As the shill presence on this board intensifies, more and more people are drawn to the delusion that this is r/The_Donald or some sort of church replacement for them. However, we are defined by our opposition to Zionism and Americanism in the Aryan nations of the world, and are conclusively a National Socialist board in conflict with various shill groups, and nothing else.
We share a common enemy with libertarians, and nothing stops them from posting here, but they should remain aware that their positions are not compatible with true nationalism and any friendly feelings cant last forever.
user, there are many natsoc here. But you have to consider the hundreds of other right wing views on here, we are not one ideology but hundreds formed into one. Diversity is truly our strength.
We can of course cooperate with other right-wing groups(provided they do not support international jewry) but we must not weaken our core identity, as that would make it much easier for shills to turn ourselves against each other.
Leo Perez
Natsoc only exists in the past user. Good luck reviving it you'd have to experience Versailles and Weimar again.
Profits are fine but must be capped the nat soc way.
Sebastian Richardson
the jews were so mad national socialism worked well, and there could be domino effect with other countries, their scam would be revealed. Of course corrupted countries by jews would gang up against Germany.
Jayden Clark
We made this board great. National Socialism is the wave of the future.
The only thing I can understand is I am newfag and I want to act cool by going against everyone. Now fuck off Obviously that doesn't mean people shouldn't change it to fit their country
Oliver Walker
Maybe the real Reich was the friends we made along the way
Jow Forums is a redpilled boomer board now "What up my fellow boomers! The Great Awakening QANON" youtube.com/watch?v=_lfuT47jZPY
This shit is ridiculous literal T_D boomers are recording themselves ranting about Jow Forums memes and Q.
Adrian Williams
I am personally american fascist.
Kevin Hill
Based and FRENSpilled. Niggers and kikes are not frens tho.
Luke Fisher
here's what you guys should do >require all citizens to be at least 3/4 White with at least one American citizen as parent >only citizens can vote and receive government financial assistance >give tax cuts to citizens with lots of children at this point, the White American population goes up while the others go down >take over the entire Americas, including all the little islands and shit >rewards citizens that go into newly conquered territories >Right Wing Bleaching Squads >once a Territory's population is majority citizen, allow it to become a State
boom, all of the Americas under one flag, and fully bleached
I would say my ideology is mostly close to National Socialism and it is the society I model the most has the example of what I think we should become.
However I must say i feel pretty out of place here,since there's almost no chances of this picking up here( even nationalism doesn't grow on a socialist swamp). I have to say I'm way more inclined to helping "Europe" has a whole now and have grew tired of convincing a largely socialistic/marxian population of even standard Nationalism.
If there was a European cause I could join I would,even if It was just to get sent to the front lines has long I was helping making European nationalist again I would.
A respectable viewpoint, the way I see it national socialism has an obligation towards europeans as a whole, so portugal should not be left behind by natsoc ideology.
Jackson Evans
Yes,I have been trying to convince people for literally years but it simply doesn't work when like 90% of your populace are either left leaning or materialists.
Nationalism won't grow here,it's just the truth and there's no need to get mad,if anything we will become a small Venezuela in Europe in the next 20 years.
I won't give up on this lands but I have to say I am much more concerned/focused efforts on helping Europe has a "whole" than Portugal since I have dwelled on too many realities. I really hope there's a european movement I can join at some point in time,or even a single country going /natsoc/ if I have any way to help in there or at least will relocate any extra resources I have to it.
Noah Davis
I think Portugal in particular will likely depend on how Spain develops, which is certainly interesting atm. Is there a cultural continuity to Brazil like with the anglosphere?
Julian Wilson
>t. stormfaggot filthy socialist fuck off
Luke Bailey
Mosleyite here, I’ve heard many fellow mosleyite describe themselves as national socialist and many others describe themselves as simply fascist. I always thought mosleyite fascism was its own branch but a lot of propaganda posters describe the BUF as Nat soc…
>I think Portugal in particular will likely depend on how Spain develops
The idea that Spain's politics influence us is mostly a meme,we aren't really even 3/10 has connected has people (unsurprisingly) may think. Just being honest.
>which is certainly interesting atm. Is there a cultural continuity to Brazil like with the anglosphere?
Brazil has been basically doing their own thing/following their own path for a long time now. Our countries aren't that connected anymore besides us getting a ton of Brazilians migrants here(this needs to stop also). We have a far left government and their on the verge on electing a true right Wing,pro gun,pro nationalism (even if it's meme civic nat), anti feminism,pro militarism politician. This would never happen here,people react to any nationalist undertones in the same way when a cat sees a growling dog(aka histeric, aggressive and defensive,ready to attack or shut it down)
Alexander Adams
I'm a Slav living in the UK. If you are a real German National Socialist (not some LARPing 56% Amerimutt who calls himself a "Nazi"), can you tell me on the views the National Socialists had on the Slavic races and how they treated them on the Eastern Front on account of their blood? Are your views different or the same as what the original NSDAP believed? The reason I ask this is because there's is much conflicting information on the subject and I just want to get to the bottom of it. Would a German National Socialist and say a Slavic fascist with similar views still be natural enemies?
Owen Lewis
wasn't Jow Forums a dump for jews and left shills when real men discuss politics somewhere else.
Austin Evans
>Would a German National Socialist and say a Slavic fascist with similar views still be natural enemies?
This depends on the country, a pole would likely have opposing interests, but this is secondary as long as the main threat is outside of Europe.
Slavs are certainly a part of the Aryan race as repeatedly outlined by Alfred Rosenberg, and while inferior to Nords, do not present a natural enemy. Eastern front is a bit of a tricky topic, as germany supported many lesser ethnic groups like ukrainians and sought to balkanise russia, as in pic related.
This does not mean a hostility, just that slavs were to be in a lesser position relative to the reich proper. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lokot_Autonomy
Jow Forums is not a place with a set ideology, set demographic, set religion, set whatever. Jow Forums is an international board of whites of all kinds and non-whites of many other kinds, and whilst I think it's perfectly workable for you, a German, to call himself a National Socialist, it doesn't make any sense at all for the rest of us to adhere to such a term.
There are no "American National Socialists", "British National Socialists", "Irish National Socialists", "Indian National Socialists", "Australian National Socialists", "Japanese National Socialists", "Russian National Socialists" etc. etc. etc. because National Socialism is a uniquely defined ideological system for the Germans and Germany only. I know you guys like to think it's just another ideology that can be applied anywhere, but it just fucking isn't. It's for the Germans and the wider Germanic European continent only, and even those Swedes, Danes, Dutchmen, Norwegians, etc. can be National Socialists not by some organic philosophy of a Norwegian race being made great but only in allegiance to the GERMAN nation, who must always be dominant. That's how National Socialism is. You will not find any major Nazi Party official saying anything close to "National Socialism is for everyone!!1!" because it's not true.
Fascism is a little different; fascism's a little more universal and open to anybody to profess. Not National Socialism. This isn't up for debate, fags.
I see your point, but it's not exactly true. Speaking of japanese national socialists would certainly be odd, but most white countries shouldn't have any trouble adopting the term to themselves. If you feel incompatible but still sympathetic, try not to balkanise fascism even more by putting the -ism above the ideology itself. There usually hasn't been much of a problem with that as this is not a pseudo-intellectual site except for /his/ in particular.
I've only got a Swastika pendant made in Latvia. I was thinking of saving up in order to buy an older Mein Kampf.
Liam Turner
So in short, physical extermination wouldn't have happened had the NatSocs won the war - but assimilating certain "valuable" Slavs into the Germanic race as well subjugating them to be governed by Reichskommissariats economically dependent on the Reich seems conducive to what is commonly heard of "Lebensraum" - how much to the East did Germany want to expand its Volk? As far as the boundaries of the General Gouvernment (Poles were designated to be assimilated as "racially valuable")? Or even to the Urals as is sometimes heard?
Secondly, this "assimilation" does sound a lot like racial mixing at its core. After all if the "valuable" Slavs still hail from largely "inferior" stock then wouldn't it make sense not to debase your blood to accommodate them into the Volksgemeinschaft? People of a different race that are high functioning and healthy are still fundamentally of a different race.
What do those three lines under the swastika mean?
Thomas Richardson
Alt-right? Yes. NatSoc? Jow Forums is too goddamn lazy for that.
Liam Bell
It doesn't specifically mean valuable slavs, but citizens of these slavic territories that are racially closer to germans, after all there used to be many ethnic german settlements in the east.
>how much to the East did Germany want to expand its Volk? Probably depends on how practical it is for them, I think in the long run they didn't expect to colonise russia proper, but they probably would if the circumstances made it feasible. They certainly did intend for a lot of territories to remain slavic.
>Secondly, this "assimilation" does sound a lot like racial mixing at its core.
Slavs aren't really a whole different race, but racemixing was never a policy, slavs who did end up impregnated by the SS were forced to abort.
Nolan Hill
Why does this thread gets few replies but reddit/bait/literal BBC threads get more replies than this. This place is truly dead.
We're already balls deep in far worse than weimar. I don't think what comes in reaction will be the same as natsoc though, It'll be something new and formed by this time period.
Centralized invasive government styles are destined to fail. You cannot have an all powerful central body and expect it to be resistant to corruption, as these two things are counterintuitive to each other. A centralized body will always have supreme power and as such will be targeted by (((special interest))) that exist in every country. The only way to protect from these special interest is to lock the centralized power to a select few people, but this leads to dictatorships and all other consequences that comes with great power resting in the hands of a few. Not to mention what happens if one of those few becomes (((corrupted))) by the special interest.
The only true salvation for our peoples is a decentralized republic that recognizes the existence of families of peoples (nations) and allows these people to govern THEMSELVES how they see fit. The purpose of government is to be the intermediary to resolve disputes between nations that wish to coexist in proximity to each other. A government is not there to rule over these nations as a king, for that only leads to corruption, strife, and revolution. None of this is prolific of stability.
Christopher Martinez
different by name maybe, but national socialism is a principle truth, its life over death, its anti-anti-human, and such a pure ideology cant be changed by the things that its opposed to
William Bailey
decentralised anarcho-capitalism
Aaron Lopez
That kind of government doesn't have the power to root out those (((special interests))). You have to use authoritarian power to counter them, like what Poland and Hungary are doing right now.
Parker Fisher
the democrats are nazis
this is a place to abuse democrat nazis
to the extent that you help the nazi democrats organize it is both painful and annoying
the democrats openly promote nationalist and socialist values
of course the democrats promote the nationalist values of mexicans invading the territory of the USA but the fact is that democrats are (Mexican) nationalists
Americans hate Mexican nationalists invading the USA
this isn't about promoting the American nation this is about destroying the mexican invaders that want to turn the USA into a spanish-speaking nation
the democrats are waging national war on the Americans
the democrats complain about Russia when they let the Mexcians kill Americans
this is really fucking stupid
Luis Stewart
Authoritative power inevitably leads to an entrenched ruling elite who is unwilling to forfeit their power. Men grow old and wish to enact a legacy, and will often entrust any power they have to that legacy. This is how monarchy was born, and monarchies lead to strife in very few generations.
Thus it is unstable and destined to fall. Like all centralized governments.
The only true solution is decentralized government with power compartmentalized between opposing parties to ensure that even when (not if) special interest infiltrate and take control there exist many equal and opposite bodies of power to resist and destroy the infiltration. Only then do you have a system capable of resisting corruption.
Or to put it through a different lense: how does the liver deal with impurities in the blood? Liver cells capture the impurities and die, taking the impurities with it. The body then regenerates the liver to continue it's task.
The only form of government that is worth considering is one that can identify and destroy infiltration before it takes root. A centralized government is incapable of this as the central powerful body will always be the target. And due to the nature of the structure there is no other part of the government that can resist the central power if it becomes corrupt.
But how does your decentralized republic deport those special interests? You can't form an ethnostate without some authoritarian power, you don't need to full on dictator but some totalitarianism is necessary, at least for a while.
Gabriel Reyes
According to their record, and it is often based on how they are able to retain power. Too often a monarchy will disenfranchise peoples who gather together in the far reaches of a country and plot to overthrow. This is inevitable with absolute power, as absolute power will never be able to acknowledge its faults as that leads to challenges to the throne.
Monarchies are the best at creating this resistance due to absolute power. Just because they can employ that absolute power to delay the collapse doesn't mean the collapse is not inevitable. Furthermore concentrating governmental power in the hands of a few always leads to favoritism and corruption. It is the job of the government to be the intermediaries between nations existing in close proximity to each other. A monarchy is incapable of this as it will ALWAYS look for it's own interest first and foremost.
So monarchies may be adequate for a small nation or for a set period of time, but it is not a form of government that is resistant to time and corruption. All monarchies are destined to fail.
Bentley Lee
I really missed it when there nearly an /NSG/ thread every day can some user help to how to make an /NSG/ thread plz
When were there /NSG/ threads everyday, I almost never see them
Jaxson Perez
The special interest are encapsulated in the compartment they have infiltrated and the entire compartment is terminated by all other compartments. This is the purpose of the decentralized nature. Once the old compartment is dealt with, a new one can be erected in its place in full sight of all other compartments to ensure the infestation has been dealt with.
The flaw of this approach is if too many compartments become infected before a proper purge can be enacted. But again this result is the default result of all centralized power archetypes, so it is simply a return to the corrupt status quo. The entire decentralized body has to be significantly corrupt for it to lead down this path.
And can a corrupt, decentralized power really be considered decentralized if it is the same corruption that exist throughout? I don't think so.
Himmler's wife was Polish, and they had a daughter. They didn't pay much attention to racial purity when they had Polish girls in front of them... Also the anti slav propaganda started when war with the Soviet Union started. Its true Rosenberg and Hitler saw the "slavs" as inferior to Germans but he wasn't gonna genocide them lol. Hitler was just pissed because the Austro-Hungarian empire was a clusterfuck of races that was only maintained by the Austrians and thought the other races were leeching off them.
I think the worst that would have happened to slavs is being pushed further to the east to make room for Greater Germany
Angel Parker
use 4chanx and enable the noscript option, you get super easy ccaptcha
Luis Collins
Remember how the last day of the rope worked out for you?
I have to leave unfortunately, but I pose a very serious question to true natsocs reading: >is natsoc a centralized power? >If so, how does a natsoc government prevent the spread of corruption to its core?
Also it should be noted that while corruption is familiar with the juden, they are not one and the same. The juden relies on the corruption to infiltrate, and as such will be gravitated to power bodies prone to corruption, which I believe to be any and all centralized power structures. The "success" of the juden's history of infiltration is mostly due to the prevalence of centralized power structures, which seem to be the default mode of government for humanity.
So as such, a corruptable body is always susceptible to the juden threat. Deal with the corruption in your own house and the juden will find it hard to gain control.
William Clark
Really, hqdefault (1)? Can you at least bother to name the shill pic before you show up to a dead thread and try to shit it up?
Ian Rogers
I wouldn't want a dictatorship, but also wouldn't want a decentralized republic. I think some type of limited democracy based on ethnicity might be a good idea.
>(((pol))) is a hive mind of like minded people no
Jaxon Sanchez
Before trump ran for president. At the moment when he revealed his colors and his stupendous ability of using meme magic then hell broke loos. Shills were in here before but now they have multiplied. Especially in the summer. I am here since 2015 back then i was only here for the memes don't hold against i was only 15 back then, but then the red pills got good. /NSG/ threads were always on this board everyday they were here 2 or three times a week and don't you notice how /SIG/ threads were here in that pattern too a few months ago? I hate this place now shill threads infesting the place the good threads now are about Kavanaugh, may god give him strength but atleast shit is dying down now i guess it's the summer
Mason Allen
>require all citizens to be at least 75% white That's where you're wrong my Dutch friend, White Americans are on average 98.6% European DNA. We have historically abhorred race-mixing and the large majority of White Americans still do, we are not about to sacrifice our racial purity to make it easier to obtain a White America again.
