Why aren't sex cyborgs/bots or government funded prostitution still a thing?
>women don't want to have anything to do with beta males (80% of male population)
>every male craves sex due to higher testosterone
It's a win-win situation. Women wouldn't have to stand the rapey beta males and beta males would get sexually satisfied and not become bitter and potentially dangerous.
>and not become bitter and potentially dangerous.
Why wouldn't they want white men to chimp out...?
Because muh vagina
Because then women would have to compete with sex toys
Women are preemptively shutting down the creation of sexbots to allegedly stop a hypothetical objectification of women. If women lose the ability to withhold sex then what power do they have?
Male and female populations are not supposed to be the same size. Most males are supposed to die during wars.
The problem is that people nowadays decide deny nature and promote "peace", and the result is a society of sluts and gays/beta-males.
But the point is those males who can't get laid despite the effort would be provided with them as a substitute pussy funded by government.
It wouldn't be for the top 20% (males who women crave and get laid)
Women don't care if the bottom 80% fucks sex bots or prostitutes as these males hold no value to them
>government funded
COMMIES FUCK OFF
IM NOT PAYING FOR YOUR DEVIANT WAYS
BUY IT YOURSELF REEEEEE
>Women don't care if the bottom 80% fucks sex bots or prostitutes as these males hold no value to them
That's where you're fucking wrong, kiddo. They don't want competition, period. It doesn't matter if they're interested or not, they lose value if hordes of men stop slathering like retards after them.
I'll let someone else call you a retard. Populations always return to 50/50 split after wars.
The bottom 80% provides them with attention and money. There aren't enough Chads out there and at some point they will be too old to get the attention of Chad.
>to stop the hypothetical objectification of women
lol that's what they call it? should be "to stop men from dropping my spoiled obnoxious ass like a sack of yams" or even "to stop men from opening the shotgun door FOR ME to order I get the fuck out at my home address, only to never be texted back because I'm a raging bitch"
all you have to do to prevent being obsolete is not be a gross whore with a princess complex, because any girl who isn't can find meaningful love
the dregs among us men can have the fucking sexbots to make up for their useless, infertile nature, and the worst of the women can die lonely spinsters tortured by regret who bear no children because they failed at the game of survival of the fittest
Not a thing because the goal of the government is not to placate you. They don't want everyone to be fat and happy, only those who matter.
For the rest a constant state of unease (but not too much) is desirable, because it makes the population more easy to manipulate. They don't want people to be "blackpilled" because then they will lose hope and become dangerous.
They don't care if most men are in despair due to modern dating. They want the idea of being in a relationship to be just plausible enough that you don't rebel against the system. They want you in a state of despair where you can be manipulated, but not so despondent that you give up on society.
Tinder and dating apps keep you in despair. Porn keeps you from being despondent.
bump
Programmer here.
In like ~15 years, you are going to be able to interact with a bot that will feel very damn close to the real deal. It will be like having sex with a mute. But, of course, it can be programmed to say or do anything.
Pretty much everyone should be happy sexually after this.
The thing is, human to human interactions are getting more interesting too. It isn't that bots are going to take over. Humans are just being forced to perform better overall as knowledge spreads rapidly.
Imagine summoning a 9/10 20 yr old girl or guy that is gay, straight, whatever you want really. That is what is coming.
Any proof of this?
Yes I've been watching the sex toy market evolve and its going at an exponential pace. Rewind the clock 15 years from today and you basically just had a stick and a vibrator that wasn't even optimally shaped being the standard.
You literally have companies doing R&D about this shit. There is more research going into how to make people get off today than at any other point in human history.
Interact how? I'm also a programmer and I have no doubt we'll be able to have better conversation with an AI, but if I'm going to interact with a sex robot, I want my penis to do the interaction. Basically, I don't care about the software, I want the hardware to work well. I can do enough talking with humans, thank you very much.
based
so what can we expect in 15 years then? actually realistic sex bots?
You mgtow faggots take this the wrong way, 80/20 doesn’t mean 80% of men don’t get sex it settle down. It means ideally women find the top 20% of men desirable.
Many women settle, understand they don’t have a chance with a top 20, or are self aware enough to find a man they can actually attain even if deep down they want one of the 20%
And they spend their prime years casually fucking and going out for gangbangs with those top 20%ers. Nobody wants to be settled for, and more and more men are waking up to the fact that these roasties only want an average guy for his money. This and modern western females shitty behaviour, sex bots are looking evermore appealing.
>cheaper investment than a marriage
>won't nag
>doesn't get fat and stays young forever
>won't cheat
>won't give you an std
>won't divorce and financially enslave you
>won't falsely accuse you of rape or domestic violence
I could go on.
No way we can have that in 15 years and have them be affordable. I would say in 20 years we may have a realistic robot that you would want to have sex with and it would cost at least 50k USD.
No this is natural woman behavior
There is a reason why religion and social pressure were used to an oppressive degree against women for basically all of human history.
Adulatory could be met with execution, being a slutt basically meant you’d be a beggar or a literal Street whore for the rest of your life. Families married their daughters off to strong families when they were young.
Women were kept out of anything beyond the social sphere.
Women are this way, modern men have let them run wildz. It isn’t our fault
do you honestly think its even possible to take away womens rights anno domini 2018?
>There is a reason why religion and social pressure were used to an oppressive degree against women for basically all of human history.
Yeah, we had somthing to keep them from becoming the insufferable cunts they are today.
>Adulatory could be met with execution, being a slutt basically meant you’d be a beggar or a literal Street whore for the rest of your life. Families married their daughters off to strong families when they were young.
I don't see the problem with this either.
>Women were kept out of anything beyond the social sphere.
Again, the way it ideally should be.
>Women are this way, modern men have let them run wildz. It isn’t our fault
Yes, it is our fault. We should have never given them the right to vote and have careers because all that does is create the shitshow and destabilization we see today. They can't legally be put back in their place so men will naturally find alternatives.
I'm still not getting your point.
2 questions implicit in your OP.
>1. Why is prostitution illegal?
Dumb prudes and/or women voting, mostly.
>2. If prostitution were legal, should it be government funded?
Mostly no. I don't buy your argument that it would prevent "rapey beta males". Most betas lack the spine to rape.
However I would support a small subsidized program offering specially trained prostitutes for the severely mentally disabled, mostly as an act of government charity. Just because you're a retard doesn't mean you don't get horny, and they can't have sex in the normal way because they can't consent in the normal way.
bump
But women need betas to buy stuff and do favors for them. Such a thing as widely available sexbots will only harm women, even they're not gonna want to admit that. So any advancements in sexbots availability will be reeeed to the death by women.
Only in the most cucked and feminist shitholes like Sweden, UK or Australia will they have the power to ban or heavily regulate them. I'd love to see those pigs try to get them banned here. Just watch , you're gonna see an illicit sexbot trade in the countries i mentioned.