America's next civil war won't be fought between whole regions like north or south but instead rural vs urban Urban has: -population advantage -greater international recognition and foreign trade -gdp -infrastructure
Did the mods just really nuke another NPC thread But the one about the black pilling faggot going on about a shooting is still up? What kinda signals are being sent here I'm not sure if it's computing Asking for a neighbor They like Trump and that's how this post is related
Taking my mom with me to Phoenix area rally, do you guys know how the bathroom situation at these rallies are? Is there many by the line or inside? She is older and has to use restroom often, will she be ok there? She loves trump even bought his books when he ran and read a bunch of them, she and me convinced whole family to vote trump. I really want her to go but don’t want her to be humiliated or something
>Urban has: >-population advantage Rural has bullet advantage >-greater international recognition and foreign trade Source? >-gdp Don't fucking matter when you're dead >-infrastructure Which any smart guerilla targets first >Rural has: >-Guns >-Foods And a coherent white group
William Brown
Rural immediately wins by sieging cities that are not on the coasts, forcing them to capitulate. Urban would get recognition on the international stage, but the rurals play the Viet Cong game; sporadic guerrilla attacks on urban towns and supply lines, as well as power plants and water supplies.
Russia annexes Alaska. The urbans may call in the UN/EU/China but conventional fighting forces, as evidenced by almost every instance of this happening, are defeated in a war of attrition.
Give it to me straight, lads, will Republicans hold onto the House or is shit fucked? I know the Senate is safe but the House worries me. Not that I'm concerned about legislation, of course. Trump would veto the bad shit. I'm convinced, though, that if Pelosi gets the speaker's gavel she'll make life hard for the President with endless investigations.
There are some Presidents in the running for among the best, but I can't think of a single decent first lady besides Melania. In fact, I can barely remember their names. The drunk, the insane(lincoln), the cuck (several), the ugly (also cousin)...Am I forgetting any?
Control of the food supply gives the rural retards a good deal of control over the urban elites' international trade. Infrastructure is crumbling - did you know that one out of every nine American bridges is structurally unsound? GDP doesn't mean much to hungry people. Civil war goes to the rural retards.
OMG all that most people want is good jobs with livable wages and affordable healthcare. Have economic policies that lead to that and there won't be a war.
The problem is you're looking at urban areas in terms of what they used to be. The infrastructure is crumbling and can't be rebuilt because democrats are retarded at budgeting. The gdp is all in terms of non-production, DC and jew bankers in NYC don't exactly CREATE anything, and the areas with manufacturing are growing redder by the day. International recognition will not help when you are the riot mob trying to overthrow your duly elected govt. Blue regions have nothing that will allow them to win, the lack of guns is only the beginning
THEY DON'T HAVE THE TOMBOYS EITHER AND IT'S TIME AGAIN
>one out of every nine American bridges is structurally unsound man it sure would be a shame for the costal states if the strongest agriculture state was bordered on both sides by wide rivers
Quick rundown? I took a "History of Women in America" class in college but the only one who was mentioned (briefly) was a proto-feminist letter from John Adams' wife I think.
Modern urbanites have >no guns >no food >no industry >civil infrastructure entirely dependent on largesse of rural and suburban master race, is otherwise run by incompetent niggers It will be much shorter than the last one
