Jow Forums literally cannot refute this

>today’s wheat is “natural”
>after we went full eugenics on it for literal millennia

Bedbugs use their serrated dicks to literally fuckrip new vaginas into their unwilling females, filling the entire body with rapecum. Hurr it’s natural so that means MeToo!!

>1 post by ID
>board being slid hard to shut down the Kanye thing
FUCKING SAGE

Homosexual penguin couples are known to kidnap baby penguins.

I can't really see why its a bad thing.

dont penguins also rape eachother pretty often, should we be raping bitches and killing their parents because that's the message I'm getting here

Attached: 1438076013356.jpg (386x386, 33K)

Actually not really.
Single mother penguins do this not homo couples.
And in the rush to try and adopt they often crush the baby to death.

???

Attached: natural.png (631x157, 7K)

It's bad because it's a filthy commie spreading lies instead of the truth.

I mean, if a baby doesn't have parents, its better if the homos adopt it than it having no parents at all.

This. I wouldn't mind degenerates if their degeneracy was contained on some remote island. But they are danger for the society.

...

because you literally offered nothing worth refuting, you've offered no evidence, no study, no tracking information, just a narrative which tells me nothing.

Besides, I don't want to be an unthinking animal. I get one set of gonads and one life, and I'm not interested in attaching my brain to a pile of shit held inside an intestine.

meme flag faggotry with no sources

How can anything that's healthy be the cause of rampant STDs?

Attached: IMG_6028.jpg (634x623, 49K)

So cancer is natural, leaf?

Agreed but pedophiles and flamboyant freaks should be barred from the adoption process, the risk is simply too high.

Just did.

Attached: 9wluelb2x8lz.jpg (1158x1158, 156K)

Literally yeah, it is.
Where you expecting me to say no? Did you think that would prove me wrong?

Even in nature gays groom unattended children

>my dog fucks the couch pillow
>therefore humans should fuck their couch pillow

Do you consider an abnormality to be natural? Are skin tags natural?

The only thing that should be happening to people who try to touch children as homosexuals is bullets in the skull.
You're killing yourself for a narcissistic addiction, and now we're supposed to give you care of any child? Nope, you should be killed.

Animals don’t shit in toilets either so I guess we should stop doing that too.

I’m sure a lion would be perfectly fine getting buttfucked and wouldn’t mind at all.

Yeah, those definitely should stay as far away from kids as possible.

Animals also fuck, eat, and abandon their young.

>No see, fucking their offspring ensures that their strong genetic traits get passed on
>No see, eating their children ensures that overpopulation doesn't become a problem for the species
>No see, sometimes the offspring has genetic defects which causes the parents to abandon it.

Infanticidophobia, cannibalophobia, and incestophobia only exists in one species: Humans

Animals do not have morals.

Animals are very horny, they'd do anything to have an orgasm.

>Animals raised by homosexual parents
you never mentioned humans, an extremely self aware and understanding species, homosexuality is very common among people(not animals) raised by homosexual parents, it's almost as if it's not natural and it can be adopted via normalisation and that sex only exists for one reason that we're very aware of, procreation, anything else is simply for a dopamine release, kind of like an addiction or fetish, it's pointless, but you do it anyway...
...Degenerate.

We are also the only species to develop ""transgender"" people. Many of those species also show signs of rape, incest, matricide, infanticide, necrophilia and cannibalism. So it's still a shit argument. Homosexuals display a far higher rate of every single std that exists and are more prone to mental illness unrelated to the sexuality. Humans developed to have tons of children so that they could help each other during the events that you describe. Also, humans are inherently revolted by homosexuality, and have to be taught over time to accept it.

According to post wolves are sodomites

Our lovely (((elites))) do all that and more though.

Show me proof of animal gatamuchi

>homosexuality is very common among people raised by homosexual parents
Source?

In summary, we could say that Humanae vitae formulates the conditions according to which a sexual act is an adequate expression of conjugal love. Only when it remains in itself open to the transmission of life is the sexual act between spouses an act of union between the two, in which the authentic gift of self is realized in the body. The link between the two meanings should not be located at the biological level, but rather at the intentional level: there can be an intentionally contraceptive act which, even if it is physiologically fruitful, contradicts the truth of self-giving (for example, an act in which artificial contraception fails); just as there can be an act that per se is open to life, even though it is physiologically sterile and known as such (as happens in the natural regulation of births).

An act rendered intentionally sterile denies at the same time the sincere openness to the gift of oneself and the full acceptance of the other: it is an act that turns in on itself. Although carried out with the consent and collaboration of one’s partner, the contraceptive act intentionally closed to procreation is an act aimed at the pursuit of individual pleasure, which does not differ from masturbation. For this reason, sexual difference does not play a qualifying role in such an act and it is therefore analogous to homosexual acts. The English philosopher G.E.M. Anscombe says that those in favor of contraception will have no arguments to oppose homosexual relationships. The Italian philosopher Augusto Del Noce went so far as to say that “today’s nihilism (which he calls gay nihilism) always intends love ‘homosexually’ even when upholding a man-woman relationship.” It has been rightly observed that the man-woman relationship was public from its origin with its openness to the generation of children, and that is why it is sanctioned by marriage, while the homosexual relationship is in se private and cannot be recognized as marriage.

There are only 2 exclusively homo animals: faggot sapians and domesticated sheep. Both are a result of jewry. The latter evolved to be gay because jewish shepherds were constantly banging the female sheep, so the male sheep just started banging each other. Also, a male lion will kill all cubs that were sired by another male lion before banging the female's wet cunt.

Jow Forums: racism and ingroup preference are natural! It’s natural to be a racist and hate black people for their colour because look even animals do it!
Also Jow Forums: Homosexuality is a sin! Just because animals do it doesn’t mean we should because we are not animals.

The homosexuality found in nature is almost always a show of dominance, otherwise known as Rape.

This is pure anthropomorphization. Very few animals breed for life. Essentially no other animal has an investment in their offspring even comparable to that of man. The number of homosexual pairings observed in nature number in the single digits.

These fucking communist faggots are trying to meme humans into bonobos and it's working.

Kill yourself homophille

>Muh appeal to nature fallacy
You can also find rape, murder, incest, matrices, Patricia, and I fanticide on the animal kingdom. Should we as a species allow those things too?

One time I saw a chimp piss in its own mouth, I've seen thots do the same. Nature is so fascinating.

I think you mean that natural does not mean intentional.

Most homosexuals are pedophiles and homosexuality is a mental disorder because we're biologically heterosexual.
Would you leave your kids to be raised by mentally deranged gay pedophiles faggot?

by that logic necrophilia is okay.

Just adding on. All these have a loosely defined purpose in Darwinism as well.

>implying natural means good
>no sources
>sage

it is a logical fallacy to use "its natural" as a reason for something being ok.

Killing is natural, animals do it all the time

>Why killing is natural and important

my dog eats its own shit. I hear fags do that too.

Its just some of the things that distinguishes us from the animals...we don't eat our own shit and we don't stick our dicks in another man's asshole.

>homosexuality is natural so any argument against that is evil and stupid
>we can make people less bigoted by magnetically lobotomizing their threat-processing centers, so we should do that

Except for the ridiculously high child abuse rates among fags, and the indoctrination of children into a lifestyle that is even by fag-admission to be harmful.

killing and eating one's children occurs in thousands of animals species.

theres literally no way we can argue that its wrong to kill and eat your own children. because nature.

Humans raised by homosexual parents were raped and molested by those parents at 400% the base rate.

Sexuality is not a 'natural' category, it's a historically and culturally contingent form of subjectivity. There were no homosexuals or heterosexuals for that matter before such subjectivities were constructed in the 19th century through certain forms of discursive practice.

Essentialism is fucking retarded, but it's especially retarded to impose our cultural understandings on other species. There are no homosexual or heterosexual animals - they don't give a fuck about our understandings of identity.

Attached: Foucault2.jpg (1000x600, 83K)

Rape is more prevalent than homosexuality in nature

if a monkey masturbates in public it is natural,but if a human masturbates in public is considered to be a god damn creep and shot by police

Attached: 1530632313688.jpg (333x500, 43K)

Somebody posts that one Oglaf strip about the angelfish.

Yea I'm sure orphan Timmy is having a dandy time getting molested by his parents.

Just because you see something in nature doesn't mean its desirable or natural.
This.
Even this faggot gets it.
Sage.

balls of steel

So this is what it’s like to live in the world of darkness.

so are fags just animals?

I agree completely. Did you know that ducks have absolutely no problem with necrophilia? This helps reduce sexual tensions and provides relief for the living animal. And yet our opressive RIGHT WING DEATHSQUAD LITERAL NAZI government thinks it's right to enforce these sickening laws forbidding people to have sex with corpses. I always wanted to cum inside a dead six year olds rotting pussy, and it is absolutely and completely natural to think and feel like that!

So many fallacies and unanswered questions...

1-This explanation only makes sense for lesbian mammal couples. How two males would feed an infant?

2-There is no need to waste energy engaging in pseudo-reproductive activities to fulfill the function of adopting orphans.

3-If the parents died, their genes are not that good anyway. Keeping the orphan alive will just spread shitty genes which will decrease the overall population fitness.

4-You have all sorts of fucked behavior among animals, including infanticide, pedophilia, rape, cannibalism and etc. All these behaviors are important for their species, which does not mean is desirable or beneficial for a different species. Humans are also the only species the commit the ad Naturam fallacy.

that's pretty badass

Even if this is true, which I'm inclined to believe, if we were all primitive animals I would be fine with some faggot raising kids. But humanity is at a higher level and we have morals, civilization, intelligence, and love. To let the current understanding of homosexuality flourish in society is to let the pillars upholding us against degeneracy crumble away. You just need to take a look at San Francisco to understand just what degeneracy can do to society. You must be purged of your current form of subversion if you wish to be seen as anything even remotely close to normal.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but not every gay couple adopts a child, and there are plenty of straight fertile couples that adopt. Not to mention infertile couples that adopt, not to mention there are still plenty of orphans and foster children that aren't adopted.

This is such a shitty argument for defending gay couples, they have nothing unique to offer aside from AIDS and overall degenerate values

>Still, it’s possible that a social grouping of animals would ostracize a member for engaging in even a single act of gay sex. Indeed, members of nonhuman species have been known to shun members of their social groups on account of certain specific behaviors. A 1995 study described a young adult chimpanzee that refused to grunt submissively and seemed to bully females; eight other males assaulted him and exiled him from the group for three months.
slate.com/news-and-politics/2012/03/animals-and-homophobia-are-humans-the-only-species-that-discriminates-against-gays.html

>Homophobia has been demonstrated before in rats. In a study they showed that rats in conditions of high population density form certain trends. An increase in rats exhibiting dominant and ultimately violent behaviors (more psychopathic rats), an increase in hypersexuality, cannibalism (they kept them well fed so it's not related to running out of food) and an increase in homosexuality and bisexuality. The latter two could be seen to be a good adaptation to an increasing population. (I'm not implying it's a choice, a gene may have characteristics that make it more likely to activate in certain circumstances than others).
>The dominant rats would attack and kill them if it caught them together.
debate.org/opinions/is-the-statement-homosexuality-is-found-in-450-species-homophobia-is-only-found-in-1-correct

Homosexuality actually does occur in lions.

youtube.com/watch?v=mLJ-5WoXUlU

Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!

No penetration. No ejaculation.

Besides it is unlikely the male would not mate with females too, so the correct term would be bissexuality.

No. Homosexuality is caused by acute Toxoplasmosis in childhood, which faggots transfer to each via anal raping of children. Toxolasmosis makes you hypersexual and removes natural disgust instincts.

Cancer is natural and abnormal. Diseases are natural and abnormal.

There are 8.2 million species on the planet- 2 million of those are animals. You're telling me that 1,500/2,000,000 isn't abnormal though?

1,500 is 0.075% of 2,000,000 - you're telling me that's something to be proud of? That's extremely, EXTREMELY abnormal.

So you think 1 man shoving his johnson up another man's ass is natural?

>according to science homosexuality can be found in 1,500 animals
>there are 2 million animals
>1,500 of 2,000,000 is 0.075%
>0.075% of animals are capable of being gay! look at how common and natural that is!
>within the 0.075% of animals that can be gay, homosexual animals are even rarer
>SO NATURAL! SO COMMON!

Rape can also be found in animals, guess we should normalize it since animals do it.

Faggots rape the children they "adopt"

>Does Maltreatment in Childhood Affect Sexual Orientation in Adulthood?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
archive.fo/6D8YE

>Study: Homosexuality Linked with Childhood Trauma
archive.is/yfjOu(news article)
archive.fo/6D8YE(archive link to study)

>The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756/

Attached: images (11).jpg (509x603, 56K)

>Comparing humans and monkeys

Thats racist against black people you bigot

Gays reproduce by fucking kids.

Attached: FAG WARFARE 06694b7d786ea10608e9b2a8f4c304a8.jpg (487x650, 36K)

>it's natural so it's good
poison ivy and stinging nettles are natural too. doesn't mean you should rub them on your skin.

Attached: 1401150179357.jpg (760x596, 175K)

Are we comparing bummers to animals ?

This is the most pseudoscience bullshit I’ve ever heard. On top of that shouldn’t we be better than animals and not stoop to such lows as a non thinking animal?

Attached: image.jpg (500x359, 103K)

Darkness holds vastly more secrets than the light does.

I fucking hate penguins so much, long before reading this.

>homophobia is only found in humans
so, it is hating faggots, which makes us human?

which separates us from the animals?

Cannibalism, rape and male dominance also exist in nature. Does that mean they're okay?

Attached: 1529200898004.jpg (472x1733, 252K)

"Homophobia however, exists in only one species: the Human"
My cat will kick your faggot cat's ass.

Is that leprosy?

"natural" is a retarded and arbitrary term. according to the term, shit isn't natural either, since humans make shit in their abdomen. and other humans aren't natural either, since other humans made them.
the truth is of course, that that's bogus, and that everything is natural, since everything that exists required nature to create conditions by which they were created. human beings are as much a part of nature as are animals, plants, bacterias. what plants produce, is natural. what bacteria produce, is natural. what animals produce, is natural. thus, what humans produce, must also be natural

>Rape is a normal occurrence in the animal world
>Animals that are "homosexual" are genetic dead ends
>Humans that are homosexual are taught and groomed to be homosexual
>Animals also eat their own shit, eat their own babies, eat their own mates, and have no souls

Yeah, I would totally want to live my life like an animal.

Lions truly are the Chads of the animal
Kingdom. Say what you want but they do not get cucked.

litterally no one dies of aids anymore, theres even a birth control like pill to protect against it, just cause some gross fag looks like ass doesn't mean everyone of them is like that