Intelligent white man explains to the japanese of racism and its current state in the west

When people say white supremacy. Understand what they really mean by that word is white MAJORITY. Aka it is a particular nefarious notion that says that white/european peoples should not be allowed to be majority in their own nations/the nations they built. Can you imagine going to china and say it is wrong that china is majority chinese? Well this is EXACTLY THE SAME. But nobody would dare to say that to chinese. It´s a ridiculous proposition.

Just imagine if african immigrants to japan started to say that it is japanese supremacy for japanese to be majority in japan. And that this should be changed to make japan better, is that japanese become minority in japan? To 'cure racism and japanese supremacy' This is exactly what they are doing to white americans in the USA.

They're trying to get ready for 2020 when all of their xenophobia gets challenged. On the one hand tons of new friendships and connections will be made, on the other hand some of those connections will be yellow and brown, then black and blue.

It's not since the Chinese don't have a relatively substantial non-asian population. Nor are the minorities out-breeding asians. It's really telling when native West European populations have lower birth rates than the Japs.

How about from a young man like me aussie boy ;)

>It's not since the Chinese don't have a relatively substantial non-asian population. Nor are the minorities out-breeding asians. It's really telling when native West European populations have lower birth rates than the Japs.
The point is if there were such issues in china or japan or other places. To suggest that this was a) a good thing b) should not be prevented c) should not be taken into consideration by limiting immigration and such things. This would be an outrage in china and japan. And it would be considered unfair and subversive towards japanese or chinese people, or mexican people or any people who should have such issues. But there is no fairness towards white/european based nations in this regard when they say.
>hold on, we need to sort this out, we do have too many immigrants coming in, we do need to make sure our own people take priority and incentivize their birthrates not immigrants birthrates, we do need to demographically balance this so immigration does not negatively impact so that we become minority in our own country.

When white/europeans say this. They are called the most worst of human beings for even suggesting that something should be done about this. And this is what needs to be addressed. And white/europeans therefore want to aggressively limit mass immigration, aswell as kick illegals out aswell as to financially incentivize white people for having kids, in white nations. If you can´t incentivize white childbirth in white nations, where can you do it then? This should not even be any immoral thing whatsoever to suggest. And it isn´t. It´s just they are perpetuating this hatred by saying it is immoral. And the people who do that is because they don't like white/europeans much. And therefore really those should not be listened to because they have no good intentions with it.

You have to fight back against this shit early user. You have to organize and network with like-minded people and oppose it, or else your country will be a 56% shithole like they turned america and are turning europe into.

Do you want niggers and arabs fighting and raping somalia style in your backyard? That is your future with globalism and neoliberalism/neoconservatism

Do not give them even ONE inch.

I love how unapologetically Jared is pro-white. Its near impossible to make an argument of reason he cannnot counter.

When do we get an anime with Taylor voicing it?

>It's really telling when native West European populations have lower birth rates than the Japs.
There are two reasons for this a) massive anti natality propaganda in the western media for many decades now. Telling them to not have that many kids if any. Or to not have kids with other white people.
b) europeans tend to adopt a replacement level birthrate when they reach a number in a nation that fits the logistics. As in they can now utilize that nation properly. So when you take something that is in balance and push it downwards by this propaganda. Then obviously it dips below replacement level and they start to diminish.
But europeans have no problem having many kids if it is necessary historically either. White people tend to only boom their population in two scenarios. a) some natural disaster, war or disease that wipe out a lot, historically they went as high as 8-12 in those cases afterwards for a short time to recoup. b) when colonizing a frontier such as the US. The settlers had very high native birthrates. When the US had no frontier, they automatically adopted replacement level birthrates.
Whites just don´t have the exponential curve of breeding. They automatically when they have enough people for that landmass, adopt replacement level birthrates. Unlike say africans who have 8-12 kids when they can´t even grow their own food. Why they are in a perpetual state of starvation.
This time is a situation where to combat all this propaganda. We need to boom slightly again in birthrates to stabilize. This can easily be done by selective financial incentives. Basically almost paying white people in white nations to have kids, so that it costs them almost nothing. Right now it is the opposite, they have too few kids. And they have raised taxes, and the taxes go to immigrants that come in with different birthrates. And they pay for their kids to them sit on their ass and have 10 kids. Making it very hard for them to afford their own aswell.

The problem with this is, when someone points out that this stabilization is necessary. They spout the vilest hatred imaginable. nazi racist white supremacist. Evil white people blablabla.
And then they go and have 10 kids themselves and sit on welfare ask white taxpayers to pay for it. Whilst telling white people it´s bad to have kids. This needs to end. It´s 180 of what it should be in white nations.

I hope you redpill the nips on this kikery when you get the chance

Jared is an insectophile, his sycophantic attitude towards Asians makes me sick.

>Whites just don´t have the exponential curve of breeding. They automatically when they have enough people for that landmass, adopt replacement level birthrates.
Gee I wonder if evolving in an environment that turns into a barren frozen wasteland for half the year might've had something to do with naturally controlling your population.

I think white people are breeding less for another reason: They instinctively recognize when they don't have enough resources to support having so many children, and the modern corporatist economy that turns people into wageslaves and strips them of all possessions and values, creates a society where the average person feels like they have no resources and no room to grow.

So nobody has children.

Elites own greed is causing their downfall, and they still can't see it as they import millions of foreigners and ensure their own destruction, whether at the hands of their fellows they turned traitor on and stabbed in the back, or the hands of the brown hordes that don't give a fuck about law and order, let alone working to create a stable society.

>insectophile

Wut?

Are you a British supremacist?

youtube.com/watch?v=muw22wTePqQ
Also a good video in this regard with for example the US is in this video.
>Gee I wonder if evolving in an environment that turns into a barren frozen wasteland for half the year might've had something to do with naturally controlling your population.
Yes this is precisely what i mean.
>I think white people are breeding less for another reason: They instinctively recognize when they don't have enough resources to support having so many children, and the modern corporatist economy that turns people into wageslaves and strips them of all possessions and values, creates a society where the average person feels like they have no resources and no room to grow.
Yes exactly, we mastered this long ago. This concept of delayed gratification and scaling societies and our population sizes with regards to ressources available. And this is precisely why white/europeans tend to adopt replacement level birthrates almost immediately, and in case of war or something happeening. They boom and almost hit the precise target of what the population was before that happened. And then they go back to replacement level. It´s almost like clockwork. For example the ratio the germans kept hitting for germany in a period of like over 100 years was 80 million. They kept bouncing back to that number and staying around that. It´s like clockwork almost uncanny. This is the number that logistically fit with logistical utilization of german landmass. Enough workers to do the various things. Enough ressources and food etc. And so on.
Others don´t do that as much, and it´s quite impressive in and of itself how europeans have been able to do that.

>Gee I wonder if evolving in an environment that turns into a barren frozen wasteland for half the year might've had something to do with naturally controlling your population.
This 'ability' is also why european based nations tend to have overall higher hdi/higher average standard of living. Because the more people you have, the more demand you have, so the less there is to go around to the average person on that landmass. So population sizes are very relevant for overall quality of live and standard of living.

This is also to do with the remarkable level to which europeans cultivated their own landmasses, planting trees, all kinds of seedings, planning hundreds of years ahead. It´s a ridiculously meticulous effort over many many millennia that created many of the forests and natural areas aswelll as arable areas that were previously not arable. Remineralizing the soil with things like wood ash etc. etc.

People like to claim that european nature and arable lands always look like it was today. That it just was what they started with. OH NO! NOT AT ALL. Vast majority of it was fucking nothing cultivated by human intervention. from just total crap to what you see today. Population sizes is also relevant to not harm the nature etc. aswell. So there´s all kinds of reasons for balancing that. And since europeans cultivated most of their own landmasses, they have a lot of respect for those things including the nature. Because a lot of those nature was human intervention over millennia that spread and planted it in that specific way. Wasn´t just something they started out with.

I think jared appreciates japanese for example. Because they were not impacted by anti japanese propaganda in japan. As japanese were. So he feels the japanese has something that americans used to have. That ethnonationalistic feel that is so comfy. And i think that´s what he respects more than anything else.
I mean this is why japanese is so comfy. Because it´s basically how america and most european countries were till just 40-50 years ago.

*as whites were. Sorry for the many posts, i´ll cool off a little bit.

He was either born there or raise there, I forget.