Why are Americans so obsessed with guns?

Why are Americans so obsessed with guns?

They couldn't beat their own military if the government became a tyranny.

Attached: DZq84SxXcAAA5-a.jpg (800x1199, 126K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Cwkej79U3ek
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Hey, our "great military" took decades to kill some sand niggers that mount old AA guns onto pick up trucks.
A resistance could probably do well.

>299 million armed people would be unable to beat the 400,000 in the NG
>the government would deploy active duty troops on mainland US

The difference between Americans and Europeans, is Europeans bend over and take tyranny in the ass.

FUCK YOU BLUE SHIT

HOW MUCH DOES SOROS PAY YOU ?!

FUCKING MUSLIM/NIGGER LOVER

You know damn well who those guns are for.

At least with guns you've got a shot.
But if you're comfortable using sticks and stones against armed people looking to oppress you, by all means, lead the way.

They are preparing for the coming race war nigger, what else?

Attached: 1539138024734.jpg (317x441, 47K)

The US was literally born from a rebellion, retard. Considering the populace would seek alliances with other nations, a tyranny can be disposed, especially with the people armed.

SHALL

I know it's bait but
>W R O N G

Attached: 1538038862094.png (1802x905, 203K)

I hate when NPCs make posts. The American military is made of Americans who wouldn’t attack their fellow citizens for the most part.

Don't have to beat the military.
Just have to shoot too Democrat voters, and then we win the next election in a land slide.

YOUR COUNTRY IS WHAT 200 YEARS OLD MAX ?
YOU WERE GOOD FOR A FEW DECADES POST WW2THE APOLLO ERA

SEE WHERE YOU ARE NOW, TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR MEDIA INTERNET GIANTS, YOUR SPENDING...(((THEY))) ALREADY PERFECTED ANOTHER WAY TO CONTROL YOU GUYS

GUNS ARE OK BUT YOU NOR OTHERS WILL CLEAN YOUR NEIGHBORHOODS OR REBUILD OLD VALUES

AS LONG AS YOU ARE COMFY ...

This thread again. Been answered 200,000 times.

>Slide thread.

>They couldn't beat their own military if the government became a tyranny.
R I C E F A R M E R S

>They couldn't beat their own military
yuropoors still haven't learned their lesson

Attached: george_washington.jpg (631x348, 19K)

Thanks for the image BTW.

>couldn't beat their own military
I'll see that and raise you Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam.

I don't want to beat them, I want to join them.

million armed people would be unable to beat the 400,000 in the NG
most americans are pussy do you really think they will get away from their own comfortable life to fight a guerrilla war?

Damn that looks like Venessa Carlton:

youtube.com/watch?v=Cwkej79U3ek

winning a war isn't about overpowering the enemy, it's about holding them off long enough for it to no longer be profitable for them to keep fighting

have another

Attached: DZq84SZWAAAf2ii.jpg (800x1199, 109K)

Sage

Hey another one of these... Can we just make a stock page of general info that directly rebuts this so soccer moms and 15yo boys can get their answers?

>I'll see that and raise you Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam.
these people were warriors whose country were invaded by a foreign power and they were already used to living in bad condition , your avrage american is not like this at all
and when exactly are you guns larpers actually going to rebel?

>They couldn't beat their own military if the government became a tyranny.
Yes we certainly could. It would not be pretty but the outcome is inevitable. American partisans on the right would eventually vanquish an oppressive leftist dominated government. The problem would be the vultures circling the carnage afterward, i.e. China and Russia.

Are these threads actual shills at this point? Or is it just pro 2A trolls fishing for yous so we can have daily threads with hundreds of replies of antis getting blown the fuck out by freedom loving autists. I would imagine its trolling but then again antis are so unbelievably retarded I could see a miserable shill getting paid pennies to make these threads and not realize the effect they have.

Attached: FA07ABA8439649689B40DAE6C8F0BAA5.jpg (400x400, 38K)

I would, flaggot

Areas with heavy legal gun ownership are the safest.

If superior tech was the ultimate decider then why did the us lose Vietnam? As well why is Afghanistan unwinable?

>Yes we certainly could. It would not be pretty but the outcome is inevitable. American partisans on the right would eventually vanquish an oppressive leftist dominated government. The problem would be the vultures circling the carnage afterward, i.e. China and Russia.
how can a person be this delusional

America loves guns because their history is tightly knitted around them. They've constantly had to defend themselves, including from people on their own land. The constitution is a huge pat of their culture.

I remember a Canadian guy telling me Americans shouldn't be gun-obsessed even though they have a history of war, saying that they should be more like Australia.
If anyone ever points to this garbage, just bring up Switzerland.

so when are you exactly going to do this?what is the red line?

We didn’t lose Vietnam and never even tried to win Afghanistan. Neither of those have anything in common with what a modern US civil war would look like.

You assume the army would unquestionably follow orders indefinitely.

shut up, dutch pineapple

how would you know?
1 thing is sure tho, you can't even try without guns.

Thanks Kraut

Attached: bloody right mate.jpg (400x504, 34K)

>cucked officers and antifa vs the entirety of enlisted forces and millions of armed angry conservatives

>most americans are pussy do you really think they will get away from their own comfortable life to fight a guerrilla war?

Love memeflags who have no concept of US history (or world history in general).

I'd love to rape her.

Asymmetrical warfare. We dont need to win, just need to make it more trouble than its worth.

better yet, why are guns so obsessed with America?

and why are people so obscessed with Americans owning guns?

>Love memeflags who have no concept of US history (or world history in general).
you are the one with no understanding of world history

We legitimately didn’t stop fighting with the natives until the 1920’s. Sad that they’ve become a bunch of drunks. Probably would have been more merciful to just genocide them.

and why are some of the best gun manufacturers in the world found in europe?

>But Americans aren't warriors
Yeah they're just obsessed with guns and a large portion if then have been training with them for years. Yet you have the gall to call us larpers because we expect to have to fight a war against our own. There is a difference between pretending and preparing faggot.

because it prevents a full marxist takeover and even endangers the marxists of other nations

kek. do not underestimate the power of the people.

we killed a million mudslimes in Iraq and a quarter million mudslimes in Afghanistan without even trying

I'm sure the American government can create some real bodycounts with drone warfare

you might wanna up those totals this is just the registered hunters not all gun owners and its from 2015

Attached: Largest-Standing-Army-in-the-World-B.jpg (700x2200, 673K)

..
...
....
Keep going

Easier to kill niggers with a gun.

When they come for the AR15, in whatever manner they do, people should and will fight.

theres this awul meme that you need navy seal training to be in any way effective in combat, and this meme is perputrated by the same faggots that mock america for "losing in vietnam" (after it became clear the only way to win was to simply exterminate every asian on the continent)

>the US government would bomb their own cities and leave nothing left to rule over instead of dragging people off to gulags one by one like every other tyrannical government

Attached: Eurotard.jpg (588x823, 109K)

y do you care? you have plenty to worry about on your side of the pond. tend to your knittin'.

>They couldn't beat their own military if the government became a tyranny
Illiterate tool. Anyone with the willpower to wage a potentially ten-year urban insurgency can force a modern state to yield to their demands.

A counter insurgency against the US people would take more boots on the ground than the US currently has.

Have you binned your knives today faggot?

>the marxist-controlled government
ftfy. marxists do not care about "progress" and "value". they would love to simply irradiate the world and make it mostly uninhabitable. they are satanic.

Also the primary function of a militia is national defense. overthrowing its own government is a secondary function.

Also tens of millions of armed citizens could easily take on the military. Remember we fought Iraqi citizens for 10 years and almost didn't win.

If the other option was becoming what Sweden/Germany/cUcK are headed towards[aka: not having a comfy life either way] you bet your fucking ass the vast majority would fight.

Why do you think the (((SoS))) is so desperate to take them away, brainlet?

Attached: America Fuck Yeah.jpg (800x600, 127K)

>We didn’t lose Vietnam
Just stop dude...we lost Southeast Asia, it was a strategic failure. This is also a Bait thread and OP probably makes the same slide threads asking how Burgers lost to a bunch of Rice farmers.

>mfw Foreigners think they have a say in Poltocs stateside

Attached: F93618A3-39A8-44A0-AB60-EE38948A7F9F.gif (540x253, 2.03M)

if people don't fight then, we're screwed.

Thanks. I want to go shooting with her so bad.

this, then I will rip and tear while laughing my ass of because of my new toys. and i ain't just talking about guns. woe to him who falls in my grasp after trying to disarm me

name a win condition in vietnam that wasnt "exterminate every asian"
they are doomed to marxism because they are bugs, and the marxist infiltrators will have zero qualms with exterminating every white man in america, so there will be nothing holding the military back.

You should see ours in Canada. They're all about race-baiting and the gibs. They have twice the rights of white people, too.

Attached: 1520660474680s.jpg (123x125, 3K)

Police officers and gun owning citizens form auxiliary units to support the military personal who defect.
Game over for the oppressive government.

so when are you going to do it? the goverment powers have greatly increased since the fouding of america , your are becoming a minority , the government is spying on you ,it lied a lot of times to get you into wars
so the only reason for which people may fight is when they come for your guns?and no you are not going to fight they will just slowly boil you to death

Why do all of you fags think the military would side all side with the tyrannical government?

>falling for kike bait
please leave retard

Attached: 1537726370693.jpg (768x612, 72K)

Seriously, if they come for the AR and we don't fight we're fucked, and we should be taken over, but I will die before I am disarmed.

ok enjoy your funeral

Then I will die fighting, there is no reason to live in the cucked world you live in fag, you have no hope and no chance for survival.

It has no ability to disarm without being massacred. How could they disarm people. go door to door asking if you have guns?
pathetic

South Vietnam could have survived if the US wanted to continue to pump money and weapons into it and supplied it the necessary aircraft to have a functional independent Air Force, but Laos and Cambodia was probably fucked regardless.

The problem is the entire war was fucked from Diem's murder forward and by the time Nixon got in office it was 11th hour heroics. But this is a slide thread and OP is baiting people.

I've got a few trick up my sleeve hehehe

sorry here is a larger one

Attached: DZb3w2XUQAAYJOm.jpg large.jpg (1440x1431, 274K)

Even if it's just a legislation to make the AR illigal I will start.

>you are the one with no understanding of world history

You can literally look at every country and conflict in the world and see the case that resistance to military occupation happens. It's one thing to conquer a territory, it's another to hold and pacify it entirely.

I understand you're, probably, in Europe somewhere or perhaps along the US eastern seaboard corridor. You don't understand the vast distances and amount of territory that compromises the US. You also don't understand that we're very, very different than you.

So far as even contemplating the actual logistics of it...
You think the mountains of Afghanistan are rugged? Try Colorado and Wyoming. Even the mountains and hills surrounding major urban centers like Los Angeles and San Francisco.

You think that a population instilled with individual freedoms, and armed to the teeth, is going to roll over? You're talking ~300million guns, and ammunition stockpiles and (more importantly) manufacturing abilities spread throughout the US both on an industrial and individual level. Oh a large number of rifles in the US are going to be accurate, sporting variety with scopes. You think a sand nigger with an AK with a dogs hit 7.62x39 round that has trouble with accuracy past 200m is an issue? Try Ted who has been hunting since age 15 years and can take you at 400 yards with a single shot.

You think that among the nearly 4million square miles of the US, you're not going to have quite a lot of fertilizer, chemicals, and sophisticated machinery shops sitting unused and unknown to our own government, let alone an occupying force? How do you think that's going to end up?

Even putting aside the concept of the US military turning arms against its own citizens, it would an untenable situation. The only reason defeated Nazi Germany and defeated imperial Japan weren't a bloodbath is because we cut deals with the governments to keep various officials and structures in place.

Burger taking the bait hook, line, and sinker or not, your ass seems quite torn and now tender.

Attached: BENIS! BENIS!! BENIS!!!.gif (408x397, 35K)

Show us your real flag faggot!

see 189180397
over 1270000 active hunters not including regular gunowners

>t. butthurt lapdog

In a revolution, some of the U.S. military would side with the rebels, some would not. All these civilians with guns could be the difference between the rebellion succeeding or not.

Than invade. See how you do.

>over 1270000 active hunters not including regular gunowners
Great chart. Yup.

I think that these Europeans in their teensy-weensy iddy-biddy toy countries have zero conception of the size and scope of the US and the culture here.

They gave up their balls and their freedoms long ago for some free aspirin and shitty trains.

lol. you obviously have no clue about the amount of guns the citizenry owns

Us Army lost to rice farms & sand niggers so they will lose to there own ppl if they start a war

pic is debatable

technically you don't need any gun to kill a deer, just ask the cherokee, sioux, mohegan, or any other tribe, oh wait you can't.

to be fair, they hunted mostly buffalo and there are many examples of bears and mountain lions terrorizing a neighborhood found in the wilderness. but animal control is typical called, who typically capture and relocate.

and to use the words "deer uprising" implies that the founders wrote the 2A in case of the government uprising. which makes no sense, because the government already occupies the supreme position in almost every aspect of society. how much higher could government rise?

>to be fair
found the plebbit cuck