What did they mean by this?

What did they mean by this?

Attached: IMG27206045486996649.jpg (776x748, 170K)

It means that ancaps are retarded

Why is inequality bad

>no free market solution to income inequality
>a bad thing

>wealth inequality is bad because i say so

Not inequity, thinking that free market will fix the economy, while giving more power to corporations

The economy is. It does not need fixing or regulation. It is not bad or good.

Attached: helper_meditate_0.jpg (960x690, 122K)

Wealth inequality is something only the losers of society complain about (and they complain because they expect to benefit from taking someone elses shit).
If people are rioting because theyre demanding something that isnt theirs - thats whats called a mob and they should be shot.

Corporations are a concept enshrined in law by the government. The rules for how corporations operate are created by the government.

It means that ancaps have no solution to how to keep the poor from violently stealing the wealth of the rich once the poor outnumber the rich enough and are sufficiently pissed off.

The only "market solution" is for the rich to bribe the poor not to revolt (wealth redistribution) or for the poor to kill the rich people and redistribute it (unequally of course).

Corporations would not exist in their current state if the state didn't exist

Not really.
In a capitalist world, wealth = power.
Thus, sometimes the rulers can be benevolent and other times they can be corrupt.
If they're corrupt, the wealth should be stricken from them.

>If people are rioting because theyre demanding something that isnt theirs - thats whats called a mob and they should be shot.
The rich will have to do the shooting themselves or pay some of the poor people to shoot the other poor people or give all the poor people enough wealth so they don't shoot the rich people.

This is a negotiation between the haves and the havenots, and all the havenots can bring to the table is the threat of violence. But they can bring it

"Gibs me dat fo free"
-Socialists

"I want to legally fuck minors"
Anarcho-capitalist

Attached: 1538634400552.png (615x678, 133K)

muh wealthy knee quality
>falling for hegelian dialect
absolutely glowing, nigger

no, there's market solutions, they're called mercenary bands dubbed as security forces

>Kekistan
Fuck off to daddy basedgoy

That right libertarianism isn't going to solve wealth inequality. Honestly, I don't think anyone in that camp claims its going to, the fact that there will be multiple tiers is inherent in capitalism. I mostly hear them argue that the ideal is that you can change tiers relatively quickly in a freemarket economy, and that even tho there are people who aren't doing good, as a whole, society benefits and there's higher levels of productivity and innovation. Take that with a grain of salt, but I think there's at least some truth to it

>Equality

Gas yourself.

Attached: equality is a lie hair.jpg (517x499, 119K)

Attached: free hugs.png (768x908, 618K)

wow man that cut me deep, im totally BTFO, wtf i love leftism now? wtf i love the state agenda now? you did it man you cured me of the redpill now #ImWithHer and now it's gonna be a #BlueWave
#SurfsUp dude!

I never said that socialism solves problem. I only meant that free market is just as flawed as socialism

My philosophy is simple, all human relationships should be voluntary.

nyet tovarisch
free market at least be of workings and solve many problems
socialism be of making problems and not of workings

>all their negatives are my positives

I don't see how the existence of rich people violates your rights. If they're not doing anything to you, why should you care how much they have?

Free market gives more power to the ones with biggest amount of money. Also Somalia is great example of ancap society

This user lives in the real world.

>inequality correlates highly with social problems
>then an ideal economic system should strive to reduce inequality
>free market is not an option because it is a survival of the fittest world
>this means a few economic elites will end up controlling the whole market actually functioning as a state controlling the economy
>libertarian ideology is self-defeating

>My philosophy is simple, all human relationships should be voluntary.
too individualistic. Kill yourself.

The free market is the solution. The middle class didn't exist until US laissez faire created it. It's the fucking commies that create the inequality. What is more unequal than party members who eat while everyone else starves?

no it's a shitty example because they're niggers