Remember your responsibility, guys

Men are the primary victims of public violence. Either women are beingnhisterical over a non issue, or men are nonchalant in the face of real danger. It's obviously not smart to walk around alone at night where you're at a high risk of being attacked.

Women are not as weak minded as the left make us seem, emasculated plebs and brainless white knights need to fuck off and stop trying to ingratiate themselves, and all women taking part in this mass hysteria needs to be banished to Saudi Arabia, where they can literally shake and viscerally scream all they like.

the man's responsibility is to get hard and stick it in

a.k.a. rape

don't call it sex

all people are born because of rape

Zero fucks given.

Attached: nn.jpg (780x439, 38K)

Tits or GTFO

>men, make it happen for me

It's funny too because what he is saying is "if you arent a rapist, let women walk home alone on empty streets, in empty parking garages, in empty parking lots."

or to translate,

Men should create the ideal conditions for a rapist to strike

Wait. Does this apply to Chad or Virgin? Do traps count? Asking for a friend...

But if everybody always does it, then it works which is rule number one in the liberal handbook

It keeps happening! This guy's basically admitting that he's a creepy motherfucker, probably because he himself fantasizes about groping some unwitting victim in a lone alley. Take note ladies, these feminist cucks are the real rapists.

Attached: 4yg.png (632x640, 46K)

Kek, that's a good point. It might be worth responding to him with this suggestion. Just tweet back that the same advice could (and should!) be leveled against blacks. See how he responds.
When he inevitably back-peddles, because suggesting that blacks temper their behavior in deference to the emotional comfort of whites is incredibly racist and prejudicial, just smugly retort "Well Then!"

Attached: tmp_23069-alex-peay-in-his-north-philadelphia-neighborhood.original-768x513691267232.jpg (768x513, 75K)

What a fucking faggot, a traitor who would throw his fellow men into jail for a tiny bit of female approval. Traitors get shot first.

#RapeWalking soon.

that's not really terrible advice, i think i do this anyways

Same thing about nigger, but das raciys n sheet

So, do women want to be treated like defenseless children who have no agency and need special treatment, or do they want to be treated as equal to men, and entitled to the same pay and respect that comes with the added responsibility? It seems to me like they're trying to cherry pick the best of both sides, and that's kind of fucked up.

call me a cuck but i kind of agree with that tweet

It's so illogical. Anything and everything could be spooky so instead of preparing yourself for it you demand the world to change so you don't encounter it while assuming that everyone is like you, you are the norm and you are so stupid you cannot possibly comprehend you are the wrong one. If the Molly coddling stopped these people wouldn't function and would have to nut up fast or die, unfortunately we all know that won't happen easily. They're in for a great big culture shock soon.

>bee urself
>dont be urself
???

If only this wasn't made up martyrdom and we could actually cleanse society of weaklings simply by existing. I wish I lived in these faggots imaginary world, the first thing I'd do would be to use my powers as the most destructive force in history to snap my fingers and thanos all these faggots back into the wombs of the rabid feminists they've created.

I'll say this again, we need to publicly compare this anxiety to nigger anxiety. They are trying to treat all men like they treated niggers in the 40s.

Quintessentially British post, Nigel.

I have always avoided walking behind people at night when there aren't lots of other people around because I know it makes me uncomfortable when it happens to me.

If I sense a womans unease I usually whip my cock out. Turn that scary creepiness into happiness just like that!

>that face
every time it's some permavirgin trying to white knight women

Respecting wahmen isn't going to get you laid, moron.

>walking behind woman on the street at night
>get closer to her
>when I am only a meter or so far I step on the ground as loud as I can
Who devilish here?

Attached: 1462462540798.jpg (500x567, 22K)

this

That tweet is 100% pure projection from this guy's own psyche.
He thinks about doing that shit to women and assumes every man does.

Where have you been, user? Voting used to have certain requirements too before women were given the right. Feminism has always been about having your cake and eating it too, just look at their weight.

Cuck.

Seriously though, this is liberal logic and by their logic men of color and the underprivileged shouldn’t have to change the way they are to make whites women happy. This has undertones of racism and classism. Next topic

This.
White chicks did shit like this to get Emmett Till killed. They used this to get Mexican, Asian, and poor white men thrown in jail or killed.
This guy is a literal nazi.

Feminism: We are the strongest gender until a man makes us a little scared

That's not true. I've never raped a women, nor overly sexually harassed them. However, just a few nights ago, I crossed the street on purpose because it looked like I had been following a female for a few blocks. I was wearing dark clothes and my hood was up, it was dark and she kept looking back at me. That's a situation neither of us want to be in, so I just crossed the street. It wasn't a big deal, and she relaxed after the fact. I think she even felt bad, because she waited for a minute at the end of the road to tell me she thought my doggo was cute.

i dunno, i suppose i get a similar awkward feeling walking past a drunk slag as some guys who have to whistle with a forced nonchalance in a busy urinal.
feeling like i have to make up a short friendly conversation as to give the impression im not a rapist isnt my idea of fun. especially when the girl usually has some sob story about losing all her friends on a night out.

You could've just said something lol it's ok to talk to people

October is the month to be spooky. Get fucked, cunt

Women need to fucking learn responsibility. Feminism has removed responsibility from women's vocabulary.

She was like 50 feet in front of me. I wasn't going to shout "Hey, n-no need to be scared. I-I'm not going to rape your or anything!" That's not a normal thing to do, but crossing the street took a whopping 3 seconds out of my day. Maybe I'm just paranoid, but for me taking those 3 seconds out of my day was well worth it as anything else that had come out of that situation would have been more costly than 3 seconds. Especially if she over reacted and panicked. It's just so much easier for me to do the damn thing and avoid it all together.

Americans are so fucking weird about everything.

>walking behind woman on public sidewalk
>in a hurry but I guess she's not
>go to pass her
>she screams and pulls pepper spray
>STALKER! RAPIST! THIEF! SOMEONE HELP ME!
>run for my life praying not to be imprisoned for rape

>walking behind woman on public sidewalk
>in a hurry but I guess she's not
>cross the street even though my destination is on this side
>she screams and takes out her phone and starts recording
>SEXIST! MUH SOGGY KNEES! THIS MALE IS AVOIDING ME!
>run for my life praying not to be imprisoned for rape

Attached: 1342878798100.gif (600x338, 1.25M)

>1 post by this ID
you niggers never learn

Attached: 1518648589224.gif (1920x1080, 1.03M)

Criminality by definition requires intent though. Change it to something else you stupid cuck.

Well fair enough if you're autistic you probably shouldn't say anything. Shouldn't walk alone at night either, everyone probably thinks you're a rapist

How big of a cuck can you be.... fuck..

Lmao i remember when I was walking home once in 8th grade and some fat beaner bitch kept looking back at me like I was going to do something. They're so racist against us native Americans

>I wasn't going to shout "Hey, n-no need to be scared. I-I'm not going to rape your or anything!"
You should have. It would have eased her mind.

>walk behind a black person at night
Opressive!
>cross the street
Racist!

I like walking alone at night. There's less people and my doggo is 10/10 cute as fuck. I hate taking her out in the day because everyone wants to stop and ask me questions about her.

Yes goys. It’s your job to infantilize women. Remember they’re just one man standing near them away from a mental melt down. Remember they’re weak minded and inferior so we must make sure that our existence doesn’t scare them.

Not for black people it doesn't. Also
>memeflag

lol, guys will never get laid behaving like this. Women love being called a bitch having thier ass slapped and having you pretend your raping them while you fuck.

youtube.com/watch?v=GMieHgRG_MU

true story
>be me
>it's dark
>walk home
>women walks towards me
>i wear black jacket, have hands in jacket
>i already feel she's scared
>pass her
>she suddenly flips 180 degrees
>had a short shock moment but just kept walking
have to say that the woman already looked a bit feminist

What, no? You don't have to know what you are doing is a crime, and therefor you can "accidentally" become a criminal. Most times this happens with small traffic crime such as parking near a fire hydrant, but with some of the urban population it can go all the way up to felony theft.

If an unlawful act does not require intent, it's a tort not a crime. The only "crimes" that don't require intent are environmental and road traffic "crimes".

>>memeflag

Eurosceptics should be exterminated 2bh, followed closely by cucks who are wilfully ignorant of our laws.

>You don't have to know what you are doing is a crime, and therefor you can "accidentally" become a criminal

Ignorance of the law is indeed not a defence, but you still have to have intended to commit the criminal act. If you didn't intend to commit the criminal act, you didn't commit the crime. That's why the likes of insanity and automatism are defences to crimes - the accused didn't intend to perform those acts.

Hence "[c]riminality doesn't require intent" is a contradiction. There has to be intent in order for there to be criminality.

Why not just walk ahead of her? Afraid being robbed/shoot by her?

When Elon posted his stock share at $420 there was no mens rae of a crime. The intent was not to deceive the public of the actual price of Tesla, but that doesn't mean it wasn't still a crime. You're both talking about the grey area in criminal justice, you're going to argue back and forth for hours over ambiguity. Elon's only intent was fraud, but it wasn't a criminal intent. He simply thought his girlfriend would find it funny. What you're talking about is something to the degree in which homicide would be charged. Did they intend to kill the person? Did they intend to kill the person before the event in question? Did they take steps that show a clear mens rea of intent to end someone's life. The law isn't nearly that black and white, and that's why it's fun.

If we didn't have such a degenerate hedonistic society women wouldn't experience but a fraction of current issues whether overblown (as MANY are) or rightful. Fucking jews playing all sides man.

Also, I think you're confusing actus rea with mens rea. If someone commits the crime, then there is clearly a crime. That doesn't mean they had the intent to do so.

I like being scary

>Criminality by definition requires intent though.
Not for dindu nuffigs.
>Change it
Do it yourself faggot, nobody stops you.

>feminist women always having to ask men for help and to be "allies"
>male feminists and "male feminist allies" are always creepy beta predators

pottery upon pottery

Attached: download.jpg (233x217, 11K)

That is a kike.

Yes there has to be intent, but not intent to commit a crime. There has to be intent to do literally anything as a human. Furthermore, even when it is possible to prove you did a crime accidentally and with no intent to harm, it can still be a crime, such as the difference between manslaughter/criminal negligence and murder or the first degree. Hell, criminal negligence is almost literally "committing a serious crime without intent to commit a serious crime without intent to commit a serious crime". Furthermore, as I have state, some of the population does not even consider felony theft, rape, and even murder as a "crime" in the ethical sense, and any action taken to avoid arrest is not done in an intent to do crime (as they see no crime being committed), but rather to avoid immediate punishment from the person they are harming.

>women exaggerate
Shock, horror.

>tfw these liberal faggots are tryna tell me not to be so scary

fucking idiot must have never gotten compliments on the streets by random qts for his resting murder face

>Elon

I'm not familiar with the particular statute he was charged under but all that matters from a mens rea point of view was that he intended to post that tweet knowing it to be fraudulent. It doesn't matter that he thought his crazy missus would think it's funny. No more than it would matter if his defence to a murder charge was that he thought it would be funny. What matters is that he intended to send the fraudulent tweet (or commit the murder).

>Did they intend to kill the person? Did they intend to kill the person before the event in question? Did they take steps that show a clear mens rea of intent to end someone's life.

Indeed. If the killer lacked intent to kill, then it's manslaughter as opposed to murder (or whatever the American equivalent to manslaughter is). This is a good demonstration of the importance of intent to lay people.

>The law isn't nearly that black and white, and that's why it's fun.

Agreed, but every crime outside of road traffic offences and the like requires actus reus and mens rea - the act and the intent. Since this place got flooded with redditors a few years back, there are a hilarious amount of people here who think this basic principle of law is cuckoldry for some reason.

Isn't this exactly how White supremacists view black people?
Can one of the Nazis here confirm?

No? If you tell a police officer you didn't know you were going over the speed limit, you are still liable to get a ticket. also, watch some Cops or Live PD sometime dork.

This is actually good advice for the creepy incels on this board who lack selfawareness.

>What is involuntary manslaughter

> walking on side walk behind potential female mate
> she's not walking slow enough to pass or fast enough to pass
> I enjoy watching her ass in jeans but I remembered my SJW teachings
> *autism kicks in* now I want to go home, browse /d/, and masturbate but she's walking too slow
> *autism overdrives*, she's probably becoming uncomfortable having a White Male walk behind her, it is night time after all
> ... so I'll cross the street to make her feel more comfortable

Of all the stupid and crazy shit I've texted/tweeted/etc while drunk... nothing is as bad as what Mike Bithell tweeted. He clearly lives in a nice neighborhood for starters. A waste of a great name.

I get his point in the sense that I, as a man, have never considered any women as a physical threat to myself. Same doesn't apply to women, they can't do shit against majority of all men if they're attacked. Women are the vulnerable gender.
On the other hand, I'm sure that numale is against all the means like carrying arms that would actually allow women to defend themselves and refuses to believe demographics about the most common random attackers of women.

When in doubt on whether to seriously consider a seemingly anti-white point someone is making, always look for the low-T look in the face. That is the giveaway.

Attached: 1534475176285.gif (800x792, 607K)

That's his point.....
It's when you're doing something that you shouldn't have been doing in the first place ie. drinking and driving. Again, there is still intent to break the law when you get drunk and plan to drive home.

> slow enough to pass or fast enough to pass

Slow enough to pass or fast enough to hang back*. Sorry, finishing a bottle of vodka here. I work from 9 pm to 10 am, so yes, vodka at 11 am.

>TFW I deliberately do this stuff all the time to make sure people are uncomfortable around me.
I don't have many friends.

better advice for those creepy incels is to simply read some psychology publications to understand why they're fucked up i.e. learned helplessness or absentmindedness to the perception of social nuance as well as pick up starting strength on Jow Forums

this fucking lorax has no idea how to give advise to anyone, especially not a man. he could maybe teach a rabbit a tip or two on how to graze a bit better if he tried, but thas it mang

>out of shape poltard goes on one of his many /nightwalks/
>a woman is on the same side walk going the same direction
>immediately begins to feel concern by proxy
>need to pass her, aggressively pick up the pace
>heavy footsteps, not wearing good exercise shoes
>begins to breathe heavily, not used to any cardio
>wheezing a bit, smokes too much
>woman is now visibly anxious
>she's walking faster now
>need to get this over with, break into some sort of awkward trot
>almost past her finally
>gets maced
I can see this going well.

Attached: IMG_0522.png (1260x840, 944K)

No, I don't think I am.

>If someone commits the crime, then there is clearly a crime.

In order for it to be a crime there must be intent. Otherwise, no crime occurred.

E.g. if you attack someone while sleepwalking, you didn't commit assault because you lacked the intent/mens rea.

>Furthermore, even when it is possible to prove you did a crime accidentally and with no intent to harm, it can still be a crime, such as the difference between manslaughter/criminal negligence and murder or the first degree.

The required intent varies from offence to offence. For some crimes, like involuntary manslaughter, taking a needless risk meets the intent requirement. (cc )

For something like rape, being reckless as to the existence of consent would be sufficient intent. There still needs to be intent in order for a crime to be committed.

> Furthermore, as I have state, some of the population does not even consider felony theft, rape, and even murder as a "crime" in the ethical sense,

Well who cares. Feelings don't trump facts. I thought we avoided emotional reasoning on Jow Forums?

Read back through my posts. I said "with the exception of environmental laws or road traffic crimes" or something to that effect, i.e. minor crimes. You can have "strict liability" crimes that don't require intent but for anything beyond that you run into constitutional/fair procedures issues.

look at that thousand s o y stare

Replace man with niggers and this makes perfect sense.

just larp as a black guy gets the intendes result and he can't call you a racist

>The required intent varies from offence to offence. For some crimes, like involuntary manslaughter, taking a needless risk meets the intent requirement.
Taking a risk when you are too dumb to understand you are taking a risk is intent to do an unforeseen consequence of your actions.
>For something like rape, being reckless as to the existence of consent would be sufficient intent.
So even when you don't know you intend to do something, you intend to do something.

I'm sure your correct from a strictly legal sense, but from the perspective of a conversation on an imageboard you are spouting absolute nonsense. The legal definitions were made to be able to withstand any and all scrutiny by lawyers, but in doing so they are not indicative of reality. You're arguing law theory while everyone else is arguing about real life.

If anything this makes me want to scare women just to remind them of their place.

He's right.
Imagine how scared this young woman was by this man who seems oblivious to how his behavior is terrifying her.
youtube.com/watch?v=eU88LX4Wr30

The Muslims responsibility in any and all situations is to consider how scary they're being. Maybe that means having a transparent back back, maybe it means shaving your beard, and maybe it means not praying in public. Creepiness doesn't require intent, avoiding it does.

>I'm sure your correct from a strictly legal sense, but from the perspective of a conversation on an imageboard you are spouting absolute nonsense. The legal definitions were made to be able to withstand any and all scrutiny by lawyers, but in doing so they are not indicative of reality. You're arguing law theory while everyone else is arguing about real life.

Yeah but crimes are a legal thing, you can't really get around that. There is no crime without law.

If you want to talk about vague moral or social wrongs committed by people you're afraid of that aren't criminal in nature, then don't use words like criminality. It's not the correct (or even colloquial) meaning of the word and it's frankly a bit hysterical.

Saying things like "criminality doesn't require intent" is also daft and embarrasses Jow Forums by making us all look retarded. Don't be a cuck - hold yourself to a higher standard, for your own sake as well as ours.

Hey, another responsibility I need to have, good stuff.

>"walk on eggshells and jump through hoops so that women feel safe"

Fuck off. Whiteknighting isn't gonna get you laid, Mike.