and love God by Christianity and the State by Communism.
>Quotes leviticus
>twice
this is proof you know jack shit about what you're talking about
Not really. Capitalism is the healthiest system of economics that exists
He was so upset about what he did that one time.
>Also, jesus wasn't white
you don't say
Kingdom of Yahweh = Christendom = "Communist Workers' Utopia"
Yeshua and the frauds who deified him were all Semitic shitskins. Christianity differs from Marxism only in that Christianity is theistic while Marxism is atheistic. Other than that, they are the same. Christianity is just as degenerate and dangerous as Marxism.
>there is no choice on the part of the "charitable" because your wealth is taken from you by the state
every western state enforces redistributive practises regardless of whether they are "socialist" or not. The first modern welfar policies (employment insurances, health insurances) were implemented by the bismarkian empire as a conservative endeavour to stem the flow of proto-socialistic ideas from the french revolution infecting their skilled, artisan workforce.
Franz Kafka was one of the first state bureaucrats in charge of implementing these social policies......then he wrote the metamorphosis. kek
2 timothy 2:23
Don’t have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. 24 And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful.
>meek
This word doesn't mean what you think it does.
Meekness in the christian sense (given that its a woefully inadequate translation of the concept) is strength held in check. You could steamroll everyone's dick and be a huge ass, but you don't. You will, however, steamroll everyone's dick if you are given a god-fearing reason to do so.
As I understand it, meek was somewhat of mid translation. The real meaning was about people who forfeit their arms or something like that. Either way OP is a faggot
non believers can never understand the bible or anything written in it.
>Matthew 13 13
"Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand."
to think Jesus was political in any way represents the dimwittedness of the Godless mind.
Jesus was for personnel property but when thousands needed something to eat he realised that those thousands living is more important then the fishermen getting paid they will continue to survive hell they got fish as well. Also it's a very good opportunity to get Lemmings on your side just give them free shit and they will start to like/follow you and therefore continue to grow in popularity and fame he probably did want to help those people and make sure they didn't starve but I mean it was a very useful opportunity for Jesus.
Right I'm sure that one random fucking no name simpleton was the only one to get it right, ignoring thousands of years of theological development and the fact that Christainity spread among the weak and down trodden, not the "powerful and full of restraint." See what Romans of the time had to say about the desert cult, they weren't saying "these are such strong virile warriors." They were saying "these cucks are brain washed losers"
This is pure sophistry. Spit your venom somewhere else, lunar cultist.
Keeping people out of heaven for not giving up all earthly possessions violates the NAP
This
Christainity is a parasitic lunar cult that saps the virility of strong solar people. It latches onto a spiritually fertile nation and saps it of its life, absorbing its form and casting out the now lifeless husk it created. This is why Christainity of the West has started to focus its influence on Africa and the Middle East. The host culture is dying from its touch and it's time to jump ship.
>We're actually super strong we just don't want to fight
Turn the other cheek cuck; blessed is the meek who lets the bull take his wife. He shall inherit the household.
No, the point is that people voluntarily contributed more then they took from the basket. Government redistribution of wealth is against the ten commandments, it is evil and it leads to death.
Never meant that. You're just picking up on the propaganda that Christcucks have started to spew to get the reactionary right tamed by cuckservativism. Meekness was very intentionally chosen; there's plenty of other more apprioate terms that could have been used to describe a powerful man who shows restraint that doesn't actively mean "bitch"
There was no focus on a superior will whic is required for restraint only one of a slave moratality, turn the other cheek, cuck.
>christcucks
/thread
Can’t wait until your loving Muslim friends throw their tax on you when they finally usurp your states
No, it was because they were doing it in God's house. Thats why.
Kek
Look up the word that was translated to meek. Praus, praupatheia
It means to have strength but to be controlling it. Jesus was literally talking about being a calm concealed weapon carrier. Just that weapon would be your righteousness etc.
>support cuckservitivism otherwise we'll all go communist
Christcucks are the ones who have brought the wolves in.
There is a Third Way, user.
I am a third positionist I just laugh at the pathetic innate weakness of Christians and of what they define as (((love))). Love is subjective but it’s most often use seems to be a synonym to cucking
Nietzsche + Evola > Christianity
not that Christianity should be discarded
relinquishing the property of goys to the government (85% kike) is jewish, you faggot retard
This.
>Praus
>Ancient Greeks used this word to describe a stallion that was broken and could be ridden
>citychurchdevotions.wordpress.com
>It doesn't mean meek, it really means to be a traumatized animal subservient to a Jewish tribal deity!
So what do sources other than Christcucks have to say about this word? I mean actual scholars of the ancient Greek language, not cultists with a biased interest in coming up with a favorable definition.
>the meek
The meek are the ones who control themselves and renounce the world. "Meek" means controlled in temperament. Meaning they are the ones who are truly strong. Jesus himself said that he wasn't here to bring peace, but to bring war. Namely, to destroy this world order ruled by YHWH.
Again, flimsy evidence based upon selective translating (oh it's so convenient that when talking to hardline NAZIs our semetic cult is about war). If you want to play the bad translation game, we can get into the fact that Romans had a huge influence on the majority of the what teachings and subsequent writings early Christainity was allowed to pass along.
For all intents and purposes, the term meek is the proper translation as Christianity was centered around slave morality, a complete adoration of the weak and lowly. It did not come to create and facilitate a world of virile warriors, but to bring a peaceful flock of sheep tended by their shepherd.
Even the Templars outright denied the teachings of Christ. To deny the passivity of Jesus (his ultimate act was passively accepting death), is to deny Christainity at its core
Ah understood. I thought you were arguing that to attack Christainity was to create a power vacuum
He was a jew you retard. Paul is the main reason Christianity spread outside Judea and he pretty much bullshitted everything without referring to what Jesus actually said
>meek
Meek merely means obedient and disciplined. I have not met many proletarians who meet that criteria or anyone else for that matter.
>then He smashed up the dirty capitalists
Again, wrong. He was angry that the Temple was being profaned.
Bohemianism has its origins in 19th century America, England, France, and Germany with the Romantics.
There is a lot fucking more in the Talmud where they openly talk about their hatred for Jesus.
>Even the Templars outright denied the teachings of Christ
That's sort of a bad example, they accidentally dug up redpills in the Middle East and North Africa while fishing for swag. Pretty hard to trust in Abrahamic canon when you find the Ark of the Covenant, then find a few more stashed away by the Pharaohs and realize the whole temple and ark mythology were stolen from Egypt.
>he pretty much bullshitted everything without referring to what Jesus actually said
Biblical texts even refer to his heresy coming into conflict with the teachings of the actual disciples of Yeshua in Acts of the Apostles, but of course modern Bibles completely obfuscate what the dispute between the factions involved and that all of the extant sects of Christianity are derived from the Sauline version. It's fraud all the way down to the bedrock.
Based
Protochristians lived in fucking communes, what more do you want as proof idiots
Gospels were written 200 years after
>Protochristians lived in fucking communes
The "early Church" phase of Christianity kept that communal standard and required the donation of possessions and wealth in order to join. You will note that this sort of tactic is still used today by cults such as Scientology or those entertainment industry slave harems wherein members are forced to pay for seminars and engage in pyramid scam style recruitment. Thanks to kikes like Saul, Christianity was designed from the ground up to be a subversive cult of control.
fuck off christcuck.
This is a pretty dark one. He prophetized his execution, the fall of grace of Jews and how others would inherit God's favor on their place in just 2 mins of speech..
I'm aware
the issue is the degree of severity to which your wealth is redistributed
the only people who make the argument are the same people who advocate for the state taking so much of your earnings that independent charity would be too detrimental to a family to engage in
good post though
get out commie kike with your commie kike religion.
How the fuck do you want to become a popular religion how they came to power is not the point as long as it was not an Evil method. The point is what they preach which is Good.
OY VEY, ANUGGA SHOAH
sounds extremely jewish to steal from goy while they live a lavish life style.
The old theologians knew this tho. More often than not they priests have to study Latin and Greek in order to study lecture. This is the kind of remarks my priests usually does on Sunday's mass
Then why was Europe at its strongest also Europe at its most Christian? Christianity is becoming more popular in Africa and China because they're not brainwashed into accepting gays. Christianity is declining in Europe because Europe has been brainwashed to accept Jewish multiculturalism. The declining rate of Christian observance in Europe and the accelerating rate of multiculturalism and degeneracy correspond pretty much exactly.
What other term Greek would be more fulfilling?
>how they came to power is not the point as long as it was not an Evil method. The point is what they preach which is Good.
The method used was evil, the religion itself is fiction, and the ideology is degenerate Semitic filth dolled up in Hellenistic aesthetics. It's Marxism with a Jewish god, the globalist utopia of communism with a Jew as the eternal chairman. It's a cult of treason which turns men into slaves of the Semitic race by corrupting their souls and poisoning their minds.
Any religion that cares about "becoming popular" is immediately obvious as a fraudulent scheme to establish political control.
The New Testament is written in Greek (as you know) and in Greek there are about seven terms for what we have in English as one word "love." The New Testament is never referring to romantic or sexual love.
> cares about becoming popular
Love not the world, nor the things which are in the world. If any man love the world, the charity of the Father is not in him.
>But also, go make sure everyone worships a Jew and the Jewish tribal deity
Just kill yourself, race traitor. Your lies are not welcome here.
I think Jesus was primarily focused on saving your soul, not the economy.
>"For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
Revrum Noverum
Can't disagree with anything you said user, though I admit ignorance regarding the Templars
Good goy, you should actually read the new testament and do you not think buring forever in a lake of fire if you don;t do such is not forcing you into charity?
>Blessed are those who take under threat of violence, and distribute according to political advantage. They shall receive further power and will crush under their feet all who utter anything the least bit critical against them
I forget the chapter and verse but I'm pretty sure it's in there somewhere. I think in the Gospel of Schlomo but I'm not 100% sure.
> Jewish tribal deity
Jews hate Jesus, that's pretty much the main theme of the New Testament. Have you read it? Remember the part where they demanded Jesus be killed and said "His blood be upon us and upon our children?" The New Testament is largely devoted to explaining why Jews are NO LONGER the chosen people. "But to Israel he saith: All the day long have I spread my hands to a people that believeth not, and contradicteth me." Romans 10:21.
The Christian view is this: the Jews were chosen to receive the first communications from God, which they largely ignored (see the OT prophets). God sent Jesus to try to get them back on the path, and they crucified him. Jews are now cursed, and the center of the Christian Church is in Rome, its official language Latin, after the New Testament is written in Greek. Europeans adopt it and become the most advanced civilization by following its precepts.
LISTEN UP FAGGOTS LISTEN UP FAGGOTS ALERT ALERT ALERT.
No Religion is perfect because no man is perfect. Religion is a reflection of Man's wants and desires and these wants and desires are reflected in archetypal form. It is a product of Both the singular Man and his race just as mercy is an almost insane idea to an Negro but is a common value among Aryans and religion is the embodiment of such values with Jesus being the Christian archetypal expression of mercy while Michael the Archangel being the archetypal Christian expression of War or Bravery he still has a strong element of Mercy or peacefulness to his character because this is what Christianity is based around Mercy but to say that it is a slave mentality and is against anything such as Courage or War is throwing the baby out with the bath water it is a religion built upon the minds of Aryans therefore expresses such traits that are intrinsic to the Aryan man both mercy and Courage it just so happens to have a unique focus upon mercy.
Luke 22:36 - Sell your cloak and buy a sword
>at it's most christian it was strongest
I didn't know the dark age made Europe super strong? wasn't it only after they rejected a fuck ton of the bible did they start advancing?
The dark ages were caused by the fall of the Roman Empire. The Renaissance was caused by the Church resurrecting learning and preserving the ancient Greek texts. Why do you think Oxford's colleges have names like St. John's, St. Peter's, Trinity, Jesus, Corpus Christi?
The Templars were an old S&M Punk band that hung out with the Mentors. They we're tangentially involved with the death of Kurt Kobain.
It's almost like the bible is brilliantly constructed to be a nifty "one size fits all" religion, to cast the widest net possible for the largest share of believers.
Maybe that's because it's objectively true?
Yeah but that must have devastated the local fish economy
not sure what you're shitposting about. my post was centered around the idea that "doing good" requires making a conscious choice to do so; coercion or lack of action is not "doing good" and is likewise not good for the soul
pretty sure any monotheistic religion will fundamentally agree with that
Or maybe it's because any extreme is sinful and results in mass death? The Bible is the true centrist position before the centre because Liberal, and Liberal became Commie.
Basically, the Templars stationed in Jerusalem and throughout N. Africa and the ME started archaeological work under the idea of recovering artifacts relevant to Christianity. They also came into contact with ancient sacred sites related to the Egyptian/Sumerian mystery cults. Some of them most likely received instruction from the secret societies that still held on to the ancient wisdom traditions, because the faction of Templar who went rogue very quickly became masters of the sacred architectural styles as well as the entire underlying corpus of archetypal symbology. The entire Holy Grail narrative goes back to the most ancient concept of the temple/ritual structure acting as a font of divine energy to bless the surrounding land. The Ark and the Temple of Solomon were also derived from the Egyptian implementation of this idea.
So anyway, a bunch of Templar got redpilled about pre-Abrahamic religions being correct and started to use their wealth and newly acquired skills in masonry to build lavish temples across Europe which were encoded with Christianized versions of the principles of the mystery religions of old. The Pope got pissed and sent the cucksquad after them, those that survived went underground to create the network of secret societies from which the Rosicrucians and Freemasons emerged, but most of those societies have subsequently been infiltrated by Jews and their Christian minions.
After they rejected the Bible and picked up Greek and Roman texts. Not that all of the knowledge lost to the Christian dark age has even been close to recovered. For instance, the megalithic stone circles of northern Europe are aligned magnetically so that the field of one stone is oriented to that of its neighbors. There is simply no explanation in mainstream academia for how ancient Europeans could either detect or manipulate the weak magnetic fields of the stones. Christianity is an anti-civilization manifestation.
>The method used was evil
pls tell me how it was so fucking Evil then.
>the religion itself is fiction
because you would regularly see Thor flying by your house. What the fuck did you mean by fiction. It is no more false then any other religion in that sense.
>and the ideology is degenerate Semitic filth
Luke 22:36 - Sell your cloak and buy a Sword
>It's a cult of treason which turns men into slaves of the Semitic race by corrupting their souls and poisoning their minds.
How the fuck does it poison minds yes it can be quite placid at times but to say the religion itself is based around a slave mentality is disingenuous. But it is by far better then any Pagan religion or at very very least may be on par with the like of Hinduism or Zoroastrianism.
>Any religion that cares about "becoming popular" is immediately obvious as a fraudulent scheme to establish political control.
How fucking autistic can you get your implying that a religion should exist for the sake of existing. A religion to the masses exists to enforce certain morals while to the intellectuals it exists for enlightenment.
A religion with no power is a pointless religion the whole point of a religion is to influence the world to be it's idea of perfect you cant influence shit without control.