What if we are the NPCs and what we perceive as thought is actually not thought?

I think therefore I am, you faggot.

Attached: frans-hals-descartes.jpg (476x484, 73K)

what if you only think that you think?

Attached: 72164204.jpg (300x300, 20K)

I am therefore thinking exists

Attached: npc truth.png (1377x753, 75K)

What if Twitter could just fuck off and mind their own business instead of suspending multiple accounts?

How can anyone not think in words? surely at least when you ar reading or writing you have to think the words that you are reading or are going to write.

Kys

If it makes you feel better take a cold shower or walk on hot coals.

nah, going on the same board day after day for years on end to spew the same rhetoric over and over again is exactly the opposite of what NPCs do... wait

He's saying what is life is a simulation, to which is an accurate reply.

The meme is about not having an inner dialogue.

SOMETIMES HAPPENS KEEP IT COMIN

Attached: m2aj3s1qzzvayrcapet2.jpg (850x1080, 102K)

You are overthinking it user.
NPC
Non player controled(or character).
In both ways it comes of from game programming code and any input by player needs to comply with prestructured code in order to give output.
So, in other words, NPC resembling people are people that react always on same input and give always the same output.
Input : Trump
Output : Drumph needs to be impeached!
Input : Trump
Output : He is not my president !
Input : Trump
Output : #MeToo#Impeach#ImWithHer

There are many non NPC`s on both sides, but far less on left currently under MSM and Hollywood watch.

Attached: nutralflightmaster0.jpg (425x311, 121K)

>What if
You are one faggot

Input: Trump
output:God Emperor
Input: Trump
output:Maga!
Input: Trump
output: Awoooo

works both ways

From
>There are many non NPC`s on both sides, but far less on left currently under MSM and Hollywood watch
You add
>works both ways

Neck yourself rn.

Attached: comeOnlady.jpg (600x400, 37K)

>Intuitive and instant understanding
>Formless and abstract
That's not how knowledge works. 1+1 = 2. There's a lot more there than just having one apple and another apple making 2 apples. The concept of what makes '1' itself is incredibly hard to comprehend, and saying you can understand it intuitively AND completely at the same time is the height of hubris and perfectly highlights how badly education has failed.

Talking through concepts is required, and it takes a great deal of time and effort to create the precise words to convey a meaning.This is why people started writing things down rather than pass it on through stories - the meaning gets lost in retelling as people change or insert words into the original.

So when you say you intuitively and completely understand '1+1=2,' you are absolutely lying. You can only intuitively understand enough basics to be practical.

To further delve into the concept of 'ones,' what is 1 apple + 1 orange? These are two separate and identifiable objects that cannot be added together. The equation would be written like this:
>a + b = a + b
How then would you MULTIPLY these two objects, like so?:
>a * b=ab
What does that even represent? How can you grasp and understand this concept completely and instantly when it isn't even based in reality? What the actual hell is an apple multiplied by an orange? Or two oranges?
>a * 2b = What real world object?

This gets crazier when you consider that fructose is a basic building block for both fruits. Can you swap the fructose between the two, and still maintain their distinct 'apple' and 'orange'-ness? At what point do the properties of the 'ones' themselves change?

>I can completely understand these things instantly!
>Without words!