Does this make sense?

does this make sense?

Attached: 38193477_1359162460895147_3418842066954747904_n.png (843x843, 310K)

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5495915/Sweden-vows-ban-religious-schools-tackle-segregation.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

no just because you have student loans doesn't mean you get to steal money from people you don't like.

Seperation of Church and State is a major deal, you tax churches, they have legal rights to get involved in lobbying and politics and BELIEVE ME you do not want that.

the big churches should be taxed, yeah
but there are tons of small churches that would be totally buried if they were taxed
none of this revenue ought to go toward student loans, though

How much money would be raised by taxing synagogue s

Even if those numbers are correct at the current time, this is leftist logic which doesn’t take any economic principle into account.

Make college free = more people will go to college = cost goes up higher and higher.

Tax churches = churches close due to lack of funding = tax revenue drops.

Does that figure include mosques and synagogues?

Attached: tenor.gif (220x185, 24K)

Think Atheist
>Think
>Atheist
Ooooh baby!

Attached: repent.png (441x451, 142K)

Attached: A50C282F-6A51-4C4F-814A-C57F6EF06C47.jpg (400x400, 110K)

Estimated revenue of taxing synagogues?

Attached: jew.jpg (916x687, 62K)

Churches should be taxed, but only if synagogues and mosques are taxed equally.

This

those shouldn't be taxed

Anyone can go to any church for free.

Jews have to pay a yearly subscription for synagogues, and extra for tickets for 'high holidays'. Tell me Jow Forums, what is more fair to tax?

>leftists
>estimating costs
Funny that every time a liberal retard says "IT WILL ONLY COST THIS MUCH", the final total comes out 10x more than that. Why do leftists lie about costs just to ram through shitty projects that can never ever fit into the projected budget and always end up miring us with billions more in total debt?

Attached: 1519606157225.jpg (391x482, 30K)

>$75 billion
>making college tuition free
hahahaha

I agree. Churches should be subject to a progressive tax just like everybody else. Most nonprofits should be too.

Fuckin loser libarts students should pay debts tho

No. The true answer is to reduce the cost of college tuition, not make someone else pay for it, or pay for it wholesale at the current costs.

Attached: 1530143244124.gif (540x304, 3.15M)

churches should not be taxed. but they should pay for the public's college and hospital bills because they're all about spreading love and kindness.

Taxing people for their religion goes against the First Amendment. But aren't Atheists against bootlicking?

Why? Are they special? Why should they be exempt

No, because when governments drafted Non-Profit legislation they just copy pasted the church legislation. If you start taxing churches they just file for non-profit status and stop paying taxes again.

>$75 b cost

you know once the government starts paying for it the unis will have free reign to jack the price to high heaven cuz they know the gov will just pay for it.

more like eventual cost TBD

also if it's free, and if literally everyone goes to it, it will dilute it's value to the point where having a uni degree will be absolutely useless in order to get a job

tax all jewish people 90%
that will solve every fucking problem in the book.
and the black hat curly haired jew isn't the only version, you get to include Rothschild and the banking clan too.
What are they going to do?
Fight back?
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

anti-semitic to think they should be

Attached: You're Not A Semite, yid.png (590x242, 103K)

#TAXtheJEWS

Didn’t ending hunger worldwide cost $75 billion too? Do they always use same numbers in their propaganda?

Oh boy my nearly worthless oversaturated degree will lose even more value. Please government make college free so we help subsidize more top 500 companies by providing them with dirt cheap labor.

>taxing a place of solace and betterment to pay for idiots to get wasted and spread STDs for three years

No, degree inflation is already a thing. Letting every underclass wretch go to college would just further destroy its value. That's all while ignoring the repercussions of mixing church and state. As well as the obvious inaccuracies of their estimates.

atheism has become its own religion
double tax on starbucks, apple products, fedoras and problem glasses

>fairly
What did he mean by this?

no

Define "fair"

>Transfer $75 billion in taxpayer cash from one Hebrew deathcult to another
I want off this fucking ride

#TAXallJEWS 90%

>stealing money from Christ to fund SJW NPC breeding grounds
They will most likely take only from Christians and Catholics.
Taking from sand niggers will be Islamophobic.

Attached: 1521230136152.gif (200x200, 3.46M)

>does this make sense?
No. The tuition costs are real, but the $82 bn from churches would never materialize. They would simply spend the money instead of hoarding it and run break-even.

Tax colleges to pay for free college.

Attached: oogaboogaaa.jpg (800x450, 38K)

No. Taxing churches to fund marxism is a death sentence.

>government starts paying tuition fees
>tuition fees rise at an alarming rate

((()))

>bunch of stupid whores go to college to get dicked by chad and tyrone and end up used up if not a single mom
>"lol you need to pay for ALL of it"

>America become a theocracy over night

Would you like a small loan to pay for your degree in Nepalese underwater basket weaving? Just 66.6 percent apr!

>if you take their money you can give me this for free.

Lmao churches would just start up non-profits or donate to existing non-profits to get around the taxation.

And quality goes to more shit than it already is. Plus free college equals wasted time, money, and effort on more idiots taking pointless or unprofitable degrees. The only way it would work is if your field was mandated by testing and we dropped bullshit like art and dance from free coverage. But the left would never allow that, so like every government program costs would balloon rapidly to four to five times initial expectations.

Does it make sense that there's no excuse for a public university to charge more than $50k per student for a four-year degree?

Exactly. The only reason it is so high is because the government started to guarantee loans. Of course prices skyrocketed. Then they instituted race and gender requirements leading to whole new administrative departments. Costs rose and money was guaranteed, no way that would go wrong.

The only thing ayythiests have to maintain cohesion is the collective hatred of religion, without that the only thing holding them together would be reruns of doctor who, rick and morty, and lolbertariansim.

>BELIEVE ME you do not want that.
especially not in the US where more than 75% are religious. That would be a shit show, forcing people to pay the government to worship. 1776 all over again.

The only people suggesting this have no idea of the value of religion in society. On what basis is the state owed that money? Even if it did happen unless you were in a statist hellhole like china where the currency is almost completely digital and the govt is god, they could not get away with it.

Can we tax safespaces as well?

this x 1000
so much said so simply, if only it were so easy to grasp for NPC's

>forcing corporations* to pay the government
please understand it's not the people who are going to be taxed it's the incorporated religious order like the Mormon leadership who are raking in billions

>believing taxation is the same as generating revenue

Attached: notanothersocialistrodeo.jpg (640x788, 108K)

Better idea would be to tax religious institutions and use that for NASA.

All religious institutes should be closed.
Debate me.

Attached: 006559D3-8853-4D34-B567-F7540E9E7A6B.jpg (500x688, 43K)

Attack on the Vatican, when?

>we don't want to pay for these services
>let's use the church's money to pay for it
THEFT

How about we tax (((universities)))

who is this gorgeous mutt

No, because that is not the “cost of making college free”, it is either the amount spent on tuition or loans.

Guess what happens when you make it free?
Demand increases.
Guess what happen when demand increases and the person paying has bottomless pockets and no common sense?
Price increases
Guess what happens when there are no consequences to doing poorly?
Lower grades and even more useless majors.

Literally just adding another 4-8 years of daycare at everyone’s expense.

Why do you care how much money they make? People give them the money in earnest for the sole purpose of continuing operations of an organization that works avidly for public and national good.

You fuckers are so god damn stupid sometimes. Dont you know that its only evangelicals and mormons that are above white replacement rates?

Seriously wash this shit from your head, its worse than if obama had 4 terms.

>no taxation without representation
>separation of churh an state
No, you will give the church absolute power if that are able to legally lobby politicians.

Ypu fadora tipping faggot need to get educated in more then "muh skydaddy r dumb" NPC bullshit.

>Sweden vows to ban ALL religious schools in an effort to tackle segregation after taking in a record number of asylum seekers
>Sweden's main governing party proposes a ban on all religious schools
>It follows reports of gender segregation in some Muslim free schools
>Jewish schools will be exempt from the new ban, politicians said

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5495915/Sweden-vows-ban-religious-schools-tackle-segregation.html

fpbp

Do you think they should have lobbying power?

Are churches subsidized or something? Don't they run off of charity?

Sure. Seems plausible.

Though why not tax all churches, mosques and synagogues and funnel those proceeds into scientific research.

no

When someone else pays for things, the cost goes up exponetially. The only reason tuition is high now is because of government backed debt.
Churchs produce better citizens than schools, and money is donated for nothing in return. Which values should we reinforce?

>potential revenue from tax

Whenever some bullshit thinktank or government institution tells you a new tax will raise X, do yourself a favour and divide it by 10.

I'm old enough to remember when people said Robin Hood tax will raise billions to pay for everything

>All
You are retarded

This will never happen because if you tax churches, you will have to start taxing other nonprofits, and a lot of """"""""""non-profits"""""""""" are merely apparatuses that progressive globalist jews use to influence politics and culture extragovernmentally.

Attached: 32.png (1024x718, 1.14M)

Only God can tax me.

Jasmine sanders.
Already done 150 years ago but cucksolini gave them statehood.

Why just churches and not mosques and synagogues?

I don't want my tithing money going to scientific research on how to grow baby fetuses in homosexuals rectums.

Correct. They have know idea how this will play out.

Attached: leland.jpg (500x375, 30K)

>estimated cost of making college tuition free
>approximately 25 million students
>approximately 35k tuition
868,500,000,000

>cost to the market of every single student taking advantage of college because it's "free"
incalculable

>cost increase of the cost of education because it's "free" (inflation like healthcare)
incalculable

>cost of an evergrowing interestbearing education defecit with debatable benefits
incalculable

>cost of everyone believing that college is the only path to success
incalculable

> cost of getting government more involved in churches
.. probably right around 82 billion

They would probably try something like this with taxation as well, by defining the ''church'' in such a way that synagogues are not included, and go untaxed

FPBP. This guy gets it.

Churches should be subsides the government should be funding the construction of churches across the Dominion, mosques should be taxes $1,000,000 per square foot and synagogues $6,000,000 per square foot

Chruches but not Mosques. Which by the way WE BUILD FOR THEM WITH OUR TAX MONEY!

Attached: 1513571583267.gif (480x360, 580K)

>you tax churches, they have legal rights to get involved in lobbying and politics
Black churches already do this, legal rights or not.

>no
would be a great idea. take money from institutions built on lies and use it to fund the next generation of tech

>t.jew

no

>think atheist

Attached: 1492136095278.jpg (271x720, 54K)

>you tax churches, they have legal rights to get involved in lobbying and politics and BELIEVE ME you do not want that

so we prevent them from lobbying.

they should still be taxed. they are businesses.

Why would you tax nonprofits?

you could save $700 billion a year by stopping welfare

Except churches already spout politics to their congregations

>they are businesses.
They are nonprofits

so are universities.
so lets .. pay for .. businesses. by taxing other businesses.
because some people invest in their future by paying people to teach them things
and some people invest in their future by .. paying people to teach them things

Fair meaning a negative tax where Christians get a cash back return on their IRS to compensate for the fact that the state is paying sluts’ abortions with the contributors money despite church goers moral objections to this federally enforced resolution

Also a dissuasive form of tribute to deincentivize Christian radicalism going full inquisition on the progressively more degenerate society the churches have to survive in.
Day of the “auto de fé” soon

I think op is going to need one of those doughnut shaped cushions for a few weeks after this ass rape.

and politicians are allowed to be outwardly religious.

this is actually the next big thing for religion. they'll come for the church of scientology first. the public should have a right to church money.

>the public should have a right to church money.
no