BANNON VS THE ECONOMIST MAGAZINE!

I like him a lot but he's better on the outside

economist is cucked as fuck now

See, you racists get given a platform. Liberals get given a platform. You aren't so out there after all.

It is only communists who are censored from the media.

Bannon is a far left cuck

Holy fuck, I've never seen such a biased and ignorant interviewer. She doesn't even listen what Bannon has to say. Bannon must have ice cold nerves.

What policies specifically make him a 'far left cuck'?

wew, retard alert

mother jones?

But fuck man, any asshat, including commie asshats can put up a website. The most significant news organizations now imho are drudge (as a copy editor), and zh. These guys didn't exist 25 years ago, and you see drudge on the monitors in the back of the cnn newsrooms.

Nobody pays communist viewpoints any attention because they don't believe in the ideology. But what you really seem to be whinging about is that nobody is giving you a free propaganda outlet. I guess it is purely out of impotent frustration you guys are resorting to violence.

that bannon guy is sharp as fuck.

Bannon is great, probably clashed with Trump because they both are alpha

sharp enough to make an interview on Maher somehow educational and worthwhile

youtube.com/watch?v=egVlN-kBjZg

even Maher walks away looking like he was interested in dialogue, Bannon is on top of the whole discussion

>foreign entrepreneurs are successful
how many immigrants become entrepreneurs? wall street people are so vapid

She says 1/4 companies are made by immigrants.

I'm not even sure why she is quoting this as a success of immigration.

1. Bannon is a traitor
2. Bannon was the leaker
3. Bannon works in online media and politics
4. Bannon works for the Chinese Commies and with Kissanger
5. Bannon claims to be leader of Alt-Right
6. Bannon is ruthlessly defended on here and infinity, thread after thread. Even a sticky on how he never said those things.
7. Bannon defenders post in the same idiotic manner as the Spencer defenders.
8. Bannon had bad intentions from the start.
9. Bannon worked for Navy Intel and Hollywood
10. Bannon believes he masterminded the meme war.
11. Spencer has ties to Dugin through his wife.
12. Dugin calls Bannon soul mate

Attached: 1512221992103.jpg (1291x1044, 812K)

Attached: 1527424257530.jpg (1275x591, 367K)

Attached: 1523768724963.jpg (3774x4199, 3.57M)

Attached: 1529114352094.png (1133x574, 356K)

Attached: 1510172832514.jpg (1347x1985, 1.46M)

What are you babbling about?

This bitch irritated me no end. She comes straight out of the gate almost shaking with rage and hostile. She professes opinions (some of them already PROVEN to be wrong) as facts, to "correct" Bannon's assertions.

Look - Bannon is obviously playing a bit fast and loose with the truth regarding "ethno-nationalism" and where it does and doesn't apply. But she is also so massively hung up on that and completely wants to avoid any discussion of China.

I also love how she almost immediately dived in on WWW2, and he was like;

>Yeah, and it was our white trash deplorables who got the privilege of coming over and saving your world order three times in one century.

He says in this interview (I believe it's this one, or it might have been the Financial Times one) that he clashed with Gary (((Cohn))) over two subjects (which ultimately led to his dismissal as Trump sided with Cohn)

>Illegal immigrants/H1B1 Visas
Bannon obviously wants both shut down, Cohn says they're necessary for the economy.

>40% tax on citizens earning over 5 million per year
>NO income tax on people earning below 100 thousand per year
Cohn obviously had a shit fit about that.

Hi Moarpheus

send this bitch journalist to saudi arabia already

It's an interesting interview, because she is so obviously what he is deriding, a tried and true elitist. She is fundamentally unable to understand his position (which is a pretty generic Kennedy Democrat position - what we would think of as the old Right Wing of the Labor Party) - because she is unable to think of people below a certain station as human. She points to GDP, overall wealth creation, a small minority of successful start up businesses that lead "innovation" as being a benefit to all, while he tries to make her understand that a person who previously could have had a life doing manufacturing work for 40 hours a week that afforded him a stable savings account, a home and a family isn't pleased about earning the same amount for working 3 casual jobs at 80 hours a week and be able to share a flat with Chang in a high rise. It doesn't compute to her that standards of livings and communities operate on anything other than a share of the GDP. It's really crazy.

In his Financial Times interview he flusters the interviewer by slagging of Eton boys. It's strange how many of the cliches he and Trump throw at these people, that these people manage to live up to.

Is Steve Bannon actually an ''economic nationalist'', or is he merely a tactical civic nationalist?

is McMaster our guy

Attached: 1529481394430.png (1190x1204, 1.44M)

HES A ZOG SHILL.

He does better work without the yoke of Trump around his neck.

>t. ((soros))

The fundamental source of crisis is the diminishing vitality of White economies spanning the last 40 year business cycle, a result of sending White industries to Yellows/Browns

As a result of offshoring White industries, the West experienced Rust Belt, stagnation, and was thrust into a depressionary period known as the "Long downturn". The long-term weakness of capital accumulation and of aggregate demand was rooted in the declining profitability of capital, stemming from an oversupply in global manufacturing-- a direct result of transferring White industries to Asia and Latinos. White industries that were once solely based in the West, were transferred to agrarian, primitive races, who never reached industrialization on their own. White industries were copied throughout the 3rd world which resulted in severe excess in production, due to uncontrolled, exponential population growth of the primitive 3rd world

The offshoring of White industry to Asia coordinated with the severing of the post-war Bretton Woods monetary system in 1971 signalled the profitability crisis of industrial capitalism’s Fordist ruling contract was coming under acute stress. Neoliberal geopolitical shifts to Asia, unfettered by race realism and buoyed by military-industrial expansion, White capital, from your private bank accounts, began to colonise Asia

The 1980s ushered in more globalism by White nations to combat the ongoing turmoil of stagflation, resulting from offshoring White industries. Governments pushed deindustrialisation, higher unemployment, White population reduction, suicides, homosexuality, mass migration, demographic replacement, and austerity measures, as they sought to alleviate the globalist crisis by resorting to greater borrowing and subsidising demand of offshored products. However, stagnation intensified and debt escalated, and a wave of devastating socio-economic crises rocked White nations throughout the following 3 decades

fuck, Bannon is the real maestro, Trump is just a stepping stone to what comes next, hopefully in the right direction

Bannon has always been /ourguy/

the NPCs want to destroy him

>She points to GDP, overall wealth creation, a small minority of successful start up businesses that lead "innovation" as being a benefit to all,

Good post user, yeah her arguments are quite strange when you start picking them apart, but it basically boils down to "fuck poor people, i got mine"

Could you elaborate on what you see as the difference? It seems to me if you're a civic nationalist and an economic globalist, you're throwing away most of the glue that bind people together and you're left with wars and symbols (like America now).

I guess if you're coming at it from a European perspective where they still have ethnic states to protect, it's a different question. I don't get any sense from him that he sees Replacement as anything other than an attack. I think they talked a bit about it in the interview with Sargon, though I could be misremembering.

youtube.com/watch?v=gwKLSA6lWdo

h1bs are gibs by soros and multinational organizations to further their race replacement agenda

As a resident of formerly American city, let me tell you how immigrants create companies:
1: Soros pushes for diversity and trafficks millions of poos/chinks/spics to replace Whites
2: Soros places New ethnic mayor who replaces all law enforcement brass with fellow ethnics.
3: Newly diversified LE officers cease enforcement activity on anyone of background.
4. Ethnic group becomes richer and more powerful due to unopposed drug and human trafficking.
5. More of the government is replaced with ethnics.
6. White native population is forced to relocate and extend commute to avoid ethnic criminal gangs.
7. Eventually white population is gone completely and city becomes 3rd world slum with wealthy ethnic crime lords running all commerce/businesses.

the key is multi-tiered race replacement that doesnt just stop on affirmative action, diversity quotas, open borders, or mass migration

the whole H1B pyramid scam was devised by globalists as part of their race replacement scheme, it has nothing to do with worker shortage, skills shortage, or other smoke screen excuses

it is a corporate migrant smuggling scheme, as implemented with the migrant refugee scheme

>the nation state is a jewel to be polished
The nation state is a product of modernity, a creation of the liberal order, and needs to be destroyed. No wonder the Right cant make any headway we are still stuck with various left wing factions, pretending to be right wing, fighting each other.

Attached: 1536500983997.png (668x530, 646K)

Because Trump's balls are in Kushner's purse

Less than 3 minutes in and Bannon is already going full DR3.

>antifa are brown shirts for coming fascist movement
Holy shit it only gets worse the longer I listen. This is the genius of the right wing? How can one man be so confused about ideology to spout such nonsense.

Attached: 1520530171661.png (747x540, 510K)

Ban on is based af. I bet he started the npc meme. Man is going to be a legend in fifty years.

Mussolini started as a socialist

Read some fucking history

>Why the fuck is Bannon no longer in the white house?
Because he's a cocksucking leaker. Mooch warned you

I meant economic/civic nationalism as synonyms. They pretty much are in my mind.

But I wonder does he actually doesn't see race/religion as relevant as all like he claims in the interview. If that's true, how can one be against replacement logically?

stop replying to NPCs

Yes but one of if not the key difference between the right and the left, the fascist and the commies, is hierarchy. For the Left equality is a moral good while the right at its core is about inequality.
Does anti-fa preach inequality and hierarchy? NO. Therefore they couldn't be a right wing movement in any way. What Mussolini started at is of little importance. Antifa are commies

He's a degenerate bourgeoisie liberal like most American conservatives he only cares about money and culture not about identity

He thinks if an African nigger speaks English and votes Republican he's just as American as a white guy. At most he thinks race replacement just needs to be slowed down enough so immigrants can become good Republicans.

the light shines forth to expose darkness

Attached: coincidence.png (1021x521, 465K)

Bannon is based

Attached: Bannon.png (1200x1320, 393K)

he's good

He is doing work behind the scenes and has more autonomy and doesn’t have to deal with White House bull shit! He’s in a good spot for us anons to back up trump and military intelligence.

Attached: absolutelybarbaric.jpg (206x244, 12K)

>The New Statesman

Attached: HM_5.jpg (255x227, 8K)

This user gets it. He is an earlier iteration of the revolution fighting the latter. What that means, for those not paying attention, is that he will not be victorious in the end. The revolution always wins unless you take things back to the pre-revoultionary state.
In many ways it is a literal war against god with degeneration labeled as progress. There is only one destination and that is hell. All aboard

Attached: 1538267793010.jpg (992x1403, 156K)

Yes, but the leftists right now are hired goons for the global elites, they just don't realize it. Guy's like Soros don't give a goddamn about the little guy or helping workers rights, they care about creating a one world government.
In times gone by the oldschool left didn't support supranational government like the EU and similar. Marine Le Pen is pretty lefty economically, she was just branded 'far right' for not wanting open borders. Funnily enough, Bernie Sanders is on video saying open borders is a 'Koch Brothers proposal'.

So these terms are getting more confusing as time goes on. The best description is that the leftists in Antifa are neoliberals. Thatcher for example was considered 'right wing' but also part of the neoliberal movement along with Reagan, both helping to create their own rust belts in their respective countries.

>Why the fuck is Bannon no longer in the white house?
because Bannon has more important things to do outside of the white house, like #Gamergate 2.0 for example.
I can't wait for the greatest anime team up of all time of based Bannon and Sargon to trigger the fucking libs and the alt-right SJWs.
NPCs can't even compete, mate.

Bannon seems the best guy in American politics to me.

I liked the suggestion that unlimited immigration is the reason we can’t get enough African Americans into tech jobs. This has to be disingenuous, he must know the score here, right? Right??

he probably knows, but its a good point to counter people accusing him of racism.

This guy is only slightly less retarded than the woman. Just two minutes in and its:
>We need to cut back immigration so Africans and Hispanics can get jobs in the high-tech sector.
When this phenomena fails to materialize, wtf is he going to say?
He just keeps going.
>STEM education is going to fix inner city Baltimore.

Bannon's problem is he's stuck in this box where he's trying to compete economically on something that is, at its core, a social issue. Cheaper labor is good for the growth of the economy. Bringing in the cream of the crop from other countries increases business growth (now is a lot of the tech-business growth just a scam? Maybe, but that's a separate issue). Expecting investment in education to close this gap is short-sighted. It won't solve anything, and it doesn't answer the question of where GDP growth will come right now.

If Bannon took a stand and said, "we're a country, not an economic zone, and the American people have an identity and culture that is unique and exceptional in the world. We are taking action on immigration to help preserve this identity and culture." He would be the hero of the right, and this woman wouldn't have any response other than "b-but our culture is openness and diversity." If she tried to pivot back to "but muh GDP," He could take an easy populist jab with "a cohesive nation looks after the well-being of its people in general, not the portfolios of billionaires. We're okay taking a hit to GDP if it means higher wages and social cohesion."
Then what would she do?
I'm being a bit of a back-seat driver here, but listen to how he just keeps harping on about "Hispanics getting into engineering schools" and "why aren't there more niggers in Silicon Valley."
>Do you make no distinction on the basis of race or religion
>No I do not.
He won't even denounce the muslims, which as a doctrine and tradition is antithetical to the American way, even as he would understand it.
Bannonism leads nowhere.

Attached: 1516160175237.png (650x855, 214K)

I have watched several interviews with Bannon. I think he is on point when it comes to what is wrong with the world today and how to fix it. There seems to be a lot of opposition to him however, if you check on Jow Forums and reddit and others. Seems like shills mostly, but interesting why would they want to pay so much attention to shilling against him. His message must really be that important if the trolls have specific orders to discredit him. And who blames them? He was probably the most anti-globalist figure in the entire WH before he left.

/ourguy/

Well, some might be but some of them aren't shills.
There are some decent arguments against Bannon ITT that are properly thought out and clearly not shill posts. But there are also suspect / low effort ones.
My guess is that part of this is sychophantic types without a mind of their own who think that anyone Trump fired is bad and anyone that Trump praises is good. You've probably seen that happen on other subjects too.

>My guess is that part of this is sychophantic types without a mind of their own who think that anyone Trump fired is bad and anyone that Trump praises is good.
Those that are geniune probably belong in this category yes. But the people who do this are really stupid, they would fit perfectly with the NPC meme that just repeats what someone else told them to think. Maybe in this case fox news or someone else, they shouldn't be taken seriously. Since you mention well thought out arguments against Bannon, care to give me one?

I watched the whole thing. Decent messaging, but he probably cant talk about "The Capitalists" while being in the white house.

Plus, he can push at the margins of messaging a lot better while he is not held to the account of the white house. Im certain that hamstrung his ability to speak on the topics he wanted to.

Also, his obsession with the "People of Davos" sounds weird im sure to people who dont know about the Davos conferences.

(((The Economist)))

Attached: kike-lynn-de-rothschild-the-economist-owner.jpg (1280x720, 44K)

Its not hard to look up though, 1 second google search.

He is shilling to journos and economist when he uses "the party of davos" its a shit brand but it might get them on the anti china and immigration train.

The early Nazi party was literally communism lite until Hitler purged the faggot half ... Called "brown shirts." In the modern day, for example, we could have a Mexican Jew take over the Democrat party and purge Antifa out before killing all the eurangatangs.

I'm assuming you're young. Let me give you a tip. Don't identify yourself with terms or groups, focus on concrete positions. Like this user said,
fifteen years ago the left was against globalism and outsourcing... Now it is an "extreme right" point of view.

>The early Nazi party was literally communism lite
No it never was anything like that. It did have its left wing variants under Stasser I will give you that but to call it communism light is a misrepresentation of both Communism and National Socialism, which differs from fascism in that the race takes primacy instead of the state.
Regardless National Socialism, at least under Hitler rejected the class struggle and various Marxists conceptions of equality. It was obsessed, much like Fascism, with inequality and hierarchy. The hallmarks of a right wing movement. Being authoritarian ad centralized does not make something communism.
Anyways the point being that the Brownshirt served an organization that worked against and did not subscribe to the beliefs of Marx. To call Antifa, an organization that believes the tenets of Marx, Brownshirt is a terrible error. Either done on purpose because Bannon is trying to argue within a moral framework that is ill suited to the point he is trying to make or because of a lack of understanding in the ideology of the period.

no he left because he was fired and was trying to claim responsibility for Trump's win

>Why the fuck is Bannon no longer in the white house?

he pissed off Ivanka.

What type of accent does she have? It’s terrible. I know it’s British but, but what region or city is it from?

>Bannon is a cuck

9:25

>Right now you're serfs... you're serfs, they debased your currency and they undright debt...you're like a hamster because they destroyed the ability of you to save...
youtube.com/watch?v=e9xzY0y6RNM

100% accurate and the only prominent person to get this

Attached: download.png (1920x1080, 2.2M)

Disgusting skunk.

Attached: 1534713191991.jpg (533x863, 15K)

I agree. But you forgot to change your flag.

>Bannon's problem is he's stuck in this box where he's trying to compete economically on something that is, at its core, a social issue.
Best post in this thread so far.
Have a (you).

>this woman wouldn't have any response other than "b-but our culture is openness and diversity."
And it's about time someone stands up and doesn't let them get away with proclaiming what "our" culture and values are.
Openness and diversity are certanly not my values.

>He won't even denounce the muslims, which as a doctrine and tradition is antithetical to the American way, even as he would understand it.
That's why Bannon is nothing but a zionist stooge and I'm glad he mostly gets the cold shoulder in central Europe's New Right.

Attached: (((Bannon))).jpg (1347x1399, 351K)

He is responsible for trump's win, trump had no chance of winning by himself.

Bannon is not on the same side as sargon, sarg'n is allied only with his own giant centrist brain

Attached: Can you even handle this intellect.png (638x480, 12K)

>Bannon's problem is he's stuck in this box where he's trying to compete economically on something that is, at its core, a social issue
Bingo. The nazis actually believed economics was an entirely made up jewish science and that social issues drove the economy and the economy was merely a reflection of these other issues, which when controlled and directed can serve to then control and direct the economy.

Pretty much

Bannon will get you nowhere. He's beholden to the mantra of racial egalitarianism and doesn't put a thing in its way. He plays to the tune of it.

Steve "MLK would be on board the MAGAtrain" Bannon is at the core not one iota improvement over the cuckservatives. He still craves the acceptance of the left even though it has been shown over the last 50 years that it doesn't get you anywhere.
Just look at the Kanye thing right now. Has this guy made the left sympathetic to anti-egalitarianism or Trump or just anything? No, they call him a token nigger.
The left never peddles to the right. But the right always tries to get the left on board an on that way they have lost every single battle.

his opening comment addresses directly: jihad, terrorism, and islamic terrorism

we can disagree about the strategy, but it is by proxy going in the same direction. he explicitly supports orban and the salvini.

As far as well thought out arguments I think the above post about Bannon focusing too much on economics makes a good point for example, even though I agree with Bannon's message I think in some parts he sounds like he's using the economic argument as a proxy argument. He knows for example skilled labor immigration is different to just open borders from all over the world.

As I say though I think Bannon is largely correct, what I meant though was there's constructive criticism of someone vs shilling / low effort posts and such.

MUMMY

Also as a side point I believe that when Bannon left the white house Trump started doing worse than when he was there.

>his opening comment addresses directly: jihad, terrorism, and islamic terrorism
Yeah, yeah I know. Implicitly this, implicitly that.
Oh and you forgot: *radical* islamic terrorism. Can't say just islamic terrorism, islam is the religion of peace after all.

However you won't change directions that way. He's a liberal from 25 years ago. The train is still on the same track and once it's rolling it will arrive at egalitarianism sooner or later. As soon as the left has adjusted to the new arguments they can still hammer the same faultline: We are essentially all equal and if you oppose the replacement then the only reason is that you are racist and racism is bad.
Trying to fix the situation by playing by their rules will never allow you to win the war.

Read the new article on AmRen, it's really good:
>amren.com/commentary/2018/10/yes-churchill-was-racist/
>Yes, Churchill Was ‘Racist’
>So what?
>Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, October 15, 2018

So in that context the 'train' of either left wing or right will, over time keep on rolling along to ever more extremes?

to a certain extent you have to play the game, there isn't going to be an effective western leader that explicitly calls for ethnic nationalism. maybe this would work in Europe, the culture is much more comfortable with it than here in america where everyone actually believes in equality.

his thesis is sovereignty, which would allow nationalism and control of migration based on consensus. there isn't going to be a monarch soon, the best we can do is democracy that actually speaks to the will of the majority, who are racist in that they don't want migration from other civilizations. this is a viable counter strategy to egalitarianism, the majority in western countries don't want invasion. they want comfortable industrialized life like we had 60 years ago, without globalization.

Bannon has experience in economics and high level executive positions. That he is cooperating and supporting Orban and Salvani should be to his credit.

>over time keep on rolling along to ever more extremes?
I don't know.
But the observation that since 1789 the motto of the west has been progressivism is unambiguous.
There is always someone coming out of the woods who wants to be accepted by everyone, who wants these or those rights, who needs special status because he's oh so oppressed.
And the shit that seems outlandish today like dragonkin transniggers are completely normal tomorrow. 10 years ago noone would even consider transwymyn as anything but a mental illness. Today you lose your job in Canada if you mispronoun a child. And Obongo disapproved of fagmarriage just 10 years ago.