The enemy creates debates between themselves and pushes any other arguments out of discourse. They create these cartoon scenarios or ideological villains by pushing extreme ideas.
Libertarianism and Communism is a false dicthomy
Atheism and Theism is a false dicthomy
Nature vs Nurture is a false dicthomy
All of these arguments are based on abrahamic philosophy and religion. So you are forced to eventually pick a side. A side that they control. So any attempt to start a movement is easily defeated within these boxes. Left, right or so-called center are just unfortunately under their ideological control. When you see a movement it is a reactionary movement to not being able to hold Ideological purity. It is not a new form of thought. Those who try to start a new school of thought all together are ridiculed and prevented from having a platform.
To win the freedom of our people we must not build upon their lies or constructs but we must start from the beginning. We must start when man was alone and naked without any knowledge and build from there. Once this is done we can then have a new school of thought that will forever destroy these false dicthomies.
The only scenario that can ever play out to pull everyone from their dogma would be someone like the Antichrist and it will happen, and shortly after that you will know you were wrong
Jose Bailey
specifically, causing division among people with common interests in order to prevent them from acting on those interests as a group.
Austin Evans
it's not about ideological false dichotomies, it's the concept of ideology in the first place.
Ryder Robinson
ideology doesn't matter. just act in the best interests of your in group.
Adam Morris
this is also common sense to most people who weren't born in the west by the way. we've been programmed so that we no longer have the agency or presence of mind to further our own interests, but the interests of others.
Isaiah Scott
this is why i believe non-western/euro migrants are fundamentally incompatible with our culture, especially in its current weakened state. if we had any damned sense we'd drive them out with all our might.
Levi Cruz
it's a grave mistake to view these people as americans or europeans. do not be fooled by imitators or hyphenated americans, they are not cut from the same cloth as europeans.
Isaac Richardson
no matter how convincing they might seem, do not let your guard down. do not mistake mimicry for sincere cultural assimilation
Parker Miller
no, they can't fool me. their attempts are pitifully obvious.
Jose Gomez
you hear that? your cheap tricks aren't going to get through
Nathan Rivera
the nerve some of these people have. as if i'm a fool. it's unbelievable
Jacob Hernandez
So you can have an atheist theist? A libertarian communist? This is the dumbest shit I've read all day.
Aaron Gutierrez
No the definition of atheism is based on Elohim worship only. It has only been moving the goal post that god/gods pertains to all concepts of the Creator instead of one. There is different concepts that do not fit with the definition of god or abrahamic philosophy and worldview.
Here is a comparison of atheists and theists groups and movements.
Adam and Eve/ out of africa theory Cosmic egg/big bang All god's children/one race the human race
They believe in the exact same narrative. Adam and Eve take away god and you get out of Africa theory.
They get you to fight about this but they teach abrahamic worldview.
Samuel Collins
Libertarianism and communism is just two Marxist religions
Connor Murphy
Yeah we're not a bunch fools who believe that the false dicthomy of the patriarchy and matriarchy is a real battle.
Ideology does matter. It can get people to fight each other and it can get people to kill themselves collectively. Ideology is just a narrative on how the word works. If all the Ideologies you have been exposed too is from foriegn culture then you are not free.
Michael King
So this can get a thread but Goonan threads get pruned and banned?!?!
Liam Hernandez
So libertarianism is Marxism with the belief the state is bad. It pushes an extreme individualism.
Communism is Marxism with the idea that the state is good and pushes an extreme collectivism.
Maybe you should actually study their fundemental belief system.
Brayden Moore
Maybe the thread you are talking about wasn't good?
Hunter Green
Collapse of Western Civilization might actually be our greatest gift.
>So libertarianism is Marxism with the belief the state is bad. It pushes an extreme individualism.
>Communism is Marxism with the idea that the state is good and pushes an extreme collectivism.
>Maybe you should actually study their fundemental belief system. The philosophies liberterianism is based upon predate Marxism and are not related to Marxism. Libertarianism is just an extension of classical liberalism. Libertarianism as it is today is just classical liberalism with a few additional aspects that change depending on who you ask about it. There are utopian thinkers, i.e. ancaps, however these are just a really loud and autistic minority in the libertarian community. Libertarianism is not fundamentally untopian. Libertarianism is fundamentally individualistic.
Marxism is essentially anti-liberal, hence it is essentially anti-libertarian. Marxism is a rejection of liberalism and the attempt to bring French revolution socialist utopianism into the industrial era. It's fundamental ideology comes from the Utopian anti-intellectualism portrayed in works such as Thomas Moore's "Utopia" or Charles Fourier's writings. Marxism is fundamentally utopian. Marxism is fundamentally collectivist.
>creates dichotomy between "their constructs" and when "from the beginning when man was naked and alone" >claims dualisms are bad Try harder, sage in all fields
Anyone here who uses the Left vs Right box is in the same trapping.
Julian Walker
Typo
Liam Hall
No I don't claim dualism is bad I am talking about specific dicthomies which are false.
Bentley Clark
>bertarianism and Communism is a false dicthomy >Atheism and Theism is a false dicthomy >Nature vs Nurture is a false dicthomy >reddit spacing >shitty reddit meme
Empty, valuelss, pseudo-intellecual 105 IQ babble. Human beings will always name, classify, and organize things. Any new school of thought will be categorized in the minds of people, this in inevitable. Your post says nothing, its empty words.
So I didn't make an argument for extreme primitivism. Yes classifications will exist. What I am against is false classifications. Classifying whole Ideologies based on the subjective is the problem. False dicthomies come from the imaginations of bad men.
Retard. Existence itself is based on dichotomies. Positive and negative. Male and female. Acid and alkaline. Dark and light. It's the way things are.
You are too retarded to form an opinion yourself so you think all opinions are bad. That's postmodernist NPC nonsense. Just admit that you're stupid and apathetic, admit that you have literally nothing to say.
look at this motherfucker. Welcome to /pol now leave!!
Eli Torres
It's much simpler than that, at the end of the day it's just good vs evil. If you're too caught up defining your enemy you're going to miss the flank by his allies.
Ideological classifications are always i here tly subjective. Because they are not matters of hard science, the details and lines of delineation between classifications will always be up,for debate, your conception of falsehood depends on your personal opinion.
Not a single post you've made in this thread has sad anything. Its all just unfocused emotion, with nothing to take away for anyone. You project 100 IQ simplemindedness onto the world and onto the english language, making 105 IQ simplemindedness look insightful and revolutionary as a result.
Ideology includes hard science. The only Ideologies that are subjective are false Ideologies. Maybe you should actually make an argument instead failing
Evan Campbell
There's no such thing as a false ideology, unless you mean something held by characters in a work of fiction. All ideologies are, by definition, based on subjective belief.
Nathan Davis
People can use hard sciences to form or attempt to justify theor ideological stance. Ideologies, however, are always subjective based on their inherent definition.
Nathaniel Edwards
>Make an argument
There's nothing to argue against bevause you haven't posited anything of substance.
