A page from a chapter of an Anthro class I'm taking

I'll twist yours off your head, you stupid nigger

Pointless fucking thread, beaners should learn english.

haha
Someone has to actually read this drivel and pretend it is worth evaluating.
>indelible in the animated chronotope

tl;dr:
>Dallas sounds like "da' las" which apparently means something rude to some savvy Mexicans
>this "speaks volumes" about the "personhood" of migrants

The highlight of the chapter is this part.

Not gonna lie - I've read papers on neural networks that were easier to comprehend than this chapter. But I'm willing to give the author the benefit of the doubt. I'm friendly that way (perhaps too friendly for my own good)

Attached: 20181009_134428_004.jpg (3984x2988, 2.01M)

You dont know shit about me

He knows you're too retarded to rotate an image 90 degrees. You've said as much.

It's on my next midterm, so I gotta really comprehend it.

Despite some very dense readings like this, it's a really fun course. I wouldn't take it if I had any say in the matter, but I don't regret the experience one bit.

You're a patient fella, then. Perhaps you'll do well.

...guilty as charged. You caught me with my pants down.

In summary Mexicans conspire with each other to invade and exploit American cities so much that it has become a subject of humor for them. The Mexican high elders convene with gang leaders and point out specific cities to rape and then they all laugh hysterically.

Bunch of alphabet soup. Just cut to the chase and read the referenced material. It's not rocket appliances.

patience is part of the equation - but it can lead to sloth in excess. My shield and sword is mindfulness. Imo when you have a clear vision of where you want to be in, say, 5 years, then it's much easier to slog through whatever the world forces you to do. It's just a matter of ensuring that, whatever you do in the present, it leads you in that direction.

It's all like a giant, multidimensional endurance test.

>literally performs that resiliency into being
Ridiculous word choice. It sounds like it was generated by a computer.
>unmarked realms
the realms are marked. The borders are the marks.
>sanctioned forms of legal citizenship
you mean "legal citizenship" -- if it's an unsanctioned form, it's not legal citizenship.
The whole next line is some strange, contradictive word salad that sounds like it was fed through Google Translate too many times.

to critique the point being put forth in the text, though, sometimes a joke is a joke because it's funny. When someone from the city of Hamburg tells you that they are a Hamburger, are you going to laugh because you imagine them as a hamburger or are you going to laugh because of the socioeconomic tensions between the USA and Germany and laughing at people telling you that they are Hamburgers reinforces your personhood as an American citizen?

Long story short:

If you ever spent time around wetbacks and understood even a basic amount of mexispeak, you'd know that everything is a sex joke or a cock joke or an ass joke. They're like the jews of the brown world. Food, for instance, is a particularly abundant source of immature humor.

A: "You guys wanna get sushi?"
B: "You like sushi?"
A: "Yeah...?"
B:"SU CHINGA TU MADRE JAJAJAJAJA XD"

A: "What do you want for breakfast holmes?"
B: "Idk how about some chorizo and eggs"
A: " I bet you like chorizo and eggs"
(chorizo being dick and eggs being testicles)

It's non-fucking-stop with these "people"... And those were just the food examples.

A bunch of bullshit that was probably written by a machine

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of
neostructural sexuality. In a sense, Derrida uses the term ‘capitalist
objectivism’ to denote the role of the participant as observer. Postdialectic
materialism states that narrativity serves to reinforce hierarchy.

“Sexual identity is impossible,” says Lacan. It could be said that von
Ludwig[1] implies that we have to choose between
deconstructive predialectic theory and the cultural paradigm of narrative. The
main theme of the works of Pynchon is not theory, as Bataille would have it,
but subtheory.

However, in V, Pynchon denies postdialectic materialism; in
Vineland he affirms deconstructive predialectic theory. The primary
theme of Hanfkopf’s[2] essay on capitalist objectivism is
the paradigm, and eventually the defining characteristic, of semioticist
society.

But the premise of postdialectic materialism suggests that sexual identity,
perhaps surprisingly, has intrinsic meaning, given that Lacan’s model of
capitalist objectivism is valid. Derrida uses the term ‘deconstructive
predialectic theory’ to denote the role of the reader as writer.