Never happened

They don't make the parts that we made the saturn V out of anymore. It's cheaper to design and build a new rocket than it is to build a saturn V again. Also the government is all around terrible at everything and is full of incompetent people who never get fired.

Kek
Turned in the quest and now I get to fight off angry hordes coming in to challenge the rest of the thread.

Not even mad. I just want people to start thinking and looking for themselves... even if you doubt it right now, take a look at the pictures and think for yourself "What if?"

Attached: 1538949105351.jpg (1920x1016, 802K)

Attached: Rapture~01.jpg (1440x2264, 984K)

Sure thing
youtube.com/watch?v=8GFfbsOaZc0

Yet they were good enough to send a man to the fucking moon. After that they got lazy.
Also fucking lol NASA has astronomical (kek) budget and yet they couldn't rebuild the same thing or even improve on it?
But even than NASA said it MULTIPLE times that they don't have the technology anymore.
KEK NPC

They do, they just don’t have the budget as it goes to other shit. Post proofs of not having the tech maplenigger

it can't even survive 1 minute under a christmastree when my kids zerg this parcel.

More quest-giving.

>YOU JUST HAVE TO BELIEVE ME GOYS!
>IT'S DEFINITELY NOT THAT I JUST WANT YOU ALL TO SEEM CRAZY AND SELF-DISCREDIT.
>NO GOYIM, IT'S TOTALLY FLAT!

I already did nigger. Just one more evidence that you NPC's are so fucking brainwashed you don't even do any research.
youtube.com/watch?v=8GFfbsOaZc0

NPC quotes

>how could NASA fake such a thing? hundreds of people were involved with it, they couldn't all possibly be lying

Attached: 1533354057020.jpg (950x1871, 393K)

They don’t have the knowledge. We are leagues above and beyond as far as technology goes but to say we couldn’t recreate it is false. It would just be silly to try to redo the Saturn V and most of the original creators and designs are likely dead and lost.

Good disinfo juden.

I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

Attached: 4L_79o2ARxo.jpg (713x576, 78K)

What is this a video of?

>To say we couldn't recreate it is false

youtube.com/watch?
v=8GFfbsOaZc0

> It would just be silly to try to redo the Saturn V and most of the original creators and designs are likely dead and lost.

And yet they still don't fucking know how to leave LOW Earth Orbit and admitted in that video that they CANNOT go to the moon.
Try harder NPC.

SpaceX rocket being used to show humanity the firmament to prepare them for the great awakening.

Attached: 1538733789930.webm (960x720, 877K)

they get fuck all compared to the 60s

Attached: NASA-Budget-Federal.png (2000x1300, 70K)

So at their peak they didn't have enough witts to secure the technology but they sent a man to the moon.
Seems really legit NPC.

Was this the one in LA a few days ago?

“Nasseh” in Hebrew means “to carry”

Mongoloids

Attached: 95672783-143E-4F69-A890-1269F6F20469.gif (350x263, 771K)

stop with that flatearth shit pls. nasa are liars, but the earth is round my friend. every day the same shit without having an answer why we are not able to point our lasers to the mount everest from every other mountain on this damn planet. it is round. nasas moonlanding footage is fake btw.

>Accusations of being an NPC while believing in everything you read on the internet.

Attached: 4L_OTPbV1lm.png (500x501, 80K)

yeah but the Russians have been doing this too. Happened during the world cup. I was watching the spacex stream and the elevation of the rocket was about 70-80 miles up which is almost exactly where the firmament supposedly is elevation wise.

Attached: 1517106964724.webm (640x480, 2.78M)

Attached: 1515436507877.webm (854x480, 1.28M)

Attached: 1531940100954.webm (1280x720, 2.85M)

Attached: 1517815711305.webm (720x1280, 1.75M)

>why we are not able to point our lasers to the mount everest from every other mountain on this damn planet
Because the air blocks the light after a long enough distance.

Where was this video taken?

Not bait. Unlike you I do actual research and actually use common sense instead of being a brainwashed faggot who believes everything the mainstream media says.
The evidence is in front of you but than you get to the defencive logic saying that "Oh it's on the internet so it must be false".
Just like a good NPC.

LOS ANGELES

Attached: Firmament.jpg (2469x1812, 2.47M)

Attached: 1533351394891.webm (720x480, 817K)

Attached: 1517463154140.jpg (996x1528, 738K)

>How the fuck did NASA destroyed ALL the documents necessary to rebuild the technology that help us on the Moon landings?
Bush fired all those people after Cheney intentionally blew up the Columbia, they were warned, they had fair notice, documented, that was done on purpose and everyone was shitcanned by Obama shortly after

>most of the original creators and designs are likely dead and lost.
yeah but we have the designs

Laufet Brüder wie ein Held zum Siegen!

ok i give you that. another one:
why are skyscrapers near water when seen from distance under water?

Evidence?

Look like pic. Probably extradimensionals, since extraterriestrals are now obviously not possible.

Attached: ufo.jpg (535x478, 76K)

It's the Elohim

Attached: 1510732626256.png (1500x1000, 938K)

Look up "getting beyond the van Allen belt" is it something Scientist claim today they are struggling to deal with, but we necessarily had to through through it during the first moon landing.
And since streaming wasn't really a thing, this means all the video would have grainy holes in it from free particles piercing through the film.
It's all incredibly suspect. I used to believe we landed on the moon, but now I think it was just a ruse to help bankrupt the USSR.

I like how these quest-givers think passively watching tv is a better source for information than reading and researching on the internet.

the rockets you dummy. we'd have to build new rockets and redesign the lunar lander and return vehicles.

>why are skyscrapers near water when seen from distance under water?
Water creates a mirroring/miraging effect above its surface due to rising water vapour. Anything behind this band of thick, rising atmosphere will appear covered. During clearer days you will be able to see more of the buildings.

Thank you. Based on the speed of the planes, I assume this is a timelapse?

They have been programmed by TV brother.
That's why it's called PROGRAMMING.

Yes.

Attached: Star Trails Time Lapse.webm (1280x720, 2.98M)

Again how come they were good enough in the fucking 60's but not good enough now?
How come that right now with such a colossal technological advancements in decades we are STILL unable to leave Low Earth Orbit?
Try to think for yourself for a second God damn it.

the technology is the rockets. they'd have to build new rockets, which is something that will be quite expensive and require redesigns to modernize.

as a physics enthusiast myself this may be possible. never seen a flatearther that had proper understanding of electromagnetism. anyway both systems (round and flat) may be possible. without having a spacecraft ourself it may never be 100% sure what it is in the end. do you have an knock out argument for the globe theory?

I fucking hate you mongoloids, how stupid can you be to think that an organization exists purely to make fake shit. NASA is not a propaganda arm anymore and yet they still are doing the same shit they did in the 60s just with less publicity. Why would a "fake" organization such as NASA still exist if it wasn't a useful propaganda arm? Because they actually do the shit they show. Honestly, how would you explain private companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic etc? How do you explain the tens of thousands of aerospace engineers and students that work within the astronautical sector and make shit for these platforms? You can't, because you are incapable of using your brain, you are just as much NPCs as the dumbasses that suck Elon's cock and yet know nothing about the industry. Now get the fuck off my board.

Nice try NPC
youtube.com/watch?v=4O5dPsu66Kw

Hey canuckanon, do you believe we've gone to the moon at all or do you just doubt the first claimed occurrences?

CIA flat earth shills

Go fuck yourselves faggots

We never did you fucking mongrel. Good job believing everything you see in TV.

>do you have an knock out argument for the globe theory?
Gyroscopes prove the earth isn't rotating. There is no measurable curvature. Many laser tests have been done showing no curvature. Gravity or any theory that uses the concept of "centers" cannot exist in physical reality. The only logical option is an infinite plane. Dome model is retarded.

i am not on the flatearth side myself but you have to calm down. you probably believe in the global jew conspiracy but you can't question nasa because what? dude everything a jew touchesmay get a propaganda arm and nasa is small in comparison to other confirmed arms such as the media for example or pharma.

Fucking kek didn't say one fucking thing about Flat Earth. At least try to use logic you fucking brain damaged NPC.

Stop being a raging cunt. I was asking that question in a neutral tone.

I'm just sick of flat earthers and people who believe everything is a conspiracy. I personally am an aerospace engineering student graduating this fall so I've actually designed parts of these systems and launched my own platforms. It's aggravating when people "question" something that they know nothing about and don't care to learn before making up their minds.

sick comet vids

if the earth is flat why cant i see indefinitely when on the ocean

those are russian and spaceX rockets.

Attached: Answers needed - SpaceX launch stirs alien UFO fears in California - youtube_wIvql59t9e8.1 (1).webm (640x480, 2.69M)

Atmosphere limits the distance you can see because between 2 points theres not just empty space. Its like the haze over los angeles.

OP here. I didn't say one thing about Flat Earth.
However someone who does already gave a pretty good and logical answer.
I might not agree with him on Flat Earth but he seems like someone with a good head on his neck.

I think few people doubt the advances in space technology and the usefulness of things like artificial satellites. Doubting the moon landing in the 60's isn't the same as the faggots who think space isn't real or that we haven't gone there at all.

hm never heard of that fact but wouldn't it be a scandal if we can't measure the centrifugal force of our planet? we can measure gravitational waves but wecan't measure a bigger value in comparison?

>I've actually designed parts of these systems and launched my own platforms
Which disproves flat earth how?

but if the earth was flat wouldn't we see the sun rise at about the same time as everyone else

there is a spiritual reason for the flat earth, namely, that humans are holders of divine power, that the world is the center of all possible universes, and what happens here is crucially important for all worlds, that there is another world below and above this one. etc.

No because the same way a candle couldn't light the Madison Square Garden the sun isn't big enough or high enough to illuminate everything,

You underestimate the size of the Earth

Attached: 1520834172079.webm (426x238, 548K)

I'm not sure what you mean... Rockets have cameras on them, you can see how high they go, you can launch them yourself and get to orbit if you have the skill

Read about the Michelson–Morley experiment, my dude.

nope because you have limited vision also on a flat surface because atmosphere absorbs most photons after some distance.

If you have the skill to design one to get to orbit*

van allen belts wouldnt exist in a flat earth you dummy

> 333
> 3 3's get
> "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.”
> - Nikola Tesla
What did Kek mean by this?

I don't believe in Flat Earth tho so that's completely fine.

you sound like every normie student that goes into (((university))) and automatically believes he is one of the top 1% now because muh brainz. university is like 5 extra school years. it gives you no power here on Jow Forums but you may shine on plebbit with that. cocky university faggots may be dumber than the rest because they know nothing but are arrogant about it.

true but wouldnt the sun be at a higher point in the sky if that were the case as it were to slowly become more visible with only the very edge of the flat earth seeing the sunrise

this is true but it looks different then fog being a slow fading of visibility and more of an abrupt end

>"can't survive 3000°C heat"

Not meant to. That's the lunar lander. It's the Apollo command module is that has an ablative heat shield which protects the crew from re-entry.

>"can't survive 10^-7 torr pressure of the vacuum of space"

What you just said makes absolutely no sense. The capsule's structural is designed to survive the internal pressurize of the air *inside* the capsule and only the top part, the ascent module, has a pressurized interior.

Van Allen belts can be moved through without major exposure to the crew if moving fast enough. Electronics are difficult to insulted from the radiation as transistors get smaller because small collisions and fuck up the entire system. Was actually easier to pass through in the 60s without well insulated electronics bays because interactions were not nano scale.

The other side of it is perspective and the way our eyes work.

Attached: 1529533274821.webm (640x480, 1.74M)

Attached: 1509551653272.webm (640x480, 2.31M)

Attached: 1523451278622.webm (640x480, 2.66M)

on the ocean i mean if that was the case wouldnt my visibility fade in a manner similar to a dust storm where it slowly gets less visible, on the ocean there is a point where it just ends

interesting