Why are these Krassenstein guys always the top shitposts at trumps tweets?
Jason Lopez
I loved the part where she's asking him about (((muh climate change))) >The climate could change back >But that's denying it. I want the jews out of my country now.
>The same fucking article says that any benefit it could produce is offset by the fiscal problems it creates you fucking monkey Imma need you to quote exactly what it says, Mr. Resort to Ad Hominem.
>It is large enough to actually elect a president Maybe in the US, in an actual democracy, Hillary Clinton would be the president right now, and just see how much Trump has done regarding immigration. If that segment is large enough to elect a president then it's still not large enough to elect the legislators needed to reform the immigration system. >Not "white people". Local people. I didn't see any 'local people' complaining when immigrants from all over Europe (including Trump's ancestors) came to America, so again, does capitalism and the free market only work when it benefits their (white people's) own interests? That seems a bit hypocritical, don't you think? >As I mentioned: Salvini, Trump and the Brexit proved that otherwise What have they achieved? 99% of the immigrants who were in Italy, the US, and Britain in 2016 are still there.
>question the facts >thats denying it they go full holocaust with the climate change stuff. I really hate how disrespectful she was when she said "it would have been so powerful if you changed your mind after seeing the hurricanes" as if the existence of hurricanes prove that the UN should control our lives lmao
Levi Johnson
>189503817 Finnjew it's too early for this.
Colton Gomez
it works better with only whites
Easton Allen
If they have dual citizenship then that's twice as gay.
Michael Lewis
>why do you love that guy >hm? THIS FUCKING KIKE HATES DIPLOMACY REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>I didn't see any 'local people' complaining user, that's because you don't study history. There was a massive complaint about Italians and Irish immigrants to the point "Irish need not apply" was actually a thing. The fact you have to bring race and ethnicity when I'm clearly talking about "locals vs. outsiders" shows you are just butthurt of having been born brown. It happens, don't worry about it sweaty, Satish )the resident poo) will make you good company
> What have they achieved? A thousand miles trip starts with the first step.
Andrew Reyes
>what's an ally A miserable little parasite that hates America but for some reason gets our money for no reason. An "ally" spits in our face all the time probably because Israel has already covered our back with knives. An ally is a weak spiteful saboteur that tries to get us in wars for their benefit.
>defeated since when could abbo's or chinks vote or read for that matter
Jordan Carter
that's freeing. if someone is racist by virtue of existing then there's absolutely no incentive to even just pay lip service to being inclusive or diverse
>Imma need you to quote exactly what it says, Mr. Resort to Ad Hominem. That study concluded that the economic gain to the native-born, which is referred to by economists as the "immigrant surplus", was $1 billion to $10 billion a year in 1996. Above I update those numbers. At the same time the NRC estimated that the net fiscal drain (taxes paid minus services used) from immigrant households was negative $11 billion to $20 billion a year. Thus, there was an economic benefit, but it was smaller than the fiscal drain. While advocacy groups have tried to argue otherwise, there is simply no objective research indicating that immigration creates significant economic gains for natives. Read your own sources you lazy, taco eating mong
Evan Rogers
link pls
Anthony Young
>"I could have been earlier in terminating NAFTA."
banning the posters isn't going to accomplish anything good though a far more effective way to neutralize the campaign would have been hiring leftists groups to put up equivalent posters like "it's okay to be black" around the same places
Jackson Stewart
It's merkelstan. Nobody cares.
Nathan Clark
Trump has to spell out these retards that diplomacy requires a lot lying.
David Perez
I only saw the bollusion bit and had to change channel
Benjamin Lewis
Everyone hates Shapiro. His fanbase only remains on Reddit and they attempted to shill Shapiro as Supreme Court Justice when Kennedy retired on Jow Forums.
Mention Michelle Fields to any Shapiro fan and tell them Shapiro acted 100% like Avenatti during the Michelle Fields incident and they will instantly shut up.
Mention Michelle Fields to Ben and he will pretend it never happened.
Parker Hall
>Trump has to spell out these retards that diplomacy requires a lot lying. Checked, must be true.
They are doing everything they can to lose the midterms
Wyatt Foster
Literally who?
Asher White
If it's not Kayleigh or Hope, I don't care
Austin Diaz
>There was a massive complaint about Italians and Irish immigrants to the point "Irish need not apply" was actually a thing. Not as massive, by any means. as 'the complaint' about [illegal] immigration there is today and I'm sure 100% that if those immigrants were white, there wouldn't be anyone complaining about them. >you are just butthurt of having been born brown. I'm probably just as (or maybe even more) European than you, my whole family came from Spain and that's the reason I shill for Mexican immigrants going to the US, I'm not a fucking hypocrite like 56% of the Americans who post on this general.
Ok, I will admit that illegal immigration is a 'net fiscal drain' as it is proved on that article, but that could easily be fixed by giving citizenship (or at least resident permits) to the illegal workers so that they could actually pay income taxes. Also, we weren't discussing (since the last 2 threads) about the fiscal impact/consequences, you claimed illegal immigration damaged the economy and the wages of the general population, not that it affected the government revenues. So you were wrong in your initial claim, just fucking face it and stop moving the goalposts.
Evan Nguyen
Oh no, that sucks
The CSU won 36.8 percent of the vote, losing its absolute majority (and falling from a 46.5 percent share in the last election in 2013), preliminary results published by the Bavarian state early Monday morning showed. The Greens won 17.5 percent of the vote, putting them the second place. A collective of independent candidates, the Free Voters, came third with 11.9 percent of the vote.
The AfD won 10.3 percent of the vote putting it in fourth place but marking a stark rise for the anti-immigration, euroskeptic party that didn't even participate in the last Bavarian state election.
What's worse for the 'grand coalition' in Berlin, the SPD – its coalition partner and one that already joined the CDU-CSU alliance reluctantly after being trounced in last October's national election – fared worse than the upstart AfD, with only 10.1 percent of the vote. From the last state vote in 2013, the SPD saw its share of the vote fall by almost 10 percentage points.
