Are Koch brothers the right wing equivivalent of George Soros?

They are pro mass immigration they aren't even short term allies.

>Kochs are based and redpilled.
Boomer detected.

You are right, sorry.

They don't hand mobs money like Soros does.

koch and soros are both communist corporatist Rothschild agents

Is Mercers any better or is it same as the Kochs?

This. Koch's are the literal definition of a neocon globalist.

No, they do not profit from the destruction of a country´s currency, economy or stability like Soros.

But both want and need illegal immigration to profit

They are tolerable as long as they give money to the Republicans, but they belong to the gas chamber anyway.

Open borders just like Soros

Koch brothers are more libertarian with a heavy focus on free market economics. They are more interested in global economic growth and free trade than in America first style prosperity and have thus opposed many of Trump's economic policies.

I generally consider them a positive force in that they support free markets and oppose socialism; but their support for free trade does have them rubbing elbows with globalists on occasion.

Still way less malevolent than Soros.

Attached: SorosTimeMagCover.jpg (400x527, 47K)

Who do they fund? I know nothing about them

>Koch brothers fund every republican/conservative political campaing. Is that true?

They are the same thing as Soros. They just portray themselves as conservatives.

They hate Trump.

Open borders means the end of America.
Fuck you.

>Jew 1 donates for open borders
>Jew 2 donates for open borders
>there is somehow a difference
Koch, Soros, Adelstein, Murdoch, just another kike name on a long list of kikes financing white genocide.

>Muh free trade

That just means open borders for mass immigration and outsourcing all your industry

Fuck them and anyone who supports them

They are zionists, as far as you or I are concerned they are indistinguishable from Soros.

Kind of. Just that they’re only concerned with whatever gets them the most shekels rather than their wanting to destroy western civilization completely. Greedy kikes vs. subversive kike.

Koch bros aint jewish

You know Soros pumped a lot of effort and cash into undermining the Eastern European socialist states in the 70s-80s, something the Koch brothers never really even thought about doing.

Kochs aren't our guys, they support open borders and globalism, and support free trade so all our jobs can be outsourced to China. Open borders libertarianism is unsustainable.

Both Soros and the Kochs are liberals, left and right doesnt matter.

t. Nazbol GANG

Attached: liberberg.jpg (700x296, 44K)

maybe you can go suck a koch

libertarians are the same as communists in the real world and need to be gassed all the same

Attached: 1436011100756 copy.jpg (2113x1700, 819K)

Fuck off commie. You don't get to highjack nationalism after spending the last 40 years trying to destroy it for your fucking revolution.

This is interesting to me, why is he so pro this new manifestation of Marxism (the cultural, rather than the economic although his supporters go on about communism plenty) now?

Nazbol isnt communism.
Nazbols were persecuted during the communist era. Really makes u think.

What youre describing isnt cultural marxism it is cultural liberalism.
Cultural marxism would be workers culture as seen in the USSR, NK and other socialist states.

Cultural liberalism means deconstruction of all sense of identity, whether it be racial, religious, ethnic, gender. This is because liberalism believes in "the individual", it is an individualist ideology.
Both marxism and fascism are collectivist ideologies. For marxism the collective is class, for fascism it is the nation state or race.
Every sense of group identity is a restrain for the individual, so it has to be destroyed, in order to "liberate" humanity from racism, sexism, religion, etc.

This is why liberals (both left and right wing) oppose racism, sexism, classism and other collective identity, and is why, ultimately, conservatives (classical liberals) will embrace transgenderism and other degenerate shit, because otherwise they wouldnt be liberals.

Google Jacques Derrida

Yes but cultural marxism is now used to describe being pro-shitskin, pro-islam, pro-fag/tranny, basically pro-anything that is "oppressed" and "powerless" under the current majority rule, which happens to be white males. And doesn't that go against the deconstruction of identities? If that was the goal wouldn't the complete equality and unity of all people be promoted, rather than putting some identities on a pedestal and attacking/tearing down other ones?

>liberals (both left and right wing) oppose racism, sexism, classism and other collective identity,
liberals should _tolerate_ all of them

Theyre jews, globalists and they should hang.