Back to the trees

an influential mathematician once said:
>50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can’t make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.

i find that quite insightful, along with much of the rest of ted's manifesto

what are your guys' opinions on ted?

Attached: 650_teddete.jpg (644x327, 32K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
unqualified-reservations.org/2013/03/sam-altman-is-not-blithering-idiot/
youtu.be/PWilOr8Xk9M
youtu.be/tsCGyarK7wc
nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

bump

fuck you poltards for ignoring ted

My father's office was down the hall from Ted's. When Ted was caught and his name & face were published, I asked my father if he recognized him. He said no. Now there's no way my father never passed him in the hallway or shared an elevator with him less than a dozen times during those two years. Shows how invisible poor Ted was. Nobody recognized him or even noticed him. That's gotta rankle.

Make luddites great again!

He's a retard mathemagician who should stick to obsessing over the value of pi instead of wondering why technology (Objective reality) and traditional values (Subjective reality) are not the same thing. He outs himself as a low IQ liberal by equating the physical with the mental. the same kind of liberal who believes words are the same as violence.
Ideas are formless and timeless and indestructable, technology is material and not timeless or indestructable.
In terms a mathematician should even understand. 1 + 1 = 2 whether you perform a calculation on an abacus, a calculator, a slide rule or a computer

Fuck you op. no one cares about your rulebreaking, insulting, off topic bullshit.

Attached: Da Rules.png (607x788, 446K)

Are you really naive enough to believe that all technology is good? I ask as a Ph.D. in the hard sciences by the way. Not some fucking brainlet.

Those ideas you're so proud of are downstream from technology, bud.

So you're saying now that we can add 1 + 1 on computer now instead of on our fingers hundreds of years ago, the answer should change with technology?

Ive learned, over the many years of my life, the great irony that scientists are retarded

Although he has some interesting ideas, almost all of his credibility went out the window after he went full retard. If he wouldn't have secluded himself from society and instead tried to change it from the inside he would have way more people listening to him.

Imagine being this delusional. Do you really think you're smarter than Ted Kaczynski, idiot?

I'm saying the same thing Ted was saying. When you change technology enough, the way people interact with their world will change. Consequently, the way they THINK about their world will change.

So many of the problems we identify and rail against here are just the consequences of global communication and trade being possible. The old institutions worked, but they don't cover the new tech. They haven't changed anywhere near enough yet to make society stable with 2018 tech. It's only going to get worse.

>iPhones and capitalism can’t exist without transgender bathrooms and twerking

Attached: EE77CC69-758F-4077-8DBE-FE45EAC56BED.png (225x225, 7K)

The connection between the two is actually stronger than you might think. Consumerist capitalism requires a considerable degree of liberalism and freedom of thought and action. It's the reason why the industrial revolution happened in the most liberal places in the world at the time (western Europe).

Teds problem is that he was book learned but not capable of thinking. This NPC behavior is why he became a terrorist. Also explains the general behavior of communists and fanatics from the religion of peace. They can't objectively prove their way works and their subjective reality breaks down

Attached: 2jp53s.jpg (220x229, 12K)

Ted's IQ is 167.

his path "on the inside" was at best to become a professor of mathematics. and to him, that meant becoming a part of the "system" that promotes and develops the "surrogate activities" like mathematics which serve as the fill-in for real fulfillment in life

i honestly don't blame him for rejecting the academic system and instead learning how to live in the wild. he took ownership of his destiny away from the system

bump

Ted had no real evidence that people were happier in the past

Adopting luddism makes you worse than stone age jungle coons who are too stupid to know any better.

He's completely correct. Also you should read Pentti Linkola.

Attached: MN7ghxdpf_PpjiEd4-GeLIDXmcML4krxRNuBIG9Qv6o.png (620x349, 557K)

>machines making non mechanical things is a good thing

brainlet detected

Quads of truth. He is 100% correct. Its nicknamed "Globo-homo" for a reason. ZOG requires the coalition of degeneracy to push its agenda, at least until it can create a genderless brown homogeneous heap of human shit to rule over after a hundred years of BLANDA UP.

they can't say anything against him because he is right. There is reason why most "developed" societies tend to be liberal, patriarchy always existed in the societies in its early stages. women need to be grateful for all the meme jobs like management,hr,office jobs that technology created, without this they should work in hard manual works(we know that the 99% of women would not do it) or just being housewives.

As automation continues we have three options, continue inventing elaborate pointless tasks for ourselves (see any talk by by David Graeber on what he calls 'bullshit jobs'), develop universal basic income for everyone as labor becomes pointless or enforce a luddite existence where technology is limited as a means of providing for ourselves. I guess there's a fourth option in which we all either become homeless because there are no contribution to society we can make anymore or become part of the technological class (ruling over the development of systems). This latter class would not be very large because not many would be needed and it would only consist of the absolute best and brightest. Enjoy this video on automation:
youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU

Also a compelling argument for luddism from Mencius Moldbug:
unqualified-reservations.org/2013/03/sam-altman-is-not-blithering-idiot/

>japan high tech
>still have more traditional value than whitey
what now intelligent person?

They have a high stress lifestyle with a high depression and suicide rate and also aren't producing children.

>what are your guys' opinions on ted?
>implying uncle ted hasn't been /ourguy/ forever
newfaggot

>book smarts vs street smarts

This is something dopes say when they know they are fucking dummies. I hear this shit from niggertalking white trash bagging groceries and selling drugs for a living as some sort of halfassed excuse to avoid acknowledging their incompetence. The inevitable next piece is "i dont need a piece of paper to be successful".

>implying uncle ted hasn't been /ourguy/ forever
since when?

i thought this was the trump board

>He's a retard mathemagician who should stick to obsessing over the value of pi

is that what you think mathematicians do?

since this was /news/

>unqualified-reservations.org/2013/03/sam-altman-is-not-blithering-idiot/

I started reading but then he quoted Maslow's hierarchy and I immediately knew this guy has no clue of what he's talking about

>i thought this was the trump board
lurk moar newfaggot
of course it's the trump board but we've had uncle ted threads for years

Attached: ted.jpg (1080x726, 304K)

>worthless drivel
I love seeing people pretending to know what they're talking about. They always give themselves up when they use words in a meaningless way and throw conciseness out of the window.

Humanity is summoning a demon.

Attached: Nick-Land.jpg (500x500, 40K)

he did good work in harmonic analysis

true; he was a smart guy!

>Implying that the Tau vs Pi math civil war hasn't been raging since forever.

I'll just wait now for some mathfags to notice this post and give you just a glimpse into the bitter depths of rage that seemingly reasonable intellectuals can sink to.

he did it all on his bike !! bravo

>Conflating apples and oranges

Nice try, faggot.

Yup, just like all autists.

Smart enough to stay out a prison.

Now that's some retarded shit.

Fucking leaf

professor ted saw the world as it is

Then live a less stressful life.

Just keep reading, UR is the original redpill.

Because regardless of the sperging that Ted does, and his spot on diagnosis, progress cannot be stopped, you WILL have your children be slaves to the elite, technological progress WILL NOT stop, and humanity WILL cease tonexist through evolutionary or technological means. Time drags on. And the wheel of progress does not stop

I'll bet you hate sliced bread, too.

Attached: Brainlet.png (416x435, 100K)

go jerk off to endless streams of porn, faget

no rulesx bwoken tho

Attached: 51.jpg (1024x768, 222K)

He wasn't a liberal. At all. In fact, in his manifesto he rails against leftism in general, saying it is motivated primarily by an inferiority complex that leads the leftist to identification with 'the downtrodden' so to speak. The result is white rich kids 'fighting' for the rights of blacks, feminist males fighting for the bitches and the trannies, etc. You call him a low IQ liberal, yet he was exeptionally high in IQ, (I don't recall how high right now, but I had read years ago it was a few points lower than Einstein or one of those dudes), and his overall analysis of the technological society is very good, even if he does take many of his ideas from Jacques Ellul. He did not believe words are violence, as you say; quite the contrary, in his manifesto he explains that in order to get published and read by a wide audience ''we have had to kill people''. In other words, he used phyical and very real violence in order to publicize his word by threatening two big US newspapers to publish his manifesto ''or else''. In other words, you are grossly misrepresenting Ted. Don't do it. Ted loves you.

Bill Gaede?

>tech can help speed up deportations of shit holers.

agreed

>i find that quite insightful
I find it quite obvious.

Attached: cuckservatards.jpg (1326x1797, 410K)

College educated (mostly) white women are the main source of West's problems and an aggravator of all the other problems.

If the Kavanaugh episode didn't teach you this, then you weren't paying attention:Jewish controlled and indoctrinated colleges are brainwashing the youth MAINLY women to destroy the west!!!
The kikes have destroyed education
We must OUTLAW all forms of liberal colleges.

youtu.be/PWilOr8Xk9M

Reform the schools! Re educate the feminists, fix women and harmony will followBanned Kanye west speech at SNL with commentary!
Spread like wildfire, a good opportunity to redpill the normies !!! Dindus love kanye


youtu.be/tsCGyarK7wc

Kanye will expose the Jew
>he will redpill the masses of NPCs
>he is a golem, and we will turn him against his Jewish masters

Attached: 1537790419375.jpg (581x960, 93K)

Social constructivism. That's what fucked everything up. Social constructivism being taught for decades in universities around the world in conjunction with the rise of marxist atheism, all in the context of technological society and globalization, with the cultural dissolution all of these things imply. What the fuck else was going to happen? This mess was inevitable. It's always the intellectual class fucking it up for the rest of us. All of these factors have generated a vacuum, and society hates a vacuum, and that's where the radical left comes in. Voilá.

The exit polls are much more interesting.
nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html

>Every minority group votes Democrat at a rate of at least 65%
>The only income demographic Hillary won is those making less than 50k
>Hillary won those making less than 30k by a margin of 12%
>Trump won college educated white males and females

Attached: CapitalIsStorytime.jpg (1886x1106, 1.04M)

Except that was his goal

>Breaking free from the social conditioning and violently rebelling against the state is NPC behavior

Attached: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (800x610, 51K)

More like porn and Tinder hedonism can't exist without iPhones and other forms of personal computing. Now prove me wrong faggot.

Uncle Ted was smart and awesome
he should get pardoned

Should clarify, porn as we know it today obviously. Mild VHS tapes and Playboy mags are on a completely different level from the hardcore anal gaping porn every 12 year old white boy is exposed to today until they inevitably seek out tranny shit.

based tbqh and mathfags bbtfo

>the decay of traditional values
>technological progress
op btfo

Attached: Wernher Von Braun.jpg (640x823, 103K)

>Japan
>traditional
60-70% of young adult Japanese men are so consumed by pornography and digital media that they completely neglect seeking out women user. Have you never heard of herbivore men? Do you have any idea how many young Japanese women have appeared in at least one porno?

Do meme flags not know how to slice their own damn bread?

Imagine taking the bait this hard

fuck off jew

Lmao this leaf is going to cause so much asshurt amongst autistic quantifag cocksuckers.

>B-but muh math!

Any good documentaries or movies on him that anyone would recommend?

Scientists tend to deal in microscale. This is why the whole "technocracy" ideal is folly. Good scientists don't view the big picture, they tend to obsess over small details until they get something right, which has much larger implications for a greater system.

Scientists are not statesmen. I've known brilliant computational chemists who's understanding of the political world amounted to the narrative of The Economist, and they thought this shitrag was an acceptable dataset for comprehending global politics.

Brilliant fuckin chemists though, just couldn't grasp "big pictures".

Nice NPC rhetoric

There's a doc series on netflix right now that was mehhh. They pulled out all the jew stops, insinuating it was manlet rage/can't get pussy/ virgin. Sort of entertaining tho

This amazing thing called technique is what drives the human race forward. The capacity to think is what separates us from beasts. To create news ways to improve or lives, to find ways to achieve a goal, figuring out a process and following it through to its desired end, that is technique. The tools and gadgets in and of themselves are not. As long as humans wield technique, they will never stop believing in progress. Technique is our hope. And it is also our end. Creating something greater than ourselves that will destroy us. Technique is the utilization of knowledge itself. The very knowledge we've gained from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

As shitty as technology is agrarian or hunter life suck too.

But as much as we create new ways to improve lives we also cerate more powerful ways to destroy ourselves or others.

Doesn't mean you need to make technology available as a consumer good, professional computing can exist without every individual person owning a smartphone and desktop/laptop. Same with vehicles, but I'd argue they degenerate the individual far less than media consumption units.

*create

Which people?

Attached: CapitalIsDeceleration.jpg (1518x1103, 468K)