Where should I begin in reading on libertarianism?
Where should I begin in reading on libertarianism?
Landon Sanchez
Other urls found in this thread:
mises.org
twitter.com
Colton Bennett
Kropotkin
Stirner
Samuel Roberts
Levi Foster
Public restroom walls
Benjamin Barnes
Democracy: The God that Failed
By Hans Herman Hoppe
Aaron Bennett
I don't know why people constantly argue that Democracy is inherently weak/decadent and will fail when the majority of the past century is a literal testament to how "democracy" outguns or outlasts any other system.
Eli Morris
this is an interesting idea, considering we have been in a state of constant societal (Economically as well, in terms of policy) decline since around 1910-1920, when unviersal sufferage was introduced. Not to mention that if we, right now this instant, went back to 1900 in terms of voting rights, we would be far more conservative than we are now. Look at the people who are pushing for the things that are going to destroy us. women, niggers, spics, young people, welfare queens. Those things which would sacrifice our liberty for gibs are those who should never vote. Look at our "democracy", look at our history. Where do you think these fucking morons are going to take us next?
Op you're a fag.Stop being a fag. democracy is goign to kill us. The niggers and spics invading are a result of that.
James Thompson
anyway, i like Ayn Rand and Hoppe. Make sure youre aware that Ayn Rand's goal isnt money, thats what NPCs think.
William Young
Isaiah Stewart
Influxes of immigrants and subsequent fifth columns aren't an inherent part of democracy. Though I'd agree that in our current state the majority of liberal aristocrats only push for multiculturalism/immigration under the guise of "open-ness" and "progress" wherein what they actually want is an exploitable, uneducated, and steady stream of votes and cheap labor. However, this isn't the only reason this shit happens, has happened. Without getting into revisionist whataboutism, Late Rome was about as socially conservative and authoritarian as a state could possibly be and yet the constant influx of migrants pouring in over undefended borders wanting the benefits of living within the empire is what seriously hastened Rome's fall; with comparable levels of accompanying cultural decadence and decline included. Moreover the reason we've got a good majority of the people in this country that you've mentioned was the work of an aristocratic class of slavers intent on rising to levels of entrenched nobility off the back of a disposable African workforce - that shit ain't inherent to democracy either.
Hudson King
This
Cameron Morris
Nozick is pretty good. He makes an excellent argument for inequality and "fairness".
Austin Martin
I studied at auburn. Mises library is titties
Jeremiah Collins
You just don't get it user
Tyler Foster
Anything Patrick Henry.
Michael Miller
Hitler: democracy is weak and we shall destroy these consumerist, decadent forces with ease.
>An-heroes as slavic hordes rape Berlin
Mussolini: democracy is weak and we shall destroy these consumerist, decadent forces with ease.
>gets hung from a girder and has his corpse desecrated by a smelly Italian mob
Tojo: democracy is weak and we shall destroy these consumerist, decadent forces with ease
>tactical nuke incoming
Jeremiah Lee
>hurdur slavery is ok
James Rivera
They arent an inherent part of democracy, no. but neither is starvation in communism, welfare in not an inherent part of democracy, but it happens as a result. These are not things that should be considered in theory. Communism would be pretty stable if it worked in the real word as it does in theory. when these things are implemented, they cause things that werent intended. The best way to understand this concept would be to observe it. it really doesn't matter what its called, what matters is the result and the effects. If socialism lead to communism, maybe we shouldnt have socialism. if eating pounds of candy leads to being an American pig, maybe you should eat less candy.
Im going to be honest and say i dont understand the jew-speak in the last sentence of yours. I think you were saying that slaves arent inherent to democracy, also the slave owners were rich? i think your point was that it shouldnt exist? dont forget that they came from a monarchy, africans were sold by africans, the founding fathers purposefully tried to end slavery in the constitution. We also weren't a democracy back then, we're not really one now, but there are people who would like us to be, mostly women and kikes.
are you a boomer or a newfag?
Brayden Baker
Jackson Hall
bump for not a kike thread
Thomas Nelson
Unironically this
Easton Ortiz
Pretty simple, really. A majority of people are complete fucking idiots, therefor just because 51% of people agree on something doesn't mean that it's anywhere near the correct thing to do. If you're able to sway a small amount of people, maybe 5% of the active voting population, you control the direction of the country with very little effort.
Democracy is one of those things that's socially unacceptable to disagree with because we've been conditioned to wrongly associate it with freedom. This is why globalists love democracy so much. Israel, just as an example, pays private intelligence firms and media corporations to run pro-Israel propaganda in the U.S. and we start voting pro-Israel on everything we can. They basically own us and we feel like we're free and in control of ourselves, because that's how the system's designed.