I realise this is not going to go over well here (at least im not going to be banned like those faggots on reddits would do)
But hypothetically, if the holocaust happened more or less as generally accepted, all the persecution men women children, death numbers and means of execution. all as is in the history books.
Do you think that would have been a proper action for a government to take?... the complete removal of all human rights and dignity..
In hindsight, no. They should've shipped the jews to Palestine sooner, and have them eat eachother as they do now.
Kayden Scott
What if she made just a little braaap in the sand. Imagine being a grain of sand that gets boffed on then swallowed up by her stink wrinkles.
Kayden Cook
since the jews declared war against Germany in '33, and were LARPing as Nazi's during riots while destroying jewish owned shops, and before that a revolution after the first world war, they were not people but belligerents. Also, there was a computer called the Hollerith which the SS used to manage the camp population with a tattoo numbering system, from those records img related. For it to be a holocaust people need to be burned to death but no one suffered that fate in the camps, but innocent citizens in cities did though
that's not really what im getting at... im just asking, if say, Schindler's list is exactly accurate ... that would be an atrocity, right?
Carter Cook
So you're a pacifist who thinks any violent action is wrong regardless of the reasoning.
Afterall self defense is murder against an attacker isn't it?
Hudson Murphy
no
Gabriel Evans
Yes. When you are stuggling for your very existence against a force so completely destructive such as judeo-bolshevism, there are no rules, only victory or death.
Joshua Butler
What are you getting at? You type like a goy. Are you suggesting Spielberg is not the greatest director of all time?
Carter Sanders
simply, no. Totalitarian governments are always wrong.
is trying to mislead you. Hollerith was the name a type of card reader machine made by IBM (yes that IBM) they helped the Nazis catalogue jews and track them down (yes, that IBM)
there were hundreds of these machines used by the nazis for all sorts of purposes. (train timetables, and army pay rolls - all big factories and government departments used them)
the one at dachau was used for running the camp. However it was not used for the Auschwitz tattoo system, and it was not used to keep records of all the camps.
the records the post refers to are not from the hollerith cards. they are written records from several camps, none are complete. they have no records from hundreds of camps. the totals he gives (the numbers he gives) are not in the NYT in the article published on that date, adn it does not say that they are totals for all deaths in the camps.
the 73K deaths at Auschwitz are recorded in books, not punch cards, which cover only Camp 1, which had a 20K capacity, and only cover less than two years of the camp operations (and yes that means 73,000 people died in under two years in a camp that held only 20K max, so a life span of six months average)
the death books do not cover the 115,000 capacity Camps 2 and 3, and do not cover those killed on arrival.
the leaf knows this, but tries to deceive anyway.
He also tries to play on the ancient greek root of the word - because he thinks words never cahnge over time. He is of course an idiot
Wyatt Foster
its a simple yes or no, I have no angle. i'm not trying to prove a point, I'm just curious.
Jaxson Brooks
Ill bite. Yes the Germans were correct to persecute and put the jews in camps. I do not think a majority of the killings should have happened however. They should have just fed them minimally until after the war when they could have startex deporting again. Killing them was the easier and more effective solution but not the correct one.
Jayden Campbell
kek fpbp
Owen Parker
Lmao nice uberlarp
Levi Russell
> another attempt to deceive - Krege never published his report, he never published his data. his short paper that made these claims is obviously bullshit, since the site was extensively disturbed by looters digging up the mass graves to find gold teeth.
real archaeologists subsequently did real surveys, and found several huge mass graves.
Andrew Hernandez
so you think that killing children int eh Crimea who were not even born when Hitler came to power and have no influence or effect on Germany, is justified by... self defense?
really?
killing a million children is self defense?
killing little old ladies and grandfathers in the Ukraine is self defense?
mass shooting young women is self defense?
you are having a laugh aren't you? (a very sick psychotic laugh...)
Brody Murphy
its a measure of how threatened one feels
Brayden Sanchez
look at all the bullshit artistry I can get out of this clown. stay mad jew
There were 100 million civilian deaths in WW2. The Jews in the Warsaw ghetto were starving to death and the Germans knew they couldn't control them for long. Would it have been better to let them starve? Is it better to kill them by fire bombing them or with nuclear weapons than gassing them in an industrial method?
Isaac Hall
Survival of your people and culture is more important than someone else's dignity.
James Long
I like you and your pictures
Zachary Wright
Jews are parasites on our societies. Removing them by any means necessary is completely justifiable, but that doesn't mean that some means aren't better than others. At this point, my ideal solution would just be to enforce mandatory Jewish immigration to Israel. Jews need to become a rooted people, and Israel is realistically where that is most likely to happen. I wouldn't even mind if, say, the US continued to provide military support for a time. It would be far, far better than the arrangement we have now.
I never really understood why "nude/sex on the beach" was supposed to be appealing. All I can think about is how coarse and rough the sand would be. I'd take soft, clean sheets any day of the week.
People love to go on about "the lessons of WW2" and to imagine that even you could be "as evil" as the German people. When they say that they are participating in a greater evil, both absolving themselves of responsibility for the horrors of WW2 and perpetuating the same mentality and propaganda that led to it. Nobody wanted to take the Jews when Hitler offered, the allied leaders really were all pressured into actively pursuing war by (((business interests))) deluded by greed. We all killed those Jews and raped those Germans, none of it was needed and none of it was what anyone wanted including Hitler. There were always a million better options than literal hell on earth but everyone gets caught up in insane bullshit and then when they "win" they have the nerves to talk about how evil the other side was.
Kayden Lewis
You are responsible for anything you can fix but don't. Everyone in the world was responsible for WW2 and we will all be responsible for the next one.
Mason Harris
Jow Forums: the holocaust never happened
Also Jow Forums: Jews undermine every foreign country they reside in and they have to be stopped somehow
Nolan Richardson
I'm pretty sure that highlighted section isn't true.
Kayden Bailey
It's absurd that we can look at both sides of the rwandian civil war and understand the animosities that drove both sides to conflict.
There's been so much revisionism about the holocaust that its hard to even get a straight number even more, the 6 million doesn't add up unless you count the typhus epidemics and partisan actions on the eastern front. Even then its screwy because hundred of millions of people died in ww2, assigning every bit of blame on germany is pretty biased.
We can, however, understand motives. Jews were (and are) a largely urban type. It is natural that they would be swayed by the international communist movement. More than likely, their religion had very little to do with why they wanted a proletariat driven government around the world.
Where their religion comes into play is the organization of those movements. When jews declared a boycott against germany for its reaction to communism, the line got drawn. 1933 was when it became black and white. Even then, the persecution became monetary, work camps remained mostly political, it was only later that things got out of control. To what extent out of control is hard to quantify.
tl;dr jews had as much to do with their plight as germans. Don't be a fucking backstabbing commie.
>tl;dr jews had as much to do with their plight as germans. Don't be a fucking backstabbing commie. I can't beleive how many people forget about that. Starting a civil war sounds like a pretty sure fire way to piss off a country. Even Britain was concerned about Bolshevik revolutions taking root.