Differences in IQ are genet-

>chinks and pajeets are smart
i thought pajeets were 85 iq street-shitting subhumans according to Jow Forums?
>Africans and muslims are dumb
do you not see that african blacks and the white british have nearly identical percentages?

that's a higher n than some of the IQ studies that are posted here and treated as gospel

gcse results are g loaded though?

Intelligence is heritable.

Attached: 1514358735669.png (657x539, 110K)

this isn't a stardized test
youtube.com/watch?v=UA0XGVjQtQM

Uk arabs/pakis/blacks still perform far lower than whites in pisa scores, employment, criminality

Attached: White-PISA-640x485.jpg (640x485, 44K)

Anyone higher would leave your communist shithole

intelligence does have a large heritable factor yes, but that does not necessarily mean the IQ gap between races is caused by genes.

i love how you post that image as if ~20 pisa points are some massive difference that proves non-whites are subhuman when it's a minuscule difference that could easily come down to cultural/environmental factors (e.g. many muslims are taught anti-scientific shit such as being told by their parents evolution is a lie, which makes them perform worse at science)

look at the science column on pic related and compare to the scores in your image. oh no, non-whites have similar scores to icelanders, fucking subhumans am i right?

Attached: image.png (1200x900, 290K)

Here's the thing dunecoon, I don't care. If the failed races manage to become wakkanda, that's great. But not using my countries money or time. You're not owed shit by me, you're not entrance to my country, my money or my time. Succeed or fail, I don't care.

yeah thas right well said my fellow patriot i dun care about dumb libtard bullshit like facts and science i just dun want no joses and mowhameds in mah country

It's not up to me help you, fucking entitled camel jockey trash.

Hope the next predator drone strike gets your hut.

hell yeah kill those hajjee muzlums

>intelligence does have a large heritable factor yes, but that does not necessarily mean the IQ gap between races is caused by genes.
do you even think before you type? if it is heritable, it is some of the variation is down to genes. fucking retard
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability

>i love how you post that image as if ~20 pisa points are some massive difference that proves non-whites are subhuman
strawman

The PISA difference include whites with several other ethnicities (including chinese which tends to outperform whites), not just blacks (higher than 30 points on average in england and in places like wales it increases to almost 100 points of difference). The video I posted shows that and several other standardized tests in which whites massively outperform blacks.

But you don't have to look into those tests alone. You can always compare which groups are more successful in the UK. Needless to say blacks are extremely overrepresented in crime, for example.

Attached: uk_arrests.jpg (1036x686, 56K)

but the idea that iq isn't inherited is completely false.
most intelligence researchers agree that between 50-80% of iq is genetic
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

Attached: race_iq_3.png (1058x1447, 146K)

thats the variation between individuals brainlet, it says nothing about the variation between different groups.

What's the heritability of IQ regardless of race?

this isnt even a study based on racial IQ differences, retard.

>this post
absolute retardation. back to >>>/leftypol/

People with really high IQ are more prone to make worse choices also plenty of IT jobs with 1k+ eur salary after taxes.

there is no evidence this is caused by genes and not environment
look at pic related for example. "A 10 µg/dL increase in blood lead at 24 months is associated with a 5.8-point decline in IQ."

see also:
>Eyferth (1961) studied the out-of-wedlock children of black and white soldiers stationed in Germany after World War 2 and then raised by white German mothers and found no significant differences.
>Tizard et al. (1972) studied black (West Indian), white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries. Two out of three tests found no significant differences. One test found higher scores for non-whites.
>Moore (1986) compared black and mixed-race children adopted by either black or white middle-class families in the United States. Moore observed that 23 black and interracial children raised by white parents had a significantly higher mean score than 23 age-matched children raised by black parents (117 vs 104), and argued that differences in early socialization explained these differences.

see 70%-80%

Attached: image.png (377x512, 12K)

it's a study comparing ""filthy indio subhuman spics"" with ""based high iq med whites""

imagine calling other people retarded while you can't even grasp a concept as simple as heritability

Attached: image.jpg (693x326, 53K)

Funny thing is that we still don't have an accurate way to measure intelligence, IQ is not an accurate measure of intelligence.
But everyone just loves to have their balls harnessed claiming they have higher IQ, it's like the "who has the bigger dick" of intelectuals.

Hmm...

Attached: 220px-Map_Iberian_Peninsula_750-en.svg.png (220x153, 18K)

Dios mio

>pic
sat scores by income and race, retard. environment controlled for.
>it's a study comparing ""filthy indio subhuman spics"" with ""based high iq med whites""
and the ""based high iq med whites"" still have an IQ greater than ""filthy indio subhuman spics"".
>b-but muh environmnet!!!
see first point. it's been studied, you are wrong; race differences exist.
>imagine calling other people retarded while you can't even grasp a concept as simple as heritability
traits within populations are still heritable.

you seem to be under the impression that racialists argue for the existence of race purely so they have casus beli to exterminate non-whites. you're a retard.

>plants are just like humans, got
Lol go back to sucking down welfare and mommy's house you worthless fuck

First off, many of these studies use young children, and we all know that the influence of genes increase with aging (known as gene amplyfication).
Second, many of these studies shows immigrants groups, which may not always represent the average citizen of their country. For example, if you import elite indians to the US, they are going to score higher than US whites, even though the iq of india is lower (80s). In your example in germany, which involves soldiers, you should know that whites were accepted are a much higher % than blacks, to the point many low iq blacks weren't qualified to serve.
And third, whites outperform blacks across all classes in both the US and the UK. Most intelligence resaerchers agree that the black-white iq gap is partially genetic

>thats the variation between individuals brainlet, it says nothing about the variation between different groups.
I think you are just baiting now. I literally shows a difference of prevalence of genetic variants related to iq across ethnicities.

Attached: race_iq_1.png (962x2184, 976K)

There are several studies showing this, the prevalent of these genetic variants are not distributed equally across racial groups
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/07/race-and-iq-the-case-for-genes/

Attached: race_iq_2.png (1056x927, 194K)

Attached: 1-2.png (768x432, 22K)

IQ is the most accurate intelligence metric we have, and it's pretty damn good for what it's trying to measure. a measure doesn't have to be 100% accurate to be useful.

higher IQ generally does correlate with better performance on all forms of standardized tests (ACT, SAT, GCSE, etc), therefore, higher IQ -> smarter person.

There is an entire field of twin studies dedicated to researching the comparison of environment v genetics. Nobody is more responsible for your own ignorance than yourself

only a minority of intlligence researchers believes that the black-white iq gap is 100% caused by the environment

Attached: race_iq_env.jpg (1085x648, 91K)

IQwanking alone is rather poor.
But early childhood influence can mark people for life and make them unfit for certain enviroments while genetic influence might determine how our intelligence or chance o behave is “weighted“ towards certain patterns that have a good chance of being race based.

You cant tell me a papuan whose people lived in geographic isolation have not been subjected to wholly different selection pressure for thousands of years then for example a han chinese whose ancestors ran through the treadmill of agrarian living+high culture and its laws that are deadly in other ways then hunting and gathering in the raw wilderness.

>comparing race A with half race A half B.
>still a 1.5iq difference.
>age in months
>spanish 10 years old
>Guatemala 11.25 years old

Having to give jungle beaners 1.25 years age increase to still be 1.5 IQ points lower.

Attached: brawndoIbelieve.gif (500x281, 845K)

IQ is the best thing we have.
We can use GDP per capita, number of chess grandmasters, published patents or something like that if you want. But they show the same thing as IQ tests, basically.

Don't forget cultural issues. Education is for whiteys according to blacks in the US.

I actually downloading ensembl right now with the perl API to do more of these

we're going to do the research that the academy defacto does not allow to be published
useast.ensembl.org/info/docs/api/variation/index.html#api

Attached: Mainstream Science on Intelligence.png (1905x1865, 840K)

Cultural values are themselves shaped by genetics and intelligence.

I love that argument, actually. "Niggers in Africa are not failing because they are dumb, they are failing because they don't have good culture and institutions". Gee, I wonder what is required to have good culture and institutions, then. Perhaps good institutions grow better in the European soil, or something like that.

Alleles are also key for some drugs to work properly. t. Pharmacist.

Vwry nice post. Well done

Muh iq

>sat scores by income and race, retard. environment controlled for.
>see first point. it's been studied, you are wrong; race differences exist.
income isnt the only environmental factor dumb dumb

>and the ""based high iq med whites"" still have an IQ greater than ""filthy indio subhuman spics"".
false, see >traits within populations are still heritable.
okay?? i dont see the relevance of this. you really dont understand what heritability is do you

>you seem to be under the impression that racialists argue for the existence of race purely so they have casus beli to exterminate non-whites. you're a retard.

yeah yeah you dont hate other races you just love your race yadda yadda, ive heard it all before.
im sure you wouldnt try to exterminate all jews if you ever came into power

if thats what you gleaned from this image then you're an even bigger brainlet than i initially thought.

>""filthy indio subhuman spics""
spics are literally NPCs. they stand around looking at the ground until you give them a task. sometimes if they are standing around looking at the ground for too long and nobody has given them a task they will relocate to a place where they can receive tasks between periods of looking at the ground.

>intelligence does have a large heritable factor yes, but that does not necessarily mean the IQ gap between races is caused by genes.

Do we really have to pull out the twin adoption studies??????

Attached: IncomeAndIQRace.gif (276x315, 29K)

That looks like the guatmalan kids were 11 and the Spanish kids were 10

Tbh a few places in africa had working institutions. The subsaharan Westcoast for example was celt-tier.

>a sample size of 55 for Spain
>a sample size of 93 for Guatemala
>and the IQ's are still fairly close (within 2 points of each other)
differences in IQ are genetic?

WE

that's correct, the cytochromes responsible for drug metabolism vary in abundence from race to race

asians have fewer CYP3A4, the main metabolic pathway for benzodiazepines like xanax and klonopin, so the effects of those drugs last longer

blacks have more CYP2D6, relevant in metabolism of methylated amphetamines (meth included), which has effects on oxidative stress

Mix that with the repeated monoamine oxidation agonist gene (occurs in about 4-9% of the black population compared to just 0.1% of the European) which has been highly correlated with antisocial behavior and violence. There is a genetic pharmacological explanation for the crack epidemic in the black communities.

t. drug nerd

Attached: Exploring the association between the 2-repeat allele of the MAOA gene promoter polymorphism and psy (712x971, 227K)

>big brain nigger bitches on Jow Forums with pretty pictures of plants in order to prove his crackpot theories of genes having nothing to do with IQ
I suppose neither does your hair color, skin color, eye color, center of mass, variation in muscle twitch fibers, etc. Every exhibited trait is just the magical effect of grandma cramming more cookies down your throat, and mommy giving you more kisses before bedtime

Next I suppose youre going to start demanding for the low IQ's to seize the means of thinking by stealing those chromosomes and IQ's when you finally cpme to terms with the nature of reality

I'm sorry doesn't this graphic show boys performing consistently better than girls, and people who don't get free lunch performing better than people who do? Even when environment (less access to healthy food) is accounted for they still do worse.

BECAUSE ITS GENETIC

No rly.
With tier I mean a comparable civilisation. The means of organisation and hierachy were developed well enough that the Asante could rally several thousand armed men on a day which gave even the british a harder time then usual.
Furthermore a specialisation of trades had taken place and they could produce metaltools.
Ofc one should not throw them in the same pot as africans from other places such as kongo and pretend theyre the same.

-ic

Attached: 1537271070691.jpg (662x610, 54K)

>you really dont understand what heritability is do you

Not that guy, but apparently you don't understand what it is.

Traits can be heritable in populations without that heritability arising from genetics. A trait that is environmentally determined would ALSO be highly heritable within families. FOR FUCKING OBVIOUS REASONS.

WUZ

Attached: black egyptians.png (1769x1591, 1.19M)

>Hispanics
>the same as Spanish people

>trying to back up his opinion with infographics
You realise the irony, right?

>sample size 55 people
>children

but but but but muh environment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What is the transracial adoption study.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
give it up sandnigger.

Attached: transracialAdoptionStudy.jpg (1201x916, 227K)

There's a way more reliable metric - look for genius tier outliers.

There's not a single nigger with nobel prize in physics. It's dominated jews, northern europeans and (some) asians. There are few white women, too.

Look for savants - people with eidetic memory, people who can do complex calculation intuitively. Again, dominated by jews, whites and asians and a woman now and then.

On this metric alone you can determine which race is subhuman and who's not. Niggers and certain nigger species of asians appear to have a hard intelligence cap, almost never producing outliers unless significantly racemixed with higher species.

>income isnt the only environmental factor dumb dumb
what are the others? it's the SAT, so country (US) is controlled for.
culture/household/parental race? Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study

>false, see (OP)
did you even read your own fucking picture? the spanish have a greater mean iq, and a greater sd than guatemalans (meaning more geniuses, and more retards relative to the mean iq). also, those n-values. lmfao.

>okay?? i dont see the relevance of this. you really dont understand what heritability is do you
that's right you don't, fucking idiot. maybe tell me and everyone else what i'm apparently misunderstanding.

>yeah yeah you dont hate other races you just love your race yadda yadda, ive heard it all before.
>im sure you wouldnt try to exterminate all jews if you ever came into power
not an argument, poisoning the well.

stop pontificating about race differences when you are painfully wrong about everything. it's
cringy. go back to your /leftypol/ echochamber.

equality between races has never been proven. i don't know why people try to deny the possibility of divergent evolution within humans

ashkenazi jews were evolutionary pressured to selected for higher intelligence
it was one of the first cultures where males being good at math (finance) was valued by the community and could result in marriage instead of just hierarchical influence within the community

it's a complicated past but it has served them well in terms of their average IQ being centered around 115. That produces incredible overrepresentation in the tails of the curve compared to other populations given that they make up such a small percentage of the wider populations.

Attached: 1537084591697.png (1178x724, 67K)

So the average 10 yo in Spain have a higher IQ than the average 11-12 year old in Guatemala.

see #20-21

IQ tests compensate for age and try to remove any influence it has on the composite score. the age is not really relevant

should add, only up to a certain age. adjustments do get muddy that young.

Yes, the 115-105-100 (ashkenazi, asia, white) mostly holds.

What is most curious that niggers and nigger like people have vast amount of numerical advantage - even if they were shifted to iq 90-95 (the most liberal propaganda contends), they'd produce shitton of outliers with their sheer numbers alone - like it happens with white women.

But they demonstrably don't. What this suggest that a lot of nigger population must be in the pit of iq 75 or less on genetic level, or there would be a niglet savant.

It's weird if they use two different IQ-test on the children.. i have a hard time believing they would do this in a comparison study.

Typically but it is unknown from the small snippet.
In this situation where they directly compared two groups I would wager they were given the same test and subjected to the same altercations.
It's a lazy study to have 1+ year age difference if they are trying to compare children directly.

no, they don't use a different test. same test, but the score is adjusted based on how the different age groups perform compared to adults (18-something). also and

just assumed that the study was made in good faith for the sake of arguing with the retarded op. you are correct

so they grade the responses differently? it doesn't really make much much more sense, because then they would have to rely on previous data on how different ethnicities/nationalities perform on the test.

>comparing 10-11 year olds
Why don't you try looking at adult populations brainlet?

they don't grade the tests differently. same grade, they just adjust it in some way (add or subtract a constant, log, etc). don't know the specifics on iq age-adjustment though, something you'll have to look up. it's generally not a good idea to look at the iq of younger age groups because the adjustments reduce the reliability, and don't represent the intelligence of a population very well, as brains are still developing at that age

Being hung up on IQ tests is somewhat unfortunate in that it's roughly >10 dimensional metric (spatial, verbal, memory, speed, hypothesis forming, induction, symbol manipulation, ton of others) squished into one number.

Most importantly, it was from the get go designed so that men and women could score as iq 100 average when these metrics are summed, even if their faculties vastly differ (ie women rank low in spatial, rank high in verbal etc).

If difference between genders is anything to go by, chances are the differences in particular dimensions will vary among races somewhat too (eg ashkenazi are notoriously verbal in addition to having good "autismal" faculties).

While interesting area of inquiry, all research stopped in the tracks in the late 80s when it became politically incorrect (Guilford was most likely a plant to sabotage it for good).

Always some sad low iq rare flag coming into discussions like these and detailing them with stupidity.

My point is that the "adjustment" implies a knowledge over how the different age groups fair.. but there could also be racial differences here, like the 10 yo Spanish child that score the same as an 11 yo Spanish child are adjusted to have a different IQ.
But the same adjustment could variate if you look at a 10 and 11 yo Guatemalan child..

It is also weird to rely on previous data, because they could easily have done without this, by taking children from the same age-group.

then explain the inbreed crack house called Shitrael

Attached: 1506304509594.png (852x524, 34K)

i never meant to imply i disagreed with you on that point. it was merely a semantic misunderstanding, it seems. also it's adjusted based on performance of adults as far as i know.

The smart ones are all implanted in the first world