Did those romantic fuckers ruin it for all of us?
Is the romanticism movement in the 1800s the origin of modern NPCs?
Asher Rodriguez
Wyatt Rodriguez
its the origin of fascism
Jaxson Cooper
>its the origin of fascism
Also stupidity.
umich.edu
Joseph Moore
NPCs have always existed, idiot.
The primary program downloaded onto most modern NPCs has its roots in the French Revolution (egalitarian intellectual utopianism), then a blend of marxism and postmodernism (marxism from a racial/gender/sexual perspective)
Liam Rogers
NPCs were created in ancient times of slavery. All the PCs refused to bow and were killed, those that threw away their dignity and embraced servitude became NPCs. Generations of this type of selection resulted in the modern populace with only ocassional admixture of master genes causing divergence.
Jonathan Butler
>idiot.
Faggot.
>egalitarian intellectual utopianism
You dumb cunt, the French egalitarianism was itself inspired by romanticism of the times.
Jason Ross
French Revolution happened before the Romanticism movement
You don't know history
Owen Jones
you are mental
Jason Stewart
>All the PCs refused to bow and were killed, those that threw away their dignity and embraced servitude became NPCs. Generations of this type of selection resulted in the modern populace with only ocassional admixture of master genes causing divergence.
So NPC is an evolutionary strategy?
Xavier Cooper
>French egalitarianism was itself inspired by romanticism of the times.
It was inspired by the enlightenment and liberalism.
Romanticism was a reaction against that
Dylan Smith
evolution has no strategy, merely an outcome
Landon Butler
this
Jace Gutierrez
>French Revolution happened before the Romanticism movement
>French revolution was caused by the French egalitarianism school of thought.
Isaiah Foster
romantics were reactionary you pleb they were trying to save us from commercialism and industrialization's degredation
Brody Mitchell
>Romanticism was a reaction against that
>AnCap flag.
>Nothing surprises me anymore
Faggot, Romanticism was a reaction against the industrialization and modernization of society. Not against enlightenment and liberalism. Sure, people argue that romanticism was a reaction against the logic and cold dogma of the renaissance, but those people, like you, are just a bunch of fags.
Oliver Morris
they were opposed to the enlightment, they realized after the king and God had been dragged down into the mud there was nothing to look up towards
romantics idealize aristocracy and beauty
Eli Cox
>romantics were reactionary you pleb
I know cunt.
>they were trying to save us from commercialism and industrialization's degredation
>They were trying to create an image of the ideal based on emotions and intuition.
FTFY.
Camden Carter
>Faggot, Romanticism was a reaction against the industrialization and modernization of society. Not against enlightenment and liberalism. Sure, people argue that romanticism was a reaction against the logic and cold dogma of the renaissance, but those people, like you, are just a bunch of fags.
literally, no.
Egalitarianism is sourced to the enlightenment, which lead to revolution and the end of monarchy and traditional institutions.
Romantics understood the detrimental and destructive effect, the equivalent of tearing down a beautiful castle to use the stones for some utilitarian cause like a road.
You're a pleb, the sooner you realize this you can go on the path to knowing.
Jose Ramirez
Do you even know what the Romanticism movement was? Lmfao. The fact you may consider utopian intellectuals to be romantically minded actually doesn't speak to the Romanticism movement itself. Fucking armchair scholar
Romanticism was mostly an artistic, literary, and musical movement that reacted to the feeling of distance from nature. It's mostly pastoral poems, compositions, and fiction written with skepticism of modern society and tech, like Frankenstein and The Sorrows of Young Werther
Jackson Walker
>romantics idealize
This is true.
>aristocracy and beauty
Not aristocracy, maybe beauty (I can't think of a significant romantic work that did not have a component of beauty). They present an ideal version of emotions. The romantic works are not restricted to aristocracy. The main ingredient of romantic works is usually a hero.
Jace Young
you are literally so fucking lost and everyone here is trying to help you holy shit lol
Elijah Murphy
Not an ancap just forgot to change it
>Faggot, Romanticism was a reaction against the industrialization and modernization of society. Not against enlightenment and liberalism
I agree that it was a reaction against industrialization and modernity(both are products of .liberalism btw)
But of course it was also against liberalism, if not, at least the enlightenment
Cooper Turner
it's not just emotion and intuition, this is what you learned in public school. Romantics were virulent traditionalists and understood the nature of society, the importance of history, nobility, nature (human and plants and animals) They don't teach this in public school, instead they teach it was all women doing stupid shit.
Sebastian Harris
You dumb motherfucker he's literally saying French egalitarianism preceded Romanticism. Re-iterating his point doesn't refute that.
Mason Adams
>Not aristocracy,
literally the main theme of Romanticism is the nobility of the old family lines and the lamentation of the loss of this feature in society, knowing the Aristocratic families were a source of guidence for the plebs.
I'm sad but also this is the way that capitalist and egalitarian commercial society has to portray the movement because it is in direct contest.
Samuel Morales
> It was partly a reaction to the Industrial Revolution,[1] the aristocratic social and political norms of the Age of Enlightenment, and the scientific rationalization of nature—all components of modernity.
>It had a significant and complex effect on politics, with romantic thinkers influencing liberalism, radicalism, conservatism and nationalism.
Cameron Reed
>literally, no.
Literally yes.
>Egalitarianism is sourced to the enlightenment, which lead to revolution and the end of monarchy and traditional institutions.
Fuck man. This is what happens when you art fuckers are cut off from economics and politics. You just have faggot ideas. You dumb cunt. The French were already starving. The works of Marat and others only served as a catalyst.
A country does not fucking go to war with itself based on a few fan fictions you dumb cunt. A country goes to war, always, because of economic and political reasons. Why the fuck did Napolean ever come to power if Egalitarianism was the only reason for the French revolution.
>Romantics understood the detrimental and destructive effect, the equivalent of tearing down a beautiful castle to use the stones for some utilitarian cause like a road.
And this lead to the French revolution? Fuck me. You deserve the Nobel Prize in Logic. I better call the committee and get them to create a category for you.
>You're a pleb,
>Pic is you.
Christian Cook
you are fucking retarded m8.
>art fuckers
I'm done, ignorance is bliss I guess. Enjoy your video games.
David Gray
Wow (((npc meme shills))) pushing that fascism is dumb.
Imagine my shock.
Let me guess lolbertarianism is the only based ideology? Yayyy let's all be individuals!!!
I new that this npc meme was a psyop to infect Jow Forums with retardness.
^this guy get it.
Leo Fisher
>Fucking armchair scholar
Hey, at least I have an armchair.
Jack Watson
>you are literally so fucking lost and everyone here is trying to help
Austin Kelly
>at least the enlightenment
Fair.
>But of course it was also against liberalism
If you're talking about 1700s liberalism, ok. But otherwise no.
Mason Perez
most likely this is a Catholic v. Protestant proxy debate anyway, but OP is nonetheless illiterate
here's some of that NPC romanticism we should discard
youtube.com
Mason Adams
>this is what you learned in public school.
Kek. Lit majors are so pathetic in their insults. Which prep school did you go to faggot?
>Romantics were virulent traditionalists
Pic related
>and understood the nature of society
Pic related.
>the importance of history, nobility, nature (human and plants and animals)
Pic related
>They don't teach this in public school, instead they teach it was all women doing stupid shit.
Pic related.
Hudson Ward
Species, not the concept of evolution itself, employ evolutionary strategies in order to increase their success.
Landon Gray
>You dumb motherfucker he's literally saying French egalitarianism preceded Romanticism. Re-iterating his point doesn't refute that.
Isaiah Cooper
Lol I fucking knew this meme would backfire. Enjoy the next month or more of "me no npc, no u npc" you fucking idiots. Case in point this asshole deconstructing romanticism which was arguably the basis of nationalism using your shitty wojak memes.
Jose Green
>evolution has no strategy, merely an outcome
What about survival of the fittest? That isn't a strategy?
Easton Long
>Cite wikipedia.
Chase Russell
>What about survival of the fittest? That isn't a strategy?
Anthony Ward
There's no strategy, it's chance. An animal doesn't emerge on to the playing field with a strategy like it's playing a video game, it just happens to have traits that makes it more likely to breed.
Austin Jackson
>it just happens to have traits that makes it more likely to breed.
What gave it the traits to do so?
Isaiah Rogers
Maybe you should take a few lit courses, you have written nothing in response. What romantic works would you like to discuss? Wikipedia isn't a source.
Joshua Foster
Mutations, random, tiny little abnormalities that usually occured over a long period of time
Christian Lopez
Calling that a strategy is like seeing a face in the clouds.
Nature comes up with some absolutely bizarre shit over time, no wonder many are convinced that it's the machinations of a higher intelligence...one that would have to be utterly sick of course.
Jordan Hall
>Maybe you should take a few lit courses
No thanks.
>Wikipedia isn't a source.
I didn't cite wikipedia you stupid fuck.
Nicholas Sanders
>Mutations,
Where do mutations occur from?
>random,
So randomizing mutations to see which one fits the environment is not a strategy? Or are you and I just arguing on semantics at this stage?
>little abnormalities that usually occured over a long period of time
An alternative strategy is to not change any aspect of the genome and just die out.
I think you and I are just arguing on semantics.
Charles Adams
>no wonder many are convinced that it's the machinations of a higher intelligence...one that would have to be utterly sick of course.
Why?
>Nature comes up with some absolutely bizarre shit over time,
Yes. It did fuck up with you.
Robert Roberts
You really are an NPC. What's the last thing you read? How can you have a position on a cultural movement if you hate all culture?
Ethan Mitchell
>Romantic
>NPC meme
Does. Not. Compute.
Romanticism isn't inherently nostalgic; it has numerous flavors. One of them is 'looking towards the future'. This seems to be a characteristic NPC's do not have. Therefore, the answer is No.