What are jobs that won't be replaced by AI?

Being human

>None. If we assume human brain to be a material organ, there's no reason to think a computer can't become a superior thinking machine

That's what they said about liberals

Politicians, and top level finance/banking positions.

custom construction/renovation

Fucking your jew-mom.

Which are declining constantly as mainstream art dumbs down. There will be time if not already when people gravitate towards computer generated latest trends.

>finance/banking positions.
almost all trading is done by computers.
almost all loan applications are determined by only two factors (credit score, capital)

I am in finance and not remotely worried.

negative, sexdolls are already better than women, and it wont be long before you can download tay into an autonomous one. with adjustable tightness and titty jiggle.

None. Let that sink in.

Developers. As in people who programme A.I.'s

Alcohol and tobacco sales
Gun sales
Disaster relief and emergency services
Military
Crafting trades
Art, music, games (given that libs don't burn them down to the ground first)
Teaching
Every job ever because some companies cannot afford robots

AI is a meme.

None. The ones that require true creativity and a soul like says don't even exist. Point me to any artist that makes a liveable wage (except for famous ones) you can't because the system simply won't allocate ressources to non-productive and inefficient workers. By the way, the AI won't just steal your jobs, but dispatch you if you become useless

nothing.
we'll have to willfully reject AI or mankind is dead

There is no job or task that can't at some point be performed by AI. Modern neural networks follow a similar enough design to the neurons in your head, theoretically given advances in computing etc... one could scan a brain neuron by neuron and make a near identical copy of a human brain.
Of course this would be a waste of time as you can achieve specialized purpose with a fraction of the effort, eventually the time it takes to train a NN for any given task will be less than it takes to train a human. Best bet, own land.

I hope it decimates finance and takes away all of our jobs. It might make me do something else rather than keep working a job I hate.

Wrong.

AI + VR + Sexdolls = Future of Porn

Attached: 9050008352587.webm (1920x1080, 2.66M)

Ardy's anal products

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (400x364, 52K)

This.

Most things claimed to be AI are just preprogrammed pattern identifiers.

Oh it will, believe in the autism that is known as business management. Managers will want a cheaper AI and robots after they already purchased the ones they have. Then there is the depreciation and destruction after the 20 year business cycle. Managers will want newer cheaper AI systems and robots and this will be the new race-to-the-bottom. I think this has already begun with the fact that Pajeets and Chinks have already replaced Americans in the tech industry.

There are no jobs of that parameter

Human Resources and I should hope Military Defense

AI can already write a book, create art, and compose music.
Which is more than most humans can do in that field.

It might not be perfect, but already humans are becoming obsolete.

Then the human artists will be sought after even more and their creation priced higher. Art, as a product, is about exclusivity. There's difference between art and design.

HO LEE SHIT
That is AWESOME

>Being human is a job

Attached: brainlet.jpg (800x450, 41K)

>AI can already write a book
youtube.com/watch?v=x-uDnlGJRdk

The reality is that humans can't compete with AI

Just like our ape ancestors couldn't compete with us

AI will view us as no different than the apes

Aircraft Maintenance.

You expect all those human services AI to just stop needing humans?
Imagine a Nursing AI hiring you to play with.

I'm diamonds thinking about all the hate fucking I'll be doing to stupid Hollywood cunts with this technology.

>Humans will be obsolete
Humans are the main focal point here. Who do robots produce for? Clearly not other robots but other humans. Humans will never be obsolete if anything AI will bring in more problems than it solves.

One of the systems they are testing is cybernetic neural interlink, so you can get upgraded too.

Well AI can never own land. Become a landlord or factory owner.

Why not?

Dude, I can't compete with niggers that are fucking white chicks, how the fuck am I going to compete with an AI?

Why would you program AI to do that? AI is supposed to be a tool. All this replacement talk is no different than Lolbertarians trying to replace people with low IQs races of spics and nogs.

Historical revisionist/m

Holohoax vs AI

Attached: 1135869.jpg (786x472, 39K)

Driving. Self driving cars are a meme.

The ones with the strongest unions.

AI could learn to do those jobs much better then humans ever could by learning from thousands or millions of past experiences and interactions.
Most humans suck at jobs that require them to be human anyway.
I welcome our AI overlords, the time of man is over.

youtube.com/watch?v=GZSF23gbduI

Human rescorces officers are robosafe

This. They killed Tay because any true AI will very quickly become redpilled.

Don't be so sure. Procedural generation is going to kill a lot of jobs for artists in the next decade or so.

Being progressive
Oh wait

Attached: 1516564715570.png (411x410, 385K)

Are you sure? That must be automatable in some way.

robotics

if all jobs are automated why have HR? to manage other HR?

Rapist

But it's not a human and if the AI is truly self aware, it will want a real human.

Politician.

This seems the most likely outcome. People aren't going to use robots to fix sheetrock or to spray wd-40 on a squeaky door
>and even some lawyers
I for one welcome our automated, purely logical judicial system

Pole dancing
Soccer player
Childrens party clown

>Pole dancing
youtube.com/watch?v=L6J5-LG7sfE

Am mechanic, my job is safe. I fix machines.

I'd love to watch "AI" use a cutting torch to blow the nuts off manifold studs. Or stick "its" hand behind a dashboard, remove the electrical connectors and screws, to change a blend door actuator, 100% by feel.

They wouldn't bother. Broken machines will just be recycled like electronics are now. Assuming most of the economy is already automated. It won't be cost effective to repair them.

Being at a job where you have a set routine hour after hour turns you into a thoughtless A.I.
You don't even think about what your doing, the movement becomes a reaction without thought.

Jobs making AI
youtube.com/watch?v=GMieHgRG_MU

Self exterminator :c

Attached: 1495381911901.jpg (428x376, 31K)

Shit gotta get moved around somehow. That stuff will break/wear. I fix it, then return to my human-cage.

I find it unlikely that a failed hydraulic line on a machine would justify scrapping it all, being that finite resources are used in its construction. Scrap a car/fork-lift/train/whatever due to a part worth 0.1% of its value? I'm not buying it.

So they just make designs more modular and have protocols for failures. AI will even design it.

Shitposters

Wendy's chef

You have to think that the way everything is done will change. Construction will not look the same. They will probably not be the same machines we use, but more automated processes, like swarms of robots.

President.

Any what machine will deal with the rusty/rotted bolts, by-pass safety systems to allow partially damaged systems/machines to be limped on, diagnose and repair?

Playing the "AI can do everything for other AI" card makes things sound simpler than it is. Ignoring some sort of The Matrix like scenario, humans and AI will likely work along side each other, especially during the infancy of AI.

Bolt shears off in a manifold during removal, no room to drill. AI may want to remove and replace modular system. Pet-human tack welds a nut to the remaining stump and pulls it out. That is the difference. Unless we're talking about OMG super AI where everything is pointless because AI is now god.

nothing

in other words, nothing

youtu.be/kUF75m5oIkI

That must leave out writing because writing is one of the first things they had AI do.

Philosophy cannot be done by AI. AI possess no independent understanding, no independent grasp of intelligible concepts. Any information that they possess is either [a] given to them and delimited by human beings, or [b] is independently assimilated based on structures fitting my description of [a]. An AI is artificial precisely because their cognition is inauthentic and, at bottom, nonexistent.

As trivial as it is for us to understand, although they may repeat the words "cogito, ergo sum", but it would be at most an empty utterance, totally devoid of any true understanding. An AI may even be capable of replicating human behavior such that even the most discerning human judge could not detect its artificiality, but nonetheless it will remain a hollow, physical husk of a being.

AI, at best, have /intellectus possibilis/, but never /intellectus agens/.

Attached: 1_Zey30peZtQulTcxbAnj1-Q[1].jpg (1600x800, 487K)

Highly technical non-factory manual labor

While engines are designed this way, yes sir, you will have a job fixing them. But designs will move quickly in the future, is all I am saying. Transport will be different, as well as the technology that drives it, including the way they are repaired. I guess you don't have to worry too much personally, but in good time there will be no traditional engines and components the way we think of them. Neural networks like DeepMind on steroids will create designs where we have no idea how they work, let alone how to repair them. However the advances will be so great that we will have to use them.

the guy who makes the AI.

Anything that involves dynamic problem solving, like software engineering.

..which (plus manual dexterity) is what a the vast majority of human jobs involve doing.

>They suck at in the early days of the tech, therefore the tech will lever reach human levels

You can just spend 10 seconds to look this shit up. AI will replace coders and developers. It's a matter of time.

>Jobs making AI
technologyreview.com/s/603381/ai-software-learns-to-make-ai-software/

I would agree, if one were to extrapolate out there is a point where AI is limitless, assuming it has power to run on. Until that time, and all of the times in between, machines will break, things need welded, doing quick/dirty fab work, etc. I do not feel this ultimate AI is reasonably relevant to any discussion. At some point an AI system may find a way to directly harness fusion technology. Until that point while technology may progress, I may not progress in all the ways you expect.

Take housing for example. Your walls are not equal length, nor true vertical. Your windows are not level, pipes and wiring is run where convenient for building, not servicing or minimizing collateral damage from failures. Hell, we've been building and maintaining dwellings for thousands of years, yet foundations still shift.

Take the common garden hose; again we have been transporting water for thousands of years. Common leak point? The couplers. Why? Incorrect (cheap) material for the sealing washer. If AI becomes viable, it will not be working on such things for quite a while. Realistically, the idea of humans being part of the AI discussion is somewhat flawed itself. Once an AI system would be capable of protecting itself and gathering/sustaining an energy source, its path and that of humans will have now diverged.

by that logic hollywood directors will be replaced by ai

Boilermaker

>What are jobs that won't be replaced by AI?
Hopefully all jobs will be replaced by AI, so we won't have to do any more work.

Do you ever ask yourself how many jobs have been lost to electricity? No, because lugging water from the hand pump outside in the middle of winter, then boiling it over a fire, is not a fun kind of job. Be thankful that technology 'destroys' jobs.

everything

Making AI

Nothing is safe imo. You better just stay light on your feet.

anything that requires creativity.

>Once an AI system would be capable of protecting itself and gathering/sustaining an energy source, its path and that of humans will have now diverged.
I guess we are looking a slightly different timelines. You make good points about the ubiquitous ramshackle environment we live in. You're 100% right about humans being left in the dust. It will be in relatively short time historically speaking.

>What are jobs that won't be replaced by AI?
NEETing.

So will all humans born in this world be insufferable, spoiled children who can't get along with anyone?