What exactly would be bad with a single world government?
What exactly would be bad with a single world government?
We already live under one world government
Jews and niggers.
Outside of Bible predictions nothing.
Peace on earth would be great.
However one world govt doe mean rise of anti christ
Imagine trying to deal with living in Chelyabinsk and having some asshole in Texas deciding what your country is going to do this year.
gay as fuck
It's physically impossible to have a minority of people control large amounts of the popula--- oh. Nevermind, basically this We have it, it's not kewl brah.
this
Simply put. The reason we elect leaders is for the survival of the tribe and to negotiate terms with leaders from other tribes. What would the president of the world do exactly? What if a country doesnt agree with what he wants in that country?
uh, if you don't like the laws, you can't just move somewhere where you do like the laws.
therefore, the only solution is violent revolt.
you will make violent revolt inevitable.
Nowhere to run when it inevitably starts to violate your rights. You won't have Earth-Wide government until there's several colonies on other planetary bodies.
There isn't 1 language, 1 ethnic group or 1 religion.
800 million live like us, 800 million are trying to live like us, 3 billion have never even seen a phone.
There are many worlds.
>leaders of countries incredibly susceptible to corruption
>implying that would be better with one world government.
No one would actually be represented.
Now eat shit, global fag.
Think about it for 15 seconds
Dammit thats the 5th time Chinas won the presidency. I suppose thats what happens when everyone votes their own country in
>What exactly would be bad with a single world government?
Because it would seek to increase their involvement, to destroy and mogrelize all cultures. Look at the US at the beginning vs the US now. You could say the "world government" would resolve trade disputes and inter-planetary defense. But you simply can't trust a government to not grow and overreach.
Absolutely nothing, as long as I ran it.
A single world currency would mean a fuckload of problems in regards to interest rates and inflation and trade. Chinks would outnumber whites and all vote as a bloc for their own interests. OP is retarded.
It would be fucking hard to maintain control over the whole world for a single government. That's all. Corruption will definetely skyrocket. Not mentioning the cultural differences that cause tensions constantly even in small governments right now. Jow Forumsis fighting forced diversity and yet I see this kind of stupid ideas of world government.
Less power the government has to it's citizens, the better. If you create one world government you can say goodbye to any concept of self.
Better hope you like the powers in charge, if you don't there's nowhere to run.
It's a really dumb idea for numerous reasons. Tyranny, inefficiency, lack of integration, different cultural values, etc etc
As your new World Leader I will update my location 5 times a day and everyone must face my direction and pray on their hands and knees.
I'm more concerned with my nation than any common good of whole mankind.
We can barely get one stable country with this much corruption. Downright impossible.
Because nobody wants it, and because the Chinese would get to decide on everything because there’s more of them. Having said that, the vast majority of the worlds population would vote to arrest gay people in a heartbeat
You have been found guilty of thought crime #36912-b. World Police are enroute to your mom's basement. Sit calmly and consume tendies until they arrive. Do not resist.
Many many many mobs, cartels, gangs and it would all devolve into something much like it already is but with different borders unless you were willing to genocide multiple country's worth of peoples.
Because I hate foreigners and don't want them to have any say over my life you stupid faggot.
exactly how sub-human are you?
>thinking greater and lesser races should be held to equal laws
Nothing, assuming america just conquered the world, (and hopefully exterminated the jews, and spics)
Peace at the end of gun?
Stupid question
If theres one world currency, wouldnt that fuck up the whole world economy as theres nothing to trade it with? Like i know trade within a country is a thing but doesnt the world need multiple currencies? Explain like im a retard
Lack of proper representation for most small countries. Also immense power in the hands of a few. It must be inherently authoritarian and its impossible for the ruler to not have any sort of bias since he needs to be born somewhere.
Someone living on the other side of the globe decides that you are going to share your home with migrants and that all that is yours also is now theirs. Why? Because the your leader has a soft spot for those poor, poor migrants of course!
I'm surprised that you know what Čeļabinsk is.
the jews
You are retarded but that's ok. The biggest advantage of multiple currencies is they can inflate separately giving you localized control of the economy. With one currency you get a shitfest like the Euro where all countries are bound to the will of Germany and exist only to buoy their economy
See thats what i thought. Im no economist tho.
People tend to know about it due to the meteorite impact from a few years ago. user might have other reasons.
We all know who’s gonna be in power in a one world government.
Even if you are in the lower class of the United states, you are already richer than at least 90 percent of the world population. The real poor will demand to tax you by half even if you don't see yourself as poor
Jews would run it because goys are all nigger brained and that upsets the stormfags.
The one who runs it. Thats why we shouldnt have one till God comes along and runs it, and thats why the antichrist will LARP as God
What has any individual country government done so perfectly that we should have one governing body for the entire planet?
Are you retarded or just willfully ignorant?
centralisation is the way of satan
Can't solve all world problems with one set of rules.
A single world government would be so gigantic and complex that the inefficiencies and bureaucracy alone would implode it. (and that's ignoring real world problem such as corruption, supremacy groups or treason/sabotage)
A good single world government would basically be bare minimal with a very small set of universal rules, and everything else would be delegated to local authorities. But then, what would be the point. Might just have different governments.