LEGAL (((EXPERTS))): KAVANAUGH SHOULD SUE

The saltening part 2 coming soon

Attached: kav.jpg (1277x674, 186K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/05/report-fords-fbi-friend-monica-mclean-pressured-witness-to-modify-testimony-and-statement/
youtube.com/watch?v=V9CI46QjVQg&t=17s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: 1524762754146.jpg (607x342, 21K)

There 0% chance he will sue, that would just further inflame the legitimacy of his nomination.

What he might do to spite the left is overturn Roe, Obergefell or some other landmark decision out of spite.

Please do this.

what if his case went to the supreme court

Marsh v. Alabama. Applied to internet.

Its a trap to bait him into deposition, which will leak and the media will run with for months. Libel slander laws need to change in america. It should be criminal to libel or slander someone. Having mere civil repercussions does not stop wealthy players from lying their ass off.

kek, no, fatty defamation suit coming in.

Iowa recently passed a very strict abortion law that's almost guaranteed to reach the Supreme Court. :)

>Literally fucking Hitler I'm going to kill myself unless somebody fixes this!!!

Keep the good times a rolling lads

>Kav sues WaPo, ends up owning it
>literally resurrects the Völkischer Beobachter

Attached: 1538769098299.jpg (800x685, 35K)

Haha, I’m a lawyer and I got a good hearty laugh when I saw a couple of people saying this in the media. Idiots . . . There is no case whatsoever to be made against the news media for reporting on this controversy. As for Blasey Ford, there is probably no case against her as the judge is a public figure, and he would have the impossible burden of proving her a LIAR in court. Unless she has admitted to lying about this in writing somewhere- ain’t happening- then she would be able to get the case against her dismissed on summary judgment.

SHE HAS TIES TO THE CIA'S MIND CONTROL PROJECTS

He's on the SCOTUS, he's just going to let that victory be enough and try to move on to show he really is balanced.
If he lost, he should have absolutely gone after Harris, Feinstein, Blumenthal, Avenatti, and others who were speaking of allegation as it he was convicted. Especially disgusting from Blumenthal since he's a Senator who went through the hearing practically saying Kavanaugh was a rapist and that should disqualify him not only from the SCOTUS but his (then) current bench as well.

Sue who? Then there would be a real investigation that'll prove he's a liar.

>sue
>media portrays him as evil incarnate

yeah nahh.

>what if it goes to supreme court?
He would have to recuse

he would sue the party that accused him of rape...?
how are you able to even type words being this dumb?

What we need now is more progressive lefties on the street with weapons. We should help them to get to their civil war goal.
.
.
.
.
.


and than watch

Who the hell would he sue? He can't sue the Democrats. He can't sure Ford.

Nah. He's not dumb.

Listen to the lawyer.

No one except Ford accused him of rape. Kys

Everyone pic related belongs in prison and/or penniless

Attached: monica-lee-mclean-bromwich-katz-laufman-ford.jpg (817x459, 111K)

theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/05/report-fords-fbi-friend-monica-mclean-pressured-witness-to-modify-testimony-and-statement/

Attached: fbi-nation-security-division-chart-3.jpg (1024x725, 146K)

I get taking the high road, but that won't do enough to discourage Dems from pulling the same shit in the future. They need to feel actual recoil beyond just not getting what they want. Conservatives in the US are too nice when it comes to stuff like this. They need to send a clear message that enough is enough and these slimy tactics won't be tolerated. It will make Kavanaugh look ruthless, but I view that as a wholly good thing.

Only Swetnick accused him of rape,specifically participating in gang rape, then recanted and said he was only at the parties.
Ford accused him of sexual assault which amounted to fondling her and covering her mouth. There is a difference in those charges but not a difference in the evidence they offered- which would be none.

Oh god that would be so hilarious. The resulting influx of salt would pickle the entire earth and make it inhospitable to life for the next thousand years...but it'd be worth it.

I agree 100%.

Every fucker who made a slanderous video or appeared in one or made a slanderous tweet outright declaring without any evidence that our kav was a rapist. Needs their pockets emptying of every penny they have.

I agree with you. They will try to sink any nomination possible through these means or similar, which is why the midterms should not award any meaningful gains to the Democrats, and if anything make them lose seats. They really screwed themselves with how they handled this; Republicans, undeclared, and centrists saw the scumbaggery and won't support it. Democrats who did believe Kavanaugh did what he was accused of will see the failure of Democratic Senators to stop his confirmation as a failure that needs to be punished and so they will vote for even more radical leftists, and split the vote in their party.
Viewing him as a man, Kavanaugh could have the grounds to sue the worst few individuals who slandered him and his family. As a Justice, Kavanaugh is supposed to be "above" that (unless there's a precedent for a sitting Justice suing someone). He won, the Republicans won, and there may very well be more winning in the next month.

>that would just further inflame the legitimacy of his nomination

Are you retarded? If he wins, it will only further LEGITIMIZE IT

He should sue 100%, get Feinstein, Ford, and all of them fucking locked up and broke.

> As a Justice, Kavanaugh is supposed to be "above" that (unless there's a precedent for a sitting Justice suing someone).

This is why I think he won't do it. Despite Dems best efforts, I genuinely believe Kavanaugh to have a strong character and I think those principles will lead him to restraint. However, I don't think that's a good long term response. He could start the proceedings with something like
>I'm not doing this for the money, I'm doing to protect future candidates and nominees from this same kind of slander.
That and using a different attorney as a middleman would I think be the most classy way of doing this. But do this he should. There's too much at stake in terms of our political culture and what is considered acceptable.

>No evidence
>FBI refuses to do a proper investigation

What the fuck evidence can there be in a case like this without a proper investigation? If Ford is lying, shouldn't there be an investigation to prove she's lying?

I didn't think a public official could sue for slander. Am I wrong?

>The saltening part 2 coming soon
She won't. I hope the left pushes for it, and it happens. The process of a lawsuit will draw out more facts then just her word vs his. There would be info about the correspondence between senators and other lawmakers. Her attorneys are advising her to not continue with this. They are holding her back. Leftists can look and see the Jews getting in the way of their progress, but the insane left wants blood. All they will do is further reinforce the fact that this is all lies and a political stunt.

>I didn't think a public official could sue for slander. Am I wrong?
False accusations against anyone can result in a lawsuit if one can show damage done. This is open and shut if Brett OR his family decides to take that action.

If she has lied, and it can be proven, she is up shit creek without a paddle or an adult.

Right. They have to feel pain, consistent and repeated every time they act up, until they learn to submit. It's no different from domesticating a wild animal, because they lack the human ability to reason and make decisions based on anything but pain/pleasure.

The Senate Judiciary Committee should investigate and bring charges against everyone involved in misleading the committee. That would vindicate K while allowing him to stay above it.

youtube.com/watch?v=V9CI46QjVQg&t=17s

Wanting to protect future nominees is a good goal, but something that will fall to the Senate Judiciary Committee. They should have their own investigation into why this happened, why accusations were hidden from them until AFTER scheduled questioning had concluded, and how those accusations were leaked to the media. None of which would bode well for Feinstein and her staff.

A few reasons the FBI didn't want to talk to Dr. Ford:
1.) Her team was clearly trying to stretch the time out until the midterms. While the FBI should not have time limits placed on their investigations, they are not meant to be handling these types of investigations in the first place. They are a federal agency, not a local/state police department.
2.) The Judiciary Committee already interviewed Ford and asked her questions, to which she gave her answers or clearly had none.
3.) Further interviewing Ford could have easily resulted in perjury if she changed her story or recalled things she earlier said she didn't know. No one wants to be accused of "Bullying a victim".
At this point, Ford had said she's not pursing any allegations and so it's clear she was either lying or knows she dug herself a hole. If Trump and/or the FBI wants, they can go after her more, but refer to point 3. She still could have very well been assaulted by someone in the past and if she's not going to keep pressing the matter then the issue is pretty much settled.

Fucking this.