Is there any hard evidence that countries with published IQs of 70 such as Somalia would still have an average IQ below...

is there any hard evidence that countries with published IQs of 70 such as Somalia would still have an average IQ below 80 if things such as culture, education, and environment were compensated for?

Attached: 103630472_bruba_marq2_123_106lo.jpg (4288x2848, 976K)

>culture, education, and environment
These things don't appear out of nowhere.

neither do Moroccans coming to reverse colonize you.
who taught them French anyways?

Attached: moroccan-man-long-gown-freija-morocco-october-unidentified-63506460.jpg (600x900, 65K)

>culture is relevant for iq
>is shown 3 squares
>pick the next one, a circle, a triangle, a square, or the jew
>somehow culture is a relevant factor
although culture requires intellectual capability so culture is probably a product of iq, which by itself is mostly a product of genetics. The only environmental variables that should be taken into account is prenatal nutrition which is only a concern for africa, american blacks do not live off of watermelons and kfc so their children cannot suffer from this (unless they're so stupid that they'd actually malnutrition their women when they're pregnant...), and the second environmental variable is some very very basic education, which comes down to counting, summations substractions and maybe multiplication
after that the brain has sufficiently understood how to linguistically/visually express and observe logic. The child inherently picks up on that, if he does not, congratulations, he's retarded.
somalia's iq is of course influenced by the fact that they have 10 children and only 1 fish per day to eat and the fact that the only education consists of 'i see boats, how many? idk but i might be able to capture them all'

But then again, you should come to realize that the reason they're hungry and stupid is because they simply aren't intelligent enough to fix it by themselves

It would up their score by some, probably not enough to bring them to 90, definitely not enough to bring them to 100. There's a reason Africa has never developed.

Europeans have for too long made the mistake to think of other races as their equals. They should have genocided them all and made the world a better place.

7 year old nigger kids cant even recognize themselves in the mirror

Attached: mirror study.png (816x366, 181K)

HAHAHAHHAHAUAHHAA
imagine being a 6 year old nigger being intellectually beaten by a 2 year old white

adoption studies

yes, compare italy and germany across 2 millenia.

italy has a MASSIVE head start vs the nigger germans, because of its proximity to the greek and persian empires. even up to the 1600s italy has better scientists, artists, musicians, engineers. It really took from about 1650 to 1930s for germany to overtake them, and we really only saw it by 1960 and the german recovery, while italy is a slum now filled with shitters, germany is an economic powerhaus ruling europe.

so, it takes a very long time for these things to change, and cultures absorb each other over hundreds if not thousands of years. africa is transforming much faster than germany did, i suspect they will reach parity with european civilisation by 2100 and china by 2200. this is as extreme as saying dumb snow niggers in wooden houses in northern europe would reach venetian, portuguese or spanish technology ever. the reason behind africa's success is a lack of dominant language, they will simply adopt english and chinese and use these international languages to trade, educate and build.

We did, we're responsible for what little humanity these animals have in them. Sorry.
Yeah the bottom line is that IQ comes first. Without a certain level of intelligence, our people would not have been able to come up with any of this culture and education that we have

to explain further, this is in contrast with the various european groups, who insisted on translations being made into their native languages, which greatly slowed the process. to this day germans can't speak french or italian, spanish people can't speak dutch or english, slavs can't speak non-slav languages, it's part of the reason america overtook europe in the 20th century. no common language = impossible to work together.

africa has thousands of languages, but english and chinese are quickly becoming the defacto trade and business languages, which speeds everything up. when you have little to no care about translation because of some ethnic pride rooted in a racist view of self-superiority and religious segregation, you can quickly adopt capitalism and profit seeking behavior. think of it as accelerated technologism, which is why china went from zero to number 2 globally in 1 human lifespan, they already had a unified standardized people who were willing to submit to any form of authority. china is LITERALLY africa, and that is why they get along so well together and china right now is spending billions building up various african nations.

>forgetting that the reason china industrialised so fast was not because of capitalism or in other words due to the intelligence and capability of the Chinese people but due to the the communist party telling everyone to work in this or that factory
China is not literally africa. Africa has thousands ethnicities who never liked eachother but were forced together into these massive supercountries. The sole reason Africa is developing now is because the Chinese want their resources. Once those run out, I'll promise you, the Chinks will be up and gone in less than a day and the niggers will be left wondering what happened and wondering on how to use the machines. The same thing happened during european colonisation, after the euros left, the africans let the infrastructure the euros had built for them to crumble
it's simply because they did not built that shit themselves thus they won't ever be able to fully comprehend why and how it works

Why don't we manufacture shit there instead of China?

Surely their workers will be stupider (but intelligent enough to complete the task), they can be paid less, transport will be cheaper, etc... Could introduce some stability to the continent.

Because that would be racist you colonizer

Thats why china is doing it atm, all their cheap shit is now made in africa

If they were intelligent they wouldn’t have bad culture, education, and environment.

Attached: DDB1774D-BC57-4D9F-AE10-E9E9E9AF38E3.jpg (494x457, 45K)

we should have but any non-ngo investment in Africa is considered neo-colonialism

iq tests are literally set up so you dont need to be culturally aware of anything to do them.

Putting the cart before the horse there.

Somalia is where those things go to die.

>Sorry
don't apologize to me you dumb cuck.

What do you mean 'compensated for'? An IQ test is an IQ test. They do poorly on them wherever in the world they happen to be.

Yeah. Jews that came to America in the early 1900s were highly illiterate. Through culture they stressed education and here they are.

>if things such as culture, education, and environment were forced on them ?
you meant forced on them right ?

Could you maybe look up what an IQ test is and what it entails before asking these kinds of questions?

Shut up manlet

Attached: france_iq.jpg (615x441, 51K)

Yes, I have about thirty studies on my laptop, it's not hard to find.

But since I don't have access to that right now, just watch hjernevask parental effect & race episodes.

The norwegian documentary is available on youtube with english subtitles.

Education and environment have only a marginal effect on IQ.

You're a dumb fuck. Language access doesn't increase your IQ.

Australia is saying that more effective communication between African tribes should increase their profit-seeking behavior, which is inherently based on logic and patterns aka iq

It requires intelligence to begin said compensation.
If it what's happened to primitive white societies in the most ruthless, frigid unforgiving environment of the north, has not happened to them, in the bread-basket of the planet, over the course of 4000 years... It's safe to say that monkeys cannot create adequate levels of civilization.

A kind but firm re-implementation of slavery would do wonders for slowly leading their chromosomes to the light over 2-300 years.

throwback to that time slavery saved a bunch of niggers from getting ebola

There is no evidence for it. It's just his imagination.

If it were accurate, arab IQ would be a lot higher and swiss IQ a lot lower, to grab two examples.

South Africa? US blacks?