I don't get one thing. Why are you denying the Holocaust? Isn't it actually a pretty awesome achievement? To exterminate 6 million kikes, fags, Communists, Poles, and gypsies?
It's pretty lame to say the Holocaust didn't happen, but if the Nazis won, it would've happened. It's cognitive dissonance at its best.
I'm not ashamed of it, even if the numbers are faked and it's a logistical nightmare. It shows our enemies what are we ready to do if they push us enough.
We could have killed 'em all. Don't push us. Don't push us or we'll give you a war you won't believe. Let it go. Let it go.
Because it literally didn't happen. We're in this for the truth, and the numbers don't add up. If I have any criticism for the NSDAP it's that they allowed jews to live at all instead of just shooting them immediately and dragging the bodies into the woods.
Story doesn't make sense. At worse the numbers are massively inflated.
Carson Bailey
What a tough fighter you must be. You will give the world same kind of war where your achievement is killing millions of civilians but losing to people who fight back?
Xavier Ortiz
Because it is obvious Jew propaganda to make Whites look irrationally evil.
Colton Richardson
There's literally no evidence that it happened, and giving the lie legitimacy helps brainwash people against the platform of white survival in the name of anti-fascism, egged on by the notion we sympathize with mass murderers of tens of millions of people for being slightly socially deviant.
Oliver Richardson
I have no idea whether the holocaust happened or not because of all the conflicting data. But I don't care either way because I would support the Nazis regardless the holocaust happened or not.
>I don't get one thing. Why are you denying the Holocaust?
Maybe it's because the holocaust has made European culture defeatist and an "all-inclusive" club. Does not matter in the end, the world has made up its mind on the matter.
How many times do we have to go over this? A lot of the evidence used was fake and they forbid any investigation. If it was so real they wouldn't fear a investigation.
I wouldn’t say killing a lot of people is good plus poles are white and so are some communist but that doesn’t mean never kill anyone just wholesale slaughter isn’t really a good look and is immoral in my opinion that being said the holocaust didn’t happen so.
Levi Jenkins
Because if the holocaust was real, then there would have been no jews left in europe and we would live in a paradise. I doubt that even 600K people died in the camps, at that was due to illness and starvation as the allies bombed the railways.
Jace Nelson
There was 0,5-2 million dead in the holocaust total. The claim is there was 6 million dead jews alone.
James Jenkins
Fucking polish man.
Eli Anderson
Because it didn't happen. It would be cool if it did, but it just didn't.
Lucas Jackson
>To exterminate 6 million kikes, fags, Communists, Poles, >Poles
well the census data shows they killed at least 5.5. million... so yes it did.
>We're in this for the truth, and the numbers don't add up.
Yes they do, but please tell us your version of the numbers...
> If I have any criticism for the NSDAP it's that they allowed jews to live at all instead of just shooting them immediately and dragging the bodies into the woods. which is exactly what they did in the Eastern occupied territories.
they shot over a million like that.
Jayden Allen
neither proves the Nazis didn't kill millions (including more than 6 million non jews) in their camps and shootings
political movement that has spent twenty years saying it hates jews, and which spends years passing laws to oust jews from all businesses and professions, and confiscate their property, invades countries ans immediately exiles their jews (they drove tens of thousands out of Czechoslovakia within weeks of taking over) force other countries to impose anti jew laws, round u jews in ghettos and camps, and record shooting jews en masse, and transporting jews to camps that had no accommodation but did have gas chambers...
what part of the well documented history does not make sense?
Julian Gomez
>There's literally no evidence that it happened ignoring all the tons of documents photos, blueprints, recorded speeches, diaries, letters, and eyewitness testimony from everyone including the engineers who built the ovens and the guards who freely talked about what happneed. Ignoring the laws that persecuted jews, turned them out of their homes, forced them into camps, and sent them to their deaths. Ignoring the orders for mass shootings.
there is more evidence for the holocaust than for the american war of independence. you want to say that never happened?
its allied soviet propaganda, pure lies pushed by allies to punish germany.
Andrew Diaz
Kike
Jaxson Rodriguez
Itt basically everyone ignoring OP’s question.
Gavin Gray
Literally making shit up to sound based on empirical evidence that does not existg.
Nathan Carter
>here are some numbers out of context which mean nothing
Documented by whom? did they have a full record of every death a the camps? why do they have a number for Auschwitz that is 13,000 fewer than the number of entires int eh 20 months of the Auschwitz death certificates for Camp 1? 73.000 died there in the small camp 1 (only 20,000 capacity) in under two years, and we have their death certificates. Of course we don't have records at all for the 115,000 cpacity camps 2 adn 3, at which many were kille don arrival without any record made, but the very fact that your number does not even include the full number for under two years of a camp that we know operated for five years, makes your figures bullshit
so where are your numbers from? what bullshit source do you have?
Eli Wilson
>people can't forge documents >people can't lie
Henry White
because they bury people in football stadia with tiered seating and hot dog stands, and room thirty millionaires to run up and down in the middle playing silly games while teenage girls wave pom poms.
and the mass graves have been found, full of bone and ash.
this has to be the most retarded meme on pol
Anthony Murphy
>and the mass graves have been found, full of bone and ash. >ash
so significant portions of a book published two years before the ballpoint pen was invented were written witha ballpoint pen?
what, Otto frank had a time machine? he went forward in time, bought a bic, then wnet back in time to write the book, and didn't actually bother to go back int ime to tell himself to save himself from the camps or save his children?
what an utter bastard.
oh yes, of course if you fact check this you find that only a few page numbers and a couple of marginal notes by a later editor were in ball point pen.
and that Levin was asked to write a stage play, from the original book, and the court case was about the dispute over that.
Wasting 15 minutes of your life to write this shit
Wyatt Moore
No it's just 6,000,000 kikes. If we add everyone else it goes up to 17 million
Blake Nelson
>1 post by this id can you actually fuck off?
Carson Cooper
kys wimp
Kayden Price
i agree with that being an retarded meme. i think the holocoust was actually death due to germans running out of food, and less that what is stated. but it was still at least a million. so still bad.
Daniel Long
I agree fellow uštaša :)
Isaiah Murphy
Most of these alt-right kids do know that it happened. But it's integral for them to deny it and try to tell others that it didn't happen in some sad attempt at trying to paint themselves as an innocent lied about race all throughout history.
Wyatt Phillips
1 he was a slave. slave labour was a vital war resource 2 Churchill does mention it. De Gaulle and Eisnhower talked about their own experience - neither was in Auschwitz. Why would you expect them to talk about something they were not involved with? 3 it was also a massive 135,000 strong labour camp, and POW camp, and political prisoner camp, serving many vital war supplies factories. there is no reason why it could not be both. 4 killing people on the spot means you not only tip off the other jews as to what is happening, and risk arousing local trouble (if you did it in france of holland there would be local resistance and the news would get out to the whole world), but you also need to control the thousands of jews lined up waiting to be shot, and you have to dispose of the bodies. they wanted to do it secretly, and control it. and take slaves. however exactly what you propose is what they did in the eastern occupied territories - they rounded up jews and shot over a million. 6 because the total was never calculated by adding up individual camp estimates, especially soviet propaganda ones. And Irving was not jailed for asking that. 7 Hofle telegram. 8 not over all the site. it is not flat. 9 no, there was (and is) plenty of evidence that tens of thousands were killed at all those sites. however it was only with time that the true scale of the killings was realised, and the concentration of the killing of over 2 million people in four camps was discovered. these became properly called death camps, and the others relegated as merely scenes of mass murder 10 they did use protective gear. the few surviving sonderkommando said so 11 the soap lie was one told by the nazis to jews. the lampshade is lost, but may have existed - no one is certain. atrocity stories and wild rumours are common in war, and among persecuted prisoners. so what? the documented facts are quite terrible enough.
Kevin Fisher
Is there a way we can add up every German army regime/infantry group so we can see how many inactive/reserves were instead hunting for Jews instead of fighting on 2 fronts? That would give us a number on how many were alleged “slaughtering Jews” and see if all those people could do their job during WW2
Dylan Rodriguez
12 No one was sent to the gallows for those alleged actions. They were raised at Nuremberg as rumors that had been reported, and they were dismissed as untrue at the trial. the allegation that steam was used actually comes from a report that people were being killed in a room by the introduction of gas, exhaust fumes or steam, although they were not sure which one was being used. turns out they got two right. 14. Not only is Wiesel unreliable (so what, he is not the only or even a significant part of the evidence, despite your attempt to straw man with him) but he was never in Birkenau, he would never have seen the gas chambers. 15. not true, but yes, a disproportionate number do say that. It has become a trope. it is common for eyewitnesses over many years to start incorporating stories into their own accounts. this is a well known phenomenon. Which is why historians go back to earliest possible versions of testimony, and cross check it with documents, archaeology and photos and other hard evidence as well as comparing multiple eyewitness accounts to find common agreement. Only idiots listen to senile old jews mumbling about bears and eagles (and being immediately told by other jews that story is unbelievable rubbish) and think that is significant. 16 it doesn't. that fake report by an unqualified denier who didn't know how to use the equipment adn who never released his data or published any survey maps, has been entirely debunked by real archaeologists who have surveyed the site. not only that but the idea the site was undisturbed since the ice age is ridiculous given the Treblink Gold Rush. 17 untrue. there is plenty of hard evidence - archaeology, documents, photos, - ignorance is not an argument
Jacob Hall
we also killed them so hitler wouldn't tear apart the world with his insane antics
Julian Foster
denying the holocaust = slandering hitler as a faggot
Nicholas Phillips
providing nothing to further your argument but instead get mad. i'd say thats checkmate
18 you may express skepticism, but you need to provide reason for doing so. otherwise you are merely exonerating crimes agaisnt humanity and an accessory after the fact. the problem for deniers is tat they cannot do so without lying. if they could actually show their claims were true they would not be prosecuted. but they don't. they lie, get proven to be lying, in lies that they should have known were lies, lies that are easy to debunk, adn still insist on continuing to lie. 19 Please lis the first rate qualifications of these scholars? (Irving? no degree in history. Zundel, no degree in history. Leuchter, no degree in engineering. fausrisson, a degree in literary analysis which in France means postmodernist bullshitting) Name one with any standing in the academic world. 20 How do you know they didn't? 21 Stories grow with the telling. This may just be bullshit. Does this mean the crematoria were never used? No. Do you know who efficient the crematoria were, adn if they did not smoke? no. do you know why the bullshit story about knowing the nationality arose? It makes a sort of sense (skinny greeks don't have as much fat on them as chubby Hungarians, so they don't produce as much smoke - maybe it started as a joke, and the story spread - rumors are rife and funny remarks are good entertainment.) So it isn'thard to see why such a story would become commonplace, even if false.
but that does not contradict the fact that they could burn 4756 bodies a day at Auschwtix, over a million a year, if they needed to, and all at a camp that had only 135.000 inmates... why would they need such large capacity, so many ovens, the ability to burn millions?
Nathan Foster
Because it's simply not true that six million Jews died in WWII.
>Because if the holocaust was real, then there would have been no jews left in europe
why? the war ended before they finished - but they did get two thirds of the jews in europe. 98% of Polish Jews.
not a bad score.
>I doubt that even 600K people died in the camps, Why? where (apart from your ass) does that number come from?
>at that was due to illness and starvation as the allies bombed the railways. nope. there is no historical reason to beleive that. the trains delivered people to the camps, the could have brought food as well. the railways were not disrupted in central europe until the very last months of the war, adn the majority of deaths happened in 42 to mid 44 - before the railways had issues.
your meme opinions are not based in fact.
Kayden Moore
Zyklon B is the trade name for pellets of calcium sulphate soaked in liquif Hydrogen Cyanide. it can be used as a pesticide. at a tenth the concentration needed for killing lice (which takes hours) you can kill human beings in a few minutes.
your remarks are like saying "shotguns are for shooting pheasants, of course they could never be used for killing peasants."
>> >The United states is actually located in the middle of Mexico >people can forge documents (maps) so this is true
Wyatt Hall
make a note of this date.
pic related.
the world Almanac from 1948
read the bit underlined in red
the reason there is no change in the numbers IN THE BOOK is because they used the SAME NUMBERS from 1939
the fact IN THE REAL WORLD is that the number of actual living people had changed, but the people writing the sports trivia collection book didn't got to europe to actually count the number of jews left.
this is the most retarded argument ever. A sports trivia book says clearly on the page that the data is not up to date, and deniers read it as being gospel and factual and proof of the actual numbers. You have to be a moron or a liar to keep spreading this nonsense.
oh and by the way, this idiot argument was first tried out in the 1960's and was debunked then, and has been tried most days in the last year her on pol and been debunked every time. so you can cut the lying and stupid last line off, next time you decide to post this lie.
All the nazi documents gathered up are 16 miles long. There's not a single case of someone explicitly saying Jews are being gassed. Everything is said to be innuendo.
For a regime (or entire country depending on who you talk to) that was supposedly hell bent on GTKRWN, they for some reason hid the fact IN THEIR OWN INTERNAL DOCUMENTS that they were gassing kikes.
Out of the hundreds of officers not a single one accidently slipped up once or led on more than they should have.
If there was proof of this, jews would have it blown up to the size of a billboard outside auschwitz. They would have something definite to point to. But instead? We get circular logic and pure talmudry
Cameron Sanders
How do you know when the majority of deaths occurred?
Juan Campbell
>i think the holocoust was actually death due to germans running out of food,
so the recorded shootings (over a million) don't count?
what about the recorded hangings, and the recorded deaths through beatings? how about the deaths from disease? what abut deaths on forced marches?
how about deaths from being herded into buildings that are set on fire?
how about the 250,000 killed by Romania, without german help. Or the 80,000 killed by Yugoslavs, without German help. they are usually counted as well.
Michael Miller
nigger jew
Jason Johnson
Google how long it takes modern day ceremtorioms to burn a body. Then compare that per jew who was killed.
the NYT censored the picture because they thought it too shocking.
however, even if it was a double exposure, or a composite - which it isn't - what would that prove? that the man was not emaciated? that the man didn't live in a barracks like that? that the men int eh barracks didn't live there? that the conditions in the camp were not appalling?
what exactly would it change? would it mean the Nazis didn't nearly starve him to death, as they had starved so many thousands of others?
no. it would not change a fucking thing.
so what? this is the argument of someone who is nitpicking because they have no argument. "Ohh look they faked the picture by taking two real pictures and putting them together. Since it is made of real pictures then the whole thing is a lie.... um... er... really... "
because that is when the millions of jews from the polish ghettos and the Hungarian jews were transported to Treblinka, Sobibor and Chelmno and Auschwitz - Aktion Reinhardt
and they didn't go anywhere else, and they didn't have accommodation for them all, and they didn't just get let go out the side gate.
