Is it ok to just come up to people and film them and then post the video on the internet without consent?

is it ok to just come up to people and film them and then post the video on the internet without consent?

why is there no "image property" like "intellectual property"? my body and the image of it is my private property, how come it ends up in the public domain without my premonition? the guy recording it will make money off it while i get jack-shit. not very free market oriented if you'l ask me...

Attached: Man-kicks-anti-abortion-activist-toronto-e1538599712671.jpg (1197x514, 88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eaEXMqtcQSE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>permission

Yes, there is no assumption of privacy in public.
Its the same way the government gets away with putting cameras everywhere

In other words if you go outside other people are legally allowed to look at you, stop being so sensitive, and stop committing crimes in public

looking is not the same as recording and posting it on a PRIVATE BUSINESS platform like YouTube and GETTING MONEY off it.

its like taking photos of some petty girl in the street and then putting it on the front cover of some magazine

surely this is bait.

Attached: 1539302058849.jpg (361x361, 12K)

It's not scummy to take a video and make money off it.
What IS scummy is people like you who think freedom should be curtailed

Good leaf

Was he eating sausage or was that his tongue?

freedom is great, but your freedom ends where my freedom begins. that woman, for example didnt ask permission on whether she can post his image or not. people just do that and make money off of it. i somebody would ever did this with me i would sue his ass. not need to kick anybody

>public space
please jew, i thought you guys were all lawyers and shit

I believe this happened in Toronto, which is not a dual-consent city. Meaning the filming party does not need the filmed party's permission to use the video as they see fit.

yes, it is public space. when you look at me and i look at you we are in public. however when you take a picture of me and PRIVATIZE it, as in putting it in the private sphere (YT for example) we are no longer in public. my image goes viral. YT makes money off it. you make money off it. nobody asked me if its ok the post it. nobody gave me money for it

Wrong, freedom doesn't overlap. You're just as free to walk away as I am to shoot videos.
Even billionaires in Russia can't sue people for shit like this.

no such thing as privacy when you out in public. Dumb faggot.
stay inside if you don't want to be filmed

dumb kike

Yes it is okay provided you are on public property.

youtube.com/watch?v=eaEXMqtcQSE

sage

what if i fallow you with my camera?

Protesting is by design to draw attention.

STOP BEING RETARDED!

sage