Lib butthurt reaches new extreme

Libs now want to abolish the Supreme Court

>the Court is now a blunt political instrument, used repeatedly to undermine outcomes of democratic governance — often on behalf of corporate interests. And the recent disaster that was the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation has further delegitimized the Court in the public’s mind.

>So it’s perfectly reasonable to ask if we should abolish the Supreme Court, or at the very least strip the Court of its ability to overturn laws that it rules unconstitutional.

archive.is/rfqO4

Attached: pox news.png (639x549, 355K)

Other urls found in this thread:

balkin.blogspot.com/2016/05/abandoning-defensive-crouch-liberal.html?m=1
youtube.com/watch?v=RqfI8Yi98bc&app=desktop
youtube.com/watch?v=QpVudMngg2c
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>used repeatedly to undermine outcomes of democratic governance
Used by Democrats in that way, which they were all perfectly fine with, especially the lie that was Roe v Wade. Now that Kavanaugh is confirmed though? "Disband that shit immediately!"

> or at the very least strip the Court of its ability to overturn laws that it rules unconstitutional

Okay lets ban gay marriage and abortion again, both laws that the supreme court overturned.
I truly believe leftists do not have any foresight and do not think of the consequences of their actions.
This would bite them in the ass so hard.

>I’m not a textualist or an originalist, which is to say I don’t think the meaning of the Constitution is stable or fixed from the time it was enacted.

> judicial review may actually impair the public’s ability to engage in serious thinking about what the Constitution means, and what we want to do in light of what we think our Constitution says. In a way, the Supreme Court simply takes on this conversation for itself, and leaves the citizenry as bystanders.

This dude doesn't think that words mean things, or that we live in a republic. His opinion doesn't matter, because he's not debating the merits of the system he claims to be speaking of.

Attached: HOL_UP.png (333x237, 142K)

Why not just toss the constitution since it's the problem? Or make a new one that fits modern society better.

>trump wins
>GET RID OF ELECTORAL COLLEGE
>senate votes in favor of kav
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN EVERY STATE HAS THE SAME NUMBER OF SENATORS GET RID OF IT
>no kav impeachment taking place
>JUST GET RID OF THE SUPREME COURT THEY WONT EVEN FORCE PEOPLE TO MAKE CAKES

Civil war looks more and more sure.

SCOTUS forces faggot marriage on everyone
>Left: HAHAHHAHA BTFO!!!! LOVE WINS!!!!

Trump puts two judges on the SCOTUS
>Left: OY VEY!!! TIME TO ABOLISH THE SCOTUS!!!

This.
Vox and HuffPost with that glue eating article is really upping the stupid today. Can't wait to see what they have tomorrow.

>Dems lose against kavanaugh
>kavanaugh becomes judge of the supreme court
>Dems now want to abolish the supreme court
Dems act just like 2 year old sore losers
will they ever learn?

>the Court is now a blunt political instrument, used repeatedly to undermine outcomes of democratic governance
holy fucking shit, it is like these faggots dont know what happened to cali....

>Okay lets ban gay marriage and abortion again, both laws that the supreme court overturned.
Which was complete bullshit seeing as nowhere in the constitution does it say anything regarding abortion or marriage.

They're like little kids writhing and thrashing for what they want NOW NOW NOW!!!!! It's really quite amusing to see and sometimes I hope they get it so when all the strings attached come with it they can have another meltdown because obviously that's not what any of them ever wanted and we were supposed to know that so we're the bad guys again.

>get rid of the electoral college
>abolish the supreme court

the demonrats sure are butthurt
any bets for Illing is a heeb name?

I would be fine with this as long as all supreme court decisions are nullified.

2010: Legislating from the bench is 100% legitimate, it’s a living document, constitutionalists are fucking retarded
2018: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHGGHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOO TEARDOWN THE WHOLE FUCKING COURT AAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHHHHHH

I don't think it is, but that doesn't mean much when jews often adopt goy surnames.

By abolishing the court, all the past rulings would he invalidated.
Brown v Board
Roe v Wade
Gay marriage.
Obamacare.

>the Court is now a blunt political instrument, used repeatedly to undermine outcomes of democratic governance
lol, do they mean how judicial activists undermined democracy and legalized abortion and gay marriage?

of course not, these people's stupidity is only surpassed by their reader's

>I Hate Trump and Congress
>Let's give them more power

They really are mega brainlets

Attached: 111634__rome_l.jpg (400x300, 51K)

Because these people are good at pulling rights out their ass for faggot shit. But explicitly stated rights in the constitution are open for interpretation.

And that's a good thing.
Let them say this shit far and wide. Hell I hope they will make it their official artform for the midterms!
That and abolish ICE, and a single payer helthcare and more immigrants from the Middle East. That's the way to get absolutely destroyed in the midterms. We shouldn't criticize it. We should embrace it!

>literally makes no arguments throught the entire piece

>trump's a fascist
>give up your guns
so tiresome

We're already in a civil war. There has been little to no shooting yet but some of these protest clashes have been larger scale than battles fought during actual wars, be they during the crusades or the first American civil war.

I don't think the founding fathers even imagined a future with institutionalized abortion and fag marriage. If they could see it I wonder if they would have aborted the American experiment altogether

>abolish the electoral college
>abolish the supreme court

lel fucking faggots.

>vox
ok

The wonderful thing is, when they perpetuate such an extreme stance, something so absolutely impossible to accomplish, they are focusing their energy in the direction of the least productive strategy. A strategy that could be arguably counter-productive.

Ok, but it's only fair to not keep any of the rulings the Supreme Court has made over the years and go back to square 1

Attached: Image8.png (634x354, 89K)

they always do shit like this, it's the law of the land when it lines up with progressive dogma and it's an irrelevant, archaic institution of fucking white men when it doesn't
same thing with the constitution itself, which should be discarded by virtue of being written by white fucking men, while somehow also serving as the basis for whatever flavor-of-the-month progressive issue

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 16K)

They act as if there wasn’t a process to change the Constitution if people want to.

Instead of convincing people their side is the right one, they just pilpul’d the Constitution to get it to say whatever they want it to say at this current moment.

I'm so happy to see all the normies around me IRL see through this bullshit, it's comforting. The demosharts are accidentally redpilling so many normies when their ridiculous rhetoric.

I've always wondered, if the left can just pull rights out of thin air and overturn laws, can we just overturn the Civil Rights Act in the name of freedom of association?

They have the brains of children

I know, it's great. The left is the right's best recruitment tool.

Liberals always, ALWAYS do this shit when cornered.
>Haha what's that even mean bro?
>How do we even know we exist mannn?

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH!!!!!!!

WINNING

>can we just overturn the Civil Rights Act in the name of freedom of association?
Anything is possible with the right people in power. Presently, the right people aren't in power.

Obviously, they are emotionally stunted, damned forever to be true reactionary teenagers flittering from one outrage to the next.

You can only believe in lefty causes if you don’t think about long term consequences or broader concerns.

It’s an ideology for simple myopic peopel

True there were official battles and skirmishes of the civil war involving less than a dozen men on either side

No they can’t, they are children. Like most women they are children in adult bodies

>If we can't have it our way, we want it gone
>The presidency
>DACA deal
>Supreme court

Attached: 3412312311.png (282x241, 101K)

>>abolish ICE
>>abolish 2nd ammendment
>>abolish presumption of innocence
This is their platform as of now.
Plus some other, insane, proposition.
The party went from slightly authoritarian to full blown authoritarian with some very scary people running and bankrolling it.

>strip the Court of its ability to overturn laws that it rules unconstitutional.
I agree with this desu. That’ll work both ways and guns will forever be in our homes

Sexist?

>WOOO GAY MARRIAGE FUCK YOU YOU NAZI FACISTS
>Something doesnt go their way
>AHHHHH GET RID OF THE SUPREME COURT THEYRE NOT PANDERING TO ME AHHHHHHH
Do regular everyday people think like this. Is Trump Derangement Syndrome a real thing?

They're just laying the groundwork for the propaganda machine to explain why it's necessary to increase the number of justices and add four progressive leftist judges to the court "to restore balance"

Attached: kavanaugh if only you knew.jpg (700x700, 271K)

>the Court is now a blunt political instrument, used repeatedly to undermine outcomes of democratic governance
OH REALLY?! JUST NOW? NOW THAT'S WHAT IT IS! NOT WHEN THEY SHOVED GAY MARRIAGE AND ABORTION DOWN THE COUNTRY'S THROAT THO.

>Hey let's abolish government

>Vox
Huh..

They've already proposed something like that.

Yes. You need to get into their perpetual victim mindset to really understand.
This cult is the only place that accepts them.

No I’m not sexist.

Are you going to imply women are emotionally and temperamentally equivalent to men?

If yes; lurk more. Understanding real sex differences is critical to understanding society and our current rot

>moves the goalposts

>Hey let's abolish government

Attached: 1533073293526.png (1020x1020, 773K)

>The supreme court sometimes favors corporations
>So lets hand all the power to congress

lol what

Attached: 1304376955947.jpg (500x375, 60K)

If Kavanaugh wasn't confirmed, they wouldn't be saying this. As usual, this is all because they didn't win, so now they want things changed. First, it was the electoral college, and now this.

this is how communists work, you are just figuring this out now? All they care about is abolition. As long as something serves the purpose of abolishing "something" it is good, if it does not serve the purpose of abolishment then it is bad and racist and mean.

>Libs now want to abolish the Supreme Court
Why? It would hurt them later on.

Don't forget destroying freedom of assembly and loosing the scourge of pornography

But it would make their feefees good right now, and that's all that matters.

Liberals aren't principled, they only care about winning the race to the bottom

>lose political ground
>demand that laws and systems be changed to give you back political power
>the right are the fascists

I actually agree with you about women having the temperament of children, but tats also the definition of sexism.

It’s not sexist if it’s true

>implying the Second Civil War isn't already happening

Attached: Life imitates art.jpg (1066x1600, 520K)

>Now that it's conservative we don't like legislating from the bench anymore

well okay, don't worry then, conservatives tend not to be activist judges

>or at the very least strip the Court of its ability to overturn laws that it rules unconstitutional

i failed civics 101; the article

well, unless there's a red wave, then they'll want to abolish that too.

>a Harvard law professor
Not even going to look his (((background))) up because I know exactly what I'll find. It's all so tiresome.

That's my point. Look how they legitimized the FISA warrants in the Trump case, by leaking false info to the press and using the story to legitimize the false info. They're doing the same thing here, by laying the groundwork in the media for packing the court as a legitimate means to "restore balance" to the high court.

You cropped out the most degenerate part of the picture on the bottom. I recommend finding that version for maximum impact next time.

>2012: haha you gotta bake my cakes now faggots
>2018: WHAT DO YOU MEAN THINGS AREN'T GOING 100% THE WAY I WANTED
>#LIBERALS RISE UP

Attached: 1490868993494.jpg (574x382, 44K)

Well, for once they're not overreacting. This is a huge loss for them, their agenda. They counted on two things to get the US to become a permanent one-party state, like California. Pop. replacement and the judiciary. One is still in full swing but they can no longer ram their policies/programs through the courts. It'd be like having one of your arms cut off.
This is a huge, yuge win for Trump. I'm impressed as hell he managed to do this.
Only 3 years ago the lefties were posting "we won, you lost" all over social media. They ain't doing that now. :)

Well you'd be right.

Attached: yeah.png (996x640, 1.4M)

Why are Dems so assmad about the "conservative" majority right now? Gorsuch has been acting moderate so far.

Attached: 1538627729385.jpg (600x586, 88K)

What they really want is to abolish all of it so that whoever cheats the best in elections gets to say what the law is.

Attached: sweet potato.jpg (187x250, 6K)

It's a Cold Civil War and anyone who isn't awake to that yet just hasn't been paying attention.

Ya’ll need to read this. Same author, but back when Shillary Clinton was supposed to win. Supposedly it helped turn Justice Kennedy back to right wing.

balkin.blogspot.com/2016/05/abandoning-defensive-crouch-liberal.html?m=1

>balkin.blogspot.com/2016/05/abandoning-defensive-crouch-liberal.html?m=1
Realistically, it could have turned out exactly as he predicted had the Clinton's succeeded. Reading him, I all the more grateful he turned out to be wrong.

The smugness of "winning" something that isn't even over yet just drips off of every word.

Yes! By all means abolish it! Then we don't have to listen to their rulings on fag marriage and nigger slaves or women's rights! For once I'm in complete alignment with democrats

Attached: 1512685540245.gif (500x650, 839K)

>nigger slaves or women's rights
But those are amendments by Congress, not the Supreme Court.

once states begin amending the amendments or removing them altogether to get rid of aforementioned rights, we won't have to listen to the "rulings" a bunch faggots who wear wizard robes will eventually make in retaliation to states removing or amending said amendments

can we just ban the Democrat Party?

>I’m not a textualist or an originalist
>We shouldn't give power to a changing court to overturn archaic laws
Pick one.

This. Never interrupt the enemy when they're making a mistake, and the left has been making a fuckload of mistakes these past years. The angrier they get, the more mistakes they make by being reactionary idiots.

They have zero grasp of civics or history and even less self awareness. We couldn't ask for a better enemy than the modern left.

youtube.com/watch?v=RqfI8Yi98bc&app=desktop

NOW YOU FUCKING GET IT!!! Two can play this game. You are afraid that it will be used against you like you have used it against others. Projection at its finest.

Absolutely, but it speaks to how the left doesn’t rest. And how general people aren’t aware of their duplicity or bad-fath arguments. The Vox article is obviously manipulative and not reflective of the power the left hopes to grasp.

balkin.blogspot.com/2016/05/abandoning-defensive-crouch-liberal.html?m=1

Because we'd need a constitutional convention to change it. That means half the states need to call for one. Once that happens, the game is set. If the second amendment isn't retained or strengthened then it would be civil war 2 immediately.

>abolish supreme court
>trump has even more power now
They really are retarded

Is it time to abolish the presidency? Rule by a single person is a vestige of our monarchic and colonialist past. It's time to consign it to the dustbin of history and that's a good thing.

Attached: 1511682220102.png (593x253, 87K)

Why did I even bother checking. Of course it's a jew.

youtube.com/watch?v=QpVudMngg2c

Yeah, but he likes eating cheeseburgers and bacon so he's "nonobservant."

>fuck the supreme court
>fuck the electoral college
>fuck the constitution

thank god for the founding fathers

If we didn't win it, we must abolish it

Allahu Akbar!
The U.S. must take Monroe Doctrine now.
The U.S. must withdraw American Forces from all Foreign Countries now.
Stop America's doing its all wars now!
The U.S. must return to the gold standard now!
The U.S. must adopt the gold standard again now!
The U.S. must decrease its military-budget to 100-billion-dollar per year now.
Or, the U.S. must decrease its military-budget to 1% of its GDP now.

I love American99% and the U.S.


China, Germany and Japan must loosen Germany's, Japan's and China's monetary policies now!
China, Germany and Japan must stimulate Germany's, Japan's and China's domestic demands now!
Japan and Germany must issue a lot of construction bond now!
Japan and Germany must reduce Germany's, Japan's and China's taxes now!
The U.S. must tighten its monetary policy now!
As a result, Dollar value will rise!
The U.S. will have trade surplus!


Japan and Germany are evil empires.
Islamists' true enemies are Japan, Germany, FRB, Top1%, Wall Street, American Military Industry and DOD!
Japan is the country which has been promoting Globalization!!!
Allahu Akbar!


American Revolutionary War!
We American 99% have the 2nd amendment!
American Revolutionary War!

Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and Japanese-bureaucrats are the main largest promoters of FTA.
Wall-Street, American-top1%, American-Military-Industry are colluding with Japan and Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI).

US DOD, Japan and Germany are enemies of American99%.
US DOD, Japan and Germany are enemies of mankind.