Why are Latin American countries are so inferior to European nations?

Why are Latin American countries are so inferior to European nations?

Aren't Latino basically white?

Attached: 550px-Latin_America_(orthographic_projection)_svg.png (550x550, 100K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LCYg4DMnu40
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=83&pr.y=5&sy=2016&ey=2023&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=213,228&s=NGDPDPC&grp=0&a=
clarin.com/ediciones-anteriores/56-argentinos-antepasados-indigenas_0_HyKg3I5y0Fx.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

imagine the dumbest european
he would be above average in latam

they have a lot of native lizard people in them, so no, they're not white

"basically white"

shhhhhh

You ever tried talking to people who have had their heads boiled? No?
Well Latinos are what happens if they keep talking.

Half mixed with native inbreeds

latin america is the blueprint for globalism

Whites are the jews in the those countries and exploit the workers and let the gangs run free

>Why are Latin American countries are so inferior to European nations?
Culture of peace.
No major conflict of actual relevance has EVER happened her.
No war = no need to outsmart other human = no progress.
They developed metalurgy to create jewerly but no sword/lances/non decorative armors

combination of shitty corrupt politicians and niggers

Because Spain failed and didn`t repopulated like the anglos did.

Being so far away from the major economical powerhouses of the world means you're set to either develop at your own pace or fall into total isolation. No exchange of technology, culture and populace.
The southern cone is an exception but her growth was stunted by the lack of a direct connection to a world power metropolis. As it was with the US and the UK, or the UK to Australia
is quite right as well

Hispanic males are very masculine, egotistical, and vain about themselves - the byproducts of the (European) Spaniard mindset.

Niggers, the portugese imported the most jungle monkeys to South America and didnt bring their own women.

Attached: d28be567fd73a3899abe5fef70b367f2.jpg (600x337, 33K)

When Spaniards came down here they had a rape fest with the locals. The outcome was not the best. Still, Latinamerica worships white skin. People still use slurs like prieto or negro, and the average brown person will go by the "I was white when I was a baby but I got tanned" story.

I believe white Europeans will end up settling here if their own countries become unbearable. And if that happens Latinamerica can become a decent place (I've notice there's a lot of euros living here, mostly German, Italian and Brits).

>Hispanic males are very masculine
Pffft

Attached: 1526937468409.png (6600x6639, 1.82M)

Victory of liberalism and the British school of Philosophy over Continentalism in WW1, WW2, and the cold war all contributed to Europe being one of the best parts of the world, even today. Latin America was really only involved with the Cold War, and didn't benefit as much from the USSR's defeat.

Attached: serp.jpg (940x529, 75K)

>Hispanic males are very masculine
Is it why they are manleter than Asian???

Literally everyone is corrupt here.
Our mentality is one of scamming and fucking as much people as we can before we die

I guess Italians really left their imprint here

puerto vallarta in mexico is nice, but thats only because the entire town is built up by wealthy spanish investors who make european standard hotels and resorts

Attached: 1532188065246.png (852x1190, 423K)

How would have the British administered the Andes and Mesoamerica?

Are their good examples of successful former British colonies where there were sizable native populations before and after their arrival?

Attached: 1528254807590.gif (256x256, 458K)

> Whites are the jews in the those countries
Jews are the jews in Latin America.
In Colombia we have Jaime Gilinski who owns Sudameris Bank and he's ranked 544 in the Forbes list of world's richest men.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-10-15 at 10.11.01.png (735x534, 337K)

Even in the case Spain succeeded we would only be as good as Spain which is the shittiest European country.
We'd be two or three steps ahead or current situation but still a hundred behind actual humanity.

Attached: 1538251422130.png (547x556, 344K)

Because iberians are lazy, low iq pieces of shit. Id wish we were colonized by chinese or japanese master race

Paraguay War was a conflict of actual relevance tho.

>"spain is the shittiest euro country"
are you retarded, juan carlos?

Attached: 1494045318982.jpg (479x592, 55K)

As if, I am sure that even European medieval wars werr more relevant

Name a worse one, Tyrone.

You are mean user, fuck you

Freemasonry

All SA nations were founded on it.

Brazil when it was a monarchy was a lot better of. Freemasonry is like building your house on a big pile shit, it doesnt last long

Keep in mind, america destroyed europe from far away, and we had those pigs shitting on us from next door, with all their hurrr muh demugracy muh social justice bullshit since day one...

South American ancient peoples built massive fucking stone cities while Europeans were living in caves

take your pick

Attached: retards and famine.png (720x600, 147K)

It left 300k deaths. Its not insignificant, but of course it isn't comparable to the WWs.
Also, medieval wars weren't that deadly, not even close to the modern world.

in western Europe?
portugal
but they're taconiggers too

Why isn't the U.S. green in this pic?

this shit always cracks me up.
>5,000 years ago, we asians had the best civilization
>5,000 years ago, we aztecs had the best civilization
>5,000 years ago, we mayans had the best civilization
>2,000 years ago, we arabs had the best civilization
>hey, can we please go live in your white country now?

GIB CULTURE
GIB TECH

yeah, there went all our civilizations points

Civil wars and socialism

Albania.

>When your civilizatin has beatiful architectuere,advanced jewerly techniques,good social structure and laws but you still defend yourself with pointy rocks and clubs

Checked.

Although Latin America has alot of whites It's mixed in with alot of other races, the most common being Mestizo which is a half native half white race. The most successful areas of Latin America are white.

Attached: zzkufnv2jvg01.png (1296x1430, 160K)

chile is not white you dumb stormcel
we received little euro immigration

you fuckers couldnt kill the mapuches , and now those fuckers still roaming around and burning shit weekly

>we would only be as good as Spain which is the shittiest European country.
Spain's only in that situation due to failures in the colonial era. The way they handled the precious metals they got from the new world ducked their economy. If that hadn't happened, they'd quite possibly be in a much better economic situation right now.

Because the great people from those civilizations died well before the Spaniards came.

What they found here were a bunch of tribes living in huts. It is tragic if you really think about it.

We are sorry too.
If Incas weren't such coward you wouldn't have that problem now

Seriously? Wikipedia is fucked up then. I would never know cause I never even set foot in South America.

Attached: b8540d7ee052d04ae4d1b1f95ed4d691.png (242x557, 43K)

It was because of the criscuck who thought that you were deserving of live, I am sorry for what we have done.

Lol. They're basically niggers.

we have no racial census

It was kinda true , but it really fucked up our numbers later once we adquire the north

Attached: the virgin inca vs the chad mapuche 2.0 electric boogaloo.png (4192x1656, 457K)

The entire continent was taken over recently by the Foro of São Paulo, a communist organisation which has the goal of: "Regaining in Latin America what was lost in Europe in the early 90s".

That, and mutts everywhere.

Also, they are more further away from the international trade markets ever since Argentinian beef ceased to be a top export in the global market.

And no "latino" in the american context mostly mean mutts with natives and africans.
The only white countries there are basically Argentina and Uruguay.
And to some extent Brazil and Chile.

Cuba, Puerto Rico and Costa Rica also have a significant white population but have faded into irrelevance do to communism, american annexation and being a small country in Central America surrounded by mutts only good for tourism.

>And no "latino" in the american context mostly mean mutts with natives and africans.
For the last time. Brazil isn't all south america

If they didnt breed with the Natives they would have just been a Spanish version of Europe

>the lack of a direct connection to a world power metropolis.

I don't buy this.
Buenos Aires, São Paulo and Rio have always been rather large cities of "World Power Metropolis" standard.
Many other cities have reached a "scale of that sort" like Porto Alegre, Santiago do Chile and perhaps Brasilia and Recife.

Your problem is that you all gave up on being competitive in the world markets, contenting yourselves as being the US back yard, even though most of South America is closer to Anctarctida.

You guys fucked it all up when you said Portugal and Spain to fuck of, your natural conection to Europe and the "Civilised World and International Markets".

>and the average brown person will go by the "I was white when I was a baby but I got tanned" story.

Attached: 1479398893440.jpg (507x1497, 304K)

The Central American retard, the post.
I'm surprised this comes from Costa Rica instead of Guatemala or Honduras.

Chile has been independent for almost 200 years now.
It's you who have done a terrible job.
Back in the day of the Spaniards, Chile didn't extend nearly as much to the South.
You conquered your only South. You could have conquered the rest of your own country too.

Stop shifting blame away from you.
This is also one of your major problems.

You don't know much about Spain

of course the lady working cleaning will be a bit darker
most of them work on that type of jobs

>Aren't Latino basically white?
Latinos stopped being white since the fall of Rome

>and the average brown person will go by the "I was white when I was a baby but I got tanned" story
don't forget the blonde hair too

I disagree...

>suriname

how did I not even know this country existed?

>your natural conection to Europe
Not entirely true. In the times of the monarchy our culture was pretty much European: youtube.com/watch?v=LCYg4DMnu40
De-Europeanization of the Latin American culture is largely recent, and the Americans are the ones to blame.

POPCORN
GET YOUR POPCORN

Attached: ab0182c354d8de27ad3fde7c4918bbac.jpg (420x315, 22K)

Paraguay War os of great consequence for the region.
It destroyed what was then set to be one of the major powers in the region, and also the less European one.

i went to a private school
that skin tone wasn't rare at all
most of them looked like the people in the two other pictures

i am just pissed that they could take all the other natives but just this ones are the ones that wherent able to take , and had to delimitate a whole area where they lived , having to live whit the fuckers for 400 from the colony to later on in our independence

No, iberian blood is inferior

You had neither beautiful architecture or good social structure or laws.

You may have had advanced jewlery, but that's not much to be proud of, really.

tell us more about why

Polish surname lol

Only Argentina and Uruguay are white. Most latino countries like Mexico, Chile and Paraguay are mestizo, and there are a lot of blacks in countries like Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil. Peru and Bolivia are mostly amerindian.

Shit map.
Why do you differentiate Northern Europeans from Southern Europeans?
"Northern Europeans" in Brazil and Argentina are mostly mixed with Southern ones.
And then you join Southern Euros with Castizos. Ridiculous.

And those placements are mostly wrong, too.

Yes, that's true. We have risen to a great wealth by exporting prime resources and agricultural produce, but after ww1 we had to industrialise. That didn't happen.
The crazy level of socialism during two centuries have made impossible a culling of the population. Swedes are socialists but they have a relatively high intelligence and just now it's falling.
Pure malthusian reality

Quick Answer: They have too many fucking children

imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=83&pr.y=5&sy=2016&ey=2023&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=213,228&s=NGDPDPC&grp=0&a=

Yeah.
But not really, your Empire was born from a coup against Traditional European culture/Civilisation.
Your second Emperor was a great one, but he was also aware of the great shit that had already been done.

That's why I speak of that separation from your natural connection to Europe.

>"Northern Europeans" in Brazil and Argentina are mostly mixed with Southern ones.
This is a absurd

Brazilian South is pretty white and their south german colonies are literally the same as our entre rios german colonies.

More arguments to reinforce the idea that people are more important to culture than culture to people.

Nope.
The population here aside of Mexico/Brazil/Argentina/Colombia are a fucking joke

WE WUZ WHITTY AND SHIIEET

-Chilean mutts

how is it possible for you two to be white though?

Attached: Europeans_in_Argentina_(1914).svg.png (871x1591, 309K)

S-stop it guys , chile is white!!!
we arent white , but we at least have above 50% so i am ok whit it

Attached: wojak.png (808x805, 480K)

You stupid fuck,

Chile for instance is a white country for the people that matter: The third better off of Chile. That's why Chile sees itself as a white country (in some way).

You guys have to understand that all Southern American countries (especially Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and Brazil) were created by white people for white people and all these had a white elite since the very start which, not rarely, also comprised a good part of the rest of the country.

Essentially, the mutts were "assimilated" into the white country so bad that it became some other thing (mutt), but yet, all things being equal, these were predominantly European countries for Europeans far, far away across the sea.

>But not really, your Empire was born from a coup against Traditional European culture/Civilisation.
Not really a coup. The King of Portugal supported the separation because he thought it was inevitable the independence of the Americas

>Latin America shitskins lack most basic IQ
>Latin America did not adopt most modern technology until like, 5 years ago
>Latin American countries too often favor Socialist goverments, which are AWESOME...until the money runs out and they all turn to shit and start killing each other for Big Macs.

Red chili munching retards.

Our separation was simply of the state, not of the culture - at that time. The European culture, music, poetry, archtecture, everything was kept. Also, I must say that your Kingdom was already a revolutionary one at that time, for the freemasons already were victorious in the Porto Revolution. We broken off from an already "anti-Traditional" European country (read freemason and anti-ancient regime country).
Only after the republic - in fact, after the WW2 - we lost our European culture under the influence of the Americans.

High Percentage non-white
Embraces Socialism

Basically those two sum it up.

lol at this clueless idiot

> muhhh socialism
> muhhh i use socliams as an umbrella term to label dozens of different things

go read ayn rand and masturbate to your lolbertarian dystopia while a corporatocracy will end up owning the air that your childs will breath

In our case, way too many Japanese being corrupt, the rest of us being involved in corruption doesn't help either

Argentina is mestizo.

clarin.com/ediciones-anteriores/56-argentinos-antepasados-indigenas_0_HyKg3I5y0Fx.html

Translation: 56% of Argentinians have Native ancestors.

Attached: 1536536343829.jpg (900x527, 73K)