Is there a way how a country can put leftist media in check without becoming North Korea?

>the media
>leftist
lol you inbred cunts don't know anything.

Attached: ewrjp.jpg (1158x1000, 83K)

You should come to America. The media is very much to the left here, and most of the anchors act like leftist. They also give leftist a platform to spew their hate.

They aren't leftist, they're far-right american exceptionalist imperialists. Just because they not saying "gas the jews race war now" doesn't mean they aren't far-right captalists.

Is it leftypol pretending that left=socialist?

If you are against hierarchy you are a leftist. If you supposed welfare and open borders, or support feminism, you are leftist because you are against employer being above employee, foreigner being above native, men being above women.

Your opinion on MOP ownership isn't the decisive factor.

>claims to hate commies
>Kalashnikov
sounds j*wish, but i too am putting my faith in Trump at this point

Attached: tactical banana.jpg (168x300, 16K)

Are we looking at the same media?
Saying gas the jews race war now isn't far right, it isn't even close to the right. It is more leftist than anything else.

In order to put the Press on a leash you must be willing to at least slightly infringe upon their rights.
It is a necessary evil.
I came up with an idea long ago to resolve things like Kavanaugh, its very simple. Anytime the press reports on a sexual crime like Rape that has a very large negative effect on the alleged suspect, they MUST refer to it as "a crime of a sexual nature", this minimises impact in case its fake and gives the suspect a chance to explain to his family. The victim is not allowed to say (Publicly) about what happened till case is resolved privately. Leftist Media BTFO

The left is socialist, the right is capitalist. Any other definition is just redundant. And no, not "welfare" socialist, a welfare state implies unemployment still exists, in socialism, unemployment is eradicated.

Attached: stalin2.jpg (753x527, 73K)

> The left is socialist, the right is capitalist. Any other definition is just redundant
Your second sentence contradicts the first. Your definition is redundant because why do we need to use left and right when we already have capitalism vs socialism. Left vs right is defined with respect to hierarchies, you can read a wiki article.

You think I don't know the left is socialist. That is why I said calling for the death of Jews and a race war was not far right. Hitler was a socialist, and he called for the extermination of Jews.

Left and right isn't defined by "hierarchies", that's just silly because it doesn't explain the system. The USSR had a hierarchy but it was still left wing and anarcho-capitalism (in theory, its impossible in real life because capitalism without hierarchy is a contradiction) would have no hierarchies but is right wing.

Hitler wasn't a socialist, if anything he was extreme capitalist.

> Hitler was a socialist
Hitler was a Keynesian capitalist.

In ancap hierarchy is enforced by nap. Ussr was hardly leftist, maybe only from an economic perspective.
The most left wing idea is ancom/anarchism.

Attached: 1539016837096.jpg (691x642, 178K)

He’s trivializing slavery and the black experience. This post is racist. Next topic

Hierarchies can't be enforced by no being aggressive, that makes no sense. In reality, the NAP is just a crude justification for violence capitalists like and violence they don't like. And the USSR was leftist under everyone's definition, in fact communists who wanted some economic liberalization in the USSR were called "right-communists".

>The most left wing idea is ancom/anarchism
Not really, leftcommunists are so-called "ultra-lefts" and some of them are more authoritarian than Marxist-Leninists (lenin, Stalin, Mao ect). Anarcho-communists are considered further right than leftcoms.

>Become nazi germany
now is your time to shine you mother fuckers

Attached: 1538947070079.png (540x350, 289K)

> Hierarchies can't be enforced by no being aggressive, that makes no sense. In reality, the NAP is just a crude justification for violence capitalists like and violence they don't like.
I agree. That's why ancap is right wing.
> And the USSR was leftist under everyone's definition, in fact communists who wanted some economic liberalization in the USSR were called "right-communists".
That's why there are leftists who denounce ussr? From social perspective ussr was fairly right.
> some of them are more authoritarian than Marxist-Leninists
That's kind of a paradox when leftists support a hierarchy to destroy all other hierarchies and set them free.

Yeah, I'm sure crazy muslims give a shit about NAP.

>That's why there are leftists who denounce ussr?
Mate, if you leftists are a hive mind, you've got no idea about leftism. Marxist Leftists spend more time squabbling and fighting among each other over theory and what marx said or didn't say than with right wingers.

>From social perspective ussr was fairly right.
Not really. a lot of people think that but they're comparing it to the present day. It would be compared the western world now, but throughout most of the USSR's existence, it was more "progressive" than the west at the time.

>That's kind of a paradox when leftists support a hierarchy to destroy all other hierarchies and set them free.
Well yeah that's kind of the point. All communists, even the most authoritarian ones, *eventually* want a stateless, classless, money less society, but along the way the role of the state is disagreed upon.

Attached: hoxhagun.jpg (1968x1965, 185K)

> Marxist Leftists spend more time squabbling and fighting among each other over theory and what marx said or didn't say than with right wingers.
That's exactly what I was saying, you can find leftists who will say that ussr wasnt really left, especially after Trotsky. And on issues like drugs, art, freedom of movement, conscription it sure wasn't left.

Well, in Europe the current establishments are already enacting censorship laws. Nationalists won't need to change that much once they take power. Multiculturalists and LGBT propagandists can be charged for incitement of hatred and anything they say can be put down as hate speech towards Europeans by state propaganda. Let them taste their own medicine.

>That's exactly what I was saying, you can find leftists who will say that ussr wasnt really left
Yeah, shitty libsoc leftists who are arguing based on emotion rather than reason and never get anything done. They just sit around criticizing everyone else on their armchairs but never actually do anything. Trotskyists are just maniacs.