How did she do it

Really? I'm a lawyer, mid-thirties, and I have made sure I don't have a social media profile anyone can track or knows about. It's not that hard, retard. Only retards make extensive use of social media to broadcast their every shitty thought to the world.

I'm pretty sure a PhD can delete her facebook / instagram / twitter stuff / etc etc, and ask her "friends" to do the same.
but again, it wouldn't even take lawyers. ALL of these companies have signaled their allegiance to the causes of the left. if they were even remotely briefed on what was at stake, they would fall all over themselves to purge whatever data they needed to.
and that's not even taking the glow-in-the-dark aspects of all this into account, which just make it a hopeless pursuit. her name and identity are probably manufactured which is why nothing can be found. what possible means of properly researching this do any of us have, other than search engines?
the fact that even the republicans aren't touching her pharma connections stinks to high heaven.

She stated Google hq was just up the street from her, and she rents out that bonus door to 'google interns'.

He did not deny knowing her which I presume would be one of the first things in his statements if that were the case. Logically speaking from my perspective. The no student videos or photos or testimonials is troublesome though.

Christine Blasey Ford died a while ago. That's why Amy Schumer played her during the hearing.

Attached: 1522539314113.jpg (1280x720, 202K)

Been saying that for a week now. Show me at least one other recording of her using that fragile victimized baby voice or I don't have to 'believe her'.

You can't be a professor with a shit voice like that, no fucking way.

>they both have right hands
>conspiracy confirmed!

Actually, we dug up her ratings on that professor rating website pretty much as soon as we learned she had a teaching gig.

She... was not spoken of highly. And the ratings were all from years ago, so its not like we were shitposting about her that far in advance.

exactly ive been saying this for a while, now SOMEONE a student whoever must have video of her speaking, yet there is nothing. Google ran a blanket scrub of her across the internet

I agree, that is really weird. no students, no old syllabuses, emails/correspondence, pictures of her teaching, etc.
but again, as has been insinuated elsewhere, the whole "palo alto university" thing is probably a cover and if she works in that area at all, she's really at stanford doing shit she doesn't want her name attached to.

Hey faggot, she had everything professional scrubbed, read the post.

Normal people don't pay thousands of dollars for a company to take them off the internet in a month.

Attached: Bottomless Pit.jpg (645x729, 81K)

Who are you replying to?
I get that she has admitted ties to google. We do not know how deep those are or even what kind of power they have within the org. Yet presumably the permits for her house renovations were discovered via a search engine. I have not heard one person say those are falsified. In fact they are pointed to as her lying due to the dates.

Attached: settings.jpg (360x428, 142K)

notice that her picture was scrubbed from the palo alto university website too.

does no not see how dangerous or scary it is that google can scrub her from the internet. it means they can make traces of you disappear or even news.

BIG PREDICTION
if google is not broken up or massively fined we are ALL going to be severely fucked up the ass

it'd be sweet if we had a facebook bro look up the backup of her profile. They dont actually delete things when they say they do. In a strange way that's actually pretty hard to do.

do you believe this is something your mother is capable of?

That’s not how google works. They can remove all traces of someone from their services/results but they can’t do the same for other search engines or websites.

If she actually did have everything online wiped it had to be a cia/nsa op.

lmao, I just went and checked thd site, it's blanked too now.

If I weren't being a phoneposting faggot tonight I'd go dig through the archive.

What remains online is her
academic publications

Attached: image.jpg (1181x1752, 487K)

Attached: 1537239342636.jpg (578x392, 43K)

Attached: image.jpg (970x4553, 1.36M)

you know she's playing dumb and ditzy, right?

sigh
if cia/nsa are compromised with commies what hope do we have?

LIKE WHAT THE FUCK!, MCCARTHY was wasting his time all along,
feels like a part of the movie in captain america where hydra reveals their power level
and plan for the world

there no where we get back to rule of law without some major civil war which involves a thorough purging of institutions

Because

Attached: Capture+_2018-10-03-20-22-17.png (702x729, 463K)

because an internet cleanse doesnt rely on CIA spooks changing government files. It's a real service anyone who can afford it can get. They delete everything that's user controllabe, like facebook twitter. Then they upload webpages which exploit search algorithms to guide searches for you away from the actual information. If you doing it for your business they'll even make fake reviews all over the internet, in obscure webpages. To cause more search results with good htings to say about you.

I bet they just asked her "what socia media do you use" and she just said "facebook and twitter" she didnt think about her "ratemyprofessor" page. They cant delete her government files.

SUBPOENA THE DESTROYED EVIDENCE
FILE OBSTRUCTION CHARGES

It was scrubbed prior to her name being "leaked" to the public. This shows premeditation on her part.

she has access to interns and secretaries who could have done it well enough. Who ever did it didnt bother to check their work because they missed her "ratemyprofessor" page, but then deleted it after people found it.

She was fabricated

>she had everything professionally scrubbed
[citation needed]

Attached: Christine Ford at California State University Fullerton - RateMyProfessors_com - 2018-09-19_00_37_08 (640x357, 201K)

Understood about the TLAs not being required. So you are saying the "reputation management" type services can do this in such a short period of time?

that would make sense except
no syllabus
nothing of her talking

You arabs are pretty redpilled on kikes. Wish my government bombed niggers instead of you desu

that voice is indelible in the hippocampus user because neurons and science

This conspiracy theory doesnt explain why theres no results for her name on foreign web searches. Check yandex and baidu, all you get is scientific papers written by her.

well it wasnt short was it? They had this planned in june when she wrote the letter. Hell, she's clearly a very cunning person so she might have thought to do it even before that.

oof

Well did she have foreign social media accounts? is that normal? Why would she have a social media account in foreign language that she also didnt know about?

Those sites crawl english pages no problem

a lot of professors don't have recordings of themselves online. otherwise there would be like hundreds of thousands of videos of just that (just for US). she was probably just a really shitty teacher that no one cared about for a recording.
i have absolutely no recordings of my voice online, anywhere. i'm an adult too.
im not in any yearbooks from my time at school, and i have no social media profiles. i would be the perfect patsy for anything.
im guessing DNC or one of the google interns staying with her helped her delete everything she had. it's fairly easy to do.

You can pay both those companies to scrub search history for you though, it's not expensive either. Academics typically don't have social media anyway, most don't even have a personal site just use school pages for research contacts.

Google programmers scrubbed referenced to Dr Ford on the Google search engine. Federal tech grants to Google, ABC intelligence agencies, you get the picture.

another possibility.
IMHO paulo alto rich white people are the kind of people who are very superficially liberal in their politics, but pretty conservative and "fuddy duddy" in their practices.

from doing seo and knowing google programmers myself. something like manually controlled queries (like google does with 'payday loans') would create a huge trail that would bite them in the ass. this simply didn't happen. again, the most likely scenario is DNC got her a PR firm or a google intern helped her with deleting everything.

cause she is super cyber woyman warrior

she use her l33t grrl pwr fat lewt CODING skillz to thwart you misogynist /polfags/ !!

you know It's possible that if this involved such high level people that they could have called in a favor to google, and google did everything it to defensibly do. Which I'm sure would be quite a lot.

im telling you, that would not happen. i know google manual queries and that shit would create too much of a trail they would be worried about. it's a retarded theory.
it's an ORM/PR firm that did this. i know people who are ORM's, and this is the kind of stuff they do.

So the gist of it is you can simply delete your profiles (you or someone on your behalf) and within a few months everything that we can see is gone? And in this case all that is currently visible is real property records and for some reason her published papers? Google, bing, yahoo and as mentioned foreign search engines drop everything from their caches and the only way some of this data could be re-exposed is a leak from the inside where the data surely still exists. Is that in the ballpark of where things stand?

I believe you. But havent we seen them already throw desperate hail marries at the last second, assuming they didnt have to be hide their actions because they were going to win?

If google did do something, what kind of evidence would we see? Is it something normal people could test or would it require some kind of legitimate investigation with subpoena power to do it?

yes

wouldn't even take months, could take weeks. you rename the profiles and the delete. any caches are for the wrong name.
i'm assuming like any other retarded older boomer woman, she just had a facebook.
my mom has barely any online footprint at all, mostly just a fb.
there wouldn't be a chance of it archived, because no one archives it on like archive.org.
ORM's can also do stuff like create multiple profiles for your name but use fake photos so it looks like other people (muddles up the search results).
Ford has science papers and such in her name in google, so it's not like she has NO presence at all.

SHE'S NOT REAL YOU FUCKING RETARDS, THAT'S HOW SHE DID IT. ANYTHING YOU SEE ON HER IS NEW.

SHE'S AMY SCHUMER

>wellaware1.com/ford

Attached: amychildhood.jpg (747x574, 311K)

Because it isn’t hard if you do it before people take an interest in you. Let’s use an example, his name is George. One night George is minding his own business when some nigger tries to kill him so George zimzams the flim flam and now there’s a dead nigger named Trayvon. If George and tray tray deleted a bunch of shit from their facebooks it would have been much harder to obtain information about them. We would have no images of Trayvon being a nigger. It’s all about how much spotlight is on an individual when you try and delete information

>ORM/PR
I'm looking for her yahoo profile from back in the day on archive.org
She posted in alt.surfboards or something like that about selling shit in 1998. Odds are pretty good she had a yahoo profile at the time too.
>profiles.yahoo.com/[username]
you can wildcard with * at the end of the query.

Attached: 1538066969504.gif (900x900, 519K)

Fair enough. I do not participate in social media and have never had to jump through whatever hoops are required to shut it down. Only read accounts of "I thought I deleted everything but X was cached somewhere..."

Fucking hell

Attached: 1489900227648.jpg (258x245, 12K)

because there would be too many people who aren't trained to keep their mouths shut. not all of them are rock solid liberals either, there's libertarians at google who would freak at something convoluted like that. they would know how to give word to the media as well privately, especially if it meant ruining things for an oppressive liberal agenda.

It never goes away user. It just gets harder to find.

Attached: surfboard.jpg (3441x615, 99K)

Yup ok you sold me. I can say that I am professionally acquainted with googler's inability to keep secrets or manage their daily life. There is no way in hell the people involved wouldnt have secretly bragged to everyone they spoke to.

THAT LYING BITCH! she didnt mention she sold surf boards at her hearing!!!

>surfboards

Attached: 1538115030605.jpg (546x584, 57K)

on top of that (i know you said you already agree, but this is more food for thought). all their time is recorded for projects they do and they all work in groups/teams. they discuss the projects they work on with managers. if blocks of time are missing with multiple people that are needed to this, that's also all their higher ups needing to be filled in.
there would be emails, notes, people over hearing them, etc.
these are kids in their early 20's who are highly socialized content managers or programmers. something like this, and putting trust in them, unthinkable.

Goofy looking bitch

Attached: 1538280124507.jpg (1024x697, 64K)

Attached: 1538118874889.jpg (592x231, 26K)

>no matter how deep you dig there is, seemingly, nothing.
Welcome to modern Internet, where 90% of content is controlled by about five (((companies))), which can basically alter the history this way.
>He who controls the past controls the present
Internet was originally meant to be an open and free mean of communication, but kikery prevails again.

BEACH FRIENDS

Someone shop those into merchants please

How absolutely dare you, sir. So the problem is she got the jump on it. I suspect Kav will still be confirmed but it would be nice to see her btfo for attempting the blatant smear in the first place. Would be a shame if someone leaked her old twitter feed or facebook page.

Attached: damn bro.jpg (518x619, 181K)

They already are, though.

Attached: 1538116553281.jpg (797x555, 72K)

debra katz is so fucking evil and ugly looking

Attached: 1538116077454.jpg (1000x964, 99K)

The problem is that despite the fact that she looks like a fucking lunatic and sounds like a baby doll fuckhead, retard lemon brains still believe her and repeat ad nauseam all liberal kike talking points

Attached: 152562434756854796.jpg (1264x1080, 710K)

I imagine her lawyers told her to do it before they leaked her name out.

Looks like Ron Pearlman in drag.